Download PDF
Review  |  Open Access  |  17 Sep 2023

Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?

Views: 764 |  Downloads: 95 |  Cited:   0
Water Emerg Contam Nanoplastics 2023;2:20.
10.20517/wecn.2023.27 |  © The Author(s) 2023.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article


Microplastics (MPs) have been detected in many parts of the world in snow, hail, sea ice, glaciers, and permafrost. The ubiquity of microplastic around the globe means that there is a need to focus on its circulation dynamics in the Earth's diverse ecosystems; the prominence of MP fibers, which has been indicated as of human clothing and activities, in high altitude frozen water is explained by their enhanced suspension in the air, allowing them to be transported over long distances from urban centers. The MP particles can act as nucleation centers for ice crystals and, once incorporated, reduce the albedo (reflective capacity) of the frozen mass, causing temperature increases. However, cores have indicated that ice in glaciers may remain frozen for thousands of years. This article reviews the quantities and types of MPs that have been detected in snow, hail, sea ice, and glaciers. The potential for release of these, as well as MPs in the permafrost, following global warming, is discussed. As the global warming process evolves, these sites will act as additional sources of MPs accumulated over the course of recent human history. It is important to be aware of the future entry of microplastic into the global environment from these sources, especially into the already fragile extreme ecosystems of the cryosphere.


Ice contamination, pollutants, snow, extremophilic organisms


Microplastics (MPs) reach aquatic environments from different terrestrial sources and by different pathways[1,2]. Sources include manufacturers of plastic products used in industry or agriculture, as well as clothing and utensils used domestically or for fishing or aquaculture[3-8]. Pathways include the physical and chemical degradation of plastic materials in the terrestrial environment[9] and the release of MPs from sewage treatment plants[10].

After entering the aquatic environment, MPs pass through several further degradation paths [Figure 1], including physical, chemical and biological action, which may reduce them to nanoparticles (NPs), 1-1,000 nm in size, or even further[11]. Physical breakdown includes light, thermal and mechanical degradation, while chemical degradation mainly includes hydrolysis and thermal oxidation reactions[12]. MPs may be degraded more rapidly since plastic molecules are squeezed in the ice and produce an excited state that leads to accelerated oxidation and degradation[13].

Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?

Figure 1. Plastic degradation processes in aquatic environments.

In addition to the mechanical and photodegradation of microplastic in the aquatic environment, microorganisms, for example Bacillus sp., Rhodococcus sp.[14], Pseudomonas aeruginosa[15], Zalerion maritimum[16], and Aspergillus clavatus[17], may use plastics as an energy source, resulting in their degradation and inciting physical and chemical impacts which include alterations in the surface structures of the particles. They may produce chemical bonding structures, such as carbonyl groups, ketones, and aldehydes[14]. Thus, microorganisms may contribute to polymer breakdown first by producing surface changes and then by releasing extracellular enzymes, resulting in chain cleavage to produce monomers that can be used by the aquatic microbiota[14,18]. Some microbial species can convert polymers into monomers and, in a few cases, break down them into carbon dioxide and water.

In aqueous environments where temperatures fall below freezing, however, any microbial activities will be slow, if not absent. These regions, which include various forms of frozen water, are collectively known as the cryosphere [Figure 2].

Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?

Figure 2. The various environments that make up the cryosphere.

The cryosphere is composed of a series of environments considered of great importance in the global biogeochemical balance and radiative forcing (energy balance) of the Earth. Being controlled by the global climate, the cryosphere is responsible for maintaining the climate balance of the planet[19,20]. It contains “extremophilic” forms of life, that is, those capable of withstanding extreme environmental conditions. In ecosystems located at the poles of the planet, where mathematical models of global circulation previously projected a more pronounced rise in temperatures[21], the raised subsurface sea temperatures[22,23] have already caused increased retraction of the ice shelves[24,25]. Some benthic invertebrate[26] and larger vertebrate populations[27,28] have decreased. The original habitats and the primary production process are being dramatically altered[29,30], although for other species, the short-term impacts may not yet be significant[31].

Snow layers are the main element of the cryosphere. They reach around 25 million km2, most being present in the northern hemisphere. Obviously, their total size varies according to the season[32]. Sea ice, on the other hand, is present in most of the polar regions of the seas, covering an average of about 20 million km2[33].

Except for perennially frozen environments, ice on rivers and lakes during the year is due to seasonal cooling. Like snow cover, the ground freezes depending on the season. Permafrost, the permanently frozen portion of the soil, occupies approximately 24.5% of the Northern Hemisphere. Its maximum thickness reaches 600 m in northeastern Siberia and Alaska[34].

Finally, about 77% of the global cryosphere is concentrated in ice sheets on land. These total about 64 m, sea level equivalent (or potential sea level rise), and are located mainly in Antarctica and Greenland. The Antarctic and Greenland ice systems have a fundamental impact on atmospheric circulation, the cyclone system and the global energy balance. Large portions of the West Antarctic ice sheet are concentrated below sea level; the main mass, however, rests on bedrock in Antarctica. In the central part of the mantle, due to pressure or geothermal heating, the ice forms subglacial lakes. Ice shelves and outgoing glaciers continuously generate icebergs (about 2,072 km3 of ice in Antarctica and 235 km3 in Greenland)[35].

