Magnetic structures and correlated physical properties in antiperovskites
1Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, Guangdong, China.
2Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
3Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
4Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, China.
5School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Correspondence to: Prof. Lunhua He, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, E-mail:
Compounds with perovskite structures have become one of the focuses in both materials science and condensed matter physics because of their fascinating physical properties and potential functionalities correlated to magnetic structures. However, the understanding of the intriguing physical properties is still at an exploratory stage. Herein, owing to the magnetic frustration prompted by Mn6N or Mn6C octahedra, the abounding magnetic structures of antiperovskites, including collinear antiferromagnetic, collinear ferromagnetic, collinear ferrimagnetic, non-collinear magnetic, and non-coplanar magnetic spin configurations, are systematically introduced through the updated coverage. In addition, owing to the “spin-lattice-charge” coupling of antiperovskites, a large number of physical properties, such as anomalous thermal expansion, giant magnetoresistance, anomalous Hall effect, piezomagnetic/baromagnetic effects, magnetocaloric effect, barocaloric effect, etc., are summarized by combining the discussions of the determined magnetic structures. This review aims to clarify the current research progress in this field, focusing on the relationship between the magnetic structures and the correlated physical properties, and provides the conclusion and outlook on further performance optimization and mechanism exploration in antiperovskites.
Since the 1980s, compounds with perovskite structures have become one of the focuses in both materials science and condensed matter physics because of their fascinating physical properties and potential functionalities. These properties include superconductivity, multiferroics, colossal magnetoresistance, negative thermal expansion (NTE), etc.[1-4]. In the antiperovskite compounds (antiperovskites) similar to the perovskite structure, numerous interesting physical properties have also been observed, such as NTE[5-25], giant magnetoresistance[26-27], anomalous Hall effect[28-30], piezomagnetic/baromagnetic effects[23,31-35], magnetocaloric effect[36-39], barocaloric effect[40,41], nearly zero temperature coefficient of resistivity[42-46], superconductivity[47,48], etc. Therefore, antiperovskites have gained significant attention. Nevertheless, the understanding of these abnormal physical properties is still in the exploratory stage, and the accumulation of experimental data and further deepening of theoretical research are required.
The so-called antiperovskite structure refers to a structure that is similar to perovskite. As shown in Figure 1, the face-centered position occupied by non-metallic elements, such as oxygen, in the original perovskite structure is occupied by transition group element atoms M, especially the magnetic element
In this paper, we will summarize the magnetic structures and correlated physical properties in antiperovskites. We present the potential application of antiperovskites as novel materials in various emerging fields. In order to further optimize performance and explore mechanisms, the issues such as exploration of new magnetic structures, synthesis of single crystal samples, and practical application research for the in-depth research are deserved in the part of outlook.
MAGNETIC STRUCTURES IN MN-BASED ANTIPEROVSKITES
The research on the magnetic structures of antiperovskites mainly focuses on Mn-based compounds. Herein, the collinear, non-collinear, and non-coplanar magnetic structures in Mn-based antiperovskites will be introduced in this review.
Collinear magnetic structure
Both collinear AFM and collinear FM structures were determined by neutron diffraction in Mn3GaC as early as the 1970s. Upon warming, Mn3GaC displays several magnetic phase transitions: an AFM-intermediate (AFM-IM) phase transition at 160.1 K, an intermediate-FM (IM-FM) phase transition at
Mn3ZnN is characterized by two first-order magnetic transitions: PM-AFM at 183 K and AFM-AFM at
Non-collinear magnetic structures
It is worth noting that two non-collinear AFM phases belonging to Γ4g and Γ5g types, respectively, have been studied extensively in antiperovskites. In this case, the compounds remain cubic with the propagation vector k = (0, 0, 0). For Γ5g type shown in Figure 4A, the magnetic moments of Mn atoms are located in the (111) plane with a triangular arrangement. As seen from Figure 4B, the magnetic moments of Γ4g are triangularly located in the (111) plane achieved by rotating 90° coherently from Γ5g type. In Γ4g and Γ5g magnetic structures, two Mn atoms form an angle of 120° with each other in the (111) plane, and the magnetic moments of the three atoms cancel each other out to generate a zero net magnetic moment.
