REFERENCES
1. Xue J, Qin C, Wu C. 3D printing of cell-delivery scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Regen Biomater 2023;10:rbad032.
2. Bittner SM, Guo JL, Melchiorri A, Mikos AG. Three-dimensional printing of multilayered tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Today 2018;21:861-74.
3. Li T, Chang J, Zhu Y, Wu C. 3D printing of bioinspired biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2020;9:e2000208.
4. Zhou Y, Wu C, Chang J. Bioceramics to regulate stem cells and their microenvironment for tissue regeneration. Mater Today 2019;24:41-56.
5. Gatto ML, Cerqueni G, Groppo R, et al. Improved biomechanical behavior of 316L graded scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration produced by laser powder bed fusion. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023;144:105989.
6. Liu J, Xu C, Xu Y, et al. Bioinspired scaffolds with hierarchical structures for tailored mechanical behaviour and cell migration. Ceram Int 2020;46:24102-9.
7. Zhang H, Huang H, Hao G, et al. 3D Printing Hydrogel Scaffolds with nanohydroxyapatite gradient to effectively repair osteochondral defects in rats. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2006697.
8. Apsite I, Stoychev G, Zhang W, Jehnichen D, Xie J, Ionov L. Porous stimuli-responsive self-folding electrospun mats for 4D biofabrication. Biomacromolecules 2017;18:3178-84.
9. Chen Z, Bachhuka A, Han S, et al. Tuning chemistry and topography of nanoengineered surfaces to manipulate immune response for bone regeneration applications. ACS Nano 2017;11:4494-506.
10. Servatan M, Zarrintaj P, Mahmodi G, et al. Zeolites in drug delivery: progress, challenges and opportunities. Drug Discov Today 2020;25:642-56.
11. Carotenuto F, Politi S, Ul Haq A, et al. From soft to hard biomimetic materials: tuning micro/nano-architecture of scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Micromachines 2022;13:780.
12. Xiang Y, Lu L, Kottapalli AGP, Pei Y. Status and perspectives of hierarchical porous carbon materials in terms of high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon Energy 2022;4:346-98.
13. Nowicki MA, Castro NJ, Plesniak MW, Zhang LG. 3D printing of novel osteochondral scaffolds with graded microstructure. Nanotechnology 2016;27:414001.
14. Bertsch C, Maréchal H, Gribova V, et al. Biomimetic bilayered scaffolds for tissue engineering: from current design strategies to medical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 2023;12:e2203115.
15. Hayashi K, Kishida R, Tsuchiya A, Ishikawa K. Superiority of triply periodic minimal surface gyroid structure to strut-based grid structure in both strength and bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:34570-7.
16. Wang W, Xiong Y, Zhao R, Li X, Jia W. A novel hierarchical biofunctionalized 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffold with enhanced osteoporotic osseointegration through osteoimmunomodulation. J Nanobiotechnology 2022;20:68.
17. Lee H, Kim G. Enhanced cellular activities of polycaprolactone/alginate-based cell-laden hierarchical scaffolds for hard tissue engineering applications. J Colloid Interface Sci 2014;430:315-25.
18. Xu Y, Cui W, Zhang Y, et al. Hierarchical micro/nanofibrous bioscaffolds for structural tissue regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2017;6:1601457.
19. Norzain NA, Lin W. Fibroblast cell responses to physical cues of the triangular prism micropattern and aligned nanofibrous scaffold for promoting wound closure. Mater Des 2022;220:110864.
20. Liu Y, Yang S, Cao L, Zhang X, Wang J, Liu C. Facilitated vascularization and enhanced bone regeneration by manipulation hierarchical pore structure of scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 2020;110:110622.
21. Ribeiro VP, Pina S, Costa JB, et al. Enzymatically cross-linked silk fibroin-based hierarchical scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:3781-99.
22. Hu Y, Wang J, Li X, et al. Facile preparation of bioactive nanoparticle/poly(ε-caprolactone) hierarchical porous scaffolds via 3D printing of high internal phase Pickering emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 2019;545:104-15.
