REFERENCES

1. Chang C. The conversion of methanol and other O-compounds to hydrocarbons over zeolite catalysts. J Catal 1977;47:249-59.

2. Yurchak S. Development of Mobil’s fixed-bed methanul-to-gasoline (MTG) process. Methane Conversion, Proceedings of a Symposium on the Production of Fuels and Chemicals from Natural Gas. Elsevier; 1988. p. 251-72.

3. Lunsford JH. Catalytic conversion of methane to more useful chemicals and fuels: a challenge for the 21st century. Catal Today 2000;63:165-74.

4. Olsbye U, Svelle S, Bjørgen M, et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2012;51:5810-31.

5. Song W, Haw JF, Nicholas JB, Heneghan CS. Methylbenzenes are the organic reaction centers for methanol-to-olefin catalysis on HSAPO-34. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:10726-7.

6. Wang C, Wang Y, Du Y, Yang G, Xie Z. Similarities and differences between aromatic-based and olefin-based cycles in H-SAPO-34 and H-SSZ-13 for methanol-to-olefins conversion: insights from energetic span model. Catal Sci Technol 2015;5:4354-64.

7. Wang Y, Chen S, Gao Y, et al. Enhanced methanol to olefin catalysis by physical mixtures of SAPO-34 molecular sieve and MgO. ACS Catal 2017;7:5572-84.

8. Dai W, Wang C, Dyballa M, et al. Understanding the early stages of the methanol-to-olefin conversion on H-SAPO-34. ACS Catal 2015;5:317-26.

9. Deimund MA, Harrison L, Lunn JD, et al. Effect of heteroatom concentration in SSZ-13 on the methanol-to-olefins reaction. ACS Catal 2016;6:542-50.

10. Mei C, Wen P, Liu Z, et al. Selective production of propylene from methanol: mesoporosity development in high silica HZSM-5. J Catal 2008;258:243-9.

11. Firoozi M, Baghalha M, Asadi M. The effect of micro and nano particle sizes of H-ZSM-5 on the selectivity of MTP reaction. Catal Commun 2009;10:1582-5.

12. Rostamizadeh M, Taeb A. Highly selective Me-ZSM-5 catalyst for methanol to propylene (MTP). J Ind Eng Chem 2015;27:297-306.

13. Ni Y, Sun A, Wu X, et al. The preparation of nano-sized H[Zn, Al]ZSM-5 zeolite and its application in the aromatization of methanol. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 2011;143:435-42.

14. Williams CL, Chang C, Do P, et al. Cycloaddition of biomass-derived furans for catalytic production of renewable p-Xylene. ACS Catal 2012;2:935-9.

15. Zhang J, Qian W, Kong C, Wei F. Increasing para-Xylene selectivity in making aromatics from methanol with a surface-modified Zn/P/ZSM-5 catalyst. ACS Catal 2015;5:2982-8.

16. Olah GA. Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2005;44:2636-9.

17. Usman M, Daud WMAW. Recent advances in the methanol synthesis via methane reforming processes. RSC Adv 2015;5:21945-72.

18. Lebarbier VM, Dagle RA, Kovarik L, Lizarazo-adarme JA, King DL, Palo DR. Synthesis of methanol and dimethyl ether from syngas over Pd/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts. Catal Sci Technol 2012;2:2116.

19. Haw JF, Song W, Marcus DM, Nicholas JB. The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis. Acc Chem Res 2003;36:317-26.

20. Ilias S, Bhan A. Mechanism of the catalytic conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons. ACS Catal 2013;3:18-31.

21. Yarulina I, Chowdhury AD, Meirer F, Weckhuysen BM, Gascon J. Recent trends and fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Nat Catal 2018;1:398-411.

22. Zhong J, Han J, Wei Y, Liu Z. Catalysts and shape selective catalysis in the methanol-to-olefin (MTO) reaction. J Catal 2021;396:23-31.

23. Tian P, Wei Y, Ye M, Liu Z. Methanol to olefins (MTO): from fundamentals to commercialization. ACS Catal 2015;5:1922-38.

24. Speybroeck V, De Wispelaere K, Van der Mynsbrugge J, Vandichel M, Hemelsoet K, Waroquier M. First principle chemical kinetics in zeolites: the methanol-to-olefin process as a case study. Chem Soc Rev 2014;43:7326-57.

