REFERENCES

1. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964-6.

2. Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews. Ann Surg 2021;273:467-73.

3. Boyd B, Umansky J, Samson M, Boyd D, Stahl K. Robotic harvest of internal mammary vessels in breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006;22:261-6.

4. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger CF. Robotic harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: laboratory and clinical experience. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012;28:457-64.

5. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1305-12.

6. Selber JC. The Robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:340-3.

7. Struk S, Sarfati B, Leymarie N, et al. Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest: A feasibility study on cadaveric model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71:259-61.

8. Elver AA, Matthews SA, Egan KG, et al. Characterizing outcomes of medial and lateral perforators in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023;39:20-6.

9. Shuck J, Asaad M, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Prospective pilot study of robotic-assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: A 510(k) approval study with U.S. food and drug administration investigational device exemption. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:1287-95.

10. Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146:1221-5.

11. Bishop SN, Asaad M, Liu J, et al. Robotic harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:1073-7.

12. Gillespie BM, Gillespie J, Boorman RJ, Granqvist K, Stranne J, Erichsen-Andersson A. The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance: a systematic mixed studies review. Hum Factors 2021;63:1352-79.

13. Egan KG, Selber JC. Modern innovations in breast surgery: robotic breast surgery and robotic breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2023;50:357-66.

14. Fan CJ, Chien HL, Weiss MJ, et al. Minimally invasive versus open surgery in the Medicare population: a comparison of post-operative and economic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3874-80.

15. Eo PS, Kim H, Lee JS, Lee J, Park HY, Yang JD. Robot-assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest for partial breast reconstruction: comparison with endoscopic and conventional approaches. Aesthet Surg J 2023;44:38-46.

16. Lee MJ, Won J, Song SY, et al. Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a retrospective matched study. Front Oncol 2022;12:989231.

17. Khan MTA, Won BW, Baumgardner K, et al. Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022;89:703-8.

18. Piper M, Ligh CA, Shakir S, Messa C, Soriano I, Kanchwala S. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:890-930.

19. Selber JC. Can I make robotic surgery make sense in my practice? Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:781e-92e.

20. Williams SB, Prado K, Hu JC. Economics of robotic surgery: does it make sense and for whom? Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:591-6.