23. Xie X, Cai J, Yao Y, et al. A woven scaffold with continuous mineral gradients for tendon-to-bone tissue engineering. Compos B Eng 2021;212:108679.
24. Sun T, Zhu Y, Chen F, et al. Ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires/collagen scaffolds with hierarchical porous structure, enhanced mechanical properties and excellent cellular attachment. Ceram Int 2017;43:15747-54.
25. Chen Y, Guo C, Manousiouthakis E, et al. Bi-layered tubular microfiber scaffolds as functional templates for engineering human intestinal smooth muscle tissue. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:2000543.
26. Guzzi EA, Tibbitt MW. Additive manufacturing of precision biomaterials. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1901994.
27. Boydston AJ, Cao B, Nelson A, et al. Additive manufacturing with stimuli-responsive materials. J Mater Chem A 2018;6:20621-45.
28. Zhang L, Wang B, Song B, et al. 3D printed biomimetic metamaterials with graded porosity and tapering topology for improved cell seeding and bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 2023;25:677-88.
29. Liang Z, Pei Y, Chen C, et al. General, vertical, three-dimensional printing of two-dimensional materials with multiscale alignment. ACS Nano 2019;13:12653-61.
30. Feng C, Zhang W, Deng C, et al. 3D printing of lotus root-like biomimetic materials for cell delivery and tissue regeneration. Adv Sci 2017;4:1700401.
31. Yang Z, Xue J, Li T, et al. 3D printing of sponge spicules-inspired flexible bioceramic-based scaffolds. Biofabrication 2022;14:035009.
32. Dong C, Wei H, Zhang X, et al. 3D printed hydrogel/wesselsite-PCL composite scaffold with structural change from core/shell fibers to microchannels for enhanced bone regeneration. Compos B Eng 2022;246:110264.
33. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 2017;117:10212-90.
34. Zhang B, Gui X, Song P, et al. Three-dimensional printing of large-scale, high-resolution bioceramics with micronano inner porosity and customized surface characterization design for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022;14:8804-15.
35. Zhu H, Li M, Huang X, et al. 3D printed tricalcium phosphate-bioglass scaffold with gyroid structure enhance bone ingrowth in challenging bone defect treatment. Appl Mater Today 2021;25:101166.
36. Zhang H, Zhang H, Xiong Y, Dong L, Li X. Development of hierarchical porous bioceramic scaffolds with controlled micro/nano surface topography for accelerating bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 2021;130:112437.
37. He P, Zhao J, Zhang J, et al. Bioprinting of skin constructs for wound healing. Burns Trauma 2018;6:5.
38. Zhou F, Hong Y, Liang R, et al. Rapid printing of bio-inspired 3D tissue constructs for skin regeneration. Biomaterials 2020;258:120287.
39. Hwangbo H, Lee H, Jin EJ, et al. Bio-printing of aligned GelMa-based cell-laden structure for muscle tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater 2022;8:57-70.
40. Chakraborty J, Fernández-Pérez J, van Kampen KA, et al. Development of a biomimetic arch-like 3D bioprinted construct for cartilage regeneration using gelatin methacryloyl and silk fibroin-gelatin bioinks. Biofabrication 2023;15:035009.
41. Zulkifli MZA, Nordin D, Shaari N, Kamarudin SK. Overview of electrospinning for tissue engineering applications. Polymers 2023;15:2418.
42. Liu Y, Guo Q, Zhang X, Wang Y, Mo X, Wu T. Progress in electrospun fibers for manipulating cell behaviors. Adv Fiber Mater 2023;5:1241-72.
43. Xie X, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. Electrospinning nanofiber scaffolds for soft and hard tissue regeneration. J Mater Sci Technol 2020;59:243-61.
44. He FL, Li DW, He J, et al. A novel layer-structured scaffold with large pore sizes suitable for 3D cell culture prepared by near-field electrospinning. Mater Sci Eng C 2018;86:18-27.
45. Gan Z, Zhao Y, Wu Y, Yang W, Zhao Z, Zhao L. Three-dimensional, biomimetic electrospun scaffolds reinforced with carbon nanotubes for temporomandibular joint disc regeneration. Acta Biomater 2022;147:221-34.