So far, five typical undoped antiperovskites displaying the non-collinear magnetic structures of Γ4g and Γ5g types have been reported experimentally, including Mn3NiN, Mn3ZnN, Mn3GaN, Mn3AgN, and Mn3SnN. The magnetic structure of Mn3NiN below 163 K, Mn3ZnN between 140 K and 183 K, Mn3GaN below 298 K, and Mn3AgN between 55 and 290 K belongs single-phase Γ5g type, corresponding to the magnetic moments 0.98 μB/Mn (T = 77 K), 1.21 μB/Mn (T = 159 K), 1.17 μB/Mn (T = 4.2 K), and 3.1 μB/Mn (T = 4.2 K), respectively. This type of magnetic structure has had an important impact on the mechanism exploration of the NTE behavior, piezomagnetic effect, and barocaloric effect of antiperovskites. In addition, the magnetic structures of Mn3NiN between 163 K and 266 K, Mn3AgN below 55 K and Mn3SnN between
The non-collinear Γ5g AFM structure is also examined by both neutron diffraction and the correlated thermal expansion behavior in doped antiperovskites, such as Mn3Cu1-x(Ge, Sn)xN, Mn3Zn1-x(Ge, Sn)xN, and Mn3Ga1-xSnxN, etc.[5-22]. Particularly, the undoped Mn3CuN does not display the Γ5g magnetic configuration. As shown in Figure 5, a cubic structure with the Γ5g magnetic configuration was determined by neutron study in Mn3Cu1-xGexN (x ≥ 0.15), which is suggested to be a key ingredient of a large magnetovolume effect in antiperovskites. Meanwhile, the NTE behavior determined by Γ5g magnetic order was also observed in Mn3Zn1-xGexN[11,20]. In Mn3Cu1-xSnxN, the AFM transition closely coupled with the volume change is broadened upon Sn doping, producing the NTE behavior. The characterization of magnetic structures in doped systems still requires careful study by neutron scattering.
Figure 5. Phase diagram of Mn3Cu1-xGexN. TC and TN denote the Curie and Néel temperatures, respectively.
Non-coplanar magnetic structures
A non-coplanar FIM structure with the propagation vector k = (1/2, 1/2, 0) has been reported in
Figure 6B gives a non-collinear magnetic structure M-1 of Mn3Ga0.95N0.94. The M-1 phase remains 79% in coexistence with Γ5g magnetic configuration between 6 K and 50 K. It can be seen that the sub-lattice of the M-1 phase is
Recently, the non-collinear FIM structures were determined in the (1-x)Mn3GaN- xMn3SbN (0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.8) heterogeneous system[Figure 6C]. Upon cooling, Mn3SbN undergoes a PM-FIM phase transition at
The effect of magnetic element doping on the magnetic structure was also investigated in antiperovskites. For Mn-doped Mn3+xNi1-xN and Mn3.39Co0.61N compounds [Figure 6D], a FM component along the  direction coexisting with canted Γ5g AFM component was resolved by neutron diffraction technique[15,62]. Table 1 summarizes the magnetic structures and corresponding temperature ranges of typical antiperovskites.
Magnetic structures and corresponding temperature ranges in antiperovskites
|Antiperovskites||Magnetic ordering||Spin configurations||Temperature range|
|Collinear||163.9 K < T < 248 K
160.1 K < T < 163.9 K
T < 160.1 K
|140 K < T < 183 K
T < 140 K
|Mn3NiN||Antiferromagnetic||Γ5g + Γ4g
|163 K < T < 266 K
T < 163 K
|Mn3GaN||Antiferromagnetic||Γ5g||T < 298 K|
Γ5g + Γ4g
Γ5g + Γ4g
|357 K < T < 475 K
237 K < T< 357 K
|Mn3CuN||Ferrimagnetic||Non-coplanar||T < 143 K|
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ANTIPEROVSKITES
The research on antiperovskite structure compounds can be traced back to the 1930s when there were not many studies on physical properties. Since the 1980s, this type of compound has been paid attention by scientists, and the basic physical properties of antiperovskites have been studied by means of neutron diffraction, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Mössbauer spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Extensive research of these basic physical properties mainly includes crystal structures, magnetic properties (magnetic structures), phase diagrams, etc. At the beginning of the 21st century, superconductivity, giant magnetoresistance, magnetocaloric effect, abnormal thermal expansion, and near-zero temperature coefficient of resistance behaviors were successively reported in antiperovskites. The discovery of these physical properties prompted more and more researchers to pay attention to antiperovskites and their applications. In the past decade or so, a large number of physical properties correlated to magnetic structures have been reported.
Anomalous thermal expansion in manganese-based antiperovskites
Materials with zero thermal expansion (ZTE) and NTE behaviors have attracted widespread attention because of their broad applications in modern technology, such as high-precision optical instruments, microelectronics, aerospace devices, etc.[63-69]. A great deal of work has focused on the discovery of new materials and the improvement of thermal expansion properties. Nevertheless, the investigations for the mechanism of anomalous thermal expansion (ATE) (mainly including ZTE and NTE) are still needed. For ZrW2O8 and ScF3, the mechanism associated with the soft phonon mode of the frame structure is adopted; moreover, the ATE behavior of the material has a strong coupling effect with other physical properties, such as the valence state change in LaCu3Fe4O12, BiNiO3, and YbGaGe and the ferroelectric characteristics in PbTiO3-BiFeO3; in addition, the ATE behavior emerges with magnetic transitions in various materials, such as the NTE in La(Fe,Si,Co)13 and Ca2Ru1−xCrxO4 and near ZTE in FeNi Invar and SrRuO3. It is worth noting that although a large number of studies have shown that the Invar effect is related to the magnetic properties of materials, an adequate understanding of this property is still required. Therefore, the exploration of new materials with ATE will contribute to the clarification of mechanisms[75-80].
