1Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma 43126, Italy.
2Microbiome Research Hub, University of Parma, Parma 43126, Italy.
3School of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork Co. Cork, Ireland.
Correspondence to: Prof. Marco Ventura, Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma 43126, Italy. E-mail: email@example.com
© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
The establishment and development of the human gut microbiota constitutes a dynamic and non-random process, which involves positive and negative interactions between key microbial taxa and their host. Remarkably, these early life microbiota-host communications include key events with long-term health consequences. Bifidobacteria arguably represent the most emblematic microbial taxon of the infant gut microbiota. In this context, the interactions among bifidobacteria, their human host, and other members of the human gut microbiota are far from completely understood, despite the crucial role they play in the development and maintenance of human physiology and immune system. Here, we highlight the ecological as well as genetic and functional features of bifidobacteria residing in the human gut using genomic and ecology-based information.
Infant gut microbiota, microbiome, probiotics
The genus Bifidobacterium belongs to the Actinobacteria phylum, being phylogenetically positioned close to the ancestral node from which all members of this phylum have evolved. The number of microbial taxa ascribed to the Bifidobacterium genus currently (September 2021) amounts to 98 (sub)species, with this number steadily increasing over the last five years thanks to the very considerable efforts made by various microbiologists through the assessment of bifidobacterial communities from a wide variety of animals and through the use of metagenomics-based approaches[2-5]. The phylogenetic analysis of this genus, as based on genomic data, has highlighted the occurrence of genetic variability that allows subdivision of members of the Bifidobacterium genus into seven main phylogenetic/phylogenomic clusters. These latter clusters were assigned names based on one of the species they include, i.e., the Bifidobacterium bifidum cluster, the Bifidobacterium longum cluster, the Bifidobacterium pseudolongum cluster, the Bifidobacterium adolescentis cluster, the Bifidobacterium pullorum cluster, the Bifidobacterium asteroides cluster, and the Bifidobacterium boum cluster. Notably, the observed phylogenetic heterogeneity and associated clustering of the Bifidobacterium genus is also supported by phenotypic/physiological differences, which suggest that bifidobacteria underwent genetic adaptations to different ecological niches within the mammalian gastrointestinal tract.
Bifidobacteria were originally observed in infant stool samples by Tissier at the beginning of the last century around 1911s, and since then essentially all currently identified (sub)species of bifidobacteria have been isolated from fecal or biopsy samples originated from a wide variety of mammalian species, as well as various birds and social insects. These rather distant ecological niches appear to be linked by the fact that all animals (hosts) from which bifidobacteria have been isolated subject their newborns to parental care. This intriguing ecological situation of a very close relationship between bifidobacteria and their hosts supports the notion of a microbe-host co-evolution scenario.
Recently, with the advent of metagenomics approaches, insights have been obtained concerning the so-called “dark matter” of microbial populations residing in an environment and being represented by bacteria that are detected by sequencing but which appear to be recalcitrant to cultivation. The use of such novel approaches to disentangle bifidobacterial communities that reside in stool samples of all main representatives of mammalian species not only revealed that bifidobacterial presence is a common feature of the mammalian gut but also that a substantial part of the biodiversity of this bacterial genus is still far from being fully discovered. In fact, the existence of many novel bifidobacterial phylotypes has been discovered, present in the gut of various mammals including the human gut, some of which occurring at very low abundance, although being shared by various mammalian species. Notably, in this context, the application of shotgun metagenomics, followed by metabolic reconstruction involving those biological samples that were shown to encompass putative novel bifidobacterial species, allowed the delineation of detailed metabolic insights concerning the utilization of plant-derived complex carbon sources by these novel bifidobacterial phylotypes. The integration of the discovered plant carbohydrates in the growth media allowed the isolation and subsequent characterization of these novel bifidobacterial taxa, i.e., Bifidobacterium callimiconis, Bifidobacterium goeldii, Bifidobacterium colobi, Bifidobacterium santillanense, and Bifidobacterium amazonense[3,4,7,8].
