REFERENCES
1. 1994 Northridge earthquake reconnaissance report, Volume 11, Issues S1 and S2. 1996. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/eqsa/11/1_suppl [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
2. Brando G, Rapone D, Spacone E, et al. Damage reconnaissance of unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings after the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 2017;33:243-73.
3. Mehrabi AB, Shing PB, Schuller MP, Noland JL. Performance of masonry-infilled RC frames under in-plane lateral loads, Report CU/SR-94-6; Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, 1994. Available from: https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/static/files/NSF/PB95174025.pdf [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
4. Stavridis A, Martin-Tempestti J, Bose S. Updating the ASCE 41 provisions for infilled RC frames, 2017 SEAOC Convention, San Diego, CA, USA. 2017. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322759831_Updating_the_ASCE_41_Provisions_for_Infilled_RC_Frames [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
5. Crisafulli FJ, Carr AJ. Proposed macro-model for the analysis of infilled frame structures. Bull New Z Soc Earthq Eng 2007;40:69-77.
6. Burton H, Deierlein G. Simulation of seismic collapse in nonductile reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infills. J Struct Eng 2014;140:A4014016.
7. Sattar S, Liel AB. Seismic performance of nonductile reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls - I: development of a strut model enhanced by finite element models. Earthq Spectra 2016;32:795-818.
8. Allouzi R, Irfanoglu A. Development of new nonlinear dynamic response model of reinforced concrete frames with infill walls. Adv Struct Eng 2018;21:2154-68.
9. Al-Chaar G, Mehrabi AB, Manzouri T. Finite element interface modeling and experimental verification of masonry-infilled R/C frames. J Masonry Soc 2008;261:47-65. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284415010_Finite_element_interface_modeling_and_experimental_verification_of_masonry [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023]
10. Stavridis A, Shing PB. Finite-element modeling of nonlinear behavior of masonry-infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng 2010;136:285-96.
11. Narinder, Goswami K, Bose S, Banerjee A, Chakraborty S. ML-based surrogate model for RC bridge pier collapse fragility prediction. In: Shrikhande M, Agarwal P, Kumar PCA, editors. In Proceedings of 17th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. Volume 2, pp. 661-71. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-1604-7_49 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
12. Parida SS, Bose S, Butcher M, Apostolakis G, Shekhar P. SVD enabled data augmentation for machine learning based surrogate modeling of non-linear structures. Eng Struct 2023;280:115600.
13. Giovanis DG, Fragiadakis M, Papadopoulos V. Epistemic uncertainty assessment using incremental dynamic Analysis and neural networks. Bull Earthq Eng 2016;14:529-47.
14. Dabiri H, Faramarzi A, Dall’asta A, Tondi E, Micozzi F. A machine learning-based analysis for predicting fragility curve parameters of buildings. J Build Eng 2022;62:105367.
15. Rosti A, Del Gaudio C, Rota M, et al. Empirical fragility curves for Italian residential RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 2021;19:3165-83.
16. Liel AB, Haselton CB, Deierlein GG, Baker JW. Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Struct Saf 2009;31:197-211.
17. Esteghamati M, Flint MM. Developing data-driven surrogate models for holistic performance-based assessment of mid-rise RC frame buildings at early design. Eng Struct 2021;245:112971.
18. Hwang S, Mangalathu S, Shin J, Jeon J. Machine learning-based approaches for seismic demand and collapse of ductile reinforced concrete building frames. J Build Eng 2021;34:101905.
19. Micheli L, Alipour A, Laflamme S. Multiple-surrogate models for probabilistic performance assessment of wind-excited tall buildings under uncertainties. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A Civ Eng 2020;6:04020042.
20. Haselton CB, Deierlein GG. Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment-frame buildings, PEER report 2007-08. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, USA. 2006. Available from: https://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/2007-08 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
21. Bose S, Martin J, Stavridis A. Simulation framework for infilled RC frames subjected to seismic loads. Earthq Spectra 2019;35:1739-62.
22. Bose S, Nozari A, Mohammadi ME, et al. Structural assessment of a school building in Sankhu, Nepal damaged due to torsional response during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. In: Pakzad S, Juan C, editors. Dynamics of civil structures, Volume 2. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 31-41.