Some manganese nitrogen compounds (such as Mn3ZnN at 185 K, Mn3GaN at 298 K, etc.) are accompanied by a sudden change in volume during the magnetic transition, that is, the so-called magnetovolume effect. In 2005, Takenaka et al. reported the NTE behavior in the Ge-doped antiperovskite structure compound Mn3Cu1-xGexN. For Mn3CuN, the compound itself has no magnetovolume effect. Through the doping of Ge, the discontinuous volume change caused by the magnetic volume effect is broadened, thereby realizing the regulation of the thermal expansion coefficient and temperature range of the NTE behavior. With increasing the doping amount of Ge, the magnetovolume effect of Mn3Cu1-xGexN was broadened and moved to the high temperature region, resulting in NTE behavior near room temperature. As shown in Figure 7A and 7B, near room temperature, the linear expansion coefficient α of Mn3Cu0.53Ge0.47N and Mn3Cu0.5Ge0.5N are -16 × 10-6 K-1 and -12 × 10-6 K-1, respectively. In order to further reduce the material cost, Takenaka et al. used Sn as the dopant, which is cheaper than Ge. The doping of Sn can also broaden the NTE behavior of antiperovskites.
The thermal expansion behavior of Mn3Ga0.5Ge0.4Mn0.1N1-xCx was also reported, and a single-phase ZTE material with a wider temperature range has been obtained. As shown in Figure 7C, the thermal expansion behavior of Mn3Ga0.5Ge0.4Mn0.1N1-xCx changes with the doping of C. When x = 0.1, the compound exhibits low thermal expansion in the temperature range of 190-272 K with |α| < 0.5 × 10-6 K-1. In addition, a very close correlation between N content and NTE behavior was found in Mn3Cu0.5Sn0.5N1-δ. The N content in the compound decreases with the increase of the sintering temperature. When the sintering temperature is
Huang et al. carried out research on Ge and Si co-doped Mn3Cu0.6SixGe0.4−xN and obtained a low-temperature NTE material. As shown in Figure 7D, with the co-doping of Si, the NTE temperature range of the compound moves to a lower temperature. When x = 0.15, Mn3Cu0.6Si0.15Ge0.25N shows NTE behavior in a wide temperature range in the temperature range of 120-184 K, and its linear expansion coefficient is
Lin et al. reported the thermal expansion and magnetic properties of antiperovskite manganese nitrides Mn3+xAg1-xN. The substitution of Mn for Ag effectively broadens the temperature range of NTE and moves it to low temperatures [Figure 7E]. When x = 0.6, the Mn3.6Ag0.4N compound shows ZTE with
The influence of Ge and Sn doping on the thermal expansion behavior of Mn3Zn1-xGe(Sn)xN has been investigated by us[11,12]. Figure 7F shows the variation of lattice constant with temperature in Mn3Zn1-xGexN. The doping of Ge broadens the magnetovolume effect of Mn3Zn1-xGexN and moves the temperature zone to the higher one, thereby realizing the regulation of NTE behavior. A similar behavior was also observed in Sn-doped Mn3Zn1-xSnxN compounds. On the other hand, the regulation of the thermal expansion behavior of Mn3NiN-based compounds has also been reported[13,14]. Antiperovskite Mn3Ni0.5Ag0.5N shows NTE behavior in a wide temperature range (260-320 K) near room temperature with α = -12 × 10-6 K-1. The Mn3Ni0.5Cu0.5N exhibits NTE in the temperature range of 160-240 K (ΔT = 80 K) with α = -22.3 × 10-6 K-1. Interestingly, a new type of Invar-like material exhibiting ZTE has been revealed in Mn3+xNi1-xN.
Song et al. revealed the ZTE behavior of Mn3Cu0.5Ge0.5N due to the size effect. When Mn3Cu0.5Ge0.5N was prepared from polycrystalline samples (average size of 2.0 μm) to ultra-nanocrystals (average size of 12 nm), the occupancy rate of Mn in the sample changed from 100% to 78.7% [Figure 8A]. Meanwhile, the ultra-nanocrystalline sample exhibits ZTE behavior in a wide temperature range ΔT = 218 K (12-230 K) with
The mechanism for the NTE of antiperovskites was investigated by Iikub et al. The neutron diffraction results indicate that the non-collinear Γ5g AFM structure plays a key role in the magnetovolume effect of Mn3Cu1-xGexN, which leads to the appearance of NTE behavior. Moreover, Iikub et al. further revealed that the local lattice distortion plays a very important role in the NTE of Mn3Cu1-xGexN [Figure 8B]. As suggested by the pair distribution function (PDF) analysis, Mn3Cu1-xGexN maintains a cubic structure within a certain doping range, while the Mn6N octahedrons in Mn3Cu1-xGexN rotate along the z-axis with Ge doping to form a local lattice distortion. This structural instability displays a strong correlation with the broadness of the growth of the ordered magnetic moment, which is considered as a trigger for broadening the volume change. Moreover, Tong et al. studied the magnetic transition broadening and local lattice distortion in Mn3Cu1-xSnxN with NTE. The PDF results indicate that the distribution of Cu/Sn-Mn bonds is linked to the fluctuations of the AFM integral. This may account for the broadening of the volume change in antiperovskites.