Bifidobacteria are highly abundant within the neonatal gut microbiota starting from birth until weaning, while their occurrence in the human large intestine declines with aging. Although bifidobacteria represent dominant members of the gut microbiota in the very early stages of life, their colonization trajectory is affected by peri- and post-natal factors such as delivery mode (cesarian delivery vs. vaginal delivery) and/or feeding method (e.g., formula feeding instead of breast feeding), the geographical origin (urbanized vs. countryside region), family members, host interactions, exposure to antibiotics, and full-term vs. pre-term delivery. In this context, there is robust scientific evidence demonstrating that inheritance of bifidobacteria occurs by vertical transmission from mother to her newborn[10-13]. Recently, detailed cataloging of bifidobacterial communities residing in the gut microbiota of mothers and their corresponding babies highlighted the occurrence of identical bifidobacterial strains shared by mother-newborn dyads[10,12,14,15]. If this bacterial transmission route is interrupted, for example as a consequence of delivery by cesarian section, the gut microbiota of the newborn has been shown to be delayed in becoming dominated by bifidobacteria. Remarkably, but perhaps not surprisingly, it has been demonstrated that mothers and their corresponding newborns not only share identical bifidobacterial strains but also identical bifidobacteriophages, i.e., phages capable of infecting members of the Bifidobacterium genus. This substantiates a wider vertical transmission trend involving both bifidobacterial cells and their bacteriophages[11,17].
Recently, the importance of human milk as a source of bifidobacteria has been inferred in terms of their impact on bifidobacterial communities in the very early stages of human life[18,19]. Human milk possesses its own microbiota, i.e., the human milk microbiota, and bifidobacteria are frequently part of this microbial community. The origin of the human milk microbiota remains uncertain and somewhat controversial. It has been supposed that its bacterial constituents may originate from the female gut where gut commensals reach the mammalian gland through their translocation in the blood or by dendritic cells, i.e., the bacterial entero-mammary pathway[1,9,20]. Another hypothesis poses that microbial components of the human milk microbiota originate from the baby as a result of regurgitation during the sucking of the mother’s milk; bacteria present in the oral cavity of the neonate are those that have been inherited from the mother during birth[1,9]. Human milk is not only considered a crucial contributor of bacterial cells but also an important source of prebiotic compounds, i.e., specific chemical compounds that specifically support the growth of particular bacterial groups, in particular human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs). Currently, there is growing scientific interest in the application of HMOs as natural modulators of the gut human milk microbiota, eliciting prebiotic effects on bifidobacteria and toward very specific bifidobacterial taxa[1,21,22]. Considering the significant importance of bifidobacterial communities during early life, particularly as drivers of gut immunity and development, the evolution of a mammalian secretory fluid containing bifidogenic compounds represents compelling evidence for the notion of bifidobacteria-host/human co-evolution.
With the decoding of the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum NCC2705 genome in 2002, the genus Bifidobacterium officially entered the microbial genomic era[23-25]. Since then, several bifidobacterial genomes belonging to many different taxa have been decoded. In this context, it is worth mentioning the international project entitled Genomic Encyclopedia of Bifidobacteria, which was driven by a consortium of scientists and aimed at decoding the genome sequences of the reference strain for each Bifidobacterium (sub)species. The results of this project reveal that bifidobacterial genomes, which range in size from 1.35 to 3.25 Mb, are rather small when compared to other members of the Actinobacteria phylum, and that the evolutionary development of the bifidobacterial chromosome is characterized by extensive acquisition of genes, many of which encode glycosyl hydrolases (GH). The genome of the ancestor of the Bifidobacterium genus is predicted, based on genome information on currently recognized bifidobacterial species, to contain about 1048 genes. Genetic acquisition events allowed an expansion of bifidobacterial genomes, in particular causing a considerable enlargement of their glycobiomes, i.e., the genetic arsenal encoding functions associated with carbohydrate metabolism. This genomic evolution allowed bifidobacteria to become saccharolytic microorganisms with obvious genetic adaptations to degrade and subsequently use carbohydrates typically found in the associated ecological niches[27,28] [Figure 1]. Based on the GH families encoded by the various bifidobacterial genomes, it is possible to identify two main genetic clusters, one particularly enriched in members of the GH13 family and the other in members of the GH43 family, reflecting distinct glycobiomes required for the utilization of a different set of complex plant carbohydrates such as xylan and starch[27,28]. Notably, the mammalian gut is highly enriched in these complex carbohydrates, which reflect those that are present in a typical omnivorous diet.
