Strain-engineered stretchable substrates for free-form display applications
Abstract
With the growing potential of the Internet of Things, displays are being utilized to provide various types of information in every aspect of daily life, leading to the expansion of form-factor-free displays. Stretchable displays are considered the ultimate goal in form factor innovation, and they are not limited to rectangular shapes with deformation characteristics suited to target applications. Because reliable stretchable displays should be robust under uniaxial and biaxial strain, there have been efforts to tailor mechanical stress with promising strategies from structural and material perspectives. This review focuses on strain-engineering stretchable substrates for free-form display applications. First, we introduce deformable substrates with structural stretchability, achieved by incorporating buckling and Kirigami structures into plastic films, and we systematically analyze the tensile deformation characteristics based on design elements. In addition, we examined intrinsically stretchable elastomeric substrates, which have gained considerable attention due to recent advances in material and processing technologies. Their spatial modulus patterning is studied by applying optimized design principles, achieved through network alignment and crosslinking control in homogeneous elastomers, as well as by incorporating heterogeneous structures within the elastomer materials. Finally, we discussed state-of-the-art stretchable display applications employing strain-engineered stretchable substrates, focusing on advantageous materials and structures based on the display components, processes, and target deformation characteristics. Building on this foundation, we discuss the development of next-generation free-form displays and aim to contribute to their application in various static and dynamic deformation environments.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Displays play a crucial role in the industry, serving as a key component that enables efficient communication between humans and machines by delivering visual information[1,2]. Given that humans heavily rely on vision to process information, displays are essential for conveying this information accurately and efficiently[3,4]. With the rapid advancement of communication technology, displays have become indispensable in nearly every aspect of daily life, including smart homes, wearable devices, automotive systems, and digital signage[5-8]. As these diverse application areas continue to expand, research and development efforts are increasingly focused on creating displays with broader functionalities and innovative form factors. The development of flexible displays has been made possible by advancements in material and process technologies, leading to the commercialization of foldable and rollable displays with adjustable screen sizes, which have gained significant popularity among consumers due to their attractive designs[9-11]. Additionally, the accumulated expertise in display materials and processes, along with advancements in analyzing stress and strain during deformation, has further fueled research into displays with cutting-edge multi-form factors[12-14]. Particularly, stretchable displays, which can freely change shape as the device stretches, are regarded as the pinnacle of display form factor innovation and are expected to play a vital role in the future evolution of display technology[15,16].
In the effort to expand display form factors, extensive research and development have been conducted on substrates, electrodes, light-emitting elements, and driving components, with substrate materials consistently being a top priority[17-21]. For instance, flat panel displays have traditionally relied on glass substrates that offer high transmittance along with excellent thermal durability[22,23]. On the other hand, the emergence of flexible and foldable displays has shifted the focus toward researching thin and flexible glass and plastic substrates, which are better suited to handle the mechanical demands of bending and folding[24,25]. In this manner, different substrates are selectively utilized based on the display’s target form factor. The selection process carefully considers not only the physical and chemical properties of the display materials but also the temperature and pressure requirements during processing, as well as the functional and aesthetic needs of the final application area. Therefore, to successfully realize display devices, it is crucial to balance these factors and choose the most suitable substrate.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of strain-engineered substrate materials and their applications in stretchable displays. It specifically categorizes and explains the differences between plastic films with structural stretchability and elastomers with intrinsic stretchability [Figure 1]. For plastic films, the review delves into the buckling and Kirigami structures that are commonly used to impart structural stretchability, providing detailed explanations of the deformation behaviors that arise from various design elements of these structures. For elastomers with intrinsic stretchability, it is emphasized that various deformation dynamics can be programmed under the same tensile input through spatial modulus patterning. This patterning can be achieved by aligning the elastomer network, adjusting the crosslink density, or creating structures on the substrate surface. Additionally, this can be accomplished by structurally designing heterogeneous materials, embedding them into the elastomer matrix, or forming patterns on the matrix surface with heterogeneous materials. Finally, the review explores the utilization of these strain-engineered stretchable substrates in display applications, adapted to different usage scenarios and environmental conditions, by examining various examples.
STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED PLASTIC SUBSTRATES
To provide stretchability to flexible plastic films, strategies are commonly used that incorporate structures capable of accommodating dimensional changes due to tensile deformation. To achieve this, various structural designs have been introduced, including serpentine structures with zigzag patterns[26,27], helical spring forms[28,29], accordion-like structures that enable repeated folding and unfolding[30,31], buckling structures that form wrinkles or wave-like patterns on substrate surfaces[32-35], and Kirigami designs, where cut patterns create voids upon deformation[36-39]. In this review paper, the focus is on buckling and Kirigami structures, which can be readily integrated into 2D planar substrates and provide sufficient effective area for device fabrication, especially in display applications. Buckling structures are deformation phenomena that occur when compressive forces are applied to plastic films, resulting in vertically oriented buckling structures on the surface once the critical compressive stress is exceeded[32-35]. By intentionally designing these structures, external deformation can be absorbed and dimensional changes accommodated, converting vertical deformation into horizontal expansion and thereby granting stretchability to flexible plastic films [Figure 2A]. Kirigami is a design technique that imparts stretchability to plastic films through the use of cut patterns[36-39]. Cut sections open under external forces, creating voids that allow for dimensional adjustments, while the size and orientation of the cut patterns are modified to precisely control stretchability and deformation behavior [Figure 2B]. As previously mentioned, this review paper explores the significance and potential of design strategies centered on buckling and Kirigami structures to enable strain programming in plastic films for applications in free-form displays.
Figure 2. Dimensional compensation mechanism under tensile strain in (A) buckling and (B) Kirigami structures.
Buckling-structured plastic films
The strategy for imparting stretchability to plastic films using buckling structures focuses on adjusting compressive stress beyond the critical threshold under various physical property conditions of the plastic film to program vertical buckling structures, thereby inducing the desired stretchable deformation. The critical compressive stress (σcr) refers to the specific stress condition at which the surface of the plastic substrate can no longer remain flat and begins to form vertical buckling structures. It is determined by the film’s physical properties and dimensional parameters, such as Young’s modulus (E) and thickness (t), and is defined as follows[32].
where c represents the buckling constant, bcr denotes the half-width of the buckling structure formed under σcr, and ν refers to the Poisson’s ratio of the plastic film. When a compressive stress (σ) exceeding σcr is applied to the film, the shape and size of the buckling structure are determined according to the applied σ conditions, thereby defining the stretchable properties of the film substrate. At this time, the amplitude (A) of the buckling structure can be summarized as follows[32].
When buckling structures on the film surface have wider widths (2b), larger amplitudes (A), and shorter distances between them (λ - 2b, where λ is the buckling period), the in-plane dimensional compensation during tensile deformation increases, thereby enhancing the substrate’s stretchability. However, achieving such structures requires higher σ, which can cause more damage to the film during the buckling formation process and potentially reduce structural stability. Additionally, increasing the amplitude in buckling structures of the same width leads to a larger angle (θ), as shown in Figure 2A, which compromises mechanical reliability under repeated deformation and makes performance degradation or device delamination due to substrate deformation more likely in device applications. Therefore, by carefully designing the buckling structures considering the deformation behaviors and required stretchability of the target applications, an optimal balance between stretchability and structural stability should be achieved.
Various buckling structures can be achieved depending on the compression stress pattern applied to the plastic film, broadly categorized into uniaxial and biaxial buckling structures [Figure 3]. Methods for applying compression stress to a plastic substrate include attaching a pre-fabricated mold to the film and applying heat or pressure[40], directly scanning the substrate surface with a laser[41,42], or attaching the plastic film to a pre-stretched substrate and subsequently releasing it[43,44]. Uniaxial buckling structures arise when σ is applied along a single, specific axis of the plastic film, typically forming basic structures that facilitate stretchable deformation in the direction of compression [Figure 3A]. Positional variations in the magnitude of σ can occur due to material non-uniformity based on the film’s boundary conditions or positional differences, generally resulting in the formation of aperiodic uniaxial buckling structures with variable wavelengths and amplitudes across different locations on the film[45-49]. Drack et al. developed an ultrathin stretchable polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film with anisotropic wrinkle structures through a pre-strain process[45]. They achieved a film with up to 140% stretchability by attaching a pre-strained elastic adhesive tape to a PET film embedded with electronic devices and then detaching it to induce aperiodic buckling, providing mechanical stability that allowed the device to continue functioning under various deformations such as crumpling and twisting [Figure 4A]. Similarly, Li et al. formed an aperiodic buckling structure with an average peak-to-peak distance of 100 μm and a curvature radius of 70 μm by attaching a polyimide (PI) film coated with Ag nanowires (AgNWs) to a pre-strained adhesive film and then releasing it[47]. This method demonstrated excellent electrical performance even under tensile conditions, maintaining consistent luminance despite repeated stretching when applied to display devices [Figure 4B]. Additionally, Mishra et al. created an aperiodic buckling structure by attaching a polystyrene (PS) film to a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate, bending the substrate, and then releasing it to tailor the stress[49]. This resulted in the highest buckling density at the center of the substrate, decreasing towards the edges, and their study demonstrated that the buckling structures not only imparted stretchability but also induced changes in the light diffusion performance through the substrate [Figure 4C].
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of (A) uniaxial geometric and (B) biaxial geometric buckling structures under unidirectional compressive stress and multi-directional compressive stress, respectively.
Figure 4. Flexible films with vertically uniaxial buckling structures. (A) Schematic of a PET film with an aperiodic buckling structure and attached electronic foil, along with a 3D digital optical microscope image. Reproduced with permission[45]. Copyright 2015, Wiley-VCH; (B) Schematic of the buckling structure formed on a PI/AgNW composite electrode and the wrinkled surface morphology of the composite electrode. Reproduced with permission[47]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH; (C) Schematic of the buckling structured PS film on the PDMS, including a cross-sectional depiction of the interface layer between the PS and the PDMS. Reproduced with permission[49]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature; (D) Planar SEM image of a PI film replicated using a micro-wrinkle pattern mold, including surface morphology and cross-sectional SEM images of the wrinkles. Reproduced with permission[51]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier; (E) SEM image of a periodic buckling pattern on a PET film created by a laser-programmable process. Reproduced with permission[52]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature; (F) SEM images of the isotropically buckled parylene film structure replicated using a micro-patterned silicon mold. Reproduced with permission[53]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. PET: Polyethylene terephthalate; PI: polyimide; AgNW: Ag nanowire; PS: polystyrene; PDMS: polydimethylsiloxane; SEM: scanning electron microscope.