Through the study of Mn3(Zn, M)xN(M = Ag, Ge), we revealed the quantitative relationship between thermal expansion and atomic magnetic moments in antiperovskites and realized the regulation of thermal expansion. A collinear AFM structure MPTE and a non-collinear AFM structure Γ5g are observed in
The first-principle calculations have been adopted for understanding the NTE behavior of antiperovskites. The primary theoretical works focus on the comparison of differences in equilibrium volumes of antiperovskites with different magnetic structures. Lukashev et al. found that the equilibrium volume of the Γ5g AFM state in Mn3GaN is larger than that of the PM state, which confirms that the magnetic transition in the material can lead to volume change (magnetovolume effect). Qu et al. calculated the energy-lattice curves of various magnetic configurations, and the results show that the Γ5g AFM state has the largest volume. This work also confirms that the Γ5g AFM state has the largest volume compared to other magnetic configurations. In addition, Mochizuki et al. constructed a classical spin model with frustrated exchange interactions and magnetic anisotropy to study the nontrivial magnetic orders in the antiperovskite Mn3AN. With a replica-exchange Monte Carlo technique, the Γ5g and Γ4g spin configurations, known to trigger the NTE, have been reproduced.
Electronic transport properties in antiperovskites
There is a strong correlation between the lattice, spin, and charge of Mn3GaC. Therefore, a giant magnetoresistance effect was found near its collinear AFM - collinear FM magnetic transition. The size of magnetoresistance can be expressed by [ρ(H) - ρ(0)]/ρ(0), and ρ(H) and ρ(0) represent the resistivity when the external magnetic field is finite and 0, respectively. As shown in Figure 9A, Mn3GaC generates a magnetoresistance of about 50% under an external magnetic field of 3 kOe. With the further increase of the external magnetic field, the magnetoresistance value is almost unchanged, but its peak width is broadened and reaches 20 K at 50 kOe. Kamishima et al. suggested that the magnetoresistance effect in Mn3GaC is aroused by the difference of resistivity between AFM and FM states, and the external magnetic field can induce the temperature shift of AFM-FM phase transition. In addition, an electroresistance-like behavior of the antiperovskite Mn3GaC, revealed by a resistivity change of 50% due to the local Joule heating, is reported around the collinear AFM- intermediate phase transition. The currents significantly reduce the proportion of the higher resistivity AFM phase relative to the lower resistivity interphase with warming, showing a change in resistivity. On the other hand, for a non-coplanar magnet Mn3.338Ni0.651N with triangular lattice, a high-resistivity state can be frozen along the direction of the cooling field while a low-resistivity state is determined in the reversed field direction, indicating an asymmetry with respect to H [Figure 9B]. This characteristic further demonstrates a switchable scalar spin chirality of Mn3.338Ni0.651N.
Recently, the anomalous Hall effect, originating from the nonvanishing momentum space Berry curvature, has been reported in the non-collinear AFM antiperovskites. Among the magnetic orders, a typical non-collinear AFM configuration is Γ4g, whose atomic magnetic moments point to the triangle "inside" or "outside" in the triangular lattice of the antiperovskite (111) surface, forming a phase similar to that of
Piezomagnetic/baromagnetic effects in antiperovskites
The piezomagnetic effect has been reported in non-collinear AFM antiperovskites[23,33]. In 2008,
Figure 10. (A) Variation of magnetic moment of Mn Atoms in the (111) Plane of Γ5g AFM Mn3GaN with axial strain; (B) variation of net magnetic moment and rotation angle of Mn atomic magnetic moment with axial strain for Mn3GaN; (C) piezomagnetic effect determined by magnetization curve in Mn3Ga0.95N0.94; (D) piezomagnetic effect of in Mn3Ga0.95N0.94 at 130 K and 170 K.
In 2016, the baromagnetic effect of Mn3Ga0.95N0.94 was determined by both neutron diffraction analysis and magnetic measurements. Interestingly, Mn3Ga0.95N0.94 displays a new tetragonal non-coplanar magnetic structure M-1 below 50 K, which is in coexistence with Γ5g spin configuration under atmospheric pressure. As shown in Figure 10C and D, the sample exhibits the piezomagnetic effect. When the applied pressure is 750 MPa at 130 K, the magnetic phase transition from M-1 to Γ5g AFM appears, generating the piezomagnetic characteristic of 0.63 μB/f.u. Combined with the refined results of neutron diffraction, the change of Mn-Mn distance and spin rearrangement caused by pressure is considered to be the trigger of the observed baromagnetic effect.
The magnetocaloric effect of antiperovskites was primarily reported in Mn3GaC. The collinear AFM- intermediate magnetic transition of Mn3GaC showing a first-order characteristic can be controlled by an external magnetic field, generating the magnetocaloric effect. Figure 11A shows the temperature dependence of the maximum value of magnetic entropy change ΔSmag. The peak of ΔSmag reaches 17 J/(kg·K) when the external magnetic field is 10 kOe, and the peak value broadens to a "platform" shape with further increase of the magnetic field. In addition, by introducing C vacancies, the magnetic properties of Mn3GaC were changed, thereby affecting the magnetocaloric effect. The magnetic entropy of Mn3GaC0.78 decreased to 3.7 J/kg·K under a 5 T magnetic field. In Mn3-xCoxGaC, Co doping can reduce the first-order phase transition temperature from 164 K to 100 K without a significant decrease of magnetic entropy and realize the magnetocaloric effect covering a wider temperature range (50-160 K).