MPs have been found in the many forms of frozen water around the world and might be expected to persist unaltered under such conditions. The deterioration rate of MPs may indeed be reduced in continuous permafrost zones, where freezing and thawing do not occur and light, temperature and oxygen levels are low. However, following global warming, the stable permafrost will undergo an alternation of physical states[36], allowing MP release and degradation. The same may occur with the forms of frozen water.

MPs have been detected in snow and ice samples in many countries using various methods of collection, even manual[37]. Examples include Italy[37], Mount Everest[38], Ecuador[39], Iceland[40], Tibet[41,42], Austria[43] and Antarctica[44]. In the polar regions where water occurs predominantly in the frozen state, there is little human influence. Nevertheless, MPs have been found in such locations. The main types of plastics indicated in the literature are polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide (PA), polyethylene (PE), and rubber[45]. For a brief review of the methods used in detection and identification, see Zhang et al. (2022)[45].

The potential for microbiological degradation of MPs has often been considered, and even ice-derived bacteria have been suggested as candidates[46-48]. The presence of microorganisms in sea ice has been studied by several groups[49-51]. It seems clear that these psychrophilic organisms, bacteria, archaea, and algae grow in liquid water at the sea-ice interface during warmer weather and become incorporated into the ice in winter. Thiele et al. (2022), collecting ice core samples from the Arctic pack ice north of Svalbard, Norway, studied the changes between the winter and summer communities in Arctic Sea ice, concluding that the winter community used a nitrogen-based metabolism, which switched to microorganisms that used carbon derived from algae and cyanobacteria in the spring and summer[52]. Although not studied by these workers, it is possible that some of these microorganisms could be plastic-degraders.

The mechanics of freezing represent a survival challenge to living organisms, as ice crystallization can damage cell membranes. Life in the cryosphere is thus particularly difficult and hence scarce; most of the organisms are bacterial and archaeal groups, such as Pseudomonas, Calothrix[53], and Bacteroidetes[54]. To protect themselves, the psychrophilic cells concentrate lipids and antifreeze enzymes to maintain physical plasticity below the freezing limit and to allow cellular membrane homeostasis and biochemical reactions. They produce ice-binding proteins that act via thermal hysteresis and inhibition of ice recrystallization[55]. Overall, little is known about the potential impacts of microplastics on organisms that live in the cryosphere, especially the microbiota, although substrates that are more difficult to biodegrade (such as plastics) have been suggested to reduce the growth potential of certain psychrophilic organisms[46]. Research on psychrophilic and plastic-degrading microorganisms continues, but it seems unlikely that the microbiota associated with MPs in the cryosphere will influence plastic degradation either before or after any thawing event. Considering the difficult accessibility of these environments and the impact that global warming will bring, this article seeks to provide more details about the presence of MPs in the cryosphere and potential effects of global climate change on the balance and circulation of microplastics from these environments. The article was written based on the scientific literature available through the platforms ResearchGate, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, among others. MPs in the various forms of frozen water that make up the Earth's cryosphere are discussed in the following sections.


Snow is a temporal sink for MPs[45] and a method of aerial transport of these particles, which can act as nucleation centers for ice formation in the atmosphere[56]. Various types of plastics are found in snow in different places in the world and at different levels of urbanization. In Arongqi city in the inner Mongolian plateau, 86-199 MPs L-1 of freshly fallen snow were detected[57]. Most were fibers, but the type of plastic varied. In Hokkaido, Japan, MPs found in all deposited snow samples were mainly alkyd, ethylene-vinyl acetate, and PE[58]. These were attributed to long-distance transport through the atmosphere, whereas the rubber and larger particles found mainly in cities and near highways were considered to be from local sources. A similar situation was found in Arctic snow falling on sea ice[59]. It contained large amounts of MPs, including road MPs like tyre-wear particles, which would have been transported in snow from North America and Europe, later falling on Northern Greenland and other parts of the Arctic.

Snow samples taken in cities or other conurbations are expected to yield higher MP counts. However, Crosta et al. (2022), working in the Italian Alps, hypothesized that the higher levels of MPs on the Ebenferner-Vedretta Piana glacier (0.265 ± 0.027 MPs g-1 dry weight) were higher than those on the Forni and Cedec glaciers (0.033 ± 0.007 and 0.025 ± 0.009 g-1 dry weight, respectively) because of its greater footfall[60]. In this case, the direct influence of humans was suggested, rather than the transfer of MPs from more distant urban centers. However, most glaciers are not subject to human footfall and long-range transport is the main source of their contamination.

Transport through the air, which can occur over many hundreds of kilometers, can result in MPs being degraded to nanoplastics (NPs), with a resulting increase in the total particle counts. Materić et al. (2021) detected 46.5 ng·mL-1 NPs of melted surface snow in the high Austrian Alps, mainly composed of polypropylene (PP) and PET[61]. It was assumed that these originated as larger particles in European towns and cities and were broken down to NPs during aerial transportation. The authors calculated that more than 2 × 1011 NP particles were deposited per square meter of surface snow per week.

Polymer types in Arctic snow have been found to vary greatly. Bergmann et al. (2019) found that varnish (acrylates), plasticized rubber and polyamides (PA) were most common, while in European snow, MP composition was 67% polyamide, varnish, rubber, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), and PE[62]. The Antarctic had been considered a relatively untouched (unpolluted) area until MPs were detected there in 2020[63]. More recently, MPs (mainly PE fibers) have been detected in fresh snow samples collected near and distant from research stations in the Ross Island region and considered likely to originate either locally, in clothing and equipment around research stations, or, following modeling using the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model (HYSPLIT)[64], to have a possible origin up to 6,000 km away[44].

