fig8

Recent progress on metal-organic framework-based separators for quasi-solid-state lithium metal batteries

Figure 8. (A) Schematic representation of Li+ transportation through MIL-101(Cr)/PP separator; (B) Schematic illustration for the configuration of the designed “Li+ desolvated electrolyte”; (C) The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of typical “Li+ solvated ether-based electrolytes” and “desolvated electrolyte”; (D) The discharge capacity against cycle number collected from Li//NCM-811 full-cells using “Li+ desolvated electrolyte”; (E and F) Desolvation energy of Li(EC)4+ to Li(EC)3+ and EC molecule in bulk LE and UiO-66 pores, respectively; (G) The UiO-66-modified PP separator for Li-S batteries; (H) Geometries of atomic model configurations and (I) corresponding adsorption energy between polysulfides and UiO-66; (J) Molecular surface electrostatic potential (ESP) of UiO-66 and polysulfides; (K) The HKUST-1-modified GF separator for Li-O2 batteries. (A) is quoted with permission from Li et al.[230]; (B-D) from Chang et al.[231]; (E and F) from Sheng et al.[232]; (G-J) from Fan et al.[235]; (H) from Fan et al.[238]. EC: Ethylene carbonate; GF: glass fibers.

Energy Materials
ISSN 2770-5900 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/