25. Song W, Marcus DM, Fu H, Ehresmann JO, Haw JF. An oft-studied reaction that may never have been: direct catalytic conversion of methanol or dimethyl ether to hydrocarbons on the solid acids HZSM-5 or HSAPO-34. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:3844-5.

26. Olsbye U, Svelle S, Lillerud KP, et al. The formation and degradation of active species during methanol conversion over protonated zeotype catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 2015;44:7155-76.

27. Wang W, Buchholz A, Seiler M, Hunger M. Evidence for an initiation of the methanol-to-olefin process by reactive surface methoxy groups on acidic zeolite catalysts. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:15260-7.

28. Jiang Y, Wang W, Reddymarthala V, Huang J, Sulikowski B, Hunger M. Effect of organic impurities on the hydrocarbon formation via the decomposition of surface methoxy groups on acidic zeolite catalysts. J Catal 2006;238:21-7.

29. Li J, Wei Z, Chen Y, et al. A route to form initial hydrocarbon pool species in methanol conversion to olefins over zeolites. JJ Catal 2014;317:277-83.

30. Wu X, Xu S, Zhang W, et al. Direct mechanism of the first carbon-carbon bond formation in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2017;56:9039-43.

31. Wang C, Chu Y, Xu J, et al. Extra-framework aluminum-assisted initial C-C bond formation in methanol-to-olefins conversion on zeolite H-ZSM-5. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018;57:10197-201.

32. Lo B, Ye L, Chang G, et al. Dynamic modification of pore opening of SAPO-34 by adsorbed surface methoxy species during induction of catalytic methanol-to-olefins reactions. Appl Catal B: Environ 2018;237:245-50.

33. Sun T, Chen W, Xu S, et al. The first carbon-carbon bond formation mechanism in methanol-to-hydrocarbons process over chabazite zeolite. Chem 2021;7:2415-28.

34. Liu Y, Müller S, Berger D, et al. Formation mechanism of the first carbon-carbon bond and the first olefin in the methanol conversion into hydrocarbons. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016;55:5723-6.

35. Blaszkowski SR, van Santen RA. Theoretical study of C-C bond formation in the methanol-to-gasoline process. J Am Chem Soc 1997;119:5020-7.

36. Chowdhury AD, Houben K, Whiting GT, et al. Initial carbon-carbon bond formation during the early stages of the methanol-to-olefin process proven by zeolite-trapped acetate and methyl acetate. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016;55:15840-5.

37. Airi A, Damin A, Xie J, Olsbye U, Bordiga S. Catalyst sites and active species in the early stages of MTO conversion over cobalt AlPO-18 followed by IR spectroscopy. Catal Sci Technol 2022;12:2775-92.

38. Plessow PN, Studt F. Unraveling the mechanism of the initiation reaction of the methanol to olefins process using ab initio and DFT calculations. ACS Catal 2017;7:7987-94.

39. Yang L, Yan T, Wang C, et al. Role of acetaldehyde in the roadmap from initial carbon-carbon bonds to hydrocarbons during methanol conversion. ACS Catal 2019;9:6491-501.

40. Wu X, Zhang Z, Pan Z, Zhou X, Bodi A, Hemberger P. Ketenes in the induction of the methanol-to-olefins process. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2022;61:e202207777.

41. Wang W, Hunger M. Reactivity of surface alkoxy species on acidic zeolite catalysts. Acc Chem Res 2008;41:895-904.

42. Yamazaki H, Shima H, Imai H, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T, Kondo JN. Evidence for a “carbene-like” intermediate during the reaction of methoxy species with light alkenes on H-ZSM-5. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011;50:1853-6.

43. Yamazaki H, Shima H, Imai H, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T, Kondo JN. Direct production of propene from methoxy species and dimethyl ether over H-ZSM-5. J Phys Chem C 2012;116:24091-7.

44. Minova IB, Bühl M, Matam SK, et al. Carbene-like reactivity of methoxy groups in a single crystal SAPO-34 MTO catalyst. Catal Sci Technol 2022;12:2289-305.

45. Kubelková L, Nováková J, Jírů P. Reaction of small amounts of methanol on Hzsm-5, Hy and modified Y zeolites. Structure and Reactivity of Modified Zeolites, Proceedings of an International Conference. Elsevier; 1984. p. 217-24.

46. Hutchings GJ, Gottschalk F, Hall MVM, Hunter R. Hydrocarbon formation from methylating agents over the zeolite catalyst ZSM-5. Comments on the mechanism of carbon-carbon bond and methane formation. J Chem Soc., Faraday Trans 1987;83:571-83.