Another finding that supports our view of bifidobacterial genome evolution toward glycan utilization is represented by the predicted glycobiomes of bifidobacterial strains isolated from social insects, in particular the prototypical Bifidobacterium asteroides PRL2011, which have been shown to be particularly enriched in GHs and sugar transporters involved in the metabolism of simple sugars typically found in the hindgut of honeybees, from which this bacterium is commonly isolated. The scientific literature describes several other interesting examples of metabolic adaptation of bifidobacterial strains to sugars that are particularly abundant in the ecological niches where they live. It has been described how the genomes of bifidobacterial taxa typically present during early life such as Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium breve, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis[2,4,11,30] are also enriched in GH-encoding genes involved in the metabolism of HMOs and mucins, both being host-associated glycans. Various genetic traits involved in HMO breakdown are typically identified in the genomes of members of these three bifidobacterial species, while they are generally absent from chromosomes of other bifidobacterial species, and they further support the notion of highly specialized genetic adaptations of these bifidobacterial species to the infant gut. Furthermore, since the chemical structure of HMOs is very similar to that of mucin-associated O-glycans, it has been argued that these infant-associated bifidobacterial species may also persist in the adult human gut.
As mentioned above, in the human gut, bacteria are engaged in a wide variety of trophic interactions aimed at enhancing the utilization of complex carbohydrates by various strains. In this context, it has been shown that B. bifidum and B. breve cooperate in the utilization of mucin and their generated products. Specifically, sialic acid released by mucin degradation performed by B. bifidum PRL2010 cells will be available for
In the context of the genetic predisposition of certain bifidobacteria towards HMO utilization, it is worth mentioning that only the B. bifidum species is fully equipped with an enzymatic machinery for the full degradation of HMOs while B. longum subsp. infantis can only metabolize HMOs up to a certain size due to restrictions of its uptake machinery. Both in silico analyses involving all currently available bifidobacterial genomes and growth experiments based on synthetic media containing (specific) HMOs as the sole carbon source have revealed such intriguing genetic features[12,18]. Intriguingly, co‐cultivation of B. bifidum with various bifidobacterial strains on HMOs has confirmed cross‐feeding abilities of various bifidobacterial strains.
Another important genetic feature of bifidobacteria is represented by the abilities of a relatively small number of taxa to colonize and persist in the human gut. Various extracellular structures produced by bifidobacteria have been postulated to be driving such colonization and persistence. These involve sortase-dependent pili, type IVb pili, exopolysaccharides, and extracellular transaldolases[35,36]. The structure and biological functions of these cell surface-associated macromolecules have been reviewed in great detail previously (for reviews, see[34,37,38]). However, such structures, except for the type IVb pili, are not universally present among members of the Bifidobacterium genus and may in addition display heterogeneity within strains of the same species. For example, it has been shown that the number and composition of gene sets required for the biosynthesis of sortase-dependent pili in the genus Bifidobacterium are highly variable and may be responsible for interactions with different molecules.
Altogether, these findings highlight our knowledge concerning genetic determinants responsible for bifidobacteria-host interactions and interplay between bifidobacterial cells with other members of the gut microbiota is still far from complete.
It has been hypothesized that extracellular structures produced by gut bacteria engage in cross-talk with the host’s immune system, thereby eliciting pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects, and thus showing that intestinal bacteria can act as natural modulators of the immune system. For bifidobacteria, there is mounting evidence that extracellular structures such as pili/fimbria, exopolysaccharides, and teichoic acids play a pivotal role in the communication between bifidobacteria and the host’s immune system, especially during early life, which is characterized by an immature immune system. Remarkably, considering that bifidobacterial dominance is common until weaning, it is tempting to attribute a training role of these bacteria toward the host’s immune system.