23. Tempestti JM, Stavridis A. Simplified method to assess lateral resistance of infilled reinforced concrete frames. In Proceedings of 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile. 2017. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312939259_SIMPLIFIED_METHOD_TO_ASSESS_LATERAL_RESISTANCE_OF_INFILLED_REINFORCED_CONCRETE_FRAMES [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
24. ASCE/SEI 41-13. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, VA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2017. Available from: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784412855 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
25. Yousefianmoghadam S, Behmanesh I, Stavridis A, Moaveni B, Nozari A, Sacco A. System identification and modeling of a dynamically tested and gradually damaged 10-story reinforced concrete building. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2018;47:25-47.
26. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH, Jeremic B. Open system for earthquake engineering Simulation (OpenSEES), Berkeley, California, USA: University of California; 2000. Available from: https://opensees.berkeley.edu/ [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
27. Spacone E, Filippou FC, Taucer FF. Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of r/c frames: part I. formulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1996;25:711-25. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291096-9845%28199607%2925%3A7%3C711%3A%3AAID-EQE576%3E3.0.CO%3B2-9 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023]
28. Menegotto M, Pinto PE. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and nonelastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending, IASBE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Final Report, Lisbon. 1973. Available from: https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=672527f0ca29d742b9e32522a8210769 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
29. Filippou FC, Popov EP, Bertero VV. Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints. Report EERC 83-19. Berkeley: University of California; 1983. Available from: https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/static/files/NSF/PB84192020.pdf [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
30. Yassin M, Hisham M. Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic loads. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, USA. 1994. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/e0565f57989505eb9b0cbcdfba94e500/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
31. Chaulagain H, Rodrigues H, Spacone E, Varum H. Seismic assessment of RC structures with infill masonry panels in Nepal - Sensitivity analysis. Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey. 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/12676 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
32. Pradhan PM. Composite action of partial infill wall in reinforced concrete frame under lateral load. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tribhuvan University, Nepal. 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268387175_Composite_Action_of_Partial_Infill_Wall_in_Reinforced_Concrete_Frame_Under_Lateral_Load [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
33. Takai N, Shigefuji M, Rajaure S, et al. Strong ground motion in the Kathmandu Valley during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake. Earth Planets Space 2016:68.
34. United State Geological Survey. 2015. Available from: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002926#scientific_waveforms [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
35. ATC. FEMA-P695. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009. Available from: https://store.atcouncil.org/index.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=210 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
37. Hancock J, Bommer JJ. The effective number of cycles of earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2005;34:637-64.
38. Garini E, Gazetas G. Damage potential of near-fault records: sliding displacement against conventional “Intensity Measures”. Bull Earthq Eng 2013;11:455-80.
39. Biasio MD. Ground motion intensity measures for seismic probabilistic risk analysis. Universite de Grenoble, France. 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290182432_Ground_motion_intensity_measures_for_seismic_probabilistic_risk_analysis [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
40. Anastasopoulos PC, Mannering FL. Analysis of pavement overlay and replacement performance using random parameters hazard-based duration models. J Infrastruct Syst 2015;21:04014024.
41. Housner GW. Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes. California Institute of Technology, USA. 1952. Available from: https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/s16tc-ah892#:~:text=A%20measure%20of%20the%20surface,Intensities%20for%20the%20same%20earthquakes [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
42. Zhang Y, Shen R, Sun B, Liu T, Shi Y, Li L. Selection of ground motion intensity measures in fragility analysis of a mega-scale steel frame structure at separate limit states: a case study. Buildings 2022;12:1530.
43. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1975;65:581-626. Available from: https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/65/3/581/101795/A-study-on-the-duration-of-strong-earthquake?redirectedFrom=fulltext [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
44. Sarma SK, Yang KS. An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1987;15:119-32.
45. Bommer JJ, Martinez-Pereira A. The prediction of strong-motion duration for engineering design. In Proceedings of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK. 1996. Available from: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/11_84.PDF [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
46. Pejovic J, Jankovic S. Selection of ground motion intensity measure for reinforced concrete structure. Procedia Eng 2015;117:588-95.
