How human milk shapes the gut microbiota in preterm infants: potential for optimizing early-life microbial development
Abstract
Breast milk plays a crucial role in shaping the gut microbiota of preterm infants, with significant microbial sharing influenced by feeding practices and antibiotics, highlighting the benefits of direct breastfeeding for gut health.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Preterm very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants are at heightened risk of severe health complications due to their physiological underdevelopment, with immediate and long-term consequences[1,2]. The diversity of gut microbiota in VLBW infants is initially low but increases over time, with facultative anaerobic bacteria dominating in the early stages[3]. Factors such as gastrointestinal immaturity, delayed enteral feeding, limited breast milk intake, antibiotic use, and maternal separation contribute to dysbiosis[1,4]. Dysbiosis in early life in VLBW has been associated with sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and potential long-term effects on physical and behavioral development[5].
Traditionally viewed as a nutritional source, human milk is increasingly recognized for its role in shaping neonatal immune, neurological, metabolic and gut microbiota development[6]. Recently, Shama et al. addressed an important question: how does the maternal milk microbiota contribute to the assembly of the gut microbial community in VLBW infants, especially during the first months of life[7]? This study focused on microbial sharing between mother’s milk and infant stool in 94 mother-infant dyads and 422 milk-stool pairs. The dyads were part of the OptiMoM Fortifier Study (NCT02137473), a multi-center, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial[8]. Most infants received antibiotics (92.3%), 2/3 received enteral feeding, and 1/3 pasteurized donor human milk (PDMH) due to insufficient maternal milk volumes. Dose-response relationships between milk bacterial intake and infant gut colonization were quantified, highlighting the impact of feeding practices and antibiotics on these dynamics.
KEY FINDINGS AND ADVANCES
The study found significant microbial sharing (35%) between mother’s milk and the gut microbiota of VLBW infants[7]. This number is similar to breastfed term infants[9]. Moreover, breastfed infants had a higher probability of sharing a microbe with their mother, with breastfeeding enhancing microbial sharing compared to other feeding methods. Human milk showed greater microbial diversity than VLBW infant stool samples, correlating with their low gut microbial diversity[7].
The physical process of breastfeeding may expose infants to additional maternal microbes from the skin and milk ducts. The proportion of shared bacteria underscores the pivotal role of mother’s milk not only as a nutritional source but also as a microbial vector shaping gut microbiota. It challenges assumptions that the hospital environment or external factors predominantly shape microbial colonization in VLBW infants. These results advocate for promoting direct breastfeeding whenever feasible, even in the context of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), to optimize microbial transfer and, potentially, health outcomes.
Daily microbial intakes from milk were strongly associated with the bacterial concentrations observed in infant stool, demonstrating clear dose-response relationships[7]. Specific genera in milk, such as Streptococcus, were detected in higher concentrations in the gut when administered in larger quantities. This quantitative relationship highlights that microbial colonization in preterm infants is not random but is influenced by the specific bacterial composition and volume of milk intake.
Finally, the relationships between milk microbiota and gut colonization evolved over time and were significantly impacted by feeding practices and antibiotic exposure. Antibiotic exposure disrupted microbial sharing by reducing bacterial diversity, and direct breastfeeding was particularly beneficial in the earlier stages of hospitalization.
These results align with existing research showing that breast milk is a key source of microbial inoculation for the infant gut, particularly for Bifidobacterium spp., which dominates the gut microbiota of breastfed infants[10]. Previous studies have highlighted how dysbiosis in VLBW infants, driven by factors like antibiotic use and delayed enteral feeding, increases the risk of complications such as sepsis and NEC[4]. This study is also important because it quantifies microbial sharing and dose-response relationships, showing that specific bacterial genera in breast milk are associated with gut colonization patterns.
CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The study also highlights challenges and areas for future research. It is important to further verify vertical transmission beyond 16S rRNA sequencing. Future work should integrate culturomics or metagenomic data at strain level to capture a more holistic view of the maternal-infant microbiome relationships. Moreover, microbial taxa should be considered beyond taxonomy. While taxonomic data provide insights into microbial presence, functional studies are needed to understand how the activity of these microbes influences host health, immunity, and metabolism. Shared microbes belonged to different taxa. Analyzing microbes differentially enriched or depleted by human milk in VLBW infants might provide mechanistic insights into how breast milk shapes the microbiome in these infants.
Another aspect of consideration is the potential influence of delivery type in this intricate colonization process, although some studies argue against a high relevance[11]. Further, there could be differences in the chemical and microbial composition of preterm mothers’ milk, compared to term milk, which might influence this process[12]. Considering that human milk matures over time since pregnancy and before birth, these differences might shape microbial communities residing in the breast and arriving later at the gut of VLBW infants. Finally, it is up to see if this increased colonization has an actual beneficial impact on the preterm infant in the short or long term.