46. Han F, Yu Q, Chu G, et al. Multifunctional nanofibrous scaffolds with angle-ply microstructure and co-delivery capacity promote partial repair and total replacement of intervertebral disc. Adv Healthc Mater 2022;11:e2200895.
47. Pal P, Srivas PK, Dadhich P, Das B, Maulik D, Dhara S. Nano-/Microfibrous cotton-wool-like 3D scaffold with core-shell architecture by emulsion electrospinning for skin tissue regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017;3:3563-75.
48. Wang Z, Wang H, Xiong J, et al. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of PCL/gelatin hierarchical scaffolds based on melt electrospinning writing and solution electrospinning for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 2021;128:112287.
49. Liu S, Wang Z, Chen X, et al. Multiscale anisotropic scaffold integrating 3D printing and electrospinning techniques as a heart-on-a-chip platform for evaluating drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Adv Healthc Mater 2023;12:e2300719.
50. Lee HS, Jeon EY, Nam JJ, et al. Development of a regenerative porous PLCL nerve guidance conduit with swellable hydrogel-based microgrooved surface pattern via 3D printing. Acta Biomater 2022;141:219-32.
51. Zheng T, Wu L, Xu J, et al. YR/DFO@DCNT functionalized anisotropic micro/nano composite topography scaffolds for accelerating long-distance peripheral nerve regeneration. Compos B Eng 2022;246:110242.
52. Zheng Y, Wu J, Zhu Y, Wu C. Inorganic-based biomaterials for rapid hemostasis and wound healing. Chem Sci 2022;14:29-53.
53. Wegst UG, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO. Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 2015;14:23-36.
54. Shao G, Hanaor DAH, Shen X, Gurlo A. Freeze casting: from low-dimensional building blocks to aligned porous structures-a review of novel materials, methods, and applications. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1907176.
55. Nelson I, Naleway SE. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of freeze casting. J Mater Res Technol 2019;8:2372-85.
56. Nelson M, Li S, Page SJ, et al. 3D printed silica-gelatin hybrid scaffolds of specific channel sizes promote collagen Type II, Sox9 and aggrecan production from chondrocytes. Mater Sci Eng C 2021;123:111964.
57. Li G, Xue C, Wang H, et al. Spatially featured porous chitosan conduits with micropatterned inner wall and seamless sidewall for bridging peripheral nerve regeneration. Carbohydr Polym 2018;194:225-35.
58. Feng Y, Gao H, Wu D, et al. Biomimetic lamellar chitosan scaffold for soft gingival tissue regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2105348.
59. Deng C, Lin R, Zhang M, et al. Micro/Nanometer-structured scaffolds for regeneration of both cartilage and subchondral bone. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1806068.
60. Yin J, Zhong J, Wang J, et al. 3D-printed high-density polyethylene scaffolds with bioactive and antibacterial layer-by-layer modification for auricle reconstruction. Mater Today Bio 2022;16:100361.
61. Song P, Hu C, Pei X, et al. Dual modulation of crystallinity and macro-/microstructures of 3D printed porous titanium implants to enhance stability and osseointegration. J Mater Chem B 2019;7:2865-77.
62. Chai N, Zhang J, Zhang Q, et al. Construction of 3D printed constructs based on microfluidic microgel for bone regeneration. Compos B Eng 2021;223:109100.
63. Xu H, Lv F, Zhang Y, et al. Hierarchically micro-patterned nanofibrous scaffolds with a nanosized bio-glass surface for accelerating wound healing. Nanoscale 2015;7:18446-52.
64. Li T, Zhai D, Ma B, et al. 3D printing of hot dog-like biomaterials with hierarchical architecture and distinct bioactivity. Adv Sci 2019;6:1901146.
65. Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KW, Liu C, Yang X. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 2014;80:1-36.
66. Li Y, Jahr H, Pavanram P, et al. Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous iron. Acta Biomater 2019;96:646-61.
67. Yu X, Hu Y, Zou L, et al. A bilayered scaffold with segregated hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity enables reconstruction of goat hierarchical temporomandibular joint condyle cartilage. Acta Biomater 2021;121:288-302.