Historically, bifidobacteria have been exploited by food and pharmaceutical companies as health promoting microorganisms, i.e., probiotic bacteria. However, their use as probiotic bacteria is rather restricted to a relatively small number of bifidobacterial species and strains, whose selection was not always based on scientific support for their claimed health benefits. The need for a robust scientific/molecular characterization of health-promoting features led to a microbial genomic discipline called probiogenomics, which could underpin the next generation of probiotic (bifido)bacterial strains. The main aim of probiogenomics is to provide clear insights into the molecular mechanisms responsible for the interaction of the probiotic bacterial strains with the host, as well as with other members of the gut microbiota, and thus ultimately into the resulting health-promoting effects. In the context of probiogenomics as applied to bifidobacteria, novel probiotic bifidobacterial strains may become available that are able to modulate the gut microbiota during early life, especially in those newborns who as a consequence of the cesarian delivery or antibiotic treatment may suffer from a disturbed gut microbiota. As extensively reported, early life represents a very critical window of time for the foundation of human health with very long-lasting effects. Thus, the establishment of a balanced gut microbiota during infancy could be seen as a very valuable approach to prevent negative health outcomes. The intervention during this period with (bifido)bacteria-based therapies may thus be considered a very suitable approach to promote and sustain the generation of such balanced infant gut microbiota.
It is desirable that a similar protocol-based novel generation of probiotic bifidobacterial strains will be applied for other ages or conditions of human life that are often associated with a serious depletion in bifidobacterial cells in the gut, i.e., in elderly and obese individuals, and thus influence host health host through, for example, the application of bifidobacteria to enhance immune therapy strategies[40-43]. However, this next generation of probiotic bifidobacterial strains needs to be further investigated through statistically robust clinical interventions (e.g., based on a large cohort of patients, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded). There are many ongoing studies on this crucial topic that are expected to provide crucial insights into the mechanistic roles of a novel generation of probiotic bifidobacterial strains. It is hoped that this information will lead to the establishment of personalized probiotic interventions (use of different bifidobacterial strains with targeted functionalities and based on the gut microbiota composition and genetics of the host), which perfectly aligns with recent developments in personalized medicine.
Bifidobacteria represent one of the most prominent microbial bacterial groups in the mammalian gut microbiota during early life, and their key functional roles for mammalian health and well-being are well documented. However, in contrast to other microbial groups, their biology is still largely unexplored. This is partly due to difficulties in their cultivation under in vitro conditions, while many bifidobacterial are also highly recalcitrant to genetic manipulation. Despite these methodological limitations, it is highly desirable that investigations pertaining to bifidobacteria continue or even increase in the coming years, and efforts need to be made to overcome these constraints. Notably, the importance of developing novel genetic tools as well as their use to establish engineered bifidobacterial strains for food and biomedical applications, from eliminating antibiotic resistance mobile elements and improving robustness to preventing pathogen infections and delivering therapeutics for cancer treatment, has already been pointed out.
Several metagenomic studies focusing on particular diseases, e.g., autoimmune diseases, have identified bifidobacteria as a key microbial biomarker, thereby opening up possibilities for future therapeutic and/or preventive strategies involving bifidobacteria. In addition, the administration of bifidobacteria has already been shown to be a valid approach for co-adjuvating immunotherapy approaches for the treatment of melanoma and other forms of cancer.
All these findings clearly demonstrate the central role played by bifidobacteria in microbiome research while also highlighting future translational applications as a result of such research.
Wrote the manuscript: Turroni F
Edited the manuscript: van Sinderen D, Ventura MAvailability of data and materials
Not applicable.Financial support and sponsorship
Douwe van Sinderen is funded by the Irish Government’s National Development Plan (Grant numbers SFI/12/RC/2273a and SFI/12/RC/2273b). Francesca Turroni is funded by Italian Ministry of Health through the Bando Ricerca Finalizzata (Grant Number GR-2018-12365988).Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.Consent for publication
© The Author(s) 2021.
