REFERENCES
1. Wen L, Zhang J, Song Q. A scenario analysis of Chinese carbon neutral based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022;29:55105-30.
2. Xie Y, Wu D, Zhu S. Can new energy vehicles subsidy curb the urban air pollution? Empirical evidence from pilot cities in China. Sci Total Environ 2021;754:142232.
3. He X, Zhang S, Wu Y, et al. Economic and climate benefits of electric vehicles in China, the United States, and Germany. Environ Sci Technol 2019;53:11013-22.
4. Carbon CC, Gebauer F. Data and material of the safe-range-inventory: an assistance tool helping to improve the charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Data Brief 2017;14:573-8.
5. Erickson LE, Jennings M. Energy, transportation, air quality, climate change, health nexus: sustainable energy is good for our health. AIMS Public Health 2017;4:47-61.
6. Fang YR, Sun X, Zhang S, et al. Regionally differentiated promotion of electric vehicles in China considering environmental and human health impacts. Environ Res Lett 2023;18:074022.
7. Álvarez-Rodríguez C, Martín-Gamboa M, Iribarren D. Sensitivity of operational and environmental benchmarks of retail stores to decision-makers’ preferences through data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 2020;718:137330.
8. Gao Z, Li Y, Qian H, Wei M. Environmental, economic, and social sustainability assessment: a case of using contaminated tailings stabilized by waste-based geopolymer as road base. Sci Total Environ 2023;888:164092.
9. Milovanoff A, Minet L, Cheah L, Posen ID, MacLean HL, Balasubramanian R. Greenhouse gas emission mitigation pathways for urban passenger land transport under ambitious climate targets. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55:8236-46.
10. Wang W, Zhong H, Zeng Y, Liu Y, Chen J. A carbon emission calculation model for roadside parking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:1906.
11. Yu W, Zhang L, Lu R, Ma J. Optimal number of charging station and pricing strategy for the electric vehicle with component commonality considering consumer range anxiety. PLoS One 2023;18:e0283320.
12. Zhang R, Yao E, Yang Y. Degradable transportation network with the addition of electric vehicles: network equilibrium analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0184693.
13. Xie H, Chen B, Dai M, et al. Upgrading passenger vehicle emission standard helps to reduce China’s air pollution risk from uncertainty in electrification. Environ Sci Technol 2024;58:5325-35.
14. Xu L, Shah SAA, Zameer H, Solangi YA. Evaluating renewable energy sources for implementing the hydrogen economy in Pakistan: a two-stage fuzzy MCDM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:33202-15.
15. Qi Y, Kim K. Evaluation of electric car styling based on analytic hierarchy process and Kansei engineering: a study on mainstream Chinese electric car brands. Heliyon 2024;10:e26999.
16. de Oliveira WC, de Araújo SR, Rodrigues LF, de Freitas Almeida JF. Sustainable approach towards alternatives for the use of iron ore tailings in the construction sector using data envelopment analysis methodology. Waste Manag Res 2024;734242X231219632.
17. Al-Thani NA, Al-Ansari T, Haouari M. Integrated TOPSIS-COV approach for selecting a sustainable PET waste management technology: a case study in Qatar. Heliyon 2022;8:e10274.
18. Sung TW, Li W, Liang Q, Hong C, Fang Q. Research on charging behavior of electric vehicles based on multiple objectives. Math Biosci Eng 2023;20:15708-36.
19. Taefi TT, Kreutzfeldt J, Held T, et al. Comparative analysis of European examples of freight electric vehicles schemes - A systematic case study approach with examples from Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. Cham: Springer; 2014. pp. 495-504.
20. Chakraborty P, Parker R, Hoque T, et al. Addressing the range anxiety of battery electric vehicles with charging en route. Sci Rep 2022;12:5588.
21. Fu F, Dong H. Targeted optimal-path problem for electric vehicles with connected charging stations. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220361.
22. Liu X, Zhao F, Geng J, Hao H, Liu Z. Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? iScience 2023;26:106654.
23. Shekhawat M, Bansal HO. An extensive review on hybrid electric vehicles powered by fuel cell-enabled hybrid energy storage system. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023;30:119750-71.
24. Steadman CL, Higgins CW. Agrivoltaic systems have the potential to meet energy demands of electric vehicles in rural Oregon, US. Sci Rep 2022;12:4647.