68. Yang Y, Li X, Chu M, et al. Electrically assisted 3D printing of nacre-inspired structures with self-sensing capability. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaau9490.
69. Tabard L, Garnier V, Prud’homme E, et al. Robocasting of highly porous ceramics scaffolds with hierarchized porosity. Addit Manuf 2021;38:101776.
70. Zhang M, Lin R, Wang X, et al. 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration. Sci Adv 2020;6:eaaz6725.
71. Jia G, Huang H, Niu J, et al. Exploring the interconnectivity of biomimetic hierarchical porous Mg scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: effects of pore size distribution on mechanical properties, degradation behavior and cell migration ability. J Magnes Alloy 2021;9:1954-66.
72. Zhang Q, Ma L, Ji X, et al. High-strength hydroxyapatite scaffolds with minimal surface macrostructures for load-bearing bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2204182.
73. Meng C, Tang D, Liu X, et al. Heterogeneous porous PLLA/PCL fibrous scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 2023;235:123781.
74. Nitti P, Palazzo B, Gallo N, Scalera F, Sannino A, Gervaso F. Smooth-rough asymmetric PLGA structure made of dip coating membrane and electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds meant to be used for guided tissue regeneration of periodontium. Polym Eng Sci 2022;62:2061-9.
75. Fan Z, Liu H, Ding Z, Xiao L, Lu Q, Kaplan DL. Simulation of cortical and cancellous bone to accelerate tissue regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2301839.
76. Li T, Ma Z, Zhang Y, et al. Regeneration of humeral head using a 3D bioprinted anisotropic scaffold with dual modulation of endochondral ossification. Adv Sci 2023;10:e2205059.
77. Wang Y, Liu F, Wang N, et al. Bioinspired stretchable helical nanofiber yarn scaffold for locomotive tissue dynamic regeneration. Matter 2022;5:4480-501.
78. No YJ, Castilho M, Ramaswamy Y, Zreiqat H. Role of biomaterials and controlled architecture on tendon/ligament repair and regeneration. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1904511.
79. Xie X, Xu J, Lin J, et al. A regeneration process-matching scaffold with appropriate dynamic mechanical properties and spatial adaptability for ligament reconstruction. Bioact Mater 2022;13:82-95.
80. Arun Y, Ghosh R, Domb AJ. Biodegradable hydrophobic injectable polymers for drug delivery and regenerative medicine. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2010284.
81. Ma C, Jing Y, Sun H, Liu X. Hierarchical nanofibrous microspheres with controlled growth factor delivery for bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2015;4:2699-708.
82. Xu C, Wu F, Yang J, et al. 3D printed long-term structurally stable bioceramic dome scaffolds with controllable biodegradation favorable for guided bone regeneration. Chem Eng J 2022;450:138003.
83. Cai P, Lu S, Yu J, et al. Injectable nanofiber-reinforced bone cement with controlled biodegradability for minimally-invasive bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 2023;21:267-83.
84. Sun Y, You Y, Jiang W, Wang B, Wu Q, Dai K. 3D bioprinting dual-factor releasing and gradient-structured constructs ready to implant for anisotropic cartilage regeneration. Sci Adv 2020;6:eaay1422.
85. Kim JA, Lim J, Naren R, Yun HS, Park EK. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo. Acta Biomater 2016;44:155-67.
86. Shi X, Nommeots-nomm A, Todd NM, et al. Bioactive glass scaffold architectures regulate patterning of bone regeneration in vivo. Appl Mater Today 2020;20:100770.
87. Li Y, Li J, Jiang S, et al. The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Mater Today Bio 2023;20:100667.
88. Cao G, He W, Fan Y, Li X. Exploring the match between the degradation of the ECM-based composites and tissue remodeling in a full-thickness abdominal wall defect model. Biomater Sci 2021;9:7895-910.
89. Vatankhah E, Prabhakaran MP, Ramakrishna S. Biomimetic microenvironment complexity to redress the balance between biodegradation and de novo matrix synthesis during early phase of vascular tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 2017;81:39-47.