A rare instance of the almost complete absence of MPs in snow was reported in Dimon Lake, a high-mountain lake in the Italian Alps[37]. No MPs were detected in the lake water, sediment, or biota. The extremely low MP (PET) particle levels in the snow (0.11 ± 0.19 L-1) were suggested to be due to particles trapped by massive snow precipitates in the winter. The location obviously influences the types of plastic present in snow, but there is no evidence of any relationship between snowflake formation and the type of particle entrapped.

Napper et al. (2020) examined the presence of MPs (above 30 μm) in snow samples taken from Mt. Everest at 5,300 to 8,400 m above sea level[38]. They found MPs in all snow samples, with the highest level at the Base Camp (79 particles L-1). The majority were fibers and plastic types were PE > acrylic > nylon > PP. The researchers concluded that the fibers were most likely deposited from the clothes and equipment of climbers, who spend more time at the base camp, and that high levels of MPs in such snow-covered areas are related to tourism activities. The majority of technical clothing worn by trekkers and climbers on Mt. Everest is composed of synthetic fabrics and De Falco et al. (2020) estimated that most MP fibers are released into the air as a direct consequence of wearing clothes made of MP[65]. A recently developed online tool for calculating the “plastic footprint”[66] determined that, of a distinct group of students living in the mountains, mountain activities had the second largest footprint (after food consumption), and that this was due mainly to synthetic fleeces, followed by special climbing footwear. Although many other workers have detected more MP fibers than fragments in snow[62,67,68], they have not always attributed this to clothing worn at the site, more often considering fibers transported through the air or water. Owing to the large surface area to volume ratio of MP fibers, the air resistance is increased, and the settling speed is reduced, leading to a high proportion of fibers at high altitudes[69,70].


Hail is produced when a water droplet is raised above the freezing level in the atmosphere. The droplet attracts supercooled vapor that freezes on contact, causing the hailstone to grow [Figure 3A].

Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?

Figure 3. (A) Image of a 6 cm hailstone [National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) Collection:]; (B) deposited hail in Colorado, in USA’s “Hail Alley”, August 2019.

The recent increased incidence of giant hailstones has been linked to the presence of MP fibers, which act as nucleation centers[71]. These authors used micro-FTIR and -Raman spectroscopy to identify over 450 MP fibers in the interior of 10-12 cm diameter hailstones that fell in Slovenia. Felton et al. (2021) had previously reported MPs (mainly fibers) in four large hailstones from thunderstorms in Texas; one hailstone contained an MP fragment[72]. There are very few reports on MPs in hailstones, but their plastic-related content may well be found to be similar to that of snow. Their formation in the atmosphere is similar, but differences are clear. Hail falls in defined paths known as hail swaths. They can range in size from 100,000 - 215,000 ft² to an area 10 miles wide and 100 miles long. Hailstorms normally last from a few minutes up to 15 min in duration, accumulating to a depth of over 5 cm [Figure 3B], and can occur in areas not normally associated with frozen water. The increasing frequency and severity of hailstorms in Europe have been associated with climate change[73], but the influence of MPs on the size and duration of hailstones has never been considered.


Sea ice is a highly variable and complex biogeochemical component of the Antarctic marine environment[74]. Two major sea ice types can be discerned - landfast ice and pack ice. Whereas pack ice is free drifting sea ice, which moves with winds and currents, landfast sea ice is attached to the coast, shallow seafloor, or grounded icebergs[75]. Landfast ice usually forms and dissipates seasonally, controlled by atmospheric and oceanic conditions.

The first indication that MPs were present in sea ice was in the early 1960s when plastic fragments were found in Canadian seabirds[76]. In the 1970s, the quantity of beached plastic increased substantially in the Bering Sea[77], suggesting its deposition from ice. Since this time, MPs have been identified in sea ice in many areas. As long ago as 2014, Obbard et al. stated that sea ice at the North Pole is a major historic global sink for MPs[78]. Von Friesen et al. (2020) found that the average number of anthropogenic MPs (> 50 µm) per liter in Arctic sea ice was 158 ± 155 (221-1,054) and that some of these were derived from pigmented ship paint[79]. MPs were released during the summer melt and thus became directly available to the marine biota of the summer bloom, increasing the immediate risk of plastic-associated damage to sea life.

Peeken et al. (2019) found that most of the MP particles identified in the Central Arctic sea ice cores were smaller than 50 µm, with 67% being of the smallest detectable size (11 µm); this suggests that von Friesen’s numbers are too low and also indicates the high risk of uptake by and damage to the cells of marine organisms if the ice melts[80]. Peeken’s group found over 12,000 MP particles L-1, a much higher number than previous workers, and attributed this to their methodology allowing the detection of much smaller particles. They deduced that MPs became incorporated into the ice when it was first formed and also as it continued to grow while passing through the water masses. The high levels of PE found were attributed to the remains of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, now being driven along the Bering Strait into the Arctic Ocean. However, in ice from the shallow seas along the margin of Siberia, paint particles from ships and nylon from shipping nets were predominant. These ice floes take a maximum of 11 years to reach the Fram Strait. Here, they melt, releasing the MP load, which may then become colonized by microorganisms and sink into the sediment[81].