47. Tajima N, Tsuneda T, Toyama F, Hirao K. A new mechanism for the first carbon-carbon bond formation in the mtg process:  a theoretical study. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:8222-9.

48. Liu Y, Kirchberger FM, Müller S, et al. Critical role of formaldehyde during methanol conversion to hydrocarbons. Nat Commun 2019;10:1462.

49. Wen W, Yu S, Zhou C, et al. Formation and fate of formaldehyde in methanol-to-hydrocarbon reaction: in situ synchrotron radiation photoionization mass spectrometry study. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020;59:4873-8.

50. Lesthaeghe D, Van Speybroeck V, Marin GB, Waroquier M. Understanding the failure of direct C-C coupling in the zeolite-catalyzed methanol-to-olefin process. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2006;45:1714-9.

51. Dahl I, Kolboe S. On the reaction mechanism for hydrocarbon formation from methanol over SAPO-34: I. Isotopic labeling studies of the co-reaction of ethene and methanol. J Catal 1994;149:458-64.

52. Dahl IM, Kolboe S. On the reaction mechanism for hydrocarbon formation from methanol over SAPO-34: 2. Isotopic labeling studies of the co-reaction of propene and methanol. J Catal 1996;161:304-9.

53. Bjørgen M. The methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction: insight into the reaction mechanism from [12C]benzene and [13C]methanol coreactions over zeolite H-beta. J Catal 2004;221:1-10.

54. Svelle S, Joensen F, Nerlov J, et al. Conversion of methanol into hydrocarbons over zeolite H-ZSM-5: ethene formation is mechanistically separated from the formation of higher alkenes. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128:14770-1.

55. Bjorgen M, Svelle S, Joensen F, et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolite H-ZSM-5: on the origin of the olefinic species. J Catal 2007;249:195-207.

56. Van Speybroeck V, Van der Mynsbrugge J, Vandichel M, et al. First principle kinetic studies of zeolite-catalyzed methylation reactions. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:888-99.

57. Svelle S, Rønning PO, Kolboe S. Kinetic studies of zeolite-catalyzed methylation reactions1. Coreaction of [12C]ethene and [13C]methanol. Journal of Catalysis 2004;224:115-23.

58. Svelle S, Ronning P, Olsbye U, Kolboe S. Kinetic studies of zeolite-catalyzed methylation reactions. Part 2. Co-reaction of [12C]propene or [12C]n-butene and [13C]methanol. J Catal 2005;234:385-400.

59. Hill IM, Hashimi SA, Bhan A. Kinetics and mechanism of olefin methylation reactions on zeolites. J Catal 2012;285:115-23.

60. Hill IM, Hashimi SA, Bhan A. Corrigendum to “kinetics and mechanism of olefin methylation reactions over zeolites”. J Catal 2012;291:155-7.

61. Hill IM, Ng YS, Bhan A. Kinetics of butene isomer methylation with dimethyl ether over zeolite catalysts. ACS Catal 2012;2:1742-8.

62. Nozik D, Bell AT. Role of Ga3+ Sites in Ethene Oligomerization over Ga/H-MFI. ACS Catal 2022;12:14173-84.

63. Kim YT, Chada JP, Xu Z, et al. Low-temperature oligomerization of 1-butene with H-ferrierite. J Catal 2015;323:33-44.

64. Dessau R. On the mechanism of methanol conversion to hydrocarbons over HZSM-5. J Catal 1982;78:136-41.

65. Dessau R. On the H-ZSM-5 catalyzed formation of ethylene from methanol or higher olefins. J Catal 1986;99:111-6.

66. Simonetti DA, Ahn JH, Iglesia E. Mechanistic details of acid-catalyzed reactions and their role in the selective synthesis of triptane and isobutane from dimethyl ether. J Catal 2011;277:173-95.

67. Hay P, Redondo A, Guo Y. Theoretical studies of pentene cracking on zeolites: C-C β-scission processes. Catal Today 1999;50:517-23.

68. Buchanan J, Santiesteban J, Haag W. Mechanistic considerations in acid-catalyzed cracking of olefins. J Catal 1996;158:279-87.

69. Mikkelsen Ø, Kolboe S. The conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolite H-beta. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 1999;29:173-84.

