Beta-catenin activation and immunotherapy resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms and biomarkers

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequently diagnosed at an advanced clinical stage or precluded from surgery by poor underlying liver function^[1,2]. Patients with clinically-advanced HCC have poor survival, with estimated one-year survival rates of 21% for those with regionally advanced disease and 6% for those with metastatic disease^[1]. After a decade of meager advances in systemic therapy, the treatment of unresectable advanced-stage HCC has taken a leap forward with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) antibodies. In the United States, the first ICI agent to gain regulatory approval for HCC was the anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD1) monoclonal antibody nivolumab. Accelerated approval for this ICI as a second-line systemic agent for HCC came after a 20% objective response rate was reported in the dose expansion phase of its phase I/II trial (CheckMate-040) that involved patients who were refractory to, or intolerant of, sorafenib^[3]. Pembrolizumab, another anti-PD1 antibody, also received accelerated approval as a second-line therapeutic after similar response rates were reported in a non-randomized open-label phase II clinical trial (KEYNOTE-224)^[4]. Most recently, a regimen combining bevacizumab with atezolizumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, received clinical approval as a first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC, based on its phase III trial (IMbrave150) reporting an objective response rate of 36%, along with better overall survival compared with sorafenib, the prior standard of care^[5].

Notwithstanding the hope that immunotherapy brings to patients with advanced HCC, all trials to date have shown substantial heterogeneity in the degree to which tumors respond to these immune-oncology agents. In the recently completed double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial of pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-240), only 2% of treated patients experienced a complete response (CR), while 16% and 32% experienced partial response (PR) and disease progression (PD), respectively^[6]. These results mirror closely what was reported in the phase II trial of pembrolizumab (CR in 1%, PR in 16%, and PD in 33%)^[4]. Similarly, in the CheckMate-040 trial of nivolumab, 1%, 18%, and 32% of patients experienced CR, PR, and PD, respectively^[3]. This degree of heterogeneity in tumor response has since been recapitulated in observational cohorts of HCC patients receiving IC therapy^[7,8]. The observational data also suggest that heterogeneity in tumor response translates into heterogeneity in survival outcome^[7]. Clinical response has also been heterogeneous in the first-line treatment setting, with the IMbrave150 trial reporting 5.5% CR, 21.8% PR, and 19.8% PD in Child-Pugh class A patients not previously treated with sorafenib^[5]. Durations of clinical response are also highly variable, ranging 6-24 (median 17) months in the CheckMate-040 trial and 1.5-23.6 (median 13.8) months in the KEYNOTE-240 trial^[3,9]. Since immune-related adverse events can be serious, a predictive biomarker that can adequately explain this heterogeneity across patients would be of great benefit in the clinical setting for optimizing patient selection.

Unfortunately, no clinical trial to date has identified a reliable tissue or serum biomarker to predict immunotherapy response in HCC. Although tumor PD-L1 expression has been associated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 ICI response in multiple cancers (including non-small cell lung, bladder, cervical, and triple-negative breast cancer), this immunohistochemical marker has not yet proven to be a good predictor of response for HCC^[3,4]. Furthermore, while high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) have been shown to be predictive of clinical immunotherapy response in multiple other cancers, they have not proven very predictive of ICI response in HCC^[8]. It is therefore time to start looking beyond these immediate immunotherapy biomarkers. Examining what is known about the underlying mechanisms of tumor immune evasion in HCC and other cancers may help facilitate a broader search for immunotherapy biomarkers that are useful for HCC.

Oncogenic mechanisms of tumor immune evasion leading to poor immunotherapy response

