REFERENCES

1. Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887-92.

2. Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, Nilsson M, Markar SR, Lagergren J. Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019;270:1005-17.

3. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1790-2.

4. van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials 2012;13:230.

5. de Groot EM, van der Horst S, Kingma BF, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Dis Esophagus 2020;33:doaa079.

6. Esagian SM, Ziogas IA, Skarentzos K, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 2022;14:3177.

7. Jin D, Yao L, Yu J, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2019;15:e1988.

8. Zhu DS, Cao JW, Geng MF, et al. Wide gastric conduit increases the risk of benign anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Am Surg 2020;86:621-7.

9. Shen Y, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The effect of narrowed gastric conduits on anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;19:263-8.

10. Zhen F, Shi S, Xue L, Liu J, Luo J. [Study on the association of gastric conduit width and postoperative early delayed gastric emptying in middle-lower esophageal cancer patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis procedure]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016;19:985-9. (in Chinese).

11. Moody ED, Viskari PJ, Colyer CL. Non-covalent labeling of human serum albumin with indocyanine green: a study by capillary electrophoresis with diode laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1999;729:55-64.

12. Okusanya OT, Hess NR, Luketich JD, Sarkaria IS. Infrared intraoperative fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;53:512-8.

13. Pather K, Deladisma AM, Guerrier C, Kriley IR, Awad ZT. Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2022;36:896-903.

14. Slooter MD, Eshuis WJ, Cuesta MA, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green during esophagectomy to prevent surgical morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:S755-65.

15. Casas MA, Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for prevention of anastomotic leak in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2022;35:doab056.

16. Banks K, Hung Y, Santos J, et al. Outcomes and predictive value of anastomotic evaluation using indocyanine green fluorescence during minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surgeons 2023;236:S115-6.

17. de Groot EM, Kuiper GM, van der Veen A, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis: a prospective study. Updates Surg 2023;75:409-18.

18. LeBlanc G, Takahashi C, Huston J, Shridhar R, Meredith K. The use of indocyanine green (ICYG) angiography intraoperatively to evaluate gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy: does it impact surgical decision-making? Surg Endosc 2023;37:8720-7.

19. Hachey KJ, Gilmore DM, Armstrong KW, et al. Safety and feasibility of near-infrared image-guided lymphatic mapping of regional lymph nodes in esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:546-54.

20. Rahouma M, Baudo M, Mynard N, et al. Volume outcome relationship in postesophagectomy leak: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2024;110:2349-54.

21. Walsh TN. The esophagogastric anastomosis: the importance of anchoring sutures in reducing anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg Open 2023;4:e231.

22. Wang L, Milman S, Ng T. Performance of the transoral circular stapler for oesophagogastrectomy after induction therapy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2019;29:890-6.

23. Lin H, Liang G, Chai H, Liao Y, Zhang C, Cheng Y. Comparison of two circular-stapled techniques for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Front Oncol 2021;11:759599.

24. Caso R, Wee JO. Esophagogastric anastomotic techniques for minimally invasive and robotic Ivor Lewis operations. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;25:105-23.

25. Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, Saito R, Maruyama K, Ogawa J. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Today 2007;37:947-52.

26. Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, et al. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1287-95.

27. Harustiak T, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Stolz A, Lischke R. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1650-9.

28. Kamarajah SK, Bundred JR, Singh P, Pasquali S, Griffiths EA. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJS Open 2020;4:563-76.

29. Zhang H, Wang Z, Zheng Y, et al. Robotic side-to-side and end-to-side stapled esophagogastric anastomosis of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. World J Surg 2019;43:3074-82.

30. Schröder W, Raptis DA, Schmidt HM, et al. Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the EsoBenchmark Database. Ann Surg 2019;270:820-6.

31. Tagkalos E, van der Sluis PC, Uzun E, et al. The circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis in esophagectomy: no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and stricture rates between the 25 mm and 28 mm circular stapler. J Gastrointest Surg 2021;25:2242-9.

32. Feingold PL, Bryan DS, Kuckelman J, et al. Anastomotic stricture after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2023;116:712-9.

33. Cerfolio RJ, Wei B, Hawn MT, Minnich DJ. Robotic esophagectomy for cancer: early results and lessons learned. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;28:160-9.

34. Slagter R. Slagter - Drawing visible and palpable surface anatomy thorax and abdomen - no labels. license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. Available from: https://anatomytool.org/content/slagter-drawing-visible-and-palpable-surface-anatomy-thorax-and-abdomen-no-labels. [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2024].

35. Baltensweiler N, Lataster A, Herrler A. Lateral view of thorax with lung, skin, ribs and shoulder blade. © Nadja Baltensweiler and Ned. Anatomen Vereniging, license: CC BY-NC-SA. Available from: https://anatomytool.org/content/lateral-view-thorax-lung-skin-ribs-and-shoulder-blade. [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2024].