fig2

Design of high energy storage ferroelectric materials by phase-field simulations

Figure 2. Comparisons of polarization change and electric breakdown strength of thin film energy storage materials, including Fe-doped (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3[23], Bi3.25La0.75Ti3O12[24], (Pb0.92La0.08)(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3[25], 0.94(Bi0.5,Na0.5)TiO3-0.06BaTiO3[9], Mn-doped 0.4BiFeO3-0.6SrTiO3[26], BiFeO3-BaTiO3-SrTiO3[27], Sm-doped 0.3BiFeO3-0.7BaTiO3[28], La-doped PbZrO3[29], (Pb0.97La0.02)(Zr0.98Ti0.02)O3[30],(Pb0.97La0.02)(Zr0.66Sn0.23Ti0.11)O3[31], Si-doped HfO2[32], Pb0.5Sr0.5HfO3[33], 0.8Pb(Zr0.925Hf0.075)O3-0.2LaScO3[34], Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3[35].

Journal of Materials Informatics
ISSN 2770-372X (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/