Multiple lines of mechanistic and clinical research have identified potential associations between tumor immunotherapy resistance and well-known oncogenic pathways and mechanisms^[10-18]. Of these, the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was among the earliest to be associated with tumor immune suppression^[13,19]. In a genetically-engineered mouse model of melanoma that exhibits stabilized β-catenin expression, it was first discovered that aberrant activation of this pathway could lead to the disappearance of immune cells from the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the development of tumor resistance to anti-PD-L1/anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody therapy^[13,20]. β-catenin expression in this model was also associated with decreases in the expression of immune-oncology relevant chemokines such as CCL4 that are important for recruiting dendritic cells and consequently T-cells into the TME. The mechanism by which β-catenin reduces CCL4 expression was tied to the induction of ATF3, a transcriptional repressor, and its binding to the CCL4 promoter^[13,20,21]. This immune evasion mechanism has since been recapitulated in a similarly engineered model of β-catenin activated HCC, where it was observed that aberrant β-catenin activation led to tumor resistance to anti-PD1 therapy and that reinstating the expression of CCL5, a chemokine that was downregulated in the β-catenin driven tumors, could restore tumor immune surveillance^[22].

TME infiltration by antigen presenting dendritic cells and T-cells, leading to a so-called inflamed TME, is now recognized as a critical factor that allows anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies to exert their therapeutic effects^[21,22]. Across numerous cancer types, analysis of TCGA data has revealed a significant difference in the percentage of Wnt/β-catenin activating mutations between immune inflamed and non-inflamed tumors, with the largest differences observed in HCC and esophageal cancer^[12]. Histologically, the TME of β-catenin activated HCC also displays a paucity of immune cells^[23]. Hence, one may speculate that it may be possible to infer the status of anti-tumor immunity in HCC by analyzing tumor biomarkers that capture the status of β-catenin activation.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is highly conserved across species and constitutively involved in embryonic development, cell migration, and tissue homeostasis^[24]. This pathway has been shown to play multiple roles in tumorigenesis and tumor immune-evasion^[12,25-29]. In the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway, the nuclear transcription co-activator protein β-catenin undergoes continual degradation in the cytoplasm by a destruction complex comprised of the scaffolding protein Axin (AXIN1) along with casein kinase 1 (CK1), glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), and the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene product [Figure 1A]^[30]. Wnt binding at the cell membrane by Frizzled protein and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 (LRP5/6) promotes recruitment of this Axin complex to the cell membrane via dishevelled (DVL) proteins. Membrane bound, this β-catenin destruction complex is no longer able to mediate the phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and subsequent proteasomal degradation of β-catenin^[31]. As a consequence, the stable form of β-catenin accumulates in the nucleus where it can interact with DNA-bound T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) proteins to promote Wnt target gene expression [Figure 1B]^[32].

Figure 1. Mechanism of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and potential molecular alterations that may affect β-catenin signaling. A: In the absence of Wnt binding at the cell membrane, β-catenin is kept in check by a large destruction complex comprised of Axin, DVL, CK1, GSK3, and APC; B: Wnt binding to Frizzled and LRP5/6 sequesters Axin and its associated molecules increases the abundance of unphosphorylated β-catenin to enhance classical Wnt/β-catenin signaling; C: as the most frequent causes of aberrant β-catenin signaling in HCC, CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations protect β-catenin from GSK3-mediated phosphorylation, leading to an increase in the amount of stable β-catenin that can enter the nucleus; D: in addition to mutations, other molecular alterations (indicated in red) can lead to aberrant Wnt/β-catenin activity to consequently promote a myriad of changes in tumor phenotype. Lipoprotein receptor related proteins 5 and 6 (LRP5/6), dishevelled protein (DVL), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), casein kinase 1 (CK1), glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), T cell factor (TCF), glypican-3 (GPC-3), soluble frizzled related protein (SFRP), and E-cadherin (Cad)

Aberrant activation of this pathway in cancer can be caused by a number of different molecular mechanisms, including gene mutations, epigenetic alterations, and abnormal regulation of other pathways. Mutations involving catenin-beta-1 (CTNNB1), the gene that encodes for β-catenin, are among the most common causes in HCC, as they are found in approximately one-third of HCC tumors^[33-36]. The specific CTNNB1 mutations implicated in tumorigenesis and immune evasion have been noted to disproportionately affect exon 3 at amino acid positions 29-49, corresponding to sites on the β-catenin protein that undergo phosphorylation by GSK3 to initiate its degradation^[34]. Protected from normal break-down, mutated β-catenin remains stable and is free to accumulate in the nucleus where it can activate multiple transcriptional programs that can promote tumor progression and immune avoidance [Figure 1C]^[12,13].