90. Dou Y, Huang J, Xia X, et al. A hierarchical scaffold with a highly pore-interconnective 3D printed PLGA/n-HA framework and an extracellular matrix like gelatin network filler for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B 2021;9:4488-501.
91. Wang C, Lai J, Li K, et al. Cryogenic 3D printing of dual-delivery scaffolds for improved bone regeneration with enhanced vascularization. Bioact Mater 2021;6:137-45.
92. Zhou X, Qian Y, Chen L, et al. Flowerbed-inspired biomimetic scaffold with rapid internal tissue infiltration and vascularization capacity for bone repair. ACS Nano 2023;17:5140-56.
93. Wang Y, Ling C, Chen J, et al. 3D-printed composite scaffold with gradient structure and programmed biomolecule delivery to guide stem cell behavior for osteochondral regeneration. Biomater Adv 2022;140:213067.
94. Wu L, Li J, Wang Y, et al. Engineered hierarchical microdevices enable pre-programmed controlled release for postsurgical and unresectable cancer treatment. Adv Mater 2023;35:e2305529.
95. Xue J, Ma H, Song E, et al. Bamboo-based biomaterials for cell transportation and bone integration. Adv Healthc Mater 2022;11:e2200287.
96. Shen Y, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Bilayer silk fibroin/sodium alginate scaffold promotes vascularization and advances inflammation stage in full-thickness wound. Biofabrication 2022;14:035016.
97. Patel A, Mukundan S, Wang W, et al. Carbon-based hierarchical scaffolds for myoblast differentiation: synergy between nano-functionalization and alignment. Acta Biomater 2016;32:77-88.
98. Ul Haq A, Carotenuto F, De Matteis F, et al. Intrinsically conductive polymers for striated cardiac muscle repair. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:8550.
99. Diedkova K, Pogrebnjak AD, Kyrylenko S, et al. Polycaprolactone-MXene nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:14033-47.
100. Ermis M, Antmen E, Hasirci V. Micro and nanofabrication methods to control cell-substrate interactions and cell behavior: a review from the tissue engineering perspective. Bioact Mater 2018;3:355-69.
101. Werner M, Blanquer SB, Haimi SP, et al. Surface curvature differentially regulates stem cell migration and differentiation via altered attachment morphology and nuclear deformation. Adv Sci 2017;4:1600347.
102. Wu L, Zhou C, Zhang B, et al. Construction of biomimetic natural wood hierarchical porous-structure bioceramic with micro/nanowhisker coating to modulate cellular behavior and osteoinductive activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020;12:48395-407.
103. Zarrintaj P, Mahmodi G, Manouchehri S, et al. Zeolite in tissue engineering: opportunities and challenges. MedComm 2020;1:5-34.
104. Zhang R, Han S, Ren N, et al. Topographical regulation of stem cell differentiation by plant-derived micro/nanostructures. Nanoscale 2020;12:18305-12.
105. Xia D, Wang Y, Wu R, et al. The effect of pore size on cell behavior in mesoporous bioglass scaffolds for bone regeneration. Appl Mater Today 2022;29:101607.
106. Xie W, Ouyang R, Wang H, Zhou C. Construction and biocompatibility of three-dimensional composite polyurethane scaffolds in liquid crystal state. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2020;6:2312-22.
107. Hou Y, Xie W, Yu L, et al. Surface roughness gradients reveal topography-specific mechanosensitive responses in human mesenchymal stem cells. Small 2020;16:e1905422.
108. Lu K, Qian Y, Gong J, et al. Biofabrication of aligned structures that guide cell orientation and applications in tissue engineering. Bio-des Manuf 2021;4:258-77.
109. Yeo M, Kim GH. Anisotropically aligned cell-laden nanofibrous bundle fabricated via cell electrospinning to regenerate skeletal muscle tissue. Small 2018;14:e1803491.
110. Razali NA, Lin WC, Norzain NA, Yu ZW. Controlling cell elongation and orientation by using microstructural nanofibre scaffolds for accelerating tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 2021;128:112321.
111. Yu M, Luo D, Qiao J, et al. A hierarchical bilayer architecture for complex tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater 2022;10:93-106.