Aperiodic buckling structures can cause non-uniform local deformations at different positions of the substrate during stretching, leading to stress accumulation in specific areas during repeated deformation and mechanical stability issues in device applications, which can hinder their practical use in electronic devices[50]. To address these challenges, methods have been proposed to induce uniform compressive stress in the film using pre-designed molds or laser scanning[51-53]. Zhao et al. replicated periodic buckling structures on PI films using an isotropic mold with a period of 200 μm and an amplitude of 160 μm[51], applying the resulting PI film as a temperature sensor capable of detecting dynamic temperature changes on the skin [Figure 4D]. Yin et al. employed laser patterning to form periodic buckling structures on an elastic stamp in a non-contact manner, then transferred these structures onto a stretched PET film to create uniform buckling structures[52]. This approach led to the development of a plastic film with up to 100% stretchability and spatially uniform deformation, which was subsequently applied to organic light-emitting diode (OLED) devices [Figure 4E]. Hartmann et al. utilized chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to precisely deposit a parylene-C film onto a silicon mold with pre-fabricated micro-structures, having a peak spacing of 50 μm. Afterward, they added Cr/Au layers to the film to impart electrical conductivity, followed by an additional layer of parylene for complete encapsulation[53]. The resulting buckled plastic film demonstrated structural stretchability, withstanding tensile strains of up to 55%. Due to the excellent insulating properties and biocompatibility of parylene-C, this buckling-structured conductive film is well-suited for both wearable devices and stretchable electronics, such as bioelectronic devices, providing enhanced durability and performance [Figure 4F].
To enable diverse deformation behaviors in buckled plastic substrates, a method has been suggested that applies multiple σ of varying magnitudes and directions to the film, creating biaxial or multiaxial buckling structures [Figure 3B]. These structures can maintain similar dimensional and periodic characteristics as conventional uniaxial buckling structures while providing enhanced stretchability or multi-directional deformation potential[54-56]. Hyun et al. applied bidirectional mechanical strain to a PS film and then sequentially released the strain to create herringbone structures[54]. The formed herringbone structures evenly distribute stress across each direction, enhancing mechanical stability and allowing for greater compensation for deformation compared to uniaxial buckling structures [Figure 5A]. Additionally, different herringbone structures could be achieved depending on the magnitude of the bidirectional σ, with the grooves of the herringbone structure filled with a polymer and silver nanoparticle mixture to create a stretchable conductive electrode. Yu et al. developed a stretchable electrode by fabricating a super-aligned carbon nanotube (SACNT) film with a wrinkled structure using a biaxial pre-strain method, allowing it to withstand large strains from multiple directions repeatedly[55]. They also created a stretchable SACNT/activated-carbon supercapacitor using activated-carbon powder and SACNT. The circuit, which integrates the stretchable electrode with the SACNT/activated-carbon supercapacitor, demonstrated excellent reliability and high-capacity performance under significant strain in various directions, indicating promising potential for various stretchable electronic device applications [Figure 5B]. Seok et al. applied isotropic or anisotropic σ along two mutually perpendicular axes to introduce buckling structures onto a PI substrate with transferred Au[56]. They analyzed the regularity of the buckling structures based on the differences in σ applied to the two axes and adjusted these parameters to modify the density and shape of the buckling structures, enabling their application in stretchable optical devices that regulate light scattering and transmission [Figure 5C].
Figure 5. Flexible films with vertical multiaxial buckling structures. (A) 2D herringbone pattern created through sequential tensile release and an SEM image of a polymer gel/metal nanoparticle composite. Reproduced with permission[54]. Copyright 2011, Wiley-VCH; (B) Randomly buckled SACNT/AC supercapacitor and SACNT conductor films formed using a biaxial pre-strain technique. Reproduced with permission[55]. Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry; (C) Simulation results showing changes in buckling structures according to the x-y BR (the left image displaying the buckling structure at BR 0.75). Reproduced with permission[56]. Copyright 2024, MDPI. SEM: Scanning electron microscope; SACNT: super-aligned carbon nanotube; AC: activated-carbon; BR: biaxial ratio.
Kirigami-structured plastic films
Plastic films with Kirigami structures expand at the cut sections under tension, creating empty spaces that accommodate dimensional changes and provide stretchability. This deformation behavior is determined by the size, orientation, and combination of the cut structures, while physical properties such as the film’s modulus (E) and thickness (t) also play a crucial role in influencing its tensile performance[57,58]. Therefore, understanding the interaction between these factors is essential for designing Kirigami-structured plastic films with customized deformation properties tailored to specific applications. The formation of Kirigami cut patterns on plastic films is primarily achieved through etching processes using pre-designed masks or by laser machining[59-63]. In particular, recent advancements in high-frequency laser technology have made it possible to create intricate and precise patterns on plastic films while minimizing thermal damage, significantly improving manufacturing efficiency[61,62]. Among various cut patterning techniques, scanning laser cutting stands out, as it enables the laser beam to move rapidly across the entire film, allowing for the swift and efficient creation of the desired patterns[63,64]. This technology is especially advantageous in mass production environments where large films must be processed in a short time, making it efficient in terms of both time and cost. Furthermore, the introduction of various Kirigami structures not only facilitates simple unidirectional tensile deformation but also allows for 2D or 3D spatial expansion depending on the arrangement and combination of cut patterns.
In single-directional expansion Kirigami structures, the tensile direction and the pattern direction are aligned perpendicularly to each other [Figure 6A]. While reducing the spacing between the cut patterns or increasing their length and width can significantly enhance the stretchability of plastic films, it also tends to increase structural distortion during deformation. Therefore, to balance stretchability and structural stability effectively, it is essential to meticulously design the pattern and precisely tailor the film’s strain characteristics to the desired tensile range and configuration, thereby achieving optimal performance. Lee
Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of plastic films with (A) single-cut and (B) multi-cut Kirigami structures, showing before and after stretching.
Figure 7. Flexible films with single-directional stretchability incorporating Kirigami patterns. (A) PET film with a single-cut Kirigami pattern, demonstrating tensile deformation up to 200%, along with twisting and bending. Reproduced with permission[65]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (B) Photographs of a Kirigami pattern with only major cuts and a hybrid pattern featuring both major and additional cuts. Reproduced with permission[66]. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature; (C) Images of the Kirigami pattern deformed under various strains and a freestanding nanosheet. Reproduced with permission[67]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH; (D) Electrothermal properties tested under tensile conditions from 0% to 200% strain, using a heating layer formed on a uniaxially cut cPI film substrate. Reproduced with permission[68]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. PET: Polyethylene terephthalate; cPI: clear polyimide.
The multi-directional expansion Kirigami structure involves combining cutting patterns with various axes and dimensions on a plastic film, allowing the designed voids to expand simultaneously in multiple directions during substrate stretching [Figure 6B]. This design hierarchically structures factors such as the angles between patterns, dimensional variations, and the positions of intersections, enabling the pattern domains to achieve multi-directional expansion through linear or rotational movements during deformation[69,70]. This design approach enables various types of deformation and ensures stability even in complex movements, thereby expanding the potential applications of stretchable substrates in multi-modal robots and curved optical devices[71,72]. An et al. demonstrated that introducing hierarchical cuts into flat Kirigami sheets can enhance the mechanical response of the substrate[73]. By adjusting the parameters of the cuts and the thickness of the film, they effectively programmed the stress-strain response and expanded the range of mechanical responses achievable by combining various hierarchical structures, allowing for the encryption of information within the structure [Figure 8A]. Khosravi et al. proposed a pneumatic actuator with pre-programmed motion capabilities using a composite Kirigami-structured substrate[74]. The Kirigami skin, wrapped around a cylindrical balloon, transformed volumetric expansion from pneumatic pressure into anisotropic stretching and shearing, resulting in a combination of axial extension and rotational deformation of the actuator. The two groups of slit cuts in the Kirigami skin imparted nonlinear kinematic and mechanical properties, allowing the combined control of extension and rotational movements by adjusting the angles and lengths of the slit cuts [Figure 8B]. Rafsanjani et al. proposed a methodology for designing deformation behaviors based on the correlation between groups of Kirigami cut patterns, analyzing the mechanical deformation behavior resulting from different combinations of cuts on a square thin plastic sheet through experimental, analytical, and numerical studies[75] [Figure 8C]. This methodology not only offers a straightforward approach to producing Kirigami sheets but can also be combined with optimization techniques to design perforation patterns that generate complex shapes under external loads. This approach can be applied to create Kirigami sheets across various scales, from transformable meter-scale structures to tunable nanoscale surfaces, providing a simple way to manufacture complex, morphable structures from flat perforated sheets. Additionally, Groeger et al. ingeniously combined Y-shaped cut patterns to develop a PET film with significantly enhanced adhesion to complex curved surfaces[76] [Figure 8D]. The Y-shaped cut pattern, created through laser patterning, provides anisotropic stretchability, allowing the film to flexibly adapt to intricate skin contours and dynamic movements. This pattern evenly distributes the stress generated when the film stretches, ensuring structural stability. As a result, the film adheres securely to the skin, even during user movement, making it ideal for applications such as E-skin and wearable devices.
Figure 8. Flexible films with multi-directional stretchable Kirigami patterns. (A) Kirigami sheet with stress-strain characteristics programmed based on the parameters of the cut patterns and the thickness of the film. Reproduced with permission[73]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH; (B) Pneumatic actuator with pre-programmed motion capabilities using a composite Kirigami-patterned substrate. Reproduced with permission[74]. Copyright 2021, Khosravi, Iannucci and Li; (C) Mechanical deformation of Kirigami sheets resulting from various combinations of cut patterns on a square flexible sheet. Reproduced with permission[75]. Copyright 2017, American Physical Society; (D) Tensile deformation of Y-cut PET film and application of a textile sensor patch, developed based on the designed film, to a bent elbow. Reproduced with permission[76]. Copyright 2019, Association for Computing Machinery. PET: Polyethylene terephthalate.