Mutations involving other Wnt/β-catenin pathway-related genes can also lead to aberrant β-catenin signaling^{[12,33,35,36]}. For example, the AXIN1 gene is mutationally inactivated in 5%-19% of HCC tumors, making it the second most frequently mutated gene leading to aberrant Wnt/β-catenin activation in HCC^[35,37]. Molecular alterations external to the classical Wnt/β-catenin pathway can also contribute to enhanced β-catenin signaling [Figure 1D], including overexpression of glypican-3 (GPC3)^[38,39], downregulation of E-cadherin^[40], and extracellular Wnt inhibition by secreted Frizzled-related proteins (FRZBs or SFRPs)^[11,12,41].

β-catenin activating mutations in HCC

Several gene mutations consistently overrepresented in HCC are associated with the β-catenin activated state^{[12,33,35,36,42]}. In particular, mutations involving CTNNB1 occur in an estimated 25%-40% of HCC tumors^{[12,16,23,36]} The specific CTNNB1 mutations that have been associated with an immune-barren tumor landscape are almost exclusive to areas within exon 3. These areas correspond to coding regions for phosphorylation sites near the N-terminus of β-catenin that are involved in mediating its breakdown^[34]. Mutations involving these regions allow β-catenin, a transcription co-activator, to escape destruction and accumulate in the nucleus, where binding to T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancing factor allows it to aberrantly promote transcriptional programs that include those that may influence tumor immune phenotype^[43-45]. Consistent with this apparent mechanism of β-catenin mediated immune cell exclusion, clinical associations between markers of Wnt/β-catenin activation and various molecular signs of immunotherapy resistance have been revealed through numerous and exhaustive molecular profiling and genotyping studies of human tumor specimens^{[10,12,16,17,46]}.

Mutated CTNNB1 and other mutated genes known to cause Wnt/β-catenin activation have been associated with poor clinical response to treatment with ICI antibodies and other targeted agents in HCC^{[12,16,33,34]}. In one study that included 27 ICI-treated HCC patients who underwent pre-treatment tumor mutation profiling, 10/10 of HCC patients with tumors bearing CTNNB1 or AXIN1 mutations experienced progressive disease compared to 5/17 patients with tumors that did not have these β-catenin activating mutations (100% vs. 29%, P < 0.001)^[16]. The gene AXIN1 codes for a protein involved in β-catenin destruction, and it is mutated in 5%-19% of HCC^{[12,30,36,37,42,47]}. The specific AXIN1 mutations involved cause loss-of-function, and they are usually mutually exclusive to CTNNB1 mutations^[47,48]. By most estimates, they are the second most frequent mutation that leads to aberrant β-catenin activation in HCC^[12,33,36]. In addition to experiencing higher rates of progressive disease, ICI-treated HCC patients with CTNNB1 or AXIN1 mutated tumors also experience significantly shorter progression free survival (median 2.0 months vs. 7.4 months, HR = 9.2, 95%CI: 2.9-28.8, P < 0.0001)^[16]. These clinical associations imply that the mutation statuses of these genes may have some value as predictive or prognostic biomarkers for HCC immunotherapy.

Several other gene mutations that can drive Wnt/β-catenin signaling are relatively uncommon in HCC^{[12,28,33,35]}. For example, mutations that result in the loss or inactivation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene product are a frequent cause of aberrant β-catenin activation in colon and rectal cancer. However, while it is estimated that over 80% of colorectal cancers harbor APC mutations, they are relatively uncommon in HCC with an estimated frequency of 5%-7%^[16,49]. With the recent clinical approval of two cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing panels for mutation profiling with relatively broad (pan-cancer) coverage, it may now be practical to detect these mutations along with the more prevalent ones through non-invasive liquid biopsy. In addition to profiling a large set of cancer-associated genes, these panels also generate blood-based estimates of TMB (bTMB) and MSI-H status, making it conceivable that an integrative genomic profile of relevance to the HCC immunotherapy space may be discovered. Cohort studies as well as carefully designed prospective biomarker trials will be necessary to learn, test, and validate such mutational profiles as predictors of ICI response. Since HCC is a cancer for which tumor tissue is difficult to obtain clinically, these pan-cancer liquid biopsy panels may eventually prove to be a boon to the development of more precise targeted therapy for this disease. However, regarding immunotherapy, mutation status alone may not be able to fully explain the estimated 60%-80% of HCC patients who fail to exhibit an objective response to ICI therapy.

