fig6

Fragility curves accounting for uncertainties in material parameters and ground motion characteristics using a data driven surrogate model

Figure 6. Fitting cumulative and probability distributions to available test data. (A) fc′ from the lab tests in Taiwan[54]; (B) fc′ from the actual buildings in the USA[56,57]; (C) fc′ from the lab tests in UB, USA[58]; (D) ε1cfrom the actual buildings in the USA[56,57]; (E) ε1cfrom the lab tests in UB, USA[58]; (F) fm′ from an actual building in the USA[56]; (G) fm′ from the lab tests in UB, USA[58]; (H) ε1mfrom an actual building in the USA[56]; (I) ε1mfrom the lab tests in UB, USA[58]; (J) fm′ from the lab tests in IITK, India[55]; (K) ε1mfrom the lab tests in IITK, India[55]; (L) ftm from the lab tests in IITK, India[55].

Disaster Prevention and Resilience
ISSN 2832-4056 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles will be preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles will be preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/