MODULUS-PATTERNED ELASTOMERIC SUBSTRATES
In the previous section, we explored the introduction of various structures into plastic substrates to impart stretchability and examined the effects of different structural design approaches on deformation. These structured plastic films possess mechanical and optical properties suitable for display device applications, yet a challenge remains in balancing the substrate’s stretchability with the effective area needed for device formation[77]. Additionally, achieving stretchability often requires adding compensatory structures perpendicular to the surface and expanding void spaces, which may compromise reliability in applications requiring complex shape deformation, thereby limiting their practical application range. Recent advancements in low-temperature and printing processes have enabled the formation of devices at relatively low temperatures, leading to increased exploration of using inherently stretchable elastomer materials as substrates[78-81]. Elastomers can undergo tensile deformation without the need for compensatory structures, as the chains within the matrix extend, and the elastomer matrix, which forms a random network, allows for tensile deformation in all directions[79]. Researchers have recently been exploring strain engineering techniques that spatially pattern the modulus of elastomers to address unwanted deformations in traditional elastomer substrates (e.g., unnecessary contraction due to the Poisson’s effect) or to achieve multi-directional dynamic tensile deformation instead of unidirectional static stretching[82,83]. This section examines methods for controlling the deformation behavior of elastomer substrates by spatially patterning the modulus, including the regulation of molecular alignment and crosslink density in homogeneous elastomers or the incorporation of heterogeneous structures.
Direct-patterning on homogeneous elastomer substrates
To control the dynamic behavior of homogeneous elastomer films, one effective method is to pattern the modulus of the film by spatially reconfiguring the polymer chain network. This approach involves aligning the molecules that constitute the elastomer network in specific directions or selectively controlling the crosslink density of the network at different locations[84,85] [Figure 9]. Key methods for controlling molecular alignment in elastomer networks include introducing spatially oriented rubbing patterns on the mother substrate surface where the film is fabricated, guiding molecules - especially those with anisotropic structures - to align in the desired direction[86]. Additionally, techniques such as applying mechanical stretching to the substrate to rearrange molecules through shear forces[87,88] and using directional electromagnetic fields to control molecular orientation can also be utilized[89]. By physically aligning polymer chains in a specific direction, differences in modulus arise between the aligned and non-aligned directions, and designing and patterning this alignment allows for various deformations to be induced even under the same external tensile input [Figure 9A]. Among various elastomer materials, these molecular alignment techniques are commonly used in block copolymer (BCP) elastomers[90-93] with chemical incompatibility between molecules or liquid crystal elastomers (LCEs)[94-100] that have anisotropic rigid domains.
Figure 9. Schematic diagrams of homogeneous elastomer films directly patterned by (A) aligning the polymer network and (B) adjusting the crosslink density.
BCPs are polymer chains made up of two or more monomers with unique properties, and due to the chemical incompatibility between these monomers, phase separation occurs in response to external stimuli, resulting in alignment[90]. This alignment generally leads to modulus anisotropy along specific axes and is primarily achieved through mechanical or chemical methods. Ye et al. investigated the effects of unidirectional alignment of polystyrene-block-polydimethylsiloxane (PS-b-PDMS) thin films on their macroscopic deformation and mechanical properties[91]. By utilizing the cold zone annealing-soft shear (CZA-SS) technique, they successfully aligned PDMS domains within the PS matrix [Figure 10A]. This alignment resulted in a significant increase of up to 31% in the elastic modulus along the alignment direction, causing notable deformation anisotropy in the film’s mechanical behavior. Park et al. employed a solvent annealing method using a chamber with solvent and a heater to induce the self-assembly of BCPs, leading to the successful reorganization and alignment of domains within the film[92] [Figure 10B]. This method operates at low temperatures below 100 °C and can produce highly ordered sub-10 nm patterns in under a minute, generating uniform and low-defect patterns that are effective for various BCP morphologies. Ditte et al. developed a triblock copolymer (TBC) combining poly-diketopyrrolopyrrole-thienothiophene (PDPP-TT) with PDMS to achieve the low elastic modulus and high charge mobility essential for stretchable electronics[93] [Figure 10C]. Through the arrangement of this TBC, they induced anisotropic charge transport within the elastomer film, leading to performance variations based on the direction of the electric field and the applied strain. Grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) analysis revealed that the TBC has an edge-on molecular orientation, aligned perpendicular to the substrate, which facilitates charge transport pathways parallel to the film surface and enhances electron mobility.
Figure 10. Homogeneous elastomers with spatially aligned polymer networks. (A) Domain images of the substrate surface showing the effects of unidirectional alignment in PS-b-PDMS thin films through the shearing process. Reproduced with permission[91]. Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society; (B) Self-assembled BCP elastomer film achieved through a solvent annealing process. Reproduced with permission[92]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH; (C) Schematic of TBC composed of PDPP-TT and PDMS blocks, exhibiting anisotropic charge transport characteristics. Reproduced with permission[93]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH; (D) LC polymer strip with a super-twisted nematic structure in the thickness direction. Reproduced with permission[96]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH; (E) Programmable complex deformation LCE films created using non-uniform stretching and optical alignment techniques. Reproduced with permission[98]. Copyright 2015, Elsevier; (F) Schematic of anisotropic expansion of an LCE film with LC molecules aligned in a designed orientation under applied voltage. Reproduced with permission[100]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. PS-b-PDMS: Polystyrene-block-polydimethylsiloxane; BCP: block copolymer; TBC: triblock copolymer; PDPP-TT: poly-diketopyrrolopyrrole-thienothiophene; PDMS: polydimethylsiloxane; LC: liquid crystal; LCE: liquid crystal elastomer.
LCEs consist of rigid liquid crystal (LC) mesogens crosslinked within a polymer network, and the orientation of this network is determined by the direction of the LC director[94]. The van der Waals interactions between the LC directors allow for hierarchical alignment in the thickness direction. Depending on the anchoring properties, alignment directions, and positional alignment profiles of mechanically or optically aligned thin films, various geometries such as vertical, horizontal, and twisted configurations can be designed, making it highly advantageous for inducing multi-directional deformation[95]. Mechanical alignment involves physically rubbing the surface of the alignment layer to guide the alignment of LC directors, providing strong anchoring properties that are effective even for thick films[96,97]. However, it has limitations in inducing complex spatial alignments. In contrast, optical alignment involves exposing the alignment layer to specific wavelengths of light, which induces chain cleavage and recombination to provide directional control[98,99]. By patterning the light source, spatial alignment can be easily controlled, making it more suitable for complex alignments. Choi et al. developed a LC polymer designed to form a twisted geometry in the thickness direction and combined it with an azobenzene monomer to create an ultraviolet (UV)-responsive LCE strip[96] [Figure 10D]. By exposing the aligned film to light, they induced curvature deformation in the designed helices and applied this to a soft robot capable of programmable multi-motion. Ahn et al. applied inhomogeneous stretching and optical alignment techniques during the film fabrication process to induce patterned molecular orientation, creating LCE films with programmable complex deformations, and applied these films to various electronic devices[98] [Figure 10E]. Fowler et al. demonstrated that LCEs exhibit excellent directional actuation in response to electric fields[100]. The directional modulus of LCEs can vary by up to 14 times depending on the alignment of LC molecules, and the dielectric constant changes according to the director orientation, enabling anisotropic expansion when an external voltage is applied [Figure 10F]. These materials achieve up to 20% strain as voltage is applied, demonstrating rapid deformation rates with minimal hysteresis. Furthermore, by applying spatial patterning to the LC director, they confirmed that precise transformation from 2D to 3D deformation is achievable.
Another approach to controlling deformation in homogeneous elastomers is by spatially patterning the crosslink density. Differences in crosslink density within the elastomer lead to changes in modulus, and by patterning these variations, the deformation behavior of the film can be controlled even under the same external tensile conditions [Figure 9B]. In elastomers, crosslinking occurs by supplying energy, such as heat or light, to form crosslink sites and create a 3D polymer network, depending on the types of monomers and crosslinkers. The crosslink density can be adjusted not only by the amount of external energy supplied but also by the content of crosslinkers within the material[101-106]. Methods for spatially patterning crosslink density include using patterned masks to selectively distribute thermal or light energy across the elastomer film or directly irradiating with patterned energy sources[101-104]. Notably, photo-crosslinking enables precise and complex pattern formation, allowing modulus patterning not only in-plane but also in the out-of-plane direction by adjusting penetration conditions according to wavelength within the elastomer matrix[105]. This crosslink density patterning approach makes it possible not only to regulate the overall mechanical behavior of a homogeneous elastomer substrate but also to enhance deformation resistance or flexibility in specific regions. Nauman et al. produced a film from a thermally cross linkable elastomer material containing photo-responsive color-changing dyes, patterning the crosslink density by generating spatial temperature variations using a gradient grayscale patterned film and an infrared light source[102]. When an external actuation light source was applied to the fabricated film, variations in photochromic dynamics appeared according to the crosslink density in different regions, and this technology was subsequently applied to artificial iris devices for contact lenses [Figure 11A]. Park et al. achieved a remarkable enhancement in the modulus of specific regions within a photo-cross linkable elastomer by up to 38,000% by selectively irradiating the material with patterned light[103] [Figure 11B]. This innovative selective patterning technique allowed them to precisely create distinct soft and hard regions within the film, facilitating the development of high-performance pressure sensors. These sensors are capable of maintaining exceptional sensitivity while effectively reducing the adverse effects of deformation, thus offering robust performance across various applications. Kang et al. developed a bio-based thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) by blending polyester elastomer (BPE) with polylactide (PLA), followed by a dynamic crosslinking process involving high temperatures and strong shear forces[104] [Figure 11C]. They adjusted the ratio of BPE to PLA to control the overall modulus of the TPV elastomer film. By optimizing the blend ratio and crosslinking process, they achieved optimal tensile strength and elongation at break for the TPV under external tensile conditions. This composite material exhibits high reprocessability and maintains its mechanical performance under repeated deformation, providing stable deformation behavior over an extended period.
Figure 11. Homogeneous elastomers with patterned crosslink density. (A) Elastomer films with spatially patterned crosslink density achieved through a gradient thermal profile during the crosslinking process, along with an example of artificial iris application. Reproduced with permission[102]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier; (B) Schematic of an elastomer substrate with enhanced local crosslink density through UV patterning and a performance comparison with previous studies on rigid island applications. Reproduced with permission[103]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH; (C) Schematic of TPV with varied modulus achieved by blending BPE and PLA (left), alongside a TEM micrograph of the TPV structure (right). Reproduced with permission[104]. Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry. UV: Ultraviolet; TPV: thermoplastic vulcanizate; BPE: blending polyester elastomer; PLA: polylactide; TEM: transmission electron microscope.