70. Teketel S, Skistad W, Benard S, et al. Shape selectivity in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: the catalytic performance of one-dimensional 10-ring zeolites: ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-48, and EU-1. ACS Catal 2012;2:26-37.

71. Yarulina I, Bailleul S, Pustovarenko A, et al. Suppression of the aromatic cycle in methanol-to-olefins reaction over ZSM-5 by post-synthetic modification using calcium. ChemCatChem 2016;8:3057-63.

72. Martínez-espín JS, De Wispelaere K, Janssens TVW, et al. Hydrogen transfer versus methylation: on the genesis of aromatics formation in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction over H-ZSM-5. ACS Catal 2017;7:5773-80.

73. Arora SS, Bhan A. The critical role of methanol pressure in controlling its transfer dehydrogenation and the corresponding effect on propylene-to-ethylene ratio during methanol-to-hydrocarbons catalysis on H-ZSM-5. J Catal 2017;356:300-6.

74. Fan S, Wang H, He S, et al. Formation and evolution of methylcyclohexene in the initial period of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5. ACS Catal 2022;12:12477-87.

75. Lesthaeghe D, Horré A, Waroquier M, Marin GB, Van Speybroeck V. Theoretical insights on methylbenzene side-chain growth in ZSM-5 zeolites for methanol-to-olefin conversion. Chemistry 2009;15:10803-8.

76. Xu T, Haw JF. Cyclopentenyl carbenium ion formation in acidic zeolites: an in situ NMR study of cyclic precursors. J Am Chem Soc 1994;116:7753-9.

77. Haw JF, Nicholas JB, Song W, et al. Roles for cyclopentenyl cations in the synthesis of hydrocarbons from methanol on zeolite catalyst HZSM-5. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:4763-75.

78. Long J, Wang X, Ding Z, et al. Cyclopentadiene transformation over H-form zeolites: TPD and IR studies of the formation of a monomeric cyclopentenyl carbenium ion intermediate and its role in acid-catalyzed conversions. J Catal 2008;255:48-58.

79. Wang C, Chu Y, Hu M, et al. Insight into carbocation-induced noncovalent interactions in the methanol-to-olefins reaction over ZSM-5 zeolite by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2021;60:26847-54.

80. Arstad B, Nicholas JB, Haw JF. Theoretical study of the methylbenzene side-chain hydrocarbon pool mechanism in methanol to olefin catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:2991-3001.

81. Li J, Wei Y, Chen J, et al. Observation of heptamethylbenzenium cation over SAPO-type molecular sieve DNL-6 under real MTO conversion conditions. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:836-9.

82. Ilias S, Khare R, Malek A, Bhan A. A descriptor for the relative propagation of the aromatic- and olefin-based cycles in methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion on H-ZSM-5. J Catal 2013;303:135-40.

83. Sun X, Mueller S, Shi H, et al. On the impact of co-feeding aromatics and olefins for the methanol-to-olefins reaction on HZSM-5. J Catal 2014;314:21-31.

84. Sun X, Mueller S, Liu Y, et al. On reaction pathways in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons on HZSM-5. J Catal 2014;317:185-97.

85. Khare R, Arora SS, Bhan A. Implications of cofeeding acetaldehyde on ethene selectivity in methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion on MFI and Its Mechanistic Interpretation. ACS Catal 2016;6:2314-31.

86. Zhang C, Ng KLA, Yan L, et al. Kinetic Perspective on methanol to propylene process via HZSM-5 catalyst: balancing between reaction and diffusion. Ind Eng Chem Res 2022;61:2055-67.

87. Goetze J, Meirer F, Yarulina I, et al. Insights into the activity and deactivation of the methanol-to-olefins process over different small-pore zeolites as studied with operando uv-vis spectroscopy. ACS Catal 2017;7:4033-46.

88. Borodina E, Meirer F, Lezcano-gonzález I, et al. Influence of the reaction temperature on the nature of the active and deactivating species during methanol to olefins conversion over H-SSZ-13. ACS Catal 2015;5:992-1003.

89. Borodina E, Sharbini Harun Kamaluddin H, Meirer F, et al. Influence of the reaction temperature on the nature of the active and deactivating species during methanol-to-olefins conversion over H-SAPO-34. ACS Catal 2017;7:5268-81.

90. Qi L, Li J, Wei Y, Xu L, Liu Z. Role of naphthalene during the induction period of methanol conversion on HZSM-5 zeolite. Catal Sci Technol 2016;6:3737-44.