A large magnetic entropy change was observed in Mn3Cu0.89N0.96 [Figure 11B]. By introducing vacancies, the onset of the FIM-PM transition is slightly reduced from 150 K of Mn3CuN to 147.7 K of Mn3Cu0.89N0.96, and a new non-coplanar FIM structure with an orthorhombic symmetry was determined. The total entropy change of Mn3Cu0.89N0.96 obtained by DSC is about 60 J/kg·K, while the maximum magnetic entropy change ΔSmag is 13.52 J/kg·K under a magnetic field of 50 kOe near the temperature of FIM-PM transition. Neutron diffraction results indicate that the magnetic entropy change of Mn3Cu0.89N0.96 is caused by the magnetic transition from the AFM to the FM component in the tetragonal phase and the phase transition from cubic to tetragonal under a magnetic field.
A significant barocaloric effect is expected when strong cross-correlations between the volume and magnetic order appear in materials. In 2015, Matsunami et al. reported the giant barocaloric effect enhanced by the frustration of the AFM phase in Mn3GaN. As shown in Figure 12A, when a hydrostatic pressure change of 139 MPa is applied, Mn3GaN exhibits an entropy change of 22.3 J kg-1 K-1. By applying a depressurization of 93 MPa, the change of adiabatic temperature is determined to be about 5 K.
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
As reviewed in this article, owing to the magnetic frustration prompted by Mn6N or Mn6C octahedra, antiperovskites display the abounding magnetic structures, including collinear AFM, collinear FM, collinear FIM, non-collinear magnetic and non-coplanar magnetic spin configurations. In antiperovskites, the magnetic phase transition (magnetic structures), abnormal lattice change, and electronic transport properties are interrelated and affect each other, showing a large number of physical properties such as ATE, electronic transport properties, piezomagnetic/baromagnetic effects, magnetocaloric effect, barocaloric effect, etc. Therefore, antiperovskites will be an excellent candidate for exploring new smart materials. In order to further optimize performance and explore mechanisms, the following issues for in-depth research deserve attention and solutions:
Exploration of new magnetic structures. The examination of new physical properties is one of the important directions of the development of modern smart materials. Due to the strong correlation of "lattice-spin-charge", antiperovskites show a series of rich and unique physical properties within some specific magnetic structures. Although the determination of the magnetic structures is a central issue in antiperovskites, there is still a lack of systematic and in-depth research, especially on how the magnetic structures and correlated physical properties evolve in the case of elemental doping, variated temperatures, varied magnetic fields, and pressurization.
Synthesis of single crystal samples. The current research work on antiperovskites is mainly focused on polycrystalline. From the perspective of mechanism research and application, single crystal research has greater advantages. However, it is difficult to precisely control the nitrogen/carbon contents of antiperovskites in preparation, and the change of contents has a great influence on its physical properties. Therefore, the synthesis of three-dimensional single crystal materials with excellent physical properties is challenging.
Practical application research. Selecting some typical antiperovskites with fascinating physical properties, the practical applications can be explored in the fields of optics, microelectronics, refrigeration, aerospace, etc.
Conceived and designed the manuscript: Deng S, He L, Wang C
Drafted and revised the manuscript: Deng S, Wang H, He L, Wang C
Availability of data and materials
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was financially supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515140117), Large Scientific Facility Open Subject of Songshan Lake (Dongguan, Guangdong), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1600602 and No. 2021YFA1600603) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52371190, No. U2032167, No. 12041202, No. U2032220, No. U1832219, and No. 52272264), the Sino-German Mobility Programme (No. M-0273), and the Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
© The Author(s) 2023.
1. Bednorz JG, Müller KA. Possible highT c superconductivity the Ba-La-Cu-O system. Z Physik B Condens Matter 1986;64:189-93.
2. Ahn CH, Tybell T, Antognazza L, et al. Local, nonvolatile electronic writing of epitaxial Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3/SrRuO3 heterostructures. Science 1997;276:1100-3.
3. von Helmolt R, Wecker J, Holzapfel B, Schultz L, Samwer K. Giant negative magnetoresistance in perovskitelike La2/3Ba1/3MnOx ferromagnetic films. Phys Rev Lett 1993;71:2331-3.
4. Chen J, Nittala K, Forrester JS, et al. The role of spontaneous polarization in the negative thermal expansion of tetragonal PbTiO3-based compounds. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:11114-7.
5. Takenaka K, Takagi H. Giant negative thermal expansion in Ge-doped anti-perovskite manganese nitrides. Appl Phys Lett 2005;87:261902.
6. Takenaka K, Asano K, Misawa M, Takagi H. Negative thermal expansion in Ge-free antiperovskite manganese nitrides: Tin-doping effect. Appl Phys Lett 2008;92:011927.
7. Takenaka K, Takagi H. Zero thermal expansion in a pure-form antiperovskite manganese nitride. Appl Phys Lett 2009;94:131904.