112. Okeyo KO, Kibe Y, Adachi T. Controlling macroscale cell alignment in self-organized cell sheets by tuning the microstructure of adhesion-limiting micromesh scaffolds. Mater Today Adv 2021;12:100194.
113. Feng B, Zhang M, Qin C, et al. 3D printing of conch-like scaffolds for guiding cell migration and directional bone growth. Bioact Mater 2023;22:127-40.
114. Yang D, Zhao Z, Bai F, Wang S, Tomsia AP, Bai H. Promoting cell migration in tissue engineering scaffolds with graded channels. Adv Healthc Mater 2017:6.
115. Bai H, Wang D, Delattre B, et al. Biomimetic gradient scaffold from ice-templating for self-seeding of cells with capillary effect. Acta Biomater 2015;20:113-9.
116. Feng X, Xu P, Shen T, Zhang Y, Ye J, Gao C. Influence of pore architectures of silk fibroin/collagen composite scaffolds on the regeneration of osteochondral defects in vivo. J Mater Chem B 2020;8:391-405.
117. Wang K, Man K, Liu J, Meckes B, Yang Y. Dissecting physical and biochemical effects in nanotopographical regulation of cell behavior. ACS Nano 2023;17:2124-33.
118. Yang C, Wang X, Ma B, et al. 3D-printed bioactive Ca3SiO5 bone cement scaffolds with nano surface structure for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:5757-67.
119. Li M, Ma H, Han F, et al. Microbially catalyzed biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2104829.
120. Long EG, Buluk M, Gallagher MB, Schneider JM, Brown JL. Human mesenchymal stem cell morphology, migration, and differentiation on micro and nano-textured titanium. Bioact Mater 2019;4:249-55.
121. Xue P, Liu W, Gu Z, et al. Graded protein/PEG nanopattern arrays: well-defined gradient biomaterials to induce basic cellular behaviors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:1595-603.
122. Yeo M, Lee H, Kim GH. Combining a micro/nano-hierarchical scaffold with cell-printing of myoblasts induces cell alignment and differentiation favorable to skeletal muscle tissue regeneration. Biofabrication 2016;8:035021.
123. Meng Z, Mu X, He J, Zhang J, Ling R, Li D. Embedding aligned nanofibrous architectures within 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds for directed cellular infiltration and tissue regeneration. Int J Extrem Manuf 2023;5:025001.
124. Kong B, Sun L, Liu R, et al. Recombinant human collagen hydrogels with hierarchically ordered microstructures for corneal stroma regeneration. Chem Eng J 2022;428:131012.
125. Jiang S, Wang M, Wang Z, et al. Radially porous nanocomposite scaffolds with enhanced capability for guiding bone regeneration in vivo. Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2110931.
126. Eichholz KF, Freeman FE, Pitacco P, et al. Scaffold microarchitecture regulates angiogenesis and the regeneration of large bone defects. Biofabrication 2022;14:045013.
127. Ha Y, Ma X, Li S, et al. Bone microenvironment-mimetic scaffolds with hierarchical microstructure for enhanced vascularization and bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2200011.
128. Lu Q, Zhang F, Cheng W, et al. Nerve guidance conduits with hierarchical anisotropic architecture for peripheral nerve regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2021;10:e2100427.
129. Li G, Zheng T, Wu L, et al. Bionic microenvironment-inspired synergistic effect of anisotropic micro-nanocomposite topology and biology cues on peripheral nerve regeneration. Sci Adv 2021;7:eabi5812.
130. Yu X, Wang Y, Zhang M, et al. 3D printing of gear-inspired biomaterials: immunomodulation and bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2023;156:222-33.
131. Zhang Z, Xie Y, Pan H, Huang L, Zheng X. Influence of patterned titanium coatings on polarization of macrophage and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells. J Biomater Appl 2018;32:977-86.
132. He Y, Tian M, Li X, et al. A hierarchical-structured mineralized nanofiber scaffold with osteoimmunomodulatory and osteoinductive functions for enhanced alveolar bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2022;11:e2102236.
133. Liu Y, Cao L, Zhang S, Ji L, Wang J, Liu C. Effect of hierarchical porous scaffold on osteoimmunomodulation and bone formation. Appl Mater Today 2020;20:100779.