MPs do not affect the growth of sea ice[82], although they may act as nuclei for ice formation[56]. High concentrations of microplastics at the ice surface can, however, increase ice salinity and reduce its reflectance properties (albedo)[82], which can increase melting. Sea ice is a significant sink for MP pollution. MPs will concentrate as the water becomes ice. Drifting ice floes, which can be many square kilometers in size, transport MPs potentially over many kilometers. The melting ice can act as a vector of MPs not only laterally but also vertically[83].

In the Arctic, the sea ice is dominated by positively buoyant microplastics, transported to the area through surface transport, while the Southern Ocean is dominated by neutrally buoyant plastics, transported to the area through deep water[84]. These differences in plastic type have not yet been explained; they may have something to do not only with the origin of the particles, but also with their interaction with microorganisms during passage through the water bodies.


Glaciers are particularly efficient at concentrating small particles from the air[85]. They provide interesting natural freezing and thawing events that involve the uptake and release of MPs. Materić et al. (2020), testing a new detection technique based on thermal desorption - proton transfer reaction - mass spectrometry, analyzed snow collected on a glacier in the Austrian Alps at 3 km above sea level and far from any anthropogenic activity for the presence of MPs and NPs[43]. Samples from within a snowpit, cores from nearby ice on the glacier, and snow covering the ice were collected. Surface snow and snowpit samples all contained PET, while snowpit samples also contained polypropylene copolymer (PPC) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). After filtration through 0.2 μm pore size filters to extract NPs, however, only PET was detected. The PET NPs had the highest concentration of all plastics detected in the snow and snowpit, as well as in recently deposited snow. The authors considered that more work would be needed to determine whether any PS (polystyrene) MPs present might have undergone chemical changes by weathering. PS was not detected in their analyses, although it had been reported in remote parts of the Pyrenees, occurring as sheets and fragments[86].

Using data previously obtained from the high Austrian Alps in 2020, Materić et al. (2021) specifically examined the content and importance of NPs in the samples[61]. They subjected the data to analysis using the HYSPLIT dispersion model[64] to track the transit of the NPs over the previous 96 h. The results suggested that NPs had been carried over large distances and principally from highly populated areas in Europe, although some deposits could have been carried from beyond Europe. It has been suggested that marine sources may contribute to atmospheric MPs[87] and the HYSPLIT model would indicate that this is certainly possible in this case.

The importance of MP transport in the atmosphere for the spread of MP pollution was emphasized by Stefánssonet al. (2021), who, using optical microscopy and Raman spectroscopy, recorded several types of MP particles of a wide range of sizes and materials in the Vatnajökull Ice Cap[40]. This ice cap, located in southeast Iceland, is, by size, the largest ice cap in Europe. The types of plastic materials identified included polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, polyamide, and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene.

Despite the scarcity of studies regarding the presence of MPs in glaciers, these ice masses are of significant importance for the global circulation of water. Glaciers occupy a significant part of the planet’s surface, representing the largest reservoirs of freshwater. The presence of MPs has a direct impact on glacier balance, influencing their light absorption as well as their structure and general rheological properties[88,89]. MPs thus potentially contribute to the melting of glaciers, contributing to sea level rise[90]. It was recently calculated that glaciers worldwide lost 2% of their total volume in the 10 years between 2010 and 2020[91]; the result of continued global warming will lead to rising sea levels and the release of any MPs previously locked in the ice. The real impact of MPs has not yet been measured, but they will probably act in such a way as to unbalance an already established balance fundamental for the existence of these environments.


The International Permafrost Association (IPA) defines permafrost as a ground remaining at or below 0 °C for at least two consecutive years. It comprises an essential percentage of continental Arctic environments[92]. Some mathematical projections suggest that the temperature at this site may double more rapidly than the global average during the present century, resulting in a non-ignorable permafrost loss[93]. Such significant permafrost damage may result in a substantial impact on global MP flux. During the melting of stored ground ice, MP migration in the permafrost region will be significantly affected, the permafrost becoming a source of MPs rather than a storage bank.

As stated before, MP degradation may be reduced and their properties may become stable in continuous permafrost zones due to the absence of the freeze-thaw process, the light-shielding effect, low temperature, and the oxygen-deficient environment. However, global warming can change this, with an annual freeze-thaw process occurring in the permafrost, allowing the installation of MP processes such as aging or other kinds of mechanical weathering, working together with biodegradation[94,95]. Such freezing and thawing events also allow the incorporation of MPs transmitted via the atmosphere into the permafrost. MPs may become chemically transformed, for example, by polymer-chain fracture and the resulting increase in surface functional groups[96], producing more reactive micro- or nano-plastics that are more readily spread. After such a thaw, the resulting water starts to work as a microplastic diffusion mechanism, carrying it into water bodies around the permafrost, producing a new source of contaminants for the environment.

The impact of MPs on the permafrost soil layer depends on the types of MPs present[97]. 70% of MPs can significantly change the physicochemical properties of their surroundings, for instance, decreasing soil permeability, resulting in increased water accumulation and future water evaporation[98]. Freeze-thaw cycles often result in the aggregation of fine particles with fragmented coarse mineral particles, making soil particles more cohesive and homogeneous. Finally, the freeze-thaw events can accentuate particle interaction, resulting in the aggregation of soil particles and MPs[99].