8. Huang R, Li L, Cai F, Xu X, Qian L. Low-temperature negative thermal expansion of the antiperovskite manganese nitride Mn3CuN codoped with Ge and Si. Appl Phys Lett 2008;93:081902.
9. Lin JC, Tong P, Tong W, et al. Tunable negative thermal expansion related with the gradual evolution of antiferromagnetic ordering in antiperovskite manganese nitrides Mn3+xAg1-xN (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6). Appl Phys Lett 2015;106:082405.
10. Lin JC, Tong P, Zhou XJ, et al. Giant negative thermal expansion covering room temperature in nanocrystalline GaNxMn3. Appl Phys Lett 2015;107:131902.
11. Sun Y, Wang C, Wen Y, Zhu K, Zhao J. Lattice contraction and magnetic and electronic transport properties of Mn3Zn1-xGexN. Appl Phys Lett 2007;91:231913.
12. Sun Y, Wang C, Wen Y, et al. Negative thermal expansion and magnetic transition in anti-perovskite structured Mn3Zn1-xSnxN compounds: rapid communications of the American ceramic society. J Am Ceram Soc 2010;93:2178-81.
13. Ding L, Wang C, Sun Y, Colin CV, Chu L. Spin-glass-like behavior and negative thermal expansion in antiperovskite Mn3Ni1-xCuxN compounds. J Appl Phys 2015;117:213915.
14. Chu L, Wang C, Yan J, et al. Magnetic transition, lattice variation and electronic transport properties of Ag-doped Mn3Ni1-xAgxN antiperovskite compounds. Scr Mater 2012;67:173-6.
15. Deng S, Sun Y, Wu H, et al. Invar-like behavior of antiperovskite Mn3+xNi1-xN compounds. Chem Mater 2015;27:2495-501.
16. Song X, Sun Z, Huang Q, et al. Adjustable zero thermal expansion in antiperovskite manganese nitride. Adv Mater 2011;23:4690-4.
17. Iikubo S, Kodama K, Takenaka K, Takagi H, Takigawa M, Shamoto S. Local lattice distortion in the giant negative thermal expansion material Mn3Cu1-xGexN. Phys Rev Lett 2008;101:205901.
18. Iikubo S, Kodama K, Takenaka K, Takagi H, Shamoto S. Magnetovolume effect in Mn3Cu1-xGexN related to the magnetic structure: neutron powder diffraction measurements. Phys Rev B 2008;77:020409.
19. Tong P, Louca D, King G, Llobet A, Lin JC, Sun YP. Magnetic transition broadening and local lattice distortion in the negative thermal expansion antiperovskite Cu1-xSnxNMn3. Appl Phys Lett 2013;102:041908.
20. Wang C, Chu L, Yao Q, et al. Tuning the range, magnitude, and sign of the thermal expansion in intermetallic Mn3 (Zn, M)x N(M = Ag, Ge). Phys Rev B 2012;85:220103.
21. Deng S, Sun Y, Wu H, et al. Phase separation and zero thermal expansion in antiperovskite Mn3Zn0.77Mn0.19N0.94: an in situ neutron diffraction investigation. Scr Mater 2018;146:18-21.
22. Shi K, Sun Y, Colin CV, et al. Investigation of the spin-lattice coupling in Mn3Ga1-xSnxN antiperovskites. Phys Rev B 2018;97:054110.
23. Lukashev P, Sabirianov RF, Belashchenko K. Theory of the piezomagnetic effect in Mn-based antiperovskites. Phys Rev B 2008;78:184414.
24. Qu BY, Pan BC. Nature of the negative thermal expansion in antiperovskite compound Mn3ZnN. J Appl Phys 2010;108:113920.
25. Mochizuki M, Kobayashi M, Okabe R, Yamamoto D. Spin model for nontrivial types of magnetic order in inverse-perovskite antiferromagnets. Phys Rev B 2018;97:060401.
26. Kamishima K, Goto T, Nakagawa H, et al. Giant magnetoresistance in the intermetallic compound Mn3GaC. Phys Rev B 2000;63:024426.
27. Deng S, Fischer G, Uhlarz M, et al. Controlling chiral spin states of a triangular-lattice magnet by cooling in a magnetic field. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1900947.
28. Gurung G, Shao DF, Paudel TR, Tsymbal EY. Anomalous HALL conductivity of noncollinear magnetic antiperovskites. Phys Rev Mater 2019;3:044409.
29. Samathrakis I, Zhang H. Tailoring the anomalous Hall effect in the noncollinear antiperovskite Mn3GaN. Phys Rev B 2020;101:214423.
30. Zhao K, Hajiri T, Chen H, Miki R, Asano H, Gegenwart P. Anomalous Hall effect in the noncollinear antiferromagnetic antiperovskite Mn3Ni1-xCuxN. Phys Rev B 2019;100:045109.
31. Rani GM, Wu CM, Motora KG, Umapathi R. Waste-to-energy: utilization of recycled waste materials to fabricate triboelectric nanogenerator for mechanical energy harvesting. J Clean Prod 2022;363:132532.