Does β-catenin activated HCC have a metabolic phenotype?

Other molecular mechanisms, including epigenetic alterations^[48], as well as alterations involving extracellular pathways^[38-40,48], have also been associated with aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling in HCC. There are also data suggesting that upregulated lipid metabolism in HCC is associated with β-catenin activation^[28,29,50]. This association raises the possibility of inferring tumor β-catenin activation status based on phenotypic assessments of tumor metabolism. Such assessments are clinically feasible and can be performed non-invasively using several molecular imaging methods including positron emission tomography (PET). As a proof of concept with regard to phospholipid metabolism, a recent series of experiments performed in an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) knock-out mouse model of β-catenin activated HCC suggests that tumor uptake of fluorocholine (FCH), a fluorine-18 labeled PET radiopharmaceutical analog of choline used for in-vivo tracing of tissue phosphatidylcholine synthesis^[51,52], is strongly influenced by β-catenin activation^[28]. This novel animal model of de-novo HCC can develop well, moderately, and poorly differentiated tumors that are capable of recapitulating the salient histological and molecular features of β-catenin-driven human HCC^[53]. Experimentally, increased tumor FCH uptake in this system was shown to correlate with increased β-catenin protein expression as well as metabolomic and transcriptional fingerprints of canonical Wnt/β-catenin activity. Conversely, control animal models with non-β-catenin-activated tumors were found to demonstrate low tumor FCH uptake^[28]. Providing a simple mechanistic explanation for how this pathway promotes increased tumor FCH uptake and choline phospholipid metabolism, it was confirmed that β-catenin activation was able to drive choline membrane transporter expression. Following a translational route, the team that conducted these experiments also obtained and sequenced tumor DNA from 13 patients that had underwent clinical FCH PET/CT and found mutated CTNNB1 in 6/7 patients with FCH-positive tumors and wild-type CTNNB1 in 6/6 patients with FCH-negative tumors^[28].

In an attempt to corroborate their results, we examined the tumor genomic profiling results from six HCC patients who underwent preoperative liver FCH PET/CT imaging prior to liver resection. These patients were among the participants of a recently completed diagnostic clinical trial of FCH PET/CT in liver cancer^[54]. To explore whether β-catenin activating mutations found in tumor DNA could also be detected in cfDNA, we analyzed the pre-treatment plasma samples collected from these patients by performing targeted mutation profiling of cfDNA using an oncology-specific next generation sequencing panel (56G Oncology Panel, Swift Biosciences). The results of this liquid biopsy mutation analysis along with the PET imaging and clinical tumor DNA profiling results are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Comparison of mutation profiling results obtained from pre-treatment cfDNA and post-resection tumor DNA in six HCC patients imaged by 18F-FCH PET/CT preoperatively. Mutations that show correspondence between tumor DNA and cfDNA are shown in bold. Mutations associated with aberrant Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation are italicized. On the liver PET/CT images shown in the first column, the tumors displaying high FCH uptake appear red on the rainbow color scale applied to these images. Note: A DNMT3A mutation found in the cfDNA but not the tumor DNA of one patient (bottom row) is likely due to clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). CHIP-associated mutations arise from hematopoietic cells and are age-related. They are often encountered incidentally through cfDNA sequencing^[55,56]. DNMT3A is the most frequently mutated gene associated with CHIP^[57,58]. VAF: variant allele frequency