Structural assembly of heterogeneous materials
The structural assembly of heterogeneous materials involves integrating pre-designed structures into an elastomer matrix to achieve desired deformations [Figure 12]. Unlike merely patterning homogeneous materials, this approach leverages the deformation control effects of assembled structures to more effectively manage both macroscopic and localized deformations, enabling in-plane and 3D deformation modes that broaden potential applications[107-116]. Heterogeneous material structures for controlling substrate deformation are manufactured through processes such as mold forming[109,111] and laser cutting[107,108], with recent widespread adoption of 3D printing-based additive manufacturing processes[116] further enhancing design flexibility by enabling the realization of complex structures.
Figure 12. Schematic diagrams of elastomer films with integrated structures for strain control. (A) Pristine elastomer without structural integration; (B and C) Elastomer film with a (B) 1D structural frame and (B) 2D structural frame embedded within the elastomer matrices, respectively.
The incorporation of 1D structures involves embedding linear elements such as fibers, rods, and ribbons into elastomers, where these components are predominantly aligned in a single direction to enhance axial deformation characteristics and control mechanical properties along that axis[109-112] [Figure 12A]. For instance, integrating frame-like structures or fibers into an elastomer substrate allows these elements to serve as mechanical supports that effectively control deformation when the substrate is stretched in a specific direction. Nauman et al. employed elastomer materials with high modulus to create a 1D line pattern, which was embedded into an elastomer matrix[109]. This resulted in a substrate with anisotropic deformation properties based on the alignment axis of the line pattern and the direction of stretching [Figure 13A]. By coating the substrate with metal nanoparticles and allowing the distance and arrangement of these particles to vary with substrate tensile direction, the surface plasmonic effects produced a range of visible light wavelengths. This enabled the substrate to be used in plasmonic optical sensors capable of directional color tuning across a broad spectrum. Matsuda et al. conducted studies using a heterogeneous silicone substrate composed of PDMS and Ecoflex, employing a molding process to regulate spatial deformation distribution and overall mechanical deformation[111] [Figure 13B]. They fabricated dot-shaped PDMS pillars with high modulus and positioned them within the Ecoflex matrix to create rigid regions that suppress excessive deformation in pressure-sensitive areas. Additionally, they integrated porous silicone for pressure sensing and conductive silicone for strain sensing, enabling precise and independent measurements. This device maintains stable performance even under strains up to 50%, providing an effective solution for advanced sensing applications. Paik et al. developed a composite substrate capable of programmed anisotropic deformation by embedding 1D Cr patterns within an elastomer matrix and adjusting the width and spacing of these patterns[112] [Figure 13C]. The Cr line patterns were pre-fabricated on a silicon wafer using electron-beam lithography, followed by overcoating with a PDMS elastomer, curing, and subsequent detachment as a single layer. This composite substrate functions as a variable photomask, enabling diverse pattern light transmission depending on the designed deformation range, with adjustable deformation range and resolution based on the arrangement and width of the metal lines.
Figure 13. Elastomer matrix with integrated 1D structures. (A) Incorporation of 1D structures with high modulus line patterns into the elastomer matrix to regulate strain along the tensile axis, demonstrating an application in plasmonic meta-optical devices. Reproduced with permission[109]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society; (B) Integration of vertical pillar structures with high modulus into the elastomer matrix to prevent sensitivity loss in pressure sensors and to suppress excessive deformation in the sensing areas. Reproduced with permission[111]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature; (C) Composite elastomeric substrate photomask embedded with 1D chromium line patterns, exhibiting diverse anisotropic deformation characteristics based on pattern and array conditions. Reproduced with permission[112]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
The 2D structure assembles frame elements capable of 2D deformation within the elastomer matrix, allowing for control of in-plane deformation through bi-directional or multi-directional expansion of the structure [Figure 12B]. Various types of planar-expanding structures, such as re-entrant, chiral, and Kagome grids, can be utilized in the form of frames, which are primarily fabricated using 3D printing methods[113] [Figure 14A]. Lee et al. developed a 2D re-entrant structure with a negative Poisson’s ratio based on a honeycomb design and integrated it into an elastomer matrix[114]. By leveraging the competitive interaction between the expansion of the structure and the contraction of the matrix, they created a composite stretchable substrate with a negative Poisson’s ratio, which was applied to a strain sensor, and this application improved the gauge factor by approximately 3.2 times compared to sensors without such structures [Figure 14B]. Additionally, Ha et al. conducted research on controlling the performance of resistive strain sensors by embedding a hard film with various integrated 2D patterns into the matrix[115] [Figure 14C]. The strain sensor was designed to concentrate surface deformation in specific areas, optimizing its performance to achieve both high sensitivity and stretchability while demonstrating long-term reliability.
Figure 14. Elastomer matrix incorporating 2D structures. (A) Examples of various designs of 2D mechanical metastructures that can be integrated into the elastomer matrix for strain control. Reproduced with permission[113]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH; (B) Comparison of vertical contraction deformation during stretching of the elastomer film with and without the 2D strain control structures. Reproduced with permission[114]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier; (C) Schematic of the fabrication process for an elastomer film with embedded structures designed for tailored deformation in different regions. Reproduced with permission[115]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Recently, innovative approaches have been exploring the integration of 3D structures into elastomer substrates to enable multi-dimensional deformation[117,118]. By employing intricate 3D designs, these methods aim to address the limitations of traditional planar electronic devices and investigate the potential of next-generation electronics with dynamic and adaptable 3D shapes. Such research goes beyond simple structural enhancements, seeking to fundamentally transform the interaction between substrates and devices in advanced applications, and drive significant technological advancements.
Rigid islands on elastomers for localized strain control
Previously, we concentrated on controlling the macroscopic deformation behavior of substrates by spatially adjusting the modulus patterns of elastomers. To expand the range of device applications, managing localized strain in areas where devices are positioned is essential; for this purpose, the rigid island pattern is commonly used. A rigid island involves placing island-shaped patterns with a higher modulus than the elastomer onto the substrate, thereby minimizing the deformation transmitted to the device under tensile strain[119-121]. Thus, positioning rigid devices on a stretchable substrate, with independent local deformation control, effectively mitigates damage or performance degradation in external deformation environments, necessitating specific design principles for successful implementation. First, the effective modulus of the rigid island should be appropriately designed by considering the target tensile deformation conditions, the device’s deformation durability, and the moduli of both the device and the substrate. Generally, it should have a modulus significantly higher than that of the substrate and, ideally, higher than that of the device[119]. Second, robust bonding characteristics are required at each interface between the substrate, rigid island, and device, ensuring that the rigid island area where stress is concentrated can withstand repeated deformation within the target tensile range without delamination[120,121].
Rigid island patterns are typically formed by depositing heterogeneous materials onto the elastomer using mask patterns or by directly forming them through printing; sometimes, they are created by spatially patterning the crosslinking density of a homogeneous elastomer material[122,123]. Han et al. fabricated amorphous indium-gallium-zinc oxide (a-IGZO) thin-film transistors (TFTs) by layering a rigid island array made from PI material onto a stretchable polyurethane substrate[122] [Figure 15A]. Subsequently, they applied an additional 3 μm thick organic passivation layer on top of the TFTs to further enhance mechanical durability. As a result, the produced stretchable TFTs maintained their electrical performance even after 10,000 stretching cycles at a strain rate of 30%. Kang et al. successfully implemented high-stretchability inorganic transistors by embedding rigid island transistors within an elastomer substrate[123] [Figure 15B]. Among various combinations of rigid island and stretchable elastomer materials, the pairing of polyepoxy acrylate (PEA) and polyurethane acrylate (PUA) enabled strong covalent bonding, achieving robust adhesion at the interface. Consequently, the transistors maintained their functionality under strains exceeding 50% and retained stable electrical performance even after 10,000 repeated stretching cycles.
Figure 15. (A) PI-based rigid island array assembled on a TPU substrate for a stretchable TFT. Reproduced with permission[122]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society; (B) Stretchable inorganic transistor with a PEA elastomer of relatively higher modulus embedded as a rigid island array within a PUA substrate, exhibiting excellent adhesion at the PUA-PEA interface. Reproduced with permission[123]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature; (C) MLPF with varying moduli introduced as rigid islands on a stretchable substrate, enabling a stretchable inorganic TFT. Reproduced with permission[125]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier; (D) Stretchable substrate with an array region designed with a modulus gradient along the thickness direction to optimize stress distribution during tensile deformation. Reproduced with permission[126]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH. PI: Polyimide; TPU: thermoplastic polyurethane; TFT: thin-film transistor; PEA: polyepoxy acrylate; PUA: polyurethane acrylate; MLPF: multilayer polymer film.
As previously discussed, integrating rigid islands with careful consideration of the elastic moduli of both the substrate and the device can significantly enhance the mechanical reliability of devices in stretchable environments, and recent approaches have focused on precisely designing rigid islands to exhibit a composite modulus along the thickness direction. This precise design allows for more effective control of localized deformations, minimizing stress at each interface and redistributing it to surrounding areas, thereby reducing stress concentrations at interfaces and further improving the device’s mechanical reliability and durability[124-126]. Kim et al. developed rigid islands in a multilayer polymer film (MLPF) with modulus engineering to enhance the mechanical durability and reliability of stretchable electronic devices[125]. This MLPF was produced using a layered CVD process, with precise adjustments of each layer’s modulus between the substrate and the islands to achieve composite modulus along the thickness direction, ensuring the mechanical reliability of devices formed on the islands under tensile strain [Figure 15C]. By restricting the deformation of the rigid islands to below 1% across the full strain range, this system was successfully integrated with a-IGZO TFTs and maintained stable performance even after 100,000 cycles at 30% strain. Additionally, Sun et al. introduced a composite stretchable substrate design featuring a gradient modulus zone in the thickness direction within regions where rigid islands would be formed, aiming to enhance induced stress management during tensile deformation[126] [Figure 15D]. They soaked the PDMS substrate in a methacrylic acid (MAA) monomer solution, allowing it to absorb curing agents, and then used patterned UV exposure to form a gradient modulus based on the UV penetration characteristics through PDMS in the thickness direction. On this engineered composite stretchable substrate, they transferred a serpentine electrode and attached a light-emitting diode (LED), verifying mechanical stability and stress concentration relief through repeated tensile and deformation tests.