32. Gokana MR, Wu CM, Motora KG, Qi JY, Yen WT. Effects of patterned electrode on near infrared light-triggered cesium tungsten bronze/poly(vinylidene)fluoride nanocomposite-based pyroelectric nanogenerator for energy harvesting. J Power Sources 2022;536:231524.
33. Zemen J, Gercsi Z, Sandeman KG. Piezomagnetism as a counterpart of the magnetovolume effect in magnetically frustrated Mn-based antiperovskite nitrides. Phys Rev B 2017;96:024451.
34. Boldrin D, Mihai AP, Zou B, et al. Giant Piezomagnetism in Mn3NiN. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:18863-8.
35. Shi K, Sun Y, Yan J, et al. Baromagnetic effect in antiperovskite Mn3Ga0.95N0.94 by neutron powder diffraction analysis. Adv Mater 2016;28:3761-7.
36. Tohei T, Wada H, Kanomata T. Negative magnetocaloric effect at the antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic transition of Mn3GaC. J Appl Phys 2003;94:1800-2.
37. Yu M, Lewis LH, Moodenbaugh AR. Assessment of the magnetic entropy change in the metallic antiperovskite Mn3GaC1-δ (δ = 0, 0.22). J Magn Magn Mater 2006;299:317-26.
38. Tohei T, Wada H, Kanomata T. Large magnetocaloric effect of Mn3-xCoxGaC. J Magn Magn Mater 2004;272-76:E585-6.
39. Yan J, Sun Y, Wu H, et al. Phase transitions and magnetocaloric effect in Mn3Cu0.89N0.96. Acta Mater 2014;74:58-65.
40. Matsunami D, Fujita A, Takenaka K, Kano M. Giant barocaloric effect enhanced by the frustration of the antiferromagnetic phase in Mn3GaN. Nat Mater 2015;14:73-8.
41. Boldrin D, Mendive-tapia E, Zemen J, et al. Multisite exchange-enhanced barocaloric response in Mn3NiN. Phys Rev X 2018;8:041035.
42. Chi EO, Kim WS, Hur NH. Nearly zero temperature coefficient of resistivity in antiperovskite compound CuNMn3. Solid State Commun 2001;120:307-10.
43. Sun Y, Wang C, Chu L, Wen Y, Nie M, Liu F. Low temperature coefficient of resistivity induced by magnetic transition and lattice contraction in Mn3NiN compound. Scr Mater 2010;62:686-9.
44. Takenaka K, Ozawa A, Shibayama T, Kaneko N, Oe T, Urano C. Extremely low temperature coefficient of resistance in antiperovskite Mn3Ag1-xCuxN. Appl Phys Lett 2011;98:022103.
45. Lin JC, Wang BS, Tong P, et al. Tunable temperature coefficient of resistivity in C- and Co-doped CuNMn3. Scr Mater 2011;65:452-5.
46. Deng S, Sun Y, Wang L, et al. Near-zero temperature coefficient of resistivity associated with magnetic ordering in antiperovskite Mn3+xNi1-xN. Appl Phys Lett 2016;108:041908.
47. He T, Huang Q, Ramirez AP, et al. Superconductivity in the non-oxide perovskite MgCNi3. Nature 2001;411:54-6.
48. Rosner H, Weht R, Johannes MD, Pickett WE, Tosatti E. Superconductivity near ferromagnetism in MgCNi3. Phys Rev Lett 2002;88:027001.
49. Wu M, Isshiki H, Chen T, Higo T, Nakatsuji S, Otani Y. Magneto-optical Kerr effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge. Appl Phys Lett 2020;116:132408.
50. Balk AL, Sung NH, Thomas SM, et al. Comparing the anomalous Hall effect and the magneto-optical Kerr effect through antiferromagnetic phase transitions in Mn3Sn. Appl Phys Lett 2019;114:032401.
51. Feng W, Guo GY, Zhou J, Yao Y, Niu Q. Large magneto-optical Kerr effect in noncollinear antiferromagnets Mn3X (X = Rh, Ir, Pt). Phys Rev B 2015;92:144426.
52. Kamishima K, Bartashevich M, Goto T, Kikuchi M, Kanomata T. Magnetic behavior of Mn3GaC under high magnetic field and high pressure. J Phys Soc Jpn 1998;67:1748-54.
53. Fruchart D, Bertaut EF, Sayetat F, Nasr Eddine M, Fruchart R, Sénateur JP. Structure magnetique de Mn3GaC. Solid State Commun 1970;8:91-9.
54. Fruchart D, Bertaut EF. Magnetic studies of the metallic perovskite-type compounds of manganese. J Phys Soc Jpn 1978;44:781-91.
55. Çakιr Ö, Acet M. Reversibility in the inverse magnetocaloric effect in Mn3GaC studied by direct adiabatic temperature-change measurements. Appl Phys Lett 2012;100:202404.
56. Sénateur JP, Boursier D, L'héritier P, Lorthioir G, Fruchart ME, Le Caer G. Etude par spectrometrie mössbauer de ZnMn3 et de la transition antiferro-ferromagnetique de GaMn3C dopes au fer 57. Mater Res Bull 1974;9:603-14.
