REFERENCES
2. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the journal of clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:380-2.
3. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Second edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001. Available from: https://alraziuni.edu.ye/uploads/pdf/Systematic-Reviews-in-Health-Care-Meta-Analysis-in-Context_2001.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jun 2023].
4. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook#how-to-access. [Last accessed on 26 Jun 2023].
5. MacLennan S, Williamson PR. The need for core outcome sets in urological cancer research. Transl Androl Urol 2021;10:2832-5.
6. Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ. Reporting Bias Group. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One 2013;8:e66844.
7. MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, et al. UCAN Systematic Review Reference Group; EAU Renal Cancer Guideline Panel. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012;61:972-93.
8. MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, et al. UCAN Systematic Review Reference Group; EAU Renal Cancer Guideline Panel. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012;62:1097-117.
9. Rossi SH, Klatte T, Stewart GD. Quality of life outcomes in patients with localised renal cancer: a literature review. World J Urol 2018;36:1961-72.
10. York C. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Available from: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jun 2023].
11. Beyer K, Widdershoven C, Wintner LM, et al. A systematic review of heterogeneity in outcome definition and reporting in localised renal cancer. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022;48:1-11.
12. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, et al. Core outcome set-standardised protocol items: the COS-STAP statement. Trials 2019;20:116.
13. Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, et al. Core outcome set-standards for development: the COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med 2017;14:e1002447.
14. Beaton D, Maxwell L, Grosskleg S, et al. The OMERACT handbook. Available from: https://omeract.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/OMERACT-Handbook-Chapter-Final-June_2_2021.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jun 2023].
15. Boers M, Tugwell P, Felson D, et al. World health organization and international league of associations for rheumatology core endpoints for symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol Suppl 1994;41:86-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7799394/. [Last accessed on 26 Jun 2023]
16. Kirkham JJ, Clarke M, Williamson PR. A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using clinicaltrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ 2017;357:j2262.
17. Kirkham JJ, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials 2013;14:324.
18. MacLennan S, Wintner LM, Beyer K, et al. A protocol for the development of core outcome sets for effectiveness trials and clinical audits in renal cell cancer (R-COS). BJUI Compass 2023. Available from: https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.266. [Last accessed on 26 Jun 2023]
19. Wintner LM, Gross F, Holzner B. Patient-reported outcome assessment in renal cell carcinoma: status quo and current developments. Onkologie 2023:1-6.
20. Wintner L, Beisland E, Beisland C, Van Hemelrijck M, Holzner B. Development of an EORTC quality of life module for renal cell cancer patients: phase I. Eur Psychiatry 2022;65:S756.
21. Khan K. The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health. BJOG 2014;121:1181-2.