47. Du W. An empirical model for the mean period (Tm) of ground motions using the NGA-West2 database. Bull Earthq Eng 2017;15:2673-93.
48. Buratti N. A comparison of the performances of various ground motion intensity measures. In Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. 2012. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-comparison-of-the-performances-of-various-ground-Buratti/328f6876a90872715501321c05e24538f65652d2 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
49. Adam C, Kampenhuber D, Ibarra LF. Optimal intensity measure based on spectral acceleration for P-delta vulnerable deteriorating frame structures in the collapse limit state. Bull Earthq Eng 2017;15:4349-73.
50. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y. Cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) and seismic intensity based on the PEER-NGA database. Earthq Spectra 2012;28:457-85.
51. Washington SP, Karlaftis MG, Mannering FL. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2011. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jrsssa/article/185/2/731/7068967 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
52. Zellner A, Theil H. Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 1962;30:54-78.
53. Thomas A. Seismic damage assessment of representative motorway bridges: a three-stage least squares approach. Master’s Dissertation. 2016. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/26c1ce1526a8c2de795412ff3fa59679/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
54. Yeh I. Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks. Cem Concr Res 1998;28:1797-808.
55. Bose S, Rai DC. Behavior of AAC infilled RC frame under lateral loading. Master’s Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India. 2013. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288099033_Behavior_of_AAC_infilled_RC_frame_under_lateral_loading [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
56. Yousefianmoghadam S, Song M, Stavridis A, Moaveni B. System identification of a two-story infilled RC building in different damage states. In Proceedings of 2nd ATC-SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and other Structures, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2015.
57. Yousefianmoghadam S, Song M, Mohammadi ME, et al. Nonlinear dynamic tests of a reinforced concrete frame building at different damage levels. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn 2020;49:924-45.
58. Gao X. Experimental and numerical assessment of the seismic performance of an innovative retrofit scheme for infilled RC frames. 2021.
60. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI J Struct Eng 2001;98:135-48.
61. Bose S. Analytical and numerical framework for the seismic assessment of infilled RC frames. PhD thesis, University at Buffalo, USA. 2019. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/ba3539943af5c626206276c25d6be72c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
62. Porter KA, Beck JL, Shaikhutdinov RV. Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthq Spectra 2002;18:719-43.
63. Grünthal G. European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98). Luxembourg: Centre Europèen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie; 1998. Available from: https://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/EMS-98%20%20-%20%20European%20Macroseismic%20Scale%201998 [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
64. National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET). Seismic vulnerability evaluation guideline for private and public buildings, Part II: post disaster damage assessment, Kathmandu, Nepal. 2009. Available from: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/2605_NSET20Profile202007.pdf [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
65. Brzev S, Pandey B, Maharjan DK, Ventura C. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings affected by the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 2017;33:275-98.
66. Bose S, Rai DC. Lateral load behavior of an open-ground-story RC building with AAC infills in upper stories. Earthq Spectra 2016;32:1653-74.
67. Hilly R, Bose S, Hu Y, Stavridis A. Distribution of seismic demand during the 2015 Gorkha earthquake. In proceedings of the 17th Symposium of Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, India. 2022. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365347010_Distribution_of_Seismic_Demand_During_the_2015_Gorkha_Earthquake [Last accessed on 20 Sep 2023].
68. Porter K, Kennedy R, Bachman R. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 2007;23:471-89.
69. Baker JW. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 2015;31:579-99.
70. Cristofaro MT, D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M. Concrete compressive strength extracted from existing buildings. In The New Boundaries of Structural Concrete: Session D - Concrete Quality Control on Site California, ACIIC - Ancona 2011. Available from: https://www.ingenio-web.it/files/d2.pdf [Last accessed on 27 Sep 2023].
71. Schueremans L, Van Gemert DA. Probability density functions for masonry material parameters - a way to go? Struct Anal Hist Construct 2006;2:921-8. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312457877_Probability_density_functions_for_masonry_material_parameters_-_A_way_to_go [Last accessed on 27 Sep 2023]
72. Shimizu Y, Hirosawa M, Zhou J. Statistical analysis of concrete strength in existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Aukland, New Zealand, 1999. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:34788826 [Last accessed on 27 Sep 2023].