25. Woody M, Vaishnav P, Craig MT, Lewis GM, Keoleian GA. Charging strategies to minimize greenhouse gas emissions of electrified delivery vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55:10108-20.
26. Sheppard CJR, Jenn AT, Greenblatt JB, Bauer GS, Gerke BF. Private versus shared, automated electric vehicles for U.S. personal mobility: energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, grid integration, and cost impacts. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55:3229-39.
27. Qiao B, Liu J, Huan J. Multi-objective economic emission dispatch of thermal power-electric vehicles considering user's revenue. Soft Comput 2022;26:12833-49.
28. Cudjoe D, Wang H, Zhu B. Assessment of the potential energy and environmental benefits of solid waste recycling in China. J Environ Manage 2021;295:113072.
29. Wen L, Shao H. Analysis of influencing factors of the carbon dioxide emissions in China’s commercial department based on the STIRPAT model and ridge regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:27138-47.
30. Wu LM, Chen BY, Ou LC, et al. [Impact of accelerated electrification under the low carbon path in dongguan city on the coordinated emission reduction of CO2 and pollutants]. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2023;44:6653-63.
31. Wu D, Guo F, Field III FR, et al. Regional heterogeneity in the emissions benefits of electrified and lightweighted light-duty vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 2019;53:10560-70.
32. He L, You Y, Zheng X, et al. The impacts from cold start and road grade on real-world emissions and fuel consumption of gasoline, diesel and hybrid-electric light-duty passenger vehicles. Sci Total Environ 2022;851:158045.
33. Xie Y, Zuo Q, Guan Q, Wei K, Zhang B. Numerical analysis on a novel CGPFs for improving NOx conversion efficiency and particulate combustion efficiency to reduce exhaust pollutant emissions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022;29:25029-45.
34. Zavorka R, Paar M. A focus on electromobility within smart city solutions-charging stations, renewable energy, and air quality monitoring. Sensors 2022;22:7841.
35. Ghorbal S, Farhani S, Youssef SB. Do renewable energy and national patents impact the environmental sustainability of Tunisia? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022;29:25248-62.
36. Jenn A, Highleyman J. Distribution grid impacts of electric vehicles: a California case study. iScience 2022;25:103686.
37. Tamba M, Krause J, Weitzel M, et al. Economy-wide impacts of road transport electrification in the EU. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2022;182:121803.
38. Hao X, Ou S, Lin Z, et al. Evaluating the current perceived cost of ownership for buses and trucks in China. Energy 2022;254:124383.
39. Appleton S, Fotouhi A. A model-based battery charging optimization framework for proper trade-offs between time and degradation. Automot Innov 2023;6:204-19.
40. Higueras-Castillo E, Singh V, Singh V, Liébana-Cabanillas F. Factors affecting adoption intention of electric vehicle: a cross-cultural study. Environ Dev Sustain 2023.
41. Perret JK, Udalov V, Fabisch N. Motivations behind individuals’ energy efficiency investments and daily energy-saving behavior: the case of China. Int Econ Econ Policy 2022;19:129-55.
42. International Energy Agency. Global EV outlook 2023. Paris: IEA; 2023. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023 [Last accessed on 30 Oct 2024]
43. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Electric vehicle outlook 2024. Finance: Bloomberg; 2024. Available from: https://about.bnef.com/electric-vehicle-outlook/ [Last accessed on 30 Oct 2024]
44. National Development and Reform Commission. The 14th five-year plan for national economic and social development of the people’s republic of China and the outline of long-term goals for 2035; 2021. Available from: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/fzzlgh/gjfzgh/202103/t20210323_1270102.html [Last accessed on 30 Oct 2024]
45. Gillingham KT, Huang P. Long-run environmental and economic impacts of electrifying waterborne shipping in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:9824-33.
46. Dinh NT, Karimi-Arpanahi S, Ali Pourmousavi S, Guo M, Liisberg JAR. Cost-effective community battery sizing and operation within a local market framework. In IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation; 2023. pp. 536-48.
47. Adnan N, Md Nordin S, Hadi Amini M, Langove N. What make consumer sign up to PHEVs? Predicting Malaysian consumer behavior in adoption of PHEVs. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2018;113:259-78.