1. Alessandri G, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. The genus bifidobacterium: from genomics to functionality of an important component of the mammalian gut microbiota running title: bifidobacterial adaptation to and interaction with the host. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2021;19:1472-87.DOIPubMedPMC
2. Milani C, Mangifesta M, Mancabelli L, et al. Unveiling bifidobacterial biogeography across the mammalian branch of the tree of life. ISME J 2017;11:2834-47.DOIPubMedPMC
3. Lugli GA, Alessandri G, Milani C, et al. Genetic insights into the dark matter of the mammalian gut microbiota through targeted genome reconstruction. Environ Microbiol 2021;23:3294-305.DOIPubMedPMC
4. Lugli GA, Milani C, Duranti S, et al. Isolation of novel gut bifidobacteria using a combination of metagenomic and cultivation approaches. Genome Biol 2019;20:96.DOIPubMedPMC
5. Lugli GA, Alessandri G, Milani C, et al. Evolutionary development and co-phylogeny of primate-associated bifidobacteria. Environ Microbiol 2020;22:3375-93.DOIPubMed
6. Lugli GA, Milani C, Turroni F, et al. Investigation of the evolutionary development of the genus Bifidobacterium by comparative genomics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014;80:6383-94.DOIPubMedPMC
7. Duranti S, Lugli GA, Napoli S, et al. Characterization of the phylogenetic diversity of five novel species belonging to the genus Bifidobacterium: Bifidobacterium castoris sp. nov., Bifidobacterium callimiconis sp. nov., Bifidobacterium goeldii sp. nov., Bifidobacterium samirii sp. nov. and Bifidobacterium dolichotidis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019;69:1288-98.DOIPubMed
8. Lugli GA, Calvete-Torre I, Alessandri G, et al. Phylogenetic classification of ten novel species belonging to the genus Bifidobacterium comprising B. phasiani sp. nov., B. pongonis sp. nov., B. saguinibicoloris sp. nov., B. colobi sp. nov., B. simiiventris sp. nov., B. santillanense sp. nov., B. miconis sp. nov., B. amazonense sp. nov., B. pluvialisilvae sp. nov., and B. miconisargentati sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2021;44:126273.DOIPubMed
9. Milani C, Duranti S, Bottacini F, et al. The first microbial colonizers of the human gut: composition, activities, and health implications of the infant gut microbiota. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2017;81:e00036-17.DOIPubMedPMC
10. Milani C, Mancabelli L, Lugli GA, et al. Exploring vertical transmission of bifidobacteria from mother to child. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:7078-87.DOIPubMedPMC
11. Duranti S, Lugli GA, Mancabelli L, et al. Maternal inheritance of bifidobacterial communities and bifidophages in infants through vertical transmission. Microbiome 2017;5:66.DOIPubMedPMC
12. Duranti S, Lugli GA, Milani C, et al. Bifidobacterium bifidum and the infant gut microbiota: an intriguing case of microbe-host co-evolution. Environ Microbiol 2019;21:3683-95.DOIPubMed
13. Toda K, Hisata K, Satoh T, et al. Neonatal oral fluid as a transmission route for bifidobacteria to the infant gut immediately after birth. Sci Rep 2019;9:8692.DOIPubMedPMC
14. Fehr K, Moossavi S, Sbihi H, et al. Breastmilk feeding practices are associated with the co-occurrence of bacteria in mothers' milk and the infant gut: the CHILD cohort study. Cell Host Microbe 2020;28:285-297.e4.DOIPubMed
15. Ding M, Yang B, Ross RP, et al. Crosstalk between sIgA-coated bacteria in infant gut and early-life health. Trends Microbiol 2021;29:725-35.DOIPubMed
16. Lugli GA, Milani C, Turroni F, et al. Prophages of the genus Bifidobacterium as modulating agents of the infant gut microbiota. Environ Microbiol 2016;18:2196-213.DOIPubMed
17. Milani C, Casey E, Lugli GA, et al. Tracing mother-infant transmission of bacteriophages by means of a novel analytical tool for shotgun metagenomic datasets: METAnnotatorX. Microbiome 2018;6:145.DOIPubMedPMC
18. Lugli GA, Duranti S, Milani C, et al. Investigating bifidobacteria and human milk oligosaccharide composition of lactating mothers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2020;96:fiaa049.DOIPubMed
19. Ruiz L, García-Carral C, Rodriguez JM. Unfolding the human milk microbiome landscape in the Omics era. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1378.DOIPubMedPMC
20. Rodríguez JM. The origin of human milk bacteria: is there a bacterial entero-mammary pathway during late pregnancy and lactation? Adv Nutr 2014;5:779-84.DOIPubMedPMC
21. Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, Mahony J, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Glycan utilization and cross-feeding activities by bifidobacteria. Trends Microbiol 2018;26:339-50.DOIPubMed