As a summary of these preliminary findings, mutations associated with Wnt/β-catenin activation were detected in the tumor DNA of four patients, with three being CTNNB1 mutations and one being a mutation involving the guanine nucleotide binding protein-alpha stimulating sub-unit (GNAS) gene. These same genes were also found mutated in the corresponding cfDNA of these patients. Interestingly, mutations involving GNAS have been reported to be a cause of upregulated Wnt/β-catenin activity and lipid metabolism in several digestive tract cancers but not yet in HCC^[59,60]. Notably, the tumors of all four of these patients showed high uptake of FCH on PET/CT (image insets on Figure 2). Conversely, no Wnt/β-catenin activating mutations were identified in the tumor DNA or cfDNA of the remaining 2 patients. The tumors of both these patients showed low FCH uptake on PET/CT. Interestingly, one of these FCH non-avid tumors harbored a SMAD4 gene mutation associated with Wnt/β-catenin pathway downregulation^[61]. While these limited data do not allow us to make any statistical conclusions, they do appear to agree with the results obtained by the other investigators and, furthermore, provide a demonstration of the potential capability of liquid biopsy to detect Wnt/β-catenin activating tumor mutations in HCC.

In further corroboration of these findings, we revisited a whole-genome expression dataset generated from 41 HCC tumors imaged preoperatively by FCH PET/CT^[54]. Using gene set enrichment analysis, we found that sets of genes associated with β-catenin activation were significantly enriched by FCH-avid HCC tumors (FDR 0.062) [Figure 3A]. Conversely, we found tumors displaying low FCH uptake were enriched by a T-cell inflammation signature that has been shown to be strongly predictive of clinical response to ICI therapy in several different cancers (FDR 0.116) [Figure 3B]^[15]. Furthermore, our previous published analysis of this radiogenomic dataset^[54] reported that tumors displaying high FCH uptake disproportionately expressed gene signatures corresponding to distinct molecular classes of HCC, including the S3 class described by Hoshida et al.^[62]; the G5 and G6 classes described by Boyault et al.^[63]; and the “CTNNB1-activated” class described by Chiang et al.^[64]. All of these classes have more recently been associated with newly described immunotherapy-relevant HCC sub-types characterized by an immunosuppressed TME or poor ICI response as well as evidence of abnormal β-catenin activity^[10,46,65]. One recently described immune-suppressed type of HCC shows significant overlap with the Hoshida S3 class and is notable for its association with a lack of TME infiltration by immune cells as well as a high likelihood of being CTNNB1 mutated^[46]. A recent integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression revealed another sub-type of HCC that showed enrichment for CTNNB1 mutations and signatures of Wnt activation but lacked signs of immune-activation^[65]. This tumor sub-type showed significant overlap with both the Hoshida S3 class and the Chiang CTNNB1-activated class that were characterized by high tumor FCH uptake in our studies. The Boyault G5 and G6 classes, among the earliest to be associated with CTNNB1 mutations^[63], have also been recently implicated with poorly immunogenic sub-types^[10,65]. This high degree of transcriptomic overlap forms an intriguing link between tumor FCH avidity and poor anti-tumor immunity. Furthermore, a TIMER (Tumor Immune Estimation Resource^[66], accessed via timer.cistrome.org) based analysis of the tumor expression profiles revealed significantly higher estimated densities of monocytic, CD8+, and dendritic cells among the tumors that displayed low FCH uptake [Figure 4], suggesting that poor FCH avidity was associated with immune cell infiltration. While collectively these results support associations between Wnt/β-catenin activation, lipid metabolism, and tumor immune-evasion in HCC, it remains to be tested in clinical trials whether molecular imaging biomarkers such as those derived from FCH PET/CT can serve as reliable predictors of immunotherapy response for HCC.

Figure 3. Gene set enrichment analysis associates tumor FCH uptake with immunotherapy-relevant expression profiles. Gene set enrichment plots are based on 41 tumor samples (31 FCH-avid, 10 FCH non-avid): (A) tumors showing high FCH metabolism were significantly enriched for genes from a CTNNB1 activation signature (FDR 0.062); and (B) a signature of T-cell inflammation that can predict immunotherapy response in several different tumor types was enriched by tumors that showed low FCH metabolism (FDR 0.116)

Figure 4. QuantiSeq TIMER estimation of intratumoral immune cell abundance. Density plots compare estimates of immune cell infiltration between tumors demonstrating high FCH uptake (n = 31) and low FCH uptake (n = 10). The names of the immune cell lineages are identified below the X-axis of these plots