In addition, these findings could be used to understand antibiotic interference, and even counteract the detrimental effects of antibiotics on microbial sharing in VLBW infants, based on current feeding practices or probiotic supplementation. These findings could also help improve feeding strategies in NICUs, enhancing proper colonization of the gut microbiota in VLBW with clear health outcomes.
This research emphasizes the importance of breastfeeding support, particularly in clinical settings. Policies promoting direct breastfeeding and mitigating unnecessary antibiotic use could have profound implications for improving outcomes in VLBW populations. The discovery of microbial consortia dynamics suggests potential therapeutic avenues, such as engineering milk microbiota or designing microbial consortia for supplementation. These strategies could pave the way for novel interventions targeting neonatal dysbiosis.
Moreover, the observed disruptions caused by antibiotics and the protective potential of breastfeeding are consistent with findings from earlier research advocating for minimal antibiotic exposure and promoting maternal milk use to support healthy gut microbiota development[13]. The study’s emphasis on the dynamic nature of microbial interactions provides new insights that could inform personalized feeding strategies to mitigate health risks associated with prematurity.
CONCLUSION
This study provides compelling evidence that mother’s milk microbiota plays a critical role in shaping the gut microbiota of VLBW infants. By highlighting the significance of microbial sharing, dose-response relationships, and community-level interactions, it advances our understanding of how maternal milk contributes to early-life microbial colonization. The findings underscore the need to prioritize direct breastfeeding and develop targeted strategies to optimize microbial health in preterm infants, with the potential for long-term health benefits.
As we continue to unravel the complexities of the maternal-infant microbiome, this research lays the foundation for novel approaches to neonatal care and microbial therapeutics. This study provides a framework for understanding how mother’s milk can mitigate these disruptions by acting as a natural reservoir of beneficial microbes. It also supports the concept that early microbial interventions could have long-lasting effects on the health trajectory of VLBW infants, particularly in reducing the risk of NEC and sepsis.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Wrote the article: Garrido D
Edited the article: Thomson P
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
Garrido D is a Junior Editorial Board member of the journal Microbiome Research Reports. Garrido D was not involved in any steps of editorial processing, notably including reviewers’ selection, manuscript handling, and decision making. Another author declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
REFERENCES
1. Chiang MC. Therapeutic trajectory for improving survival and outcomes of very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants. Pediatr Neonatol 2023;64:493-4.
2. Groer MW, Luciano AA, Dishaw LJ, Ashmeade TL, Miller E, Gilbert JA. Development of the preterm infant gut microbiome: a research priority. Microbiome 2014;2:38.
3. Yee AL, Miller E, Dishaw LJ, et al. Longitudinal microbiome composition and stability correlate with increased weight and length of very-low-birth-weight infants. mSystems 2019;4:e00229-18.
4. Lee CC, Feng Y, Yeh YM, et al. Gut dysbiosis, bacterial colonization and translocation, and neonatal sepsis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. Front Microbiol 2021;12:746111.
5. Elgin TG, Kern SL, McElroy SJ. Development of the neonatal intestinal microbiome and its association with necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Ther 2016;38:706-15.
6. Ames SR, Lotoski LC, Azad MB. Comparing early life nutritional sources and human milk feeding practices: personalized and dynamic nutrition supports infant gut microbiome development and immune system maturation. Gut Microbes 2023;15:2190305.
7. Shama S, Asbury MR, Kiss A, et al; OptiMoM Feeding Group. Mother’s milk microbiota is associated with the developing gut microbial consortia in very-low-birth-weight infants. Cell Rep Med 2024;5:101729.
8. O’Connor DL, Kiss A, Tomlinson C, et al. OptiMoM Feeding Group. Nutrient enrichment of human milk with human and bovine milk-based fortifiers for infants born weighing <1250 g: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2018;108:108-16.
9. Bogaert D, van Beveren GJ, de Koff EM, et al. Mother-to-infant microbiota transmission and infant microbiota development across multiple body sites. Cell Host Microbe 2023;31:447-60.e6.
10. Murphy K, Curley D, O’Callaghan TF, et al. The composition of human milk and infant faecal microbiota over the first three months of life: a pilot study. Sci Rep 2017;7:40597.
11. Butcher J, Unger S, Li J, et al. Independent of birth mode or gestational age, very-low-birth-weight infants fed their mothers’ milk rapidly develop personalized microbiotas low in Bifidobacterium. J Nutr 2018;148:326-35.
12. Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and term breast milk. BMC Pediatr 2014;14:216.
Cite This Article
How to Cite
Thomson, P.; Garrido, D. How human milk shapes the gut microbiota in preterm infants: potential for optimizing early-life microbial development. Microbiome. Res. Rep. 2025, 4, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.86
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.