Many authors have tried to establish correlations between changes in global mean surface temperature and mean sea level[100-103]. However, the impact of global warming on MP dispersion and resulting circulation has not even been addressed. Difficulties due to the empirical nature of such studies may explain this phenomenon. These difficulties lie not only in those associated with collecting suitable samples, but also in the lack of appropriate methods for identifying MPs, which applies to MP research in all environments. But the truth is that these projections are becoming more and more necessary for the future management of the challenges that will be faced. The main question that remains is: How important is frozen water, in its various forms, as a storage deposit for MPs? Ice cores from glaciers on the Tibetan plateau have been used to determine the changes in the environment over hundreds of years[104], indicating that MPs could be held in ice for many years after plastics have ceased to be produced. So, is global warming going to release large amounts of MPs? How much and at what speed? Colored MPs, especially, can absorb radiation and increase the melting of snow, the so-called “radiative forcing”[105]. Thus, recordings of MP colors in the environment (a commonly reported characteristic) can take on a new and important meaning when dealing with icy environments. Perhaps this information is even important in the new sustainability policies of the plastics industry. MPs could be released sooner than expected from other matrices in response to their absorption of energy and consequent increase in temperature due to the color. Other issues related to MPs refer to global balances. What is the potential impact of MPs in the cryosphere on the Earth’s biogeochemical cycles? There are no published studies on this. What will be the effect of global warming and the release of MPs previously trapped in the cryosphere on the world’s ecosystems and on marine organisms in polar regions?


MPs have been detected in all the types of frozen water on the planet. The majority are present as fibers; this, and the types of polymer mainly identified, have led to the conclusion that MPs in frozen water are the result of transport from areas of human activity, even though such activity may be thousands of miles away. The degradation rate of MPs in frozen environments is low, resulting in accumulation and potential future release to cause pollution of rivers and marine environments. Their increasingly significant presence in the cryosphere reduces the reflection of the sun’s rays, increasing the temperature. These small particles thus contribute to the melting of polar environments, affecting not only sites considered borderline, which have a biosphere extremely sensitive to temperature change, but also the oceanic circulation as a whole, increasing the flow of melted ice and potentially unbalancing the global thermohaline fluxes. Even if we manage to solve the current MPs problem by eliminating the production of non-degradable plastics, will the hidden time bomb of MPs in frozen water around the world explode and destroy our environment?


Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, writing - original draft preparation: Gaylarde CC, Baptista Neto JA, da Fonseca EM

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

This research was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior).

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.


© The Author(s) 2023.


1. Browne MA, Dissanayake A, Galloway TS, Lowe DM, Thompson RC. Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:5026-31.

2. Browne MA. Sources and pathways of microplastics to habitats. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M, editors. Marine anthropogenic litter. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 229-44.

3. Zhang W, Zhang S, Wang J, et al. Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Bohai Sea, China. Environ Pollut 2017;231:541-8.

4. Xue B, Zhang L, Li R, et al. Underestimated microplastic pollution derived from fishery activities and “hidden” in deep sediment. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:2210-7.

5. Zhang Q, Xu EG, Li J, et al. A review of microplastics in table salt, drinking water, and air: direct human exposure. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:3740-51.

6. Fadare OO, Wan B, Guo LH, Zhao L. Microplastics from consumer plastic food containers: are we consuming it? Chemosphere 2020;253:126787.

7. Deng H, Wei R, Luo W, et al. Microplastic pollution in water and sediment in a textile industrial area. Environ Pollut 2020;258:113658.

8. Wang F, Wang B, Duan L, et al. Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in domestic, industrial, agricultural and aquacultural wastewater sources: a case study in Changzhou, China. Water Res 2020;182:115956.

9. Eo S, Hong SH, Song YK, Lee J, Lee J, Shim WJ. Abundance, composition, and distribution of microplastics larger than 20 μm in sand beaches of South Korea. Environ Pollut 2018;238:894-902.

10. Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Leusch FDL. Wastewater treatment plant effluent as a source of microplastics: review of the fate, chemical interactions and potential risks to aquatic organisms. Water Sci Technol 2016;74:2253-69.

11. Mintenig SM, Bäuerlein PS, Koelmans AA, Dekker SC, van Wezel AP. Closing the gap between small and smaller: towards a framework to analyse nano- and microplastics in aqueous environmental samples†. Environ Sci Nano 2018;5:1640-9.

12. Yuan J, Ma J, Sun Y, Zhou T, Zhao Y, Yu F. Microbial degradation and other environmental aspects of microplastics/plastics. Sci Total Environ 2020;715:136968.

13. Tian C, Lv J, Zhang W, et al. Accelerated degradation of microplastics at the liquid interface of ice crystals in frozen aqueous solutions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2022;61:e202206947.

14. Auta HS, Emenike CU, Jayanthi B, Fauziah SH. Growth kinetics and biodeterioration of polypropylene microplastics by Bacillus sp. and Rhodococcus sp. isolated from mangrove sediment. Mar Pollut Bull 2018;127:15-21.

15. Jeon HJ, Kim MN. Functional analysis of alkane hydroxylase system derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa E7 for low molecular weight polyethylene biodegradation. Intl Biodeterior Biodegrad 2015;103:141-6.

16. Paço A, Duarte K, da Costa JP, et al. Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the marine fungus Zalerion maritimum. Sci Total Environ 2017;586:10-5.

17. Gajendiran A, Krishnamoorthy S, Abraham J. Microbial degradation of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) by Aspergillus clavatus strain JASK1 isolated from landfill soil. 3 Biotech 2016;6:52.

18. Rogers KL, Carreres-calabuig JA, Gorokhova E, Posth NR. Micro-by-micro interactions: how microorganisms influence the fate of marine microplastics. Limnol Oceanogr Lett 2020;5:18-36.