DISPLAY APPLICATIONS OF STRAIN-ENGINEERED STRETCHABLE SUBSTRATES
This section presents examples of how strain-engineered stretchable substrates are being applied in various free-form displays. Light-emitting devices include micro-LEDs, quantum dot LEDs (QD-LEDs), and OLEDs, which are utilized in combination with different types of stretchable substrates depending on target application, working environments, and deformation patterns[127-131]. Micro-LEDs are typically fabricated on mother substrates and subsequently transferred onto stretchable substrates using transfer printing methods[127,128]. For QD-LEDs and OLEDs, beginning with deposition processes, recent advancements in materials and techniques have introduced low-temperature inkjet printing as a method for fabricating light-emitting parts[129,130]. Among the proposed strain-engineered stretchable substrates, structured plastic substrates offer relatively superior thermal and mechanical stability compared to elastomers. As ongoing research enhances thermal stability while maintaining substrate transparency, it has become possible to fabricate devices using existing display process lines[132,133]. This allows for facile integration with existing display materials and processes, accelerating product commercialization. However, issues such as trade-offs between stretchability and resolution and limited degrees of deformation freedom exist.
Conversely, elastomer substrates with inherent stretchability offer substantial advantages over the previously discussed structured plastic substrates from a free-form display standpoint[134,135]. These benefits include enabling high-resolution applications and maintaining stable deformation in environments with dynamic and multiple deformations. To fully leverage these benefits, it is desirable for the light-emitting parts formed on the substrate to also possess stretchability. Proposed methods include forming wrinkle structures on the elastomer surface to impart structural stretchability to the light-emitting parts[136,137] and developing new materials to construct light-emitting parts with inherent stretchability[138,139]. In summary, the ideal combination of light-emitting components and strain-engineered substrates is chosen based on the specific demands of free-form displays, with Table 1 presenting the properties of each stretchable substrate and key considerations for their application in free-form displays.
Characteristics of strain-engineered stretchable substrates and their advantages and limitations in free-form display applications
Substrate type | Plastic film | Elastomers | |||
Buckling | Kirigami | Network aligning | Crosslinking control | Structure assembling | |
Stretchable characteristic | Vertical compensation | Void compensation | Intrinsic stretchability | ||
Representative manufacturing | Pre-stretching Mold transfer | Laser cutting Etching | Rubbing Post-stretching | Thermal patterning Light patterning | Evaporation Direct printing |
Advantages in free-form display | Facilitates application in conventional display materials and process lines | Suitable for high-resolution and multi-form applications | |||
Limitations in free-form display | Trade-off between stretchability and resolution/reliability | Requirement for developing new stretchable materials to overcome process limitations |
Display applications on structured plastic substrates
As previously mentioned, structured plastic substrates have been widely studied in early stretchable display research due to their structural simplicity and high manufacturing efficiency. This approach allowed companies to maintain existing display processes while avoiding complex additional steps, leading to extensive adoption and the presentation of prototype products at numerous exhibitions. For instance, Jeong et al. employed a plastic composite substrate with precisely controlled short wrinkle wavelengths to mitigate pixel distortion caused by traditional wrinkle structures used for stretchability in flexible substrates and to reduce spatial loss in displays[140]. In this study, a thin PI-based plastic composite substrate was utilized to fabricate a thin-film LED (TFLED). Compared to conventional macroscopic wrinkle structures, the short-wavelength wrinkle structure with a 20 µm wavelength significantly reduced visible image distortion, demonstrating excellent visual quality and potential for application in high-resolution free-form displays and wearable devices [Figure 16A]. Kim et al. developed a wearable QD-LED for stretchable optoelectronic applications by incorporating a wrinkle structure on a polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) substrate, which offers superior thermal stability compared to PET[141]. After forming the device on the PEN substrate, it was transferred to a pre-stretched elastomer substrate, creating a wrinkle structure that allowed the device to operate stably under stretch conditions of up to 70% [Figure 16B]. Furthermore, the elastomer beneath the plastic layer enabled easy attachment to the skin, demonstrating potential for use in various wearable electronic applications. Additionally, Yin et al. developed an energy self-powered stretchable display system by transferring a stretchable OLED and a stretchable polymer solar cell onto a plastic substrate, then forming a periodic buckling structure[142]. Using a stencil-based deposition method, they created alternating adhesive and non-adhesive regions on the substrate, attaching devices to a pre-stretched substrate and releasing it to achieve the buckled display system. This configuration achieved a maximum stretchability of 100% and consistently maintained performance even after more than 20,000 cycles of stretching and recovery [Figure 16C].
Figure 16. Display applications utilizing buckling-structured flexible films. (A) Schematic diagram of the concept for an OLED with an invisible wrinkle structure, surface SEM and light luminescence images before and after stretching, based on the dimensions of the wrinkle structure introduced on the TFLED device substrate. Reproduced with permission[140]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH; (B) Photographs of a pre-strained, wavy QD-LED. The inset shows a magnified SEM image (scale bar, 300 μm), buckling structure of the flexible substrate under tension and the R/G/B luminescence characteristics of stretchable QD-LEDs under stretching and bending conditions. Reproduced with permission[141]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society; (C) SEM images and photographs of SOLEDs captured in a dark environment under tensile strains of 0%, 50%, and 100%. Reproduced with permission[142]. Copyright 2018, Nature Publishing Group. OLED: Organic light-emitting diode; SEM: scanning electron microscope; TFLED: thin-film light-emitting diode; QD-LED: quantum dot light-emitting diode; SOLEDs: stretchable organic light-emitting devices.
Kirigami-structured flexible plastic substrates are widely used in stretchable display applications, particularly for controlling in-plane deformations such as Poisson’s ratio. Jang et al. introduced research that combines an auxetic meta-structure with a Kirigami pattern to improve image distortion in stretchable displays[143]. The auxetic metamaterial, which has a negative Poisson’s ratio, expands laterally when stretched axially, allowing for stable display operation even under 24.5% stretch conditions. The designed Poisson’s ratio of -1 helps maintain the original image after stretching, and this design allows for uniform deformation when attached to curved surfaces [Figure 17A], making it suitable for skin-attached phototherapy devices or displays that can be affixed to non-spherical surfaces. Deng et al. implemented a display device using a PEN substrate with a rotating square Kirigami pattern, designed for applications in curved tensile environments[144]. The integration of the driving flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) and LED elements on the PEN substrate provided up to 57% bidirectional stretchability, and the device demonstrated stable operation even on complex 3D curved surfaces such as cylindrical, spherical, and saddle-shaped surfaces [Figure 17B]. To address the issue of resolution degradation in stretchable displays due to stretching, Lee et al. proposed a stretchable OLED device that maintains a high fill factor even after stretching by exposing hidden active areas (HAA) during Kirigami deformation[145]. They attached an ultrathin OLED to a 3D Kirigami-structured substrate, allowing the HAA to become visible during biaxial stretching, thereby preserving resolution and quality [Figure 17C]. This approach to compensating for resolution loss effectively demonstrates the potential of the proposed method in maximizing the capabilities of stretchable OLEDs.
Figure 17. Examples of flexible displays utilizing Kirigami patterns. (A) A meta-display designed with a Kirigami pattern that has a Poisson’s ratio of -1 to address image distortion caused by the Poisson effect, along with examples of luminescence on curved surfaces. Reproduced with permission[143]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH; (B) A stretchable display with rotational Kirigami patterns demonstrating stable luminescence properties on various curved surfaces, including cylindrical, spherical, and saddle shapes. Reproduced with permission[144]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature; (C) A stretchable OLED that reveals HAA through Kirigami deformation, maintaining high resolution even after stretching. Reproduced with permission[145]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature. OLED: Organic light-emitting diode; HAA: hidden active areas.
Display applications on intrinsically stretchable elastomer substrates
Elastomers, which enable omnidirectional stretchability without compensatory structures, are considered highly promising as substrates for free-form displays, with active research underway to enhance their thermal stability and mechanical properties for effective display component integration[146,147]. Additionally, as described in previous sections, efforts are also underway to expand the potential applications of free-form displays through macroscopic and localized strain-engineering. Oh et al. developed a method to improve image distortion in stretchable displays caused by the Poisson effect of elastomers by embedding various 1D line patterns into an elastomer matrix[148]. This approach effectively suppresses the contraction due to the Poisson effect during stretching, resulting in a composite elastomer substrate with a near-zero Poisson’s ratio [Figure 18A]. To minimize unwanted deformation of the substrate, the researchers meticulously designed the modulus, dimensions, and shape of the line patterns and used transparent materials to ensure excellent optical transparency of the composite substrate. To enable diverse deformation applications while maintaining a zero Poisson’s ratio for the substrate, Choi et al. developed a meta-elastomer substrate with a bidirectional zero Poisson’s ratio by embedding structurally designed honeycomb-shaped soft mechanical metamaterials into an elastomer matrix[149]. This substrate utilized soft materials for the frame, allowing for independent tensile deformation along different axes [Figure 18B]. By optimizing the dimensions of the structures and the modulus mismatch between the substrate and the matrix, they effectively controlled the anisotropic Poisson’s ratio. The LED pixel arrays formed on this zero Poisson’s ratio meta-elastomer substrate demonstrated linear and predictable deformation during stretching, indicating significant potential for applications in stretchable displays that require various in-plane shape deformations. Lee et al. proposed a stretchable display design where a structured plastic film with a negative Poisson’s ratio is embedded within an elastomer matrix, allowing the display image to expand biaxially under tension[150] [Figure 18C]. The substrate integrates a rigid glass-fiber reinforced PDMS (GFRPDMS) region with a soft elastomer matrix, optimizing the elastic modulus difference between the stiff and stretchable areas to maintain stability under multi-directional stretching and achieve consistent strain control and performance stability, even with repeated deformation. Using this substrate, they developed a stretchable display incorporating a high-resolution micro-LED array and liquid metal electrodes, achieving up to 25% stretch without image degradation.
Figure 18. (A) Integration of 1D line patterns with various shapes and sizes into an elastomer matrix to adjust the substrate’s Poisson’s ratio to nearly zero and improve image distortion in stretchable displays. Reproduced with permission[148]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier; (B) Incorporation of a soft mechanical meta-material frame capable of self-deformation into an elastomer matrix to achieve a zero Poisson’s ratio in the biaxial direction, and examples of linear and predictable display pixel movement under biaxial tensile deformation. Reproduced with permission[149]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH; (C) Stretchable displays featuring a Kirigami structure based on high-modulus GFRPDMS embedded within an elastomer matrix, which exhibits a negative Poisson’s ratio, enabling biaxial expansion deformation without image distortion under tensile strain. Reproduced with permission[150]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature; (D) A hybrid platform with a dual-layer structure, incorporating a stress-relief layer and a rigid island array on an elastomer substrate, engineered with modulus variations in the thickness direction to prevent performance degradation in stretchable OLEDs. Reproduced with permission[151]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH. GFRPDMS: Glass-fiber reinforced polydimethylsiloxane; OLEDs: organic light-emitting diodes.