91. Yarulina I, Goetze J, Gücüyener C, et al. Methanol-to-olefins process over zeolite catalysts with DDR topology: effect of composition and structural defects on catalytic performance. Catal Sci Technol 2016;6:2663-78.

92. Teketel S, Svelle S, Lillerud K, Olsbye U. Shape-selective conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over 10-ring unidirectional-channel acidic H-ZSM-22. ChemCatChem 2009;1:78-81.

93. Teketel S, Olsbye U, Lillerud K, Beato P, Svelle S. Selectivity control through fundamental mechanistic insight in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 2010;136:33-41.

94. Cnudde P, Demuynck R, Vandenbrande S, Waroquier M, Sastre G, Speybroeck VV. Light olefin diffusion during the MTO process on H-SAPO-34: a complex interplay of molecular factors. J Am Chem Soc 2020;142:6007-17.

95. Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press; 1979.

96. Koller H, Kärger J, Ruthven DM. Theodorou DN. Sorption kinetics. In “Diffusion in nanoporous materials”. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim; 2012. p. 1433-7851.

97. Khare R, Millar D, Bhan A. A mechanistic basis for the effects of crystallite size on light olefin selectivity in methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion on MFI. J Catal 2015;321:23-31.

98. Khare R, Bhan A. Mechanistic studies of methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion on diffusion-free MFI samples. J Catal 2015;329:218-28.

99. Liu Z, Dong X, Zhu Y, et al. Investigating the influence of mesoporosity in zeolite beta on its catalytic performance for the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons. ACS Catal 2015;5:5837-45.

100. Wei R, Li C, Yang C, Shan H. Effects of ammonium exchange and Si/Al ratio on the conversion of methanol to propylene over a novel and large partical size ZSM-5. J Nat Gas Chem 2011;20:261-5.

101. Zhao X, Wang L, Li J, et al. Investigation of methanol conversion over high-Si beta zeolites and the reaction mechanism of their high propene selectivity. Catal Sci Technol 2017;7:5882-92.

102. Yarulina I, De Wispelaere K, Bailleul S, et al. Structure-performance descriptors and the role of Lewis acidity in the methanol-to-propylene process. Nat Chem 2018;10:804-12.

103. Khare R, Liu Z, Han Y, Bhan A. A mechanistic basis for the effect of aluminum content on ethene selectivity in methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion on HZSM-5. J Catal 2017;348:300-5.

104. Liang T, Chen J, Qin Z, et al. Insight into induction period of methanol conversion reaction: reactivity of ethene-precursors over H-ZSM-5 zeolite is independent of Brϕnsted acid site density. Fuel 2023;332:126062.

105. Yuan K, Jia X, Wang S, et al. Regulating the distribution of acid sites in ZSM-11 zeolite with different halogen anions to enhance its catalytic performance in the conversion of methanol to olefins. MicroporousMesoporous Mater 2022;341:112051.

106. Hereijgers BP, Bleken F, Nilsen MH, et al. Product shape selectivity dominates the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) reaction over H-SAPO-34 catalysts. J Catal 2009;264:77-87.

107. Kang JH, Alshafei FH, Zones SI, Davis ME. Cage-defining ring: a molecular sieve structural indicator for light olefin product distribution from the methanol-to-olefins reaction. ACS Catal 2019;9:6012-9.

108. Hwang A, Prieto-centurion D, Bhan A. Isotopic tracer studies of methanol-to-olefins conversion over HSAPO-34: the role of the olefins-based catalytic cycle. J Catal 2016;337:52-6.

109. Hua J, Dong X, Wang J, et al. Methanol-to-olefin conversion over small-pore ddr zeolites: tuning the propylene selectivity via the olefin-based catalytic cycle. ACS Catal 2020;10:3009-17.

110. Yang M, Li B, Gao M, et al. High Propylene selectivity in methanol conversion over a small-pore SAPO molecular sieve with ultra-small cage. ACS Catal 2020;10:3741-9.

111. Zhou Y, Zhang J, Ma W, et al. Small pore SAPO-14-based zeolites with improved propylene selectivity in the methanol to olefins process. Inorg Chem Front 2022;9:1752-60.

112. Dyballa M, Becker P, Trefz D, et al. Parameters influencing the selectivity to propene in the MTO conversion on 10-ring zeolites: directly synthesized zeolites ZSM-5, ZSM-11, and ZSM-22. AAPPL CATAL A-GEN 2016;510:233-43.