19. Boer GJ, Yu B. Climate sensitivity and climate state. Clim Dyn 2003;21:167-76.

20. Hall A. The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J Climate 2004;17:1550-68.

21. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Available from: [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2023].

22. Gille ST. Decadal-scale temperature trends in the southern hemisphere ocean. J Clim 2008;21:4749-65.

23. Madhusoodanan MS, Thompson B. Decadal variability of the Arctic Ocean thermal structure. Ocean Dyn 2011;61:873-80.

24. Pritchard HD, Arthern RJ, Vaughan DG, Edwards LA. Extensive dynamic thinning on the margins of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Nature 2009;461:971-5.

25. Pritchard HD, Ligtenberg SRM, Fricker HA, Vaughan DG, van den Broeke MR, Padman L. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature 2012;484:502-5.

26. Barnes DKA, Souster T. Reduced survival of Antarctic benthos linked to climate-induced iceberg scouring. Nature Clim Change 2011;1:365-8.

27. Lescroël A, Ballard G, Toniolo V, et al. Ecology 2010;91:2044-55.

28. Dugger KM, Ainley DG, Lyver PO, Barton K, Ballard G. Survival differences and the effect of environmental instability on breeding dispersal in an Adélie penguin meta-population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:12375-80.

29. Arrigo KR, van Dijken GL, Ainley DG, Fahnestock MA, Markus T. Ecological impact of a large Antarctic iceberg. Geophys Res Lett 2002;29:8-1.

30. Thrush SF, Cummings VJ. Massive icebergs, alteration in primary food resources and change in benthic communities at Cape Evans, Antarctica. Mar Ecol 2011;32:289-99.

31. Chambert T, Rotella JJ, Garrott RA. Environmental extremes versus ecological extremes: impact of a massive iceberg on the population dynamics of a high-level Antarctic marine predator. Proc Biol Sci 2012;279:4532-41.

32. Robinson DA, Dewey KF, Heim Jr RR. Global snow cover monitoring: an update. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 1993;74:1689-96.

33. Gloersen P, Campbell WJ, Cavalieri DJ, Comiso JC, Parkinson CL, Zwally HJ. Satellite passive microwave observations and analysis of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice, 1978-1987. Ann Glaciol 1993;17:149-54.

34. Khromova TE. Cryosphere and climate. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2010;13:012002.

35. Church JA, Gregory JM, Huybrechts P, et al. Changes in sea level. In: Climate change 2001: the scientific basis: contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 639-93. Available from: [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2023].

36. Nitzbon J, Westermann S, Langer M, et al. Fast response of cold ice-rich permafrost in northeast Siberia to a warming climate. Nat Commun 2020;11:2201.

37. Pastorino P, Pizzul E, Bertoli M, et al. First insights into plastic and microplastic occurrence in biotic and abiotic compartments, and snow from a high-mountain lake (Carnic Alps). Chemosphere 2021;265:129121.

38. Napper IE, Davies BFR, Clifford H, et al. Reaching new heights in plastic pollution -preliminary findings of microplastics on mount everest. One Earth 2020;3:621-30.

39. Cabrera M, Moulatlet GM, Valencia BG, et al. Microplastics in a tropical Andean Glacier: a transportation process across the Amazon basin? Sci Total Environ 2022;805:150334.

40. Stefánsson H, Peternell M, Konrad-Schmolke M, Hannesdóttir H, Ásbjörnsson EJ, Sturkell E. Microplastics in glaciers: first results from the vatnajökull ice Cap. Sustainability 2021;13:4183.

41. Zhang Y, Gao T, Kang S, Allen S, Luo X, Allen D. Microplastics in glaciers of the Tibetan Plateau: evidence for the long-range transport of microplastics. Sci Total Environ 2021;758:143634.

42. Wang Z, Zhang Y, Kang S, et al. Long-range transport of atmospheric microplastics deposited onto glacier in southeast Tibetan Plateau. Environ Pollut 2022;306:119415.

43. Materić D, Kasper-Giebl A, Kau D, et al. Micro- and nanoplastics in alpine snow: a new method for chemical identification and (semi)quantification in the nanogram range. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:2353-9.

44. Aves AR, Revell LE, Gaw S, et al. First evidence of microplastics in Antarctic snow. The Cryosphere 2022;16:2127-45.

45. Zhang Y, Gao T, Kang S, et al. Current status and future perspectives of microplastic pollution in typical cryospheric regions. Earth Sci Rev 2022;226:103924.

46. Atanasova N, Stoitsova S, Paunova-Krasteva T, Kambourova M. Plastic degradation by extremophilic bacteria. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:5610.

47. Urbanek AK, Strzelecki MC, Mirończuk AM. The potential of cold-adapted microorganisms for biodegradation of bioplastics. Waste Manag 2021;119:72-81.

48. Hualpa-cutipa E, Acosta RAS, Cariga OJM, et al. Chapter 20 - Metagenomic approach role of psychrotrophic and psychrophilic microbes in bioremediation. In: Vineet Kumar, Muhammad Bilal, Sushil Kumar Shahi, Vinod Kumar Garg, editors. Metagenomics to Bioremediation. Elsevier; 2023. p. 513-36.

49. Boetius A, Anesio AM, Deming JW, Mikucki JA, Rapp JZ. Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015;13:677-90.

50. Olsen LM, Laney SR, Duarte P, et al. The seeding of ice algal blooms in Arctic pack ice: the multiyear ice seed repository hypothesis. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 2017;122:1529-48.