134. Yin Y, He X, Wang J, et al. Pore size-mediated macrophage M1-to-M2 transition influences new vessel formation within the compartment of a scaffold. Appl Mater Today 2020;18:100466.
135. Zheng X, Chen L, Tan J, et al. Effect of micro/nano-sheet array structures on the osteo-immunomodulation of macrophages. Regen Biomater 2022;9:rbac075.
136. Mao R, Lai Y, Li D, et al. Flow channel performance in 3D printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds to improve metabolism and tissue ingrowth in flat bone repair. Compos B Eng 2023;259:110727.
137. Gu H, Zhu Y, Yang J, et al. Liver-inspired polyetherketoneketone scaffolds simulate regenerative signals and mobilize anti-inflammatory reserves to reprogram macrophage metabolism for boosted osteoporotic osseointegration. Adv Sci 2023;10:e2302136.
138. Zhang W, Wang H, Chu G, et al. Mechanically conditioned multilayered angle-ply collagen scaffolds promote annulus fibrosus regeneration. Appl Materi Today 2023;31:101751.
139. He D, Li H. Biomaterials affect cell-cell interactions in vitro in tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Technol 2021;63:62-72.
140. Ren X, Gao X, Cheng Y, et al. Maintenance of multipotency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on poly(ε-caprolactone) nanoneedle arrays through the enhancement of cell-cell interaction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:1076345.
141. Lutzweiler G, Barthes J, Koenig G, et al. Modulation of cellular colonization of porous polyurethane scaffolds via the control of pore interconnection size and nanoscale surface modifications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:19819-29.
142. Coyle S, Doss B, Huo Y, et al. Cell alignment modulated by surface nano-topography - roles of cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions. Acta Biomater 2022;142:149-59.
143. Gautam V, Naureen S, Shahid N, et al. Engineering highly interconnected neuronal networks on nanowire scaffolds. Nano Lett 2017;17:3369-75.
144. Zhang M, Qin C, Wang Y, et al. 3D printing of tree-like scaffolds for innervated bone regeneration. Addit Manuf 2022;54:102721.
145. Wang Y, Wang Z, Yu X, et al. 3D-Printing of succulent plant-like scaffolds with beneficial cell microenvironments for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B 2023;11:5523-36.
146. Zhang B, Zhang M, Sun Y, Li M, Han F, Wu C. Haversian bone-mimicking bioceramic scaffolds enhancing MSC-macrophage osteo-imunomodulation. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 2021;31:883-90.
147. Zhang B, Han F, Wang Y, et al. Cells-micropatterning biomaterials for immune activation and bone regeneration. Adv Sci 2022;9:e2200670.
148. Li L, Wang P, Liang H, et al. Design of a Haversian system-like gradient porous scaffold based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for promoting bone regeneration. J Adv Res 2023;54:89-104.
149. Shen M, Li Y, Lu F, et al. Bioceramic scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface architectures guide early-stage bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 2023;25:374-86.
150. Zhang J, Tong D, Song H, et al. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomimetically hierarchical scaffold for augmented bone regeneration. Adv Mater 2022;34:e2202044.
151. Li C, Zhang W, Nie Y, et al. Integrated and bifunctional bilayer 3D printing scaffold for osteochondral defect repair. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2214158.
152. Gao C, Dai W, Wang X, et al. Magnesium gradient-based hierarchical scaffold for dual-lineage regeneration of osteochondral defect. Adv Funct Materials 2023;33:2304829.
153. Gu X, Zha Y, Li Y, et al. Integrated polycaprolactone microsphere-based scaffolds with biomimetic hierarchy and tunable vascularization for osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater 2022;141:190-7.
154. Wang L, Zhu T, Kang Y, et al. Crimped nanofiber scaffold mimicking tendon-to-bone interface for fatty-infiltrated massive rotator cuff repair. Bioact Mater 2022;16:149-61.
155. Du L, Qin C, Zhang H, et al. Multicellular bioprinting of biomimetic inks for tendon-to-bone regeneration. Adv Sci 2023;10:e2301309.