In addition to macro-scale planar deformations, controlling localized deformation where the device is formed is crucial for practical applications. Strategies for engineering the modulus in the vertical direction are commonly employed to achieve this. To address these needs, Kim et al. proposed a hybrid platform with a dual-layer structure incorporating a stress-relief layer and a rigid island array on an elastomer substrate to prevent performance degradation in stretchable OLEDs under repeated stretching and restoring conditions[151]. This platform effectively manages localized strain applied to the device formed on the islands by engineering the modulus in the thickness direction. As a result, the device can operate within environments stretched up to 140% while maintaining excellent electromechanical and optical performance, demonstrating outstanding stability even after repeated deformations [Figure 18D].
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
This review provides a comprehensive summary of research trends on strain-engineered stretchable substrates for free-form display applications. It primarily proposes design strategies utilizing strain-compensation structures and modulus patterning, focusing on structured plastic films and intrinsically stretchable elastomer substrates. The review also explores how to maximize these approaches in various environments through careful selection of substrate materials and strain designs tailored to specific applications. Initially, promising buckling and Kirigami structures are examined, with an analysis of the tensile deformation characteristics of structured plastic substrates under different design conditions. Specifically, the review addresses deformation characteristics of buckling structures based on shape, size, and isotropy, and explores Kirigami structures by systematically analyzing the effects of cut pattern shape, size, and combinations, providing design guidelines for plastic film substrates across diverse applications. Furthermore, the review discusses strategies for using intrinsically stretchable elastomer materials, particularly approaches to spatially pattern moduli to minimize unwanted deformations in pristine elastomers. This section also discusses techniques such as inducing network alignment or crosslink patterning in homogeneous elastomers through external stimuli, along with utilizing compensatory effects in heterogeneous structures to achieve multi-dimensional control over both local and global deformations.
In free-form display applications, electrodes, driving components, and light-emitting elements are layered onto strain-engineered stretchable substrates, where the choice of substrate material and strain-engineering strategy should be carefully tailored to factors such as the type of light-emitting element, processing temperature, target resolution, and deformation behaviors. For example, while structured plastic substrates have limited effective areas for device formation, they offer greater heat resistance and mechanical stability than elastomers, ensuring compatibility with existing display manufacturing processes. Due to these properties, plastic substrates can be quickly commercialized in low-resolution applications such as simple signal displays or automotive screens. Conversely, elastomers provide intrinsic stretchability without additional structures, offering a large effective area, making them suitable for high-resolution displays. However, their low thermal stability restricts processing temperatures, necessitating further research to develop materials with enhanced thermal stability or reduced processing temperatures[152].
To successfully develop displays that support various form factors, ensuring compatibility between the strain-engineered stretchable substrates proposed in this review and key display components is essential. Additionally, for commercialization, hardware or software solutions are required to compensate for resolution loss and enable seamless content transitions due to form-factor changes[153]. Ideally, for high-resolution, multi-dimensional displays, most display components, including the substrate, should possess inherent stretchability. Free-form display technology is currently considered to be between the introductory and growth stages, with intensive research underway on materials, manufacturing processes, and software-based image compensation to develop optimized protocols for specific applications. However, challenges remain regarding resolution, deformation characteristics, and mechanical reliability, necessitating ongoing research and innovation to address these issues. The strain-engineering design strategies proposed in this review are expected to help overcome some of these limitations, supporting the reliable operation of free-form displays across various deformation conditions. This advancement could play a crucial role in expanding the application potential of free-form displays from static shape transformations to real-time dynamic deformations.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization and supervision: Choi JC, Chung S
Prepared the figures and wrote the article: Lee DW, Park DH, Choi JC
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
This research was supported by the Nano & Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2023-00281346) and Supported by a Korea University Grant (K2406961).
Conflicts of interest
Chung S is the Guest Editor of the Special Issue, while the other authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
REFERENCES
1. He J, Wei R, Ma X, et al. Contactless user-interactive sensing display for human-human and human-machine interactions. Adv Mater 2024;36:e2401931.
2. Koo JH, Kim DC, Shim HJ, Kim T, Kim D. Flexible and stretchable smart display: materials, fabrication, device design, and system integration. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1801834.
3. Park J, Seung H, Kim DC, Kim MS, Kim D. Unconventional image-sensing and light-emitting devices for extended reality. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2009281.
4. Yin H, Zhu Y, Youssef K, Yu Z, Pei Q. Structures and materials in stretchable electroluminescent devices. Adv Mater 2022;34:e2106184.
5. Dong B, Shi Q, Yang Y, Wen F, Zhang Z, Lee C. Technology evolution from self-powered sensors to AIoT enabled smart homes. Nano Energy 2021;79:105414.
6. Zhang W, Wang X, Duan J, et al. Recent research advances in textile-based flexible power supplies and displays for smart wearable applications. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2024;6:5429-55.
7. Srinivasan KP, Muthuramalingam T, Elsheikh AH. A review of flexible printed sensors for automotive infotainment systems. Archiv Civ Mech Eng 2023;23:604.
8. Jo M, Kim DJ, Lee SS, Tahir U. Transparent and flexible led-embedded display film using micro metal mesh. J Mech Sci Technol 2024;38:357-63.
9. Back JH, Kwon Y, Cho H, et al. Visible-light-curable acrylic resins toward UV-light-blocking adhesives for foldable displays. Adv Mater 2023;35:e2204776.
10. Han SH, Shin JH, Choi SS. Analytical investigation of multi-layered rollable displays considering nonlinear elastic adhesive interfaces. Sci Rep 2023;13:5697.
11. Jeong EG, Kwon JH, Kang KS, Jeong SY, Choi KC. A review of highly reliable flexible encapsulation technologies towards rollable and foldable OLEDs. J Inform Display 2020;21:19-32.
12. Byun J, Chung S, Hong Y. Artificial soft elastic media with periodic hard inclusions for tailoring strain-sensitive thin-film responses. Adv Mater 2018;30:e1802190.
13. Wang W, Wang S, Rastak R, et al. Strain-insensitive intrinsically stretchable transistors and circuits. Nat Electron 2021;4:143-50.
14. Wang C, Hu H, Peng D, Dong L, Zhu D. Soft devices empowered by mechanoluminescent materials. Soft Sci 2023;3:39.
15. Jung H, Park CI, Gee MB, et al. High-resolution active-matrix micro-LED stretchable displays. J Soc Info Display 2023;31:201-10.
16. Li X, Hasan MM, Kim H, Jang J. Oxide electronics transferred on stiff-stripe/PDMS substrate for high-resolution stretchable displays. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 2019;66:2971-8.
17. Kim DW, Kim SW, Lee G, et al. Fabrication of practical deformable displays: advances and challenges. Light Sci Appl 2023;12:61.
18. Lee Y, Cho H, Yoon H, et al. Advancements in electronic materials and devices for stretchable displays. Adv Mater Technol 2023;8:2201067.
19. Lee B, Cho H, Moon S, et al. Omnidirectional printing of elastic conductors for three-dimensional stretchable electronics. Nat Electron 2023;6:307-18.
20. Cho H, Lee B, Jang D, Yoon J, Chung S, Hong Y. Recent progress in strain-engineered elastic platforms for stretchable thin-film devices. Mater Horiz 2022;9:2053-75.
21. Chen J, Wang J, Ji K, et al. Flexible, stretchable, and transparent InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells/polyacrylamide hydrogel-based light emitting diodes. Nano Res 2022;15:5492-9.
22. Shankar U, Oberoi D, Bandyopadhyay A. A review on the alternative of indium tin oxide coated glass substrate in flexible and bendable organic optoelectronic device. Polym Advan Technol 2022;33:3078-111.
23. Chen J, Liu CT. Technology advances in flexible displays and substrates. IEEE Access 2013;1:150-8.
24. Yoo J, Li S, Kim DH, Yang J, Choi MK. Materials and design strategies for stretchable electroluminescent devices. Nanoscale Horiz 2022;7:801-21.
25. Baeg K, Lee J. Flexible electronic systems on plastic substrates and textiles for smart wearable technologies. Adv Mater Technol 2020;5:2000071.
26. Jiao R, Wang R, Wang Y, et al. Vertical serpentine interconnect-enabled stretchable and curved electronics. Microsyst Nanoeng 2023;9:149.
27. Ye C, Stewart BG, Sitaraman SK. Stretchability of serpentine interconnect on polymer substrate for flexible electronics: a geometry and material sensitivity analysis. In: 2020 IEEE 70th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC); 2020 Jun 03-30; Orlando, USA. IEEE; 2020. pp. 1533-41.
28. Li D, Cui T, Jian J, et al. Lantern-inspired on-skin helical interconnects for epidermal electronic sensors. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2213335.
29. Yang Z, Zhai Z, Song Z, et al. Conductive and elastic 3D helical fibers for use in washable and wearable electronics. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1907495.
30. Xu R, He Y, Li X, Lu M, Chen Y. Snap-fit mechanical metamaterials. Appl Mater Today 2023;30:101714.
31. Pan F, Li Y, Li Z, Yang J, Liu B, Chen Y. 3D pixel mechanical metamaterials. Adv Mater 2019;31:e1900548.
32. Meng K, Parry G, Hurier M, Ben Dahmane N, Coupeau C. Elastic-plastic buckling of gold thin films into straight-sided blisters. Surf Coat Tech 2024;482:130642.
33. Lee DW, Lee JH, Jin J. Innovative evolution of buckling structures for flexible electronics. Compos Struct 2018;204:487-99.
34. Sarabia-Vallejos MA, Cerda-Iglesias FE, Pérez-Monje DA, et al. Smart polymer surfaces with complex wrinkled patterns: reversible, non-planar, gradient, and hierarchical structures. Polymers 2023;15:612.
35. Jin H, Lu W, Cordill MJ, Schmidegg K. In situ study of cracking and buckling of chromium films on PET substrates. Exp Mech 2011;51:219-27.
36. Chen S, Chen J, Zhang X, Li ZY, Li J. Kirigami/Origami: unfolding the new regime of advanced 3D microfabrication/nanofabrication with “folding”. Light Sci Appl 2020;9:75.