51. de Sousa AGG, Tomasino MP, Duarte P, et al. Diversity and composition of pelagic prokaryotic and protist communities in a thin arctic sea-ice regime. Microb Ecol 2019;78:388-408.

52. Thiele S, Storesund JE, Fernández-Méndez M, Assmy P, Øvreås L. A winter-to-summer transition of bacterial and archaeal communities in arctic sea ice. Microorganisms 2022;10:1618.

53. Garcia-Lopez E, Ruiz-Blas F, Sanchez-Casanova S, Peña Perez S, Martin-Cerezo ML, Cid C. Microbial communities in volcanic glacier ecosystems. Front Microbiol 2022;13:825632.

54. Paun VI, Icaza G, Lavin P, et al. Total and potentially active bacterial communities entrapped in a late glacial through holocene ice core from Scarisoara Ice Cave, Romania. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1193.

55. Winder JC, Boulton W, Salamov A, et al. Genetic and structural diversity of prokaryotic ice-binding proteins from the central Arctic Ocean. Genes 2023;14:363.

56. Ganguly M, Ariya PA. Ice nucleation of model nanoplastics and microplastics: a novel synthetic protocol and the influence of particle capping at diverse atmospheric environments. ACS Earth Space Chem 2019;3:1729-39.

57. Yu H, Shao J, Jia H, Gang D, Ma B, Hu C. Characteristics and influencing factors of microplastics in snow in the Inner Mongolia Plateau, China. Engineering 2023; doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2023.02.007.

58. Ohno H, Iizuka Y. Microplastics in snow from protected areas in Hokkaido, the northern island of Japan. Sci Rep 2023;13:9942.

59. Evangeliou N, Grythe H, Klimont Z, et al. Atmospheric transport is a major pathway of microplastics to remote regions. Nat Commun 2020;11:3381.

60. Crosta A, De Felice B, Antonioli D, et al. Microplastic contamination of supraglacial debris differs among glaciers with different anthropic pressures. Sci Total Environ 2022;851:158301.

61. Materić D, Ludewig E, Brunner D, Röckmann T, Holzinger R. Nanoplastics transport to the remote, high-altitude Alps. Environ Pollut 2021;288:117697.

62. Bergmann M, Mützel S, Primpke S, Tekman MB, Trachsel J, Gerdts G. White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaax1157.

63. González-Pleiter M, Edo C, Velázquez D, et al. First detection of microplastics in the freshwater of an Antarctic specially protected area. Mar Pollut Bull 2020;161:111811.

64. Stein AF, Draxler RR, Rolph GD, Stunder BJB, Cohen MD, Ngan F. NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2015;96:2059-77.

65. Falco F, Cocca M, Avella M, Thompson RC. Microfiber release to water, via laundering, and to air, via everyday use: a comparison between polyester clothing with differing textile parameters. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:3288-96.

66. Senese A, Pecci M, Ambrosini R, Diolaiuti GA. MOUNTAINPLAST: a new Italian plastic footprint with a focus on mountain activities. Sustainability 2023;15:7017.

67. Abbasi S, Alirezazadeh M, Razeghi N, et al. Microplastics captured by snowfall: a study in Northern Iran. Sci Total Environ 2022;822:153451.

68. Yücel N, Tutsak E, Kiliç E. First evidence of microplastic deposition in snow from Turkey. J Anatol Environ Animal Sci 2023;8:95-102. Available from: [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2023]

69. Cabrera M, Valencia BG, Lucas-solis O, et al. A new method for microplastic sampling and isolation in mountain glaciers: a case study of one antisana glacier, Ecuadorian Andes. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 2020;2:100051.

70. Brahney J, Hallerud M, Heim E, Hahnenberger M, Sukumaran S. Plastic rain in protected areas of the United States. Science 2020;368:1257-60.

71. Kozjek M, Vengust D, Radošević T, et al. Dissecting giant hailstones: a glimpse into the troposphere with its diverse bacterial communities and fibrous microplastics. Sci Total Environ 2023;856:158786.

72. Felton A, De La Cruz A, Nordstrand T, Gao Y, Ackley S, Hutchinson J. Analysis of microplastics in hailstones from two supercell thunderstorms. Available from: [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2023].

73. Laviola S, Monte G, Cattani E, Levizzani V. Hail climatology in the Mediterranean Basin using the GPM constellation (1999-2021). Remote Sens 2022;14:4320.

74. Fripiat F, Sigman DM, Massé G, Tison JL. High turnover rates indicated by changes in the fixed N forms and their stable isotopes in Antarctic landfast sea ice. J Geophys Res Oceans 2015;120:3079-97.

75. Fraser AD, Massom RA, Ohshima KI, et al. High-resolution mapping of circum-Antarctic landfast sea ice distribution, 2000-2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 2020;12:2987-99.

76. Threlfall W. Dispersal of herring gulls from the witless bay sea bird sanctuary, Newfoundland. Available from: [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2023].

77. Merrell Jr TR. Accumulation of plastic litter on beaches of Amchitka Island, Alaska. Mar Environ Res 1980;3:171-84.

78. Obbard RW, Sadri S, Wong YQ, Khitun AA, Baker I, Thompson RC. Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice. Earths Future 2014;2:315-20.

79. von Friesen LW, Granberg ME, Pavlova O, Magnusson K, Hassellöv M, Gabrielsen GW. Summer sea ice melt and wastewater are important local sources of microlitter to Svalbard waters. Environ Int 2020;139:105511.