Perspectives on the clinical future of immunotherapy biomarkers in HCC

In 2019, the KEYNOTE-240 phase III trial was reported to have failed in achieving its pre-determined statistical endpoints for survival^[6]. However, durations of clinical response in the trial ranged from 1.5 months to 23.6 months, and the risk of death overall was reduced by 22% (HR = 0.781, 95%CI: 0.611-0.998, P = 0.0238). The implication of these results is that some patients will benefit substantially from these agents, but the benefits will be thinly spread across too many patients in the absence of a robust predictive biomarker that can be used to refine patient selection. Because anti-PD1 agents can lead to prolonged disease control in those who do respond, a predictive biomarker of treatment resistance/response could have substantial value in both the clinical and research domains. For clinical trials, a reliable predictive biomarker may substantially reduce the study sample size required and increase the statistical power for an a-priori treatment effect size^[67]. Because immune-related adverse events to ICI therapy are non-trivial, bringing such a biomarker to the clinical practice space would help guide patients with vulnerable tumors to appropriate therapy while protecting those who are unlikely to respond from the hazards of futile treatment and its side effects. From a healthcare economics standpoint, a predictive biomarker would help to enhance the value proposition of ICI treatment by reducing costs associated with wasted treatments and unhalted disease progression.

However, robust biomarkers, detectors, predictors, and other classifiers that are singular in nature are rare in the field of cancer. There are multiple biological and statistical reasons for why an integrative biomarker would perform better than a single or narrowly targeted set of biomarkers^{[35,65,68-70]}. An understanding of how different non-convergent molecular pathways and phenotypes can shape tumor immunity in HCC may support multimarker integration as an approach to predicting immunotherapeutic response^{[10,35,46,65,70]}. There is also a growing number of statistical learning and machine learning based approaches to building, integrating, and evaluating multi-biomarker classifiers^[68,71,72], although the optimal method for assigning significance to any incremental gains in biomarker classification performance has been a topic of debate^[73,74]. The tools for integrative biomarker design and analysis have also become research tools to elucidate the biologic origin and functional significance of different biomarkers with the potential of shedding more light on their clinical and biological importance.

The contemporary clinical approach to the diagnosis of HCC has evolved into something rather unique among solid tumors. Diagnostic algorithms for HCC, such as those based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Networks (NCCN) guidelines^[75], allow for the diagnosis of HCC to be predicated on the results of radiographic testing in appropriately selected patients. In those patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease, satisfaction of radiographic criteria based on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (LIRADS-5) confers a positive predictive value of > 98% for the diagnosis of HCC, effectively alleviating the need for liver biopsies to secure a tissue diagnosis^[75]. Unfortunately, this non-histopathologic approach to diagnosis can impede clinical and research efforts to advance precision medicine for HCC, as it makes tumor tissue unavailable for genetic testing or molecular profiling. Non-invasive diagnostic tools such as liquid biopsy and molecular imaging have the potential to address this lack of molecular information. Clinical development of such non-invasive methods for HCC for molecular-subclassification, risk-stratification, and treatment selection share the promise of preserving and extending the non-invasive clinical diagnosis and management approach pioneered in HCC.

Summary and conclusion

Presently, there is a critical yet unmet need for biomarkers to predict immunotherapeutic response in HCC, since objective clinical responses to the existing approved ICI agents occur in only a fraction of patients. There is now a large body of evidence that associates Wnt/β-catenin activation with tumor immune evasion and immunotherapeutic resistance. Recent work has also shown that it is feasible to assess the Wnt/β-catenin activation status of malignant tumors non-invasively through liquid biopsy and possibly molecular imaging. Further efforts along these lines to develop non-invasive assays of tumor Wnt/β-catenin activation may have the potential to be fruitful in producing much-needed biomarkers for predicting immunotherapeutic response in HCC. However, as with therapeutic agents, these biomarker tools will require rigorous and thorough clinical testing along a well-planned series of clinical trial phases that begins with the assessment of biomarker classification performance and ends with the measurement of clinical impact.