113. Lee K, Lee H, Ihm S. Influence of catalyst binders on the acidity and catalytic performance of HZSM-5 zeolites for methanol-to-propylene (MTP) process: single and binary binder system. Top Catal 2010;53:247-53.

114. Hu Z, Zhang H, Wang L, et al. Highly stable boron-modified hierarchical nanocrystalline ZSM-5 zeolite for the methanol to propylene reaction. Catal Sci Technol 2014;4:2891-5.

115. Yoshioka M, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T. Development of the CON-type aluminosilicate zeolite and its catalytic application for the MTO reaction. ACS Catal 2015;5:4268-75.

116. Zhao X, Wang L, Guo P, et al. Synthesis of high-Si hierarchical beta zeolites without mesoporogen and their catalytic application in the methanol to propene reaction. Catal Sci Technol 2018;8:2966-74.

117. Jamil AK, Muraza O, Yoshioka M, Al-amer AM, Yamani ZH, Yokoi T. Selective production of propylene from methanol conversion over nanosized ZSM-22 zeolites. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53:19498-505.

118. Zhang J, Huang Z, Li P, et al. Elucidating the reaction pathway for ethene and propene formation in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction over high silica H-Beta. Catal Sci Technol 2017;7:2194-203.

119. Wennmacher JTC, Mahmoudi S, Rzepka P, et al. Electron diffraction enables the mapping of coke in ZSM-5 micropores formed during methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2022;61:e202205413.

120. Schmidt F, Hoffmann C, Giordanino F, et al. Coke location in microporous and hierarchical ZSM-5 and the impact on the MTH reaction. J Catal 2013;307:238-45.

121. Urata K, Furukawa S, Komatsu T. Location of coke on H-ZSM-5 zeolite formed in the cracking of n-hexane. AAPPL CATAL A-GEN 2014;475:335-40.

122. Milina M, Mitchell S, Cooke D, Crivelli P, Pérez-Ramírez J. Impact of pore connectivity on the design of long-lived zeolite catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2015;54:1591-4.

123. Astafan A, Benghalem M, Pouilloux Y, et al. Particular properties of the coke formed on nano-sponge *BEA zeolite during ethanol-to-hydrocarbons transformation. J Catal 2016;336:1-10.

124. Müller S, Liu Y, Vishnuvarthan M, et al. Coke formation and deactivation pathways on H-ZSM-5 in the conversion of methanol to olefins. Journal of Catalysis 2015;325:48-59.

125. Lezcano-Gonzalez I, Campbell E, Hoffman AEJ, et al. Insight into the effects of confined hydrocarbon species on the lifetime of methanol conversion catalysts. Nat Mater 2020;19:1081-7.

126. Bjørgen M. Coke precursor formation and zeolite deactivation: mechanistic insights from hexamethylbenzene conversion. J Catal 2003;215:30-44.

127. Magnoux P, Roger P, Canaff C, Fouche V, Gnep N, Guisnet M. New technique for the characterization of carbonaceous compounds responsible for zeolite deactivation. Catalyst Deactivation 1987, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium. Elsevier; 1987. p. 317-30.

128. Aramburo LR, Teketel S, Svelle S, et al. Interplay between nanoscale reactivity and bulk performance of H-ZSM-5 catalysts during the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction. J Catal 2013;307:185-93.

129. Wei Y, Yuan C, Li J, et al. Coke formation and carbon atom economy of methanol-to-olefins reaction. ChemSusChem 2012;5:906-12.

130. Wragg DS, O'Brien MG, Bleken FL, Di Michiel M, Olsbye U, Fjellvåg H. Watching the methanol-to-olefin process with time- and space-resolved high-energy operando X-ray diffraction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2012;51:7956-9.

131. Wang C, Wang Q, Xu J, et al. Direct detection of supramolecular reaction centers in the methanol-to-olefins conversion over zeolite H-ZSM-5 by 13C-27Al solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016;55:2507-11.

132. Yang L, Wang C, Zhang L, et al. Stabilizing the framework of SAPO-34 zeolite toward long-term methanol-to-olefins conversion. Nat Commun 2021;12:4661.

133. Wang N, Zhi Y, Wei Y, et al. Molecular elucidating of an unusual growth mechanism for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in confined space. Nat Commun 2020;11:1079.