57. Deng S, Sun Y, Wang L, et al. Frustrated triangular magnetic structures of Mn3ZnN: applications in thermal expansion. J Phys Chem C 2015;119:24983-90.
58. Fruchart D, Bertaut EF, Madar R, Fruchart R. Diffraction neutronique de Mn3ZnN. J Phys Colloques 1971;32:C1-876.
59. Wu M, Wang C, Sun Y, et al. Magnetic structure and lattice contraction in Mn3NiN. J Appl Phys 2013;114:123902.
60. Hua L, Wang L, Chen LF. First-principles investigation of Ge doping effects on the structural, electronic and magnetic properties in antiperovskite Mn3CuN. J Phys Condens Matter 2010;22:206003.
61. Han H, Sun Y, Deng S, et al. Effect of thermal stress on non-collinear antiferromagnetic phase transitions in antiperovskite Mn3GaN compounds with Mn3SbN inclusions. Ceramics Int 2022;48:15200-6.
62. Sun Y, Hu P, Shi K, et al. Giant zero-field cooling exchange-bias-like behavior in antiperovskite Mn3Co0.61Mn0.39N compound. Phys Rev Mater 2019;3:024409.
63. Salvador JR, Guo F, Hogan T, Kanatzidis MG. Zero thermal expansion in YbGaGe due to an electronic valence transition. Nature 2003;425:702-5.
64. Mary TA, Evans JSO, Vogt T, Sleight AW. Negative Thermal Expansion from 0.3 to 1050 Kelvin in ZrW2O8. Science 1996;272:90-2.
65. Song Y, Shi N, Deng S, Xing X, Chen J, et al. Negative thermal expansion in magnetic materials. Prog Mater Sci 2021;121:100835.
66. Chen J, Hu L, Deng J, Xing X. Negative thermal expansion in functional materials: controllable thermal expansion by chemical modifications. Chem Soc Rev 2015;44:3522-67.
67. Gava V, Martinotto AL, Perottoni CA. First-principles mode Gruneisen parameters and negative thermal expansion in α-ZrW2O8. Phys Rev Lett 2012;109:195503.
68. Li CW, Tang X, Muñoz JA, et al. Structural relationship between negative thermal expansion and quartic anharmonicity of cubic ScF3. Phys Rev Lett 2011;107:195504.
69. Long YW, Hayashi N, Saito T, Azuma M, Muranaka S, Shimakawa Y. Temperature-induced A-B intersite charge transfer in an A-site-ordered LaCu3Fe4O12 perovskite. Nature 2009;458:60-3.
70. Gerhardt I, Liu Q, Lamas-Linares A, Skaar J, Kurtsiefer C, Makarov V. Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system. Nat Commun 2011;2:349.
71. Chen J, Fan L, Ren Y, et al. Unusual transformation from strong negative to positive thermal expansion in PbTiO3-BiFeO3 perovskite. Phys Rev Lett 2013;110:115901.
72. Huang R, Liu Y, Fan W, et al. Giant negative thermal expansion in NaZn13-type La(Fe, Si, Co)13 compounds. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:11469-72.
73. Qi TF, Korneta OB, Parkin S, De Long LE, Schlottmann P, Cao G. Negative volume thermal expansion via orbital and magnetic orders in Ca2Ru1-xCrxO4 (0 < x < 0.13). Phys Rev Lett 2010;105:177203.
74. Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, Wells CG. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 1999;400:56-8.
75. Kiyama T, Yoshimura K, Kosuge K, Ikeda Y, Bando Y. Invar effect of SrRuO3: itinerant electron magnetism of Ru 4d electrons. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 1996;54:R756-9.
76. Taniguchi T, Mizusaki S, Okada N, et al. Anomalous volume expansion in CaRu0.85Fe0.15O3: neutron powder diffraction and magnetic compton scattering. Phys Rev B 2007;75:024414.
77. Klimczuk T, Walker HC, Springell R, et al. Negative thermal expansion and antiferromagnetism in the actinide oxypnictide NpFeAsO. Phys Rev B 2012;85:174506.
78. Uchishiba H. Antiferromagnetism of γ-phase manganese alloys containing Ni, Zn, Ga and Ge. J Phys Soc Jpn 1971;31:436-40.
79. Yokoyama T, Eguchi K. Anisotropic thermal expansion and cooperative Invar and anti-Invar effects in mn alloys. Phys Rev Lett 2013;110:075901.
Cite This Article
Deng S, Wang H, He L, Wang C. Magnetic structures and correlated physical properties in antiperovskites. Microstructures 2023;3:2023044. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.42
Deng S, Wang H, He L, Wang C. Magnetic structures and correlated physical properties in antiperovskites. Microstructures. 2023; 3(4): 2023044. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.42
Deng, Sihao, Hongde Wang, Lunhua He, Cong Wang. 2023. "Magnetic structures and correlated physical properties in antiperovskites" Microstructures. 3, no.4: 2023044. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.42
Deng, S.; Wang H.; He L.; Wang C. Magnetic structures and correlated physical properties in antiperovskites. Microstructures. 2023, 3, 2023044. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.42
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.