22. Sakanaka M, Hansen ME, Gotoh A, et al. Evolutionary adaptation in fucosyllactose uptake systems supports bifidobacteria-infant symbiosis. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaaw7696.DOIPubMedPMC
23. Schell MA, Karmirantzou M, Snel B, et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:14422-7.DOIPubMedPMC
24. Ventura M, O'Flaherty S, Claesson MJ, et al. Genome-scale analyses of health-promoting bacteria: probiogenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009;7:61-71.DOIPubMed
25. Ventura M, Canchaya C, Tauch A, et al. Genomics of Actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007;71:495-548.DOIPubMedPMC
26. Milani C, Lugli GA, Duranti S, et al. Genomic encyclopedia of type strains of the genus Bifidobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014;80:6290-302.DOIPubMedPMC
27. Milani C, Lugli GA, Duranti S, et al. Bifidobacteria exhibit social behavior through carbohydrate resource sharing in the gut. Sci Rep 2015;5:15782.DOIPubMedPMC
28. Milani C, Turroni F, Duranti S, et al. Genomics of the genus Bifidobacterium reveals species-specific adaptation to the Glycan-rich gut environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016;82:980-91.DOIPubMedPMC
29. Bottacini F, Milani C, Turroni F, et al. Bifidobacterium asteroides PRL2011 genome analysis reveals clues for colonization of the insect gut. PLoS One 2012;7:e44229.DOIPubMedPMC
30. Turroni F, Peano C, Pass DA, et al. Diversity of bifidobacteria within the infant gut microbiota. PLoS One 2012;7:e36957.DOIPubMedPMC
31. Egan M, Motherway MO, Kilcoyne M, et al. Cross-feeding by Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 during co-cultivation with Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 in a mucin-based medium. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:282.DOIPubMedPMC
32. Gotoh A, Katoh T, Sakanaka M, et al. Sharing of human milk oligosaccharides degradants within bifidobacterial communities in faecal cultures supplemented with Bifidobacterium bifidum. Sci Rep 2018;8:13958.DOIPubMedPMC
33. Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, et al. Deciphering bifidobacterial-mediated metabolic interactions and their impact on gut microbiota by a multi-omics approach. ISME J 2016;10:1656-68.DOIPubMedPMC
34. Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, et al. Bifidobacteria and the infant gut: an example of co-evolution and natural selection. Cell Mol Life Sci 2018;75:103-18.DOIPubMed
35. Turroni F, Serafini F, Foroni E, et al. Role of sortase-dependent pili of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 in modulating bacterium-host interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:11151-6.DOIPubMedPMC
36. Turroni F, Serafini F, Mangifesta M, et al. Expression of sortase-dependent pili of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 in response to environmental gut conditions. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2014;357:23-33.DOIPubMed
37. Longhi G, van Sinderen D, Ventura M, Turroni F. Microbiota and cancer: the emerging beneficial role of bifidobacteria in cancer immunotherapy. Front Microbiol 2020;11:575072.DOIPubMedPMC
38. Alessandri G, Ossiprandi MC, MacSharry J, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacterial dialogue with its human host and consequent modulation of the immune system. Front Immunol 2019;10:2348.DOIPubMedPMC
39. Milani C, Mangifesta M, Mancabelli L, et al. The sortase-dependent fimbriome of the genus Bifidobacterium: extracellular structures with potential to modulate microbe-host dialogue. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:e01295-17.DOIPubMedPMC
40. Hall LJ, Robinson SD. Bacterial strains augment cancer therapeutics. Nat Microbiol 2021;6:275-6.DOIPubMed
41. Yoon Y, Kim G, Jeon BN, Fang S, Park H. Bifidobacterium strain-specific enhances the efficacy of cancer therapeutics in tumor-bearing mice. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:957.DOIPubMedPMC
42. Lee SH, Cho SY, Yoon Y, et al. Bifidobacterium bifidum strains synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors to reduce tumour burden in mice. Nat Microbiol 2021;6:277-88.DOIPubMed
43. Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science 2015;350:1084-9.DOIPubMedPMC
44. Zuo F, Chen S, Marcotte H. Engineer probiotic bifidobacteria for food and biomedical applications - current status and future prospective. Biotechnol Adv 2020;45:107654.DOIPubMed
45. Duranti S, Longhi G, Ventura M, van Sinderen D, Turroni F. Exploring the ecology of bifidobacteria and their genetic adaptation to the mammalian gut. Microorganisms 2020;9:8.DOIPubMedPMC
Turroni F, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Bifidobacteria: insights into the biology of a key microbial group of early life gut microbiota. Microbiome Res Rep 2021;1:2 . http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2021.02