80. Peeken I, Primpke S, Beyer B, et al. Arctic sea ice is an important temporal sink and means of transport for microplastic. Nat Commun 2018;9:1505.

81. Gaylarde CC, de Almeida MP, Neves CV, Neto JAB, da Fonseca EM. The importance of biofilms on microplastic particles in their sinking behavior and the transfer of invasive organisms between ecosystems. Micro 2023;3:320-37.

82. Geilfus NX, Munson KM, Sousa J, et al. Distribution and impacts of microplastic incorporation within sea ice. Mar Pollut Bull 2019;145:463-73.

83. Ball HL, Halsall C. Chapter 8: Plastic pollution in the arctic marine environment. Plast Pollut Glob Ocean 2023:233-58.

84. Mountford AS, Morales Maqueda MA. Modeling the accumulation and transport of microplastics by sea ice. J Geophys Res Oceans 2021;126:e2020JC016826.

85. Ambrosini R, Azzoni RS, Pittino F, Diolaiuti G, Franzetti A, Parolini M. First evidence of microplastic contamination in the supraglacial debris of an alpine glacier. Environ Pollut 2019;253:297-301.

86. Allen S, Allen D, Phoenix VR, et al. Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment. Nat Geosci 2019;12:339-44.

87. Allen S, Allen D, Moss K, Le Roux G, Phoenix VR, Sonke JE. Examination of the ocean as a source for atmospheric microplastics. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232746.

88. Peternell M, Wilson CJL. Effect of strain rate cycling on microstructures and crystallographic preferred orientation during high-temperature creep. Geology 2016;44:279-82.

89. Wilson CJL, Hunter NJR, Luzin V, Peternell M, Piazolo S. The influence of strain rate and presence of dispersed second phases on the deformation behaviour of polycrystalline D2O ice. J Glaciol 2019;65:101-22.

90. Chen X, Zhang X, Church JA, et al. The increasing rate of global mean sea-level rise during 1993-2014. Nature Clim Change 2017;7:492-5.

91. Jakob L, Gourmelen N. Glacier Mass Loss Between 2010 and 2020 Dominated by Atmospheric Forcing. Geophys Res Lett 2023;50:e2023GL102954.

92. Guo D, Wang H. CMIP5 permafrost degradation projection:a comparison among different regions. J Geophys Res Atmos 2016;121:4499-517.

93. Teufel B, Sushama L. Abrupt changes across the Arctic permafrost region endanger northern development. Nat Clim Chang 2019;9:858-62.

94. Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Sci Total Environ 2017;586:127-41.

95. Wang Z, An C, Chen X, Lee K, Zhang B, Feng Q. Disposable masks release microplastics to the aqueous environment with exacerbation by natural weathering. J Hazard Mater 2021;417:126036.

96. Yang M, Chen B, Xin X, et al. Interactions between microplastics and oil dispersion in the marine environment. J Hazard Mater 2021;403:123944.

97. de Souza Machado AA, Lau CW, Kloas W, et al. Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance. Environ Sci Technol 2019;53:6044-52.

98. Zhang GS, Liu YF. The distribution of microplastics in soil aggregate fractions in southwestern China. Sci Total Environ 2018;642:12-20.

99. Zhang Z, Ma W, Feng W, Xiao D, Hou X. Reconstruction of soil particle composition during freeze-thaw cycling: a review. Pedosphere 2016;26:167-79.

100. Tabassum A, Rabbani M, Omar SB. An approach to study on time series components and by using them to enumerate the height of sea level alteration for both Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) and Bay of Bengal (BOB). In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT); 2019 Feb 20-22; Coimbatore, India. IEEE; 2019. p. 1-7.

101. Hassan KMA, Haque MA, Ahmed S. Comparative study of forecasting global mean sea level rising using machine learning. In: 2021 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Information Technology (ICECIT); 2021 Sep 14-16; Khulna, Bangladesh. IEEE; 2021. p. 1-4.

102. Chung J, Tong G, Chao J, Zhu W. Path analysis of sea-level rise and its impact. Stats 2022;5:12-25.

103. Zhang M. Sea-level Rise in New York in the 21st century: projection and methodology. Available from: [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2023].

104. Kang S, Zhang Y, Qian Y, Wang H. A review of black carbon in snow and ice and its impact on the cryosphere. Earth Sci Rev 2020;210:103346.

105. Revell LE, Kuma P, Le Ru EC, Somerville WRC, Gaw S. Direct radiative effects of airborne microplastics. Nature 2021;598:462-7.

Cite This Article

Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS

OAE Style

Gaylarde CC, Baptista Neto JA, da Fonseca EM. Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?. Water Emerg Contam Nanoplastics 2023;2:20.

AMA Style

Gaylarde CC, Baptista Neto JA, da Fonseca EM. Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?. Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics. 2023; 2(4): 20.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Christine C. Gaylarde, José Antônio Baptista Neto, Estefan M. da Fonseca. 2023. "Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?" Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics. 2, no.4: 20.

ACS Style

Gaylarde, CC.; Baptista Neto JA.; da Fonseca EM. Microplastics in the cryosphere - a potential time bomb?. Water. Emerg. Contam. Nanoplastics. 2023, 2, 20.

About This Article

Special Issue

© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments




Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at

Download PDF
Cite This Article 3 clicks
Like This Article 9 likes
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics
ISSN 2831-2597 (Online)


All published articles are preserved here permanently:


All published articles are preserved here permanently: