REFERENCES
1. Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr 1995;125:1401-12.
2. Swanson KS, Gibson GR, Hutkins R, et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of synbiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;17:687-701.
3. Teo YQJ, Chong B, Soong RY, Yong CL, Chew NW, Chew HSJ. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on anthropometric, cardiometabolic and inflammatory markers: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Clin Nutr 2024;43:1563-83.
4. Santacroce L, Topi S, Bottalico L, Charitos IA, Jirillo E. Current knowledge about gastric microbiota with special emphasis on helicobacter pylori-related gastric conditions. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024;46:4991-5009.
5. Chang YS, Trivedi MK, Jha A, Lin YF, Dimaano L, García-Romero MT. Synbiotics for prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170:236-42.
6. Liu L, Li P, Liu Y, Zhang Y. Efficacy of probiotics and synbiotics in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:3402-12.
7. Moreira MM, Carriço M, Capelas ML, et al. The impact of pre-, pro- and synbiotics supplementation in colorectal cancer treatment: a systematic review. Front Oncol 2024;14:1395966.
8. Panigrahi P, Parida S, Nanda NC, et al. A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India. Nature 2017;548:407-12.
9. Panigrahi P, Parida S, Pradhan L, et al. Long-term colonization of a Lactobacillus plantarum synbiotic preparation in the neonatal gut. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008;47:45-53.
10. Buntin N, Hongpattarakere T, Ritari J, et al. An inducible operon is involved in inulin utilization in Lactobacillus plantarum strains, as revealed by comparative proteogenomics and metabolic profiling. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:e02402-16.
11. Fuhren J, Nijland R, Wels M, Boekhorst J, Kleerebezem M. Complete closed genome sequence of the inulin-utilizing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain Lp900, obtained using a hybrid nanopore and illumina assembly. Microbiol Resour Announc 2021;10:e00185-21.
12. Fuhren J, Schwalbe M, Rösch C, et al. Dietary inulin increases Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain Lp900 persistence in rats depending on the dietary-calcium level. Appl Environ Microbiol 2021;87:e00122-21.
13. Saulnier DM, Molenaar D, de Vos WM, Gibson GR, Kolida S. Identification of prebiotic fructooligosaccharide metabolism in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 through microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:1753-65.
14. Fidanza M, Panigrahi P, Kollmann TR. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum - nomad and ideal probiotic. Front Microbiol 2021;12:712236.
15. Nordström EA, Teixeira C, Montelius C, Jeppsson B, Larsson N. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v (LP299V®): three decades of research. Benef Microbes 2021;12:441-65.
16. Seddik HA, Bendali F, Gancel F, Fliss I, Spano G, Drider D. Lactobacillus plantarum and its probiotic and food potentialities. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2017;9:111-22.
17. van den Nieuwboer M, van Hemert S, Claassen E, de Vos WM. Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 and its host interaction: a dozen years after the genome. Microb Biotechnol 2016;9:452-65.
18. Siezen RJ, Tzeneva VA, Castioni A, et al. Phenotypic and genomic diversity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from various environmental niches. Environ Microbiol 2010;12:758-73.
19. Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:1990-5.
20. Boekhorst J, Wels M, Kleerebezem M, Siezen RJ. The predicted secretome of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 sheds light on interactions with its environment. Microbiology 2006;152:3175-83.
21. Kleerebezem M, Hols P, Bernard E, et al. The extracellular biology of the lactobacilli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2010;34:199-230.
22. Teusink B, Wiersma A, Molenaar D, et al. Analysis of growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a complex medium using a genome-scale metabolic model. J Biol Chem 2006;281:40041-8.
23. Wels M, Overmars L, Francke C, Kleerebezem M, Siezen RJ. Reconstruction of the regulatory network of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on basis of correlated gene expression and conserved regulatory motifs. Microb Biotechnol 2011;4:333-44.
24. Lee IC, Tomita S, Kleerebezem M, Bron PA. The quest for probiotic effector molecules - unraveling strain specificity at the molecular level. Pharmacol Res 2013;69:61-74.
25. Martino ME, Bayjanov JR, Caffrey BE, et al. Nomadic lifestyle of Lactobacillus plantarum revealed by comparative genomics of 54 strains isolated from different habitats. Environ Microbiol 2016;18:4974-89.
26. Rajput A, Chauhan SM, Mohite OS, et al. Pangenome analysis reveals the genetic basis for taxonomic classification of the Lactobacillaceae family. Food Microbiol 2023;115:104334.
27. Duar RM, Lin XB, Zheng J, et al. Lifestyles in transition: evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017;41:S27-48.
28. Molenaar D, Bringel F, Schuren FH, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ, Kleerebezem M. Exploring Lactobacillus plantarum genome diversity by using microarrays. J Bacteriol 2005;187:6119-27.
29. Fuhren J, Rösch C, Ten Napel M, Schols HA, Kleerebezem M. Synbiotic matchmaking in Lactobacillus plantarum: substrate screening and gene-trait matching to characterize strain-specific carbohydrate utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020;86:e01081-20.
30. Logtenberg MJ, Akkerman R, Hobé RG, et al. Structure-specific fermentation of galacto-oligosaccharides, isomalto-oligosaccharides and isomalto/malto-polysaccharides by infant fecal microbiota and impact on dendritic cell cytokine responses. Mol Nutr Food Res 2021;65:e2001077.
31. Logtenberg MJ, Donners KMH, Vink JCM, et al. Touching the high complexity of prebiotic vivinal galacto-oligosaccharides using porous graphitic carbon ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 2020;68:7800-8.
32. Fuhren J, Schwalbe M, Peralta-Marzal L, Rösch C, Schols HA, Kleerebezem M. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of differential galacto-oligosaccharide utilization in Lactobacillus plantarum. Sci Rep 2020;10:21657.
33. Bovee-Oudenhoven IM, Wissink ML, Wouters JT, Van der Meer R. Dietary calcium phosphate stimulates intestinal lactobacilli and decreases the severity of a salmonella infection in rats. J Nutr 1999;129:607-12.
34. Govers MJ, Termont DS, Lapre JA, Kleibeuker JH, Vonk RJ, Van der Meer R. Calcium in milk products precipitates intestinal fatty acids and secondary bile acids and thus inhibits colonic cytotoxicity in humans. Cancer Res 1996;56:3270-5.
35. Govers MJ, Van der Meet R. Effects of dietary calcium and phosphate on the intestinal interactions between calcium, phosphate, fatty acids, and bile acids. Gut 1993;34:365-70.
36. Begley M, Gahan CG, Hill C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005;29:625-51.
37. Bachmann H, Bruggeman FJ, Molenaar D, Branco Dos Santos F, Teusink B. Public goods and metabolic strategies. Curr Opin Microbiol 2016;31:109-15.
38. Cordero OX, Ventouras LA, DeLong EF, Polz MF. Public good dynamics drive evolution of iron acquisition strategies in natural bacterioplankton populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:20059-64.
39. Gore J, Youk H, van Oudenaarden A. Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature 2009;459:253-6.
40. Kümmerli R, Santorelli LA, Granato ET, et al. Co-evolutionary dynamics between public good producers and cheats in the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Evol Biol 2015;28:2264-74.
41. Fuhren J, Schwalbe M, Boekhorst J, Rösch C, Schols HA, Kleerebezem M. Prebiotic utilisation provides Lactiplantibacillus plantarum a competitive advantage in vitro, but is not reflected by an increased intestinal fitness. Gut Microbes 2024;16:2338946.
42. van Bokhorst-van de Veen H, van Swam I, Wels M, Bron PA, Kleerebezem M. Congruent strain specific intestinal persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum in an intestine-mimicking in vitro system and in human volunteers. PLoS One 2012;7:e44588.
43. Fuhren J, Schwalbe M, Boekhorst J, Rösch C, Schols HA, Kleerebezem M. Dietary calcium phosphate strongly impacts gut microbiome changes elicited by inulin and galacto-oligosaccharides consumption. Microbiome 2021;9:218.
44. Garrido D, Ruiz-Moyano S, Jimenez-Espinoza R, Eom HJ, Block DE, Mills DA. Utilization of galactooligosaccharides by Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis isolates. Food Microbiol 2013;33:262-70.
45. Motherway MOC, Kinsella M, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D. Transcriptional and functional characterization of genetic elements involved in galacto-oligosaccharide utilization by Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003. Microb Biotechnol 2013;6:67-79.
46. Rossi M, Corradini C, Amaretti A, et al. Fermentation of fructooligosaccharides and inulin by bifidobacteria: a comparative study of pure and fecal cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:6150-8.
47. Viborg AH, Katayama T, Abou Hachem M, et al. Distinct substrate specificities of three glycoside hydrolase family 42
48. Lammens W, Le Roy K, Schroeven L, Van Laere A, Rabijns A, Van den Ende W. Structural insights into glycoside hydrolase family 32 and 68 enzymes: functional implications. J Exp Bot 2009;60:727-40.
49. Honda H, Nagaoka S, Kawai Y, et al. Purification and characterization of two phospho-β-galactosidases, LacG1 and LacG2, from Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC33323(T). J Gen Appl Microbiol 2012;58:11-7.
50. Maathuis AJH, van den Heuvel EG, Schoterman MHC, Venema K. Galacto-oligosaccharides have prebiotic activity in a dynamic in vitro colon model using a 13C-labeling technique. J Nutr 2012;142:1205-12.
51. Rattanaprasert M, van Pijkeren JP, Ramer-Tait AE, et al. Genes involved in galactooligosaccharide metabolism in lactobacillus reuteri and their ecological role in the gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019;85:e01788-19.
52. Elison E, Vigsnaes LK, Rindom Krogsgaard L, et al. Oral supplementation of healthy adults with 2’-O-fucosyllactose and lacto-N-neotetraose is well tolerated and shifts the intestinal microbiota. Br J Nutr 2016;116:1356-68.
53. Van Bokhorst-van de Veen HB PA, Kleerebezem, M. Improving the digestive tract robustness of probiotic lactobaclli. In: Venema K, do Carmo AP, editors. Probiotics and prebiotics: current research and future trends. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press; 2015. pp. 195-203.
54. Lordan C, Thapa D, Ross RP, Cotter PD. Potential for enriching next-generation health-promoting gut bacteria through prebiotics and other dietary components. Gut Microbes 2020;11:1-20.
55. Rossi O, Khan MT, Schwarzer M, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strain HTF-F and its extracellular polymeric matrix attenuate clinical parameters in DSS-induced colitis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0123013.
56. Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:16731-6.
57. Louis P, Flint HJ. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009;294:1-8.
58. Canani RB, Costanzo MD, Leone L, Pedata M, Meli R, Calignano A. Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1519-28.
59. Fitzgerald CB, Shkoporov AN, Sutton TDS, et al. Comparative analysis of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii genomes shows a high level of genome plasticity and warrants separation into new species-level taxa. BMC Genomics 2018;19:931.
60. Martín R, Miquel S, Benevides L, et al. Functional characterization of novel Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains isolated from healthy volunteers: a step forward in the use of F. prausnitzii as a next-generation probiotic. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1226.
61. Dewulf EM, Cani PD, Claus SP, et al. Insight into the prebiotic concept: lessons from an exploratory, double blind intervention study with inulin-type fructans in obese women. Gut 2013;62:1112-21.
62. Ramirez-Farias C, Slezak K, Fuller Z, Duncan A, Holtrop G, Louis P. Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Br J Nutr 2009;101:541-50.
63. Scott KP, Martin JC, Duncan SH, Flint HJ. Prebiotic stimulation of human colonic butyrate-producing bacteria and bifidobacteria, in vitro. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2014;87:30-40.
64. Davis LM, Martínez I, Walter J, Goin C, Hutkins RW. Barcoded pyrosequencing reveals that consumption of galactooligosaccharides results in a highly specific bifidogenic response in humans. PLoS One 2011;6:e25200.
65. Nyangale EP, Farmer S, Keller D, Chernoff D, Gibson GR. Effect of prebiotics on the fecal microbiota of elderly volunteers after dietary supplementation of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086. Anaerobe 2014;30:75-81.