38. Zhai Z, Wu L, Jiang H. Mechanical metamaterials based on Origami and Kirigami. Appl Phys Rev 2021;8:041319.
39. Park J, Lim H, Yea J, et al. Kirigami-inspired gas sensors for strain-insensitive operation. Results Eng 2024;21:101805.
40. Yoo PJ, Suh KY, Park SY, Lee HH. Physical self-assembly of microstructures by anisotropic buckling. Adv Mater 2002;14:1383-7.
41. Singh JP, Chu H, Abell J, Tripp RA, Zhao Y. Flexible and mechanical strain resistant large area SERS active substrates. Nanoscale 2012;4:3410-4.
42. Bian J, Zhou L, Yang B, Yin Z, Huang Y. Theoretical and experimental studies of laser lift-off of nonwrinkled ultrathin polyimide film for flexible electronics. Appl Surf Sci 2020;499:143910.
43. Tao X, Zhang K, Stuart BW, Assender HE. Elastic (acrylate/polydimethylsiloxane) substrate-to-coating interlayers for improving the mechanical resilience of thermoelectric films on poly(ethylene terephthalate) during roll-to-roll manufacture and in service operation. Surf Coat Tech 2022;434:128167.
44. Kwon D, Kim DM, Choi SM, et al. Effect of the orientation and bending stiffness of nanopatterned films on wrinkling. Macromol Res 2018;26:374-9.
45. Drack M, Graz I, Sekitani T, Someya T, Kaltenbrunner M, Bauer S. An imperceptible plastic electronic wrap. Adv Mater 2015;27:34-40.
46. Ohara A, Okumura K. Bending of polymer films: a method for obtaining a compressive modulus of thin films. Soft Matter 2024;20:8589-600.
47. Li YF, Chou SY, Huang P, et al. Stretchable organometal-halide-perovskite quantum-dot light-emitting diodes. Adv Mater 2019;31:e1807516.
48. Kim MY, Kim HW, Oh C, Park SH, Kim BS. Stretchable oxide thin-film transistors with a mechanically and electrically reliable wavy structure for skin electronics. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2024;6:435-46.
49. Mishra S, Verma A. Variable density wrinkling in polymer thin film by gradient stress induced in the elastomeric substrate. Bull Mater Sci 2024;47:3156.
50. Zhang Q, Yin J. Spontaneous buckling-driven periodic delamination of thin films on soft substrates under large compression. J Mech Phys Solids 2018;118:40-57.
51. Zhao Y, Fang F. Bio-inspired hierarchical wrinkles for tunable infrared reflectance. Surf Interfaces 2024;45:103832.
52. Yin D, Feng J, Ma R, et al. Efficient and mechanically robust stretchable organic light-emitting devices by a laser-programmable buckling process. Nat Commun 2016;7:11573.
53. Hartmann F, Jakešová M, Mao G, et al. Scalable microfabrication of folded parylene-based conductors for stretchable electronics. Adv Electron Mater 2021;7:2001236.
54. Hyun DC, Park M, Park C, et al. Ordered zigzag stripes of polymer gel/metal nanoparticle composites for highly stretchable conductive electrodes. Adv Mater 2011;23:2946-50.
55. Yu Y, Fang Z, Luo Y, et al. Ultra-stretchable supercapacitors based on biaxially pre-strained super-aligned carbon nanotube films. Nanoscale 2020;12:24259-65.
56. Seok S, Park H, Kim J. Analysis of experimental biaxial surface wrinkling pattern based on direct 3D numerical simulation. Micromachines 2024;15:543.
57. Brooks AK, Chakravarty S, Ali M, Yadavalli VK. Kirigami-inspired biodesign for applications in healthcare. Adv Mater 2022;34:e2109550.
58. Tao J, Khosravi H, Deshpande V, Li S. Engineering by cuts: how Kirigami principle enables unique mechanical properties and functionalities. Adv Sci 2022;10:e2204733.
59. Baldwin A, Meng E. Kirigami strain sensors microfabricated from thin-film parylene C. J Microelectromech Syst 2018;27:1082-8.
60. Morikawa Y, Yamagiwa S, Sawahata H, Numano R, Koida K, Kawano T. Donut-shaped stretchable Kirigami: enabling electronics to integrate with the deformable muscle. Adv Healthc Mater 2019;8:e1900939.
61. Zhang S, Yang C, Qi Z, et al. Laser patterned graphene pressure sensor with adjustable sensitivity in an ultrawide response range. Nanotechnology 2024;35:365503.
62. Park R, Lee DH, Koh CS, et al. Laser-assisted structuring of graphene films with biocompatible liquid crystal polymer for skin/brain-interfaced electrodes. Adv Healthc Mater 2024;13:e2301753.
63. Biswas RK, Farid N, Bhatt BB, Gupta D, O’Connor GM, Scully P. Femtosecond infra-red laser carbonization and ablation of polyimide for fabrication of Kirigami inspired strain sensor. J Phys D Appl Phys 2023;56:085101.
64. Chen J, Shi Y, Ying B, et al. Kirigami-enabled stretchable laser-induced graphene heaters for wearable thermotherapy. Mater Horiz 2024;11:2010-20.
65. Lee HU, Park C, Jin J, Kim SW. A stretchable vertically stacked microsupercapacitor with kirigami-bridged island structure: MnO2/graphene/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanocomposite electrode through pen lithography. J Power Sources 2020;453:227898.
66. Hwang DG, Bartlett MD. Tunable mechanical metamaterials through hybrid Kirigami structures. Sci Rep 2018;8:3378.
67. Guan YS, Zhang Z, Tang Y, Yin J, Ren S. Kirigami-inspired nanoconfined polymer conducting nanosheets with 2000% stretchability. Adv Mater 2018;30:e1706390.
68. Won P, Park JJ, Lee T, et al. Stretchable and transparent Kirigami conductor of nanowire percolation network for electronic skin applications. Nano Lett 2019;19:6087-96.
69. Rao Z, Lu Y, Li Z, et al. Curvy, shape-adaptive imagers based on printed optoelectronic pixels with a Kirigami design. Nat Electron 2021;4:513-21.
70. Xu K, Lu Y, Honda S, Arie T, Akita S, Takei K. Highly stable Kirigami-structured stretchable strain sensors for perdurable wearable electronics. J Mater Chem C 2019;7:9609-17.
71. Sedal A, Memar AH, Liu T, Menguc Y, Corson N. Design of deployable soft robots through plastic deformation of Kirigami structures. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2020;5:2272-9.
72. Zhang Z, Yu Y, Tang Y, et al. Kirigami-inspired stretchable conjugated electronics. Adv Electron Mater 2020;6:1900929.
73. An N, Domel AG, Zhou J, Rafsanjani A, Bertoldi K. Programmable hierarchical Kirigami. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:1906711.
74. Khosravi H, Iannucci SM, Li S. Pneumatic soft actuators with Kirigami skins. Front Robot AI 2021;8:749051.
76. Groeger D, Steimle J. LASEC: Instant fabrication of stretchable circuits using a laser cutter. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2019. pp. 1-14.
77. Guo Z, Yu Y, Zhu W, et al. Kirigami-based stretchable, deformable, ultralight thin-film thermoelectric generator for bodyNET application. Adv Energy Mater 2022;12:2102993.
78. Jeong MW, Ma JH, Shin JS, et al. Intrinsically stretchable three primary light-emitting films enabled by elastomer blend for polymer light-emitting diodes. Sci Adv 2023;9:eadh1504.
79. Kim DC, Shim HJ, Lee W, Koo JH, Kim DH. Material-based approaches for the fabrication of stretchable electronics. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1902743.
80. Zhang Z, Wang W, Jiang Y, et al. High-brightness all-polymer stretchable LED with charge-trapping dilution. Nature 2022;603:624-30.
81. Liu J, Wang J, Zhang Z, et al. Fully stretchable active-matrix organic light-emitting electrochemical cell array. Nat Commun 2020;11:3362.
82. Dong Z, Ren X, Jia B, et al. Composite patch with negative Poisson’s ratio mimicking cardiac mechanical properties: design, experiment and simulation. Mater Today Bio 2024;26:101098.
83. Oh S, Lee S, Byun S, et al. 3D shape-morphing display enabled by electrothermally responsive, stiffness-tunable liquid metal platform with stretchable electroluminescent device. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2214766.
84. Liu G, Deng Y, Ni B, et al. Electroactive Bi-functional liquid crystal elastomer actuators. Small 2024;20:e2307565.
85. Cai M, Nie S, Du Y, Wang C, Song J. Soft elastomers with programmable stiffness as strain-isolating substrates for stretchable electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:14340-6.
87. Zhai F, Feng Y, Li Z, et al. 4D-printed untethered self-propelling soft robot with tactile perception: rolling, racing, and exploring. Matter 2021;4:3313-26.
88. Zou W, Lin X, Terentjev EM. Amine-acrylate liquid single crystal elastomers reinforced by hydrogen bonding. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2101955.
89. Li S, Aizenberg M, Lerch MM, Aizenberg J. Programming deformations of 3D microstructures: opportunities enabled by magnetic alignment of liquid crystalline elastomers. Acc Mater Res 2023;4:1008-19.
90. Torres VM, LaNasa JA, Vogt BD, Hickey RJ. Controlling nanostructure and mechanical properties in triblock copolymer/monomer blends via reaction-induced phase transitions. Soft Matter 2021;17:1505-12.
91. Ye C, Singh G, Wadley ML, Karim A, Cavicchi KA, Vogt BD. Anisotropic mechanical properties of aligned polystyrene-block-polydimethylsiloxane thin films. Macromolecules 2013;46:8608-15.
92. Park WI, Kim K, Jang HI, et al. Directed self-assembly with sub-100 degrees Celsius processing temperature, sub-10 nanometer resolution, and sub-1 minute assembly time. Small 2012;8:3762-8.
93. Ditte K, Perez J, Chae S, et al. Ultrasoft and high-mobility block copolymers for skin-compatible electronics. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2005416.
94. Chen M, Gao M, Bai L, Zheng H, Qi HJ, Zhou K. Recent advances in 4D printing of liquid crystal elastomers. Adv Mater 2023;35:e2209566.
95. Xia Y, Lee E, Hu H, et al. Better actuation through chemistry: using surface coatings to create uniform director fields in nematic liquid crystal elastomers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8:12466-72.
96. Choi JC, Jeon J, Lee JW, et al. Steerable and agile light-fueled rolling locomotors by curvature-engineered torsional torque. Adv Sci 2023;10:e2304715.