156. Zhang X, Song W, Han K, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of a structure-, composition-, and mechanics-graded biomimetic scaffold coated with specific decellularized extracellular matrix to improve the tendon-to-bone healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:28964-80.
157. Lu G, Ding Z, Wei Y, Lu X, Lu Q, Kaplan DL. Anisotropic Biomimetic Silk Scaffolds for Improved Cell Migration and Healing of Skin Wounds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:44314-23.
158. Ghosh S, Haldar S, Gupta S, et al. Single unit functionally graded bioresorbable electrospun scaffold for scar-free full-thickness skin wound healing. Biomater Adv 2022;139:212980.
159. Weigel T, Malkmus C, Weigel V, et al. Fully synthetic 3D fibrous scaffolds for stromal tissues-replacement of animal-derived scaffold materials demonstrated by multilayered skin. Adv Mater 2022;34:e2106780.
160. Gao E, Li G, Cao R, et al. Bionic tracheal tissue regeneration using a ring-shaped scaffold comprised of decellularized cartilaginous matrix and silk fibroin. Compos B Eng 2022;229:109470.
161. Wu L, Magaz A, Huo S, et al. Human airway-like multilayered tissue on 3D-TIPS printed thermoresponsive elastomer/collagen hybrid scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2020;113:177-95.
162. Xu Y, Dai J, Zhu X, et al. Biomimetic Trachea Engineering via a Modular Ring Strategy Based on Bone-Marrow Stem Cells and Atelocollagen for Use in Extensive Tracheal Reconstruction. Adv Mater 2022;34:e2106755.
163. Kim IG, Park SA, Lee SH, et al. Transplantation of a 3D-printed tracheal graft combined with iPS cell-derived MSCs and chondrocytes. Sci Rep 2020;10:4326.
164. Golafshan N, Castilho M, Daghrery A, et al. Composite graded melt electrowritten scaffolds for regeneration of the periodontal ligament-to-bone interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:12735-49.
165. Ma Y, Yang X, Chen Y, et al. Biomimetic peridontium patches for functional periodontal regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2023;12:e2202169.
166. Wang Y, Cui H, Wang Y, et al. 4D printed cardiac construct with aligned myofibers and adjustable curvature for myocardial regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021;13:12746-58.
167. Zhang W, Wang Z, Xie C, et al. Scaffold with micro/macro-architecture for myocardial alignment engineering into complex 3D cell patterns. Adv Healthc Mater 2019;8:e1901015.
168. Yeo M, Kim G. Nano/microscale topographically designed alginate/PCL scaffolds for inducing myoblast alignment and myogenic differentiation. Carbohydr Polym 2019;223:115041.
169. Zhu M, Li W, Dong X, et al. In vivo engineered extracellular matrix scaffolds with instructive niches for oriented tissue regeneration. Nat Commun 2019;10:4620.
170. Kong B, Chen Y, Liu R, et al. Fiber reinforced GelMA hydrogel to induce the regeneration of corneal stroma. Nat Commun 2020;11:1435.
171. He B, Wang J, Xie M, et al. 3D printed biomimetic epithelium/stroma bilayer hydrogel implant for corneal regeneration. Bioact Mater 2022;17:234-47.
173. Hu X, Xu J, Li W, et al. Therapeutic “tool” in reconstruction and regeneration of tissue engineering for osteochondral repair. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2020;191:785-809.
174. Lei T, Zhang T, Ju W, et al. Biomimetic strategies for tendon/ligament-to-bone interface regeneration. Bioact Mater 2021;6:2491-510.
175. Yu JR, Navarro J, Coburn JC, et al. Current and future perspectives on skin tissue engineering: key features of biomedical research, translational assessment, and clinical application. Adv Healthc Mater 2019;8:e1801471.
176. Dhasmana A, Singh A, Rawal S. Biomedical grafts for tracheal tissue repairing and regeneration “tracheal tissue engineering: an overview”. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020;14:653-72.
177. Woo HN, Cho YJ, Tarafder S, Lee CH. The recent advances in scaffolds for integrated periodontal regeneration. Bioact Mater 2021;6:3328-42.