134. Wang C, Yang M, Tian P, et al. Dual template-directed synthesis of SAPO-34 nanosheet assemblies with improved stability in the methanol to olefins reaction. J Mater Chem A 2015;3:5608-16.

135. Choi M, Na K, Kim J, Sakamoto Y, Terasaki O, Ryoo R. Stable single-unit-cell nanosheets of zeolite MFI as active and long-lived catalysts. Nature 2009;461:246-9.

136. Liu Y, Zhang Q, Li J, et al. Protozeolite-seeded synthesis of single-crystalline hierarchical zeolites with facet-shaped mesopores and their catalytic application in methanol-to-propylene conversion. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2022;61:e202205716.

137. Liang T, Chen J, Wang S, et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over H-MCM-22 zeolite: deactivation behaviours related to acid density and distribution. Catal Sci Technol 2022;12:6268-84.

138. Liu Z, Dong X, Liu X, Han Y. Oxygen-containing coke species in zeolite-catalyzed conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons. Catal Sci Technol 2016;6:8157-65.

139. Chen Z, Ni Y, Zhi Y, et al. Coupling of methanol and carbon monoxide over H-ZSM-5 to form aromatics. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018;57:12549-53.

140. Shi Z, Arora SS, Trahan DW, Hickman D, Bhan A. Methanol to hydrocarbons conversion: Why dienes and monoenes contribute differently to catalyst deactivation? Chem Eng J 2022;437:134229.

141. Martinez-espin JS, Mortén M, Janssens TVW, Svelle S, Beato P, Olsbye U. New insights into catalyst deactivation and product distribution of zeolites in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons (MTH) reaction with methanol and dimethyl ether feeds. Catal Sci Technol 2017;7:2700-16.

142. Shi Z, Neurock M, Bhan A. Methanol-to-olefins catalysis on HSSZ-13 and HSAPO-34 and Its relationship to acid strength. ACS Catal 2021;11:1222-32.

143. Hwang A, Bhan A. Bifunctional strategy coupling Y2O3-catalyzed alkanal decomposition with methanol-to-olefins catalysis for enhanced lifetime. ACS Catal 2017;7:4417-22.

144. Arora SS, Nieskens DLS, Malek A, Bhan A. Lifetime improvement in methanol-to-olefins catalysis over chabazite materials by high-pressure H2 co-feeds. Nat Catal 2018;1:666-72.

145. Hwang A, Bhan A. Deactivation of zeolites and zeotypes in methanol-to-hydrocarbons catalysis: mechanisms and circumvention. Acc Chem Res 2019;52:2647-56.

146. Zhou J, Gao M, Zhang J, et al. Directed transforming of coke to active intermediates in methanol-to-olefins catalyst to boost light olefins selectivity. Nat Commun 2021;12:17.

147. Wang C, Yang L, Gao M, et al. Directional construction of active naphthalenic species within SAPO-34 crystals toward more efficient methanol-to-olefin conversion. J Am Chem Soc 2022;144:21408-16.

148. Gao P, Wang Q, Xu J, et al. Brønsted/lewis acid synergy in methanol-to-aromatics conversion on ga-modified zsm-5 zeolites, as studied by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. ACS Catal 2018;8:69-74.

149. Wang N, Li J, Sun W, et al. Rational design of zinc/zeolite catalyst: selective formation of p-Xylene from methanol to aromatics reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2022;61:e202114786.

150. Wang H, Wang L, Luo Q, et al. Two-dimensional manganese oxide on ceria for the catalytic partial oxidation of hydrocarbons. Chem Synth 2022;2:2.

151. Wang D, Xie Z, Porosoff MD, Chen JG. Recent advances in carbon dioxide hydrogenation to produce olefins and aromatics. Chem 2021;7:2277-311.

152. Zhang W, Wang S, Guo S, et al. Effective conversion of CO2 into light olefins over a bifunctional catalyst consisting of La-modified ZnZrO. Catal Sci Technol ;12:2566-77.

153. Xie J, Firth DS, Cordero-Lanzac T, et al. MAPO-18 catalysts for the methanol to olefins process: influence of catalyst acidity in a high-pressure syngas (CO and H2) environment. ACS Catal 2022;12:1520-31.

154. Wang S, Zhang L, Wang P, et al. Highly selective hydrogenation of CO2 to propane over GaZrOx/H-SSZ-13 composite. Nat Catal 2022;5:1038-50.

Chemical Synthesis
ISSN 2769-5247 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/