97. Zhang W, Nan Y, Wu Z, Shen Y, Luo D. Photothermal-driven liquid crystal elastomers: materials, alignment and applications. Molecules 2022;27:4330.
98. Ahn C, Liang X, Cai S. Inhomogeneous stretch induced patterning of molecular orientation in liquid crystal elastomers. Extreme Mech Lett 2015;5:30-6.
99. Jeon J, Choi J, Lee H, et al. Continuous and programmable photomechanical jumping of polymer monoliths. Mater Today 2021;49:97-106.
100. Fowler HE, Rothemund P, Keplinger C, White TJ. Liquid crystal elastomers with enhanced directional actuation to electric fields. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2103806.
101. Yan S, Deng X, Chen S, et al. Deformation-induced photoprogrammable pattern of polyurethane elastomers based on Poisson effect. Adv Mater 2024;36:e2307445.
102. Nauman A, Choi J, Cho Y, Lee J, Na J, Kim H. Light-adaptable artificial iris with dynamically scalable pupil-aperture function by radially patterned photochromic transition control. Mater Design 2024;237:112515.
103. Park H, Kim M, Park H, Oh JH. Synthesis of a photo-crosslinkable elastomer for stretchable electronics and its use in strain-insensitive pressure sensors. Adv Funct Mater 2024;34:2312034.
104. Kang H, Hu X, Li M, et al. Novel biobased thermoplastic elastomer consisting of synthetic polyester elastomer and polylactide by in situ dynamical crosslinking method. RSC Adv 2015;5:23498-507.
105. Liu X, Wang Q, Zhou S, et al. Stiffness and interface engineered soft electronics with large-scale robust deformability. Adv Mater 2024;36:e2407886.
106. Qi D, Zhang K, Tian G, Jiang B, Huang Y. Stretchable electronics based on PDMS substrates. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2003155.
107. Yin L, Lv J, Wang J. Structural innovations in printed, flexible, and stretchable electronics. Adv Mater Technol 2020;5:2000694.
108. Wang Z, Luan C, Liao G, Liu J, Yao X, Fu J. Progress in auxetic mechanical metamaterials: structures, characteristics, manufacturing methods, and applications. Adv Eng Mater 2020;22:2000312.
109. Nauman A, Khaliq HS, Choi JC, Lee JW, Kim HR. Topologically engineered strain redistribution in elastomeric substrates for dually tunable anisotropic plasmomechanical responses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2024;16:6337-47.
110. Gong X, Yang Q, Zhi C, Lee PS. Stretchable energy storage devices: from materials and structural design to device assembly. Adv Energy Mater 2021;11:2003308.
111. Matsuda R, Mizuguchi S, Nakamura F, et al. Highly stretchable sensing array for independent detection of pressure and strain exploiting structural and resistive control. Sci Rep 2020;10:12666.
112. Paik S, Kim G, Chang S, et al. Near-field sub-diffraction photolithography with an elastomeric photomask. Nat Commun 2020;11:805.
113. Hwang W, Kim J, Park S, et al. A breathable and stretchable metastructure for a versatile hybrid electronic skin patch with long-term skin comfort. Adv Mater Technol 2023;8:2200477.
114. Lee Y, Lim S, Yi S, et al. Auxetic elastomers: mechanically programmable meta-elastomers with an unusual Poisson’s ratio overcome the gauge limit of a capacitive type strain sensor. Extreme Mech Lett 2019;31:100516.
115. Ha S, Kim J. Simple route to performance modulation of resistive strain sensor based on strain-engineered stretchable substrate with customized hard template. Compos Sci Technol 2022;217:109111.
116. Zhou X, Ren L, Song Z, et al. Advances in 3D/4D printing of mechanical metamaterials: from manufacturing to applications. Compos Part B Eng 2023;254:110585.
117. Pyo S, Park K. Mechanical metamaterials for sensor and actuator applications. Int J Pr Eng Man GT 2024;11:291-320.
118. Ling Y, Pang W, Liu J, et al. Bioinspired elastomer composites with programmed mechanical and electrical anisotropies. Nat Commun 2022;13:524.
119. Wu Z, Zhang S, Vorobyev A, et al. Seamless modulus gradient structures for highly resilient, stretchable system integration. Mater Today Phys 2018;4:28-35.
120. Hong SY, Lee YH, Park H, et al. Stretchable active matrix temperature sensor array of polyaniline nanofibers for electronic skin. Adv Mater 2016;28:930-5.
121. Keum K, Yang S, Kim KS, Park SK, Kim Y. Recent progress of stretchable displays: a comprehensive review of materials, device architectures, and applications. Soft Sci 2024;4:34.
122. Han K, Lee W, Kim Y, Kim J, Choi B, Park J. Mechanical durability of flexible/stretchable a-IGZO TFTs on PI island for wearable electronic application. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2021;3:5037-47.
123. Kang SH, Jo JW, Lee JM, et al. Full integration of highly stretchable inorganic transistors and circuits within molecular-tailored elastic substrates on a large scale. Nat Commun 2024;15:2814.
124. Shao Y, Yan J, Zhi Y, et al. A universal packaging substrate for mechanically stable assembly of stretchable electronics. Nat Commun 2024;15:6106.
125. Kim Y, Kim J, Kim CY, et al. A modulus-engineered multi-layer polymer film with mechanical robustness for the application to highly deformable substrate platform in stretchable electronics. Chem Eng J 2022;431:134074.
126. Sun B, Li Z, Song Z, et al. Gradient modulus strategy for alleviating stretchable electronic strain concentration. Adv Funct Mater 2024:2410676.
127. Zou S, Li Y, Gong Z. Shape-deformable micro-LEDs for advanced displays and healthcare. Soft Sci 2024;4:19.
128. Niu J, Bai X, Wang J, et al. Fully flexible all-in-one electronic display skin with seamless integration of microLED and hydrogel battery. Adv Funct Mater 2024:2411916.
129. Xuan T, Shi S, Wang L, Kuo HC, Xie RJ. Inkjet-printed quantum dot color conversion films for high-resolution and full-color micro light-emitting diode displays. J Phys Chem Lett 2020;11:5184-91.
130. Cinquino M, Prontera CT, Maggiore A, et al. Toward highly efficient solution-processable OLEDs: inkjet printing of TADF emissive layer. Adv Electron Mater 2024:2300358.
131. Hua Q, Shen G. Low-dimensional nanostructures for monolithic 3D-integrated flexible and stretchable electronics. Chem Soc Rev 2024;53:1316-53.
132. Zardetto V, Brown TM, Reale A, Di Carlo A. Substrates for flexible electronics: a practical investigation on the electrical, film flexibility, optical, temperature, and solvent resistance properties. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 2011;49:638-48.
133. Yin D, Jiang N, Chen Z, et al. Roller-assisted adhesion imprinting for high-throughput manufacturing of wearable and stretchable organic light-emitting devices. Adv Opt Mater 2020;8:1901525.
134. Wang Y, Cai Y, Zhang H, et al. Mechanical and thermal degradation behavior of high-performance PDMS elastomer based on epoxy/silicone hybrid network. Polymer 2021;236:124299.
135. Xie Z, Avila R, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Flexible and stretchable antennas for biointegrated electronics. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1902767.
136. Shih C, Lee W, Lu C, Wu H, Chen W. Enhancing the mechanical durability of an organic field effect transistor through a fluoroelastomer substrate with a crosslinking-induced self-wrinkled structure. Adv Electron Mater 2017;3:1600477.
137. Chen Z, Ji Z, Yin D, et al. Stretchable organic light-emitting devices with invisible orderly wrinkles by using a transfer-free technique. Adv Mater Technol 2022;7:2101263.
138. Oh JH, Park JW. Intrinsically stretchable phosphorescent light-emitting materials for stretchable displays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:33784-96.
139. Li XC, Yao L, Song W, et al. Intrinsically stretchable electroluminescent elastomers with self-confinement effect for highly efficient non-blended stretchable OLEDs. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2023;62:e202213749.
140. Jeong S, Yoon H, Lee B, Lee S, Hong Y. Distortion-free stretchable light-emitting diodes via imperceptible microwrinkles. Adv Mater Technol 2020;5:2000231.
141. Kim TH, Lee CS, Kim S, et al. Fully stretchable optoelectronic sensors based on colloidal quantum dots for sensing photoplethysmographic signals. ACS Nano 2017;11:5992-6003.
142. Yin D, Jiang NR, Liu YF, et al. Mechanically robust stretchable organic optoelectronic devices built using a simple and universal stencil-pattern transferring technology. Light Sci Appl 2018;7:35.
143. Jang B, Won S, Kim J, et al. Auxetic meta-display: stretchable display without image distortion. Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2113299.
144. Deng Y, Xu K, Jiao R, et al. Rotating square tessellations enabled stretchable and adaptive curved display. npj Flex Electron 2024;8:291.
145. Lee D, Kim SB, Kim T, et al. Stretchable OLEDs based on a hidden active area for high fill factor and resolution compensation. Nat Commun 2024;15:4349.
146. Ding Y, Xiong S, Sun L, et al. Metal nanowire-based transparent electrode for flexible and stretchable optoelectronic devices. Chem Soc Rev 2024;53:7784-827.
147. Chun F, Zhang B, Gao Y, et al. Multicolour stretchable perovskite electroluminescent devices for user-interactive displays. Nat Photon 2024;18:856-63.
148. Oh H, Hur J, Jeong S, et al. Mechanically anisotropic stretchable and transparent composite substrates for distortion-free display. Compos Part A Appl S 2024;185:108338.
149. Choi JC, Jeong HY, Sun JH, et al. Bidirectional zero Poisson’s ratio elastomers with self-deformable soft mechanical metamaterials for stretchable displays. Adv Funct Mater 2024:2406725.
150. Lee Y, Jang B, Song H, et al. A seamless auxetic substrate with a negative Poisson’s ratio of -1. Nat Commun 2024;15:7146.
151. Kim T, Lee H, Jo W, Kim T, Yoo S. Realizing stretchable OLEDs: a hybrid platform based on rigid island arrays on a stress-relieving bilayer structure. Adv Mater Technol 2020;5:2000494.
152. Han R, Li Y, Zhu Q, Niu K. Research on the preparation and thermal stability of silicone rubber composites: a review. Compos Part C Open 2022;8:100249.
Cite This Article
How to Cite
Lee, D. W.; Park, D. H.; Choi, J. C.; Chung, S. Strain-engineered stretchable substrates for free-form display applications. Soft Sci. 2024, 4, 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2024.36
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.