Download PDF
Opinion  |  Open Access  |  26 Jul 2024

Innovating innervation: how non-biological targets can revolutionize amputation care

Views: 303 |  Downloads: 29 |  Cited:  0
Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:31.
10.20517/2347-9264.2024.04 |  © The Author(s) 2024.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article
Author's Talk
Download PDF 0 4

INTRODUCTION

The amputation of a limb represents one of the oldest surgical procedures in medical history. In recent years, rapid advances in biomechanics and prosthetic technology have ushered in a new era of innovation for amputation procedures[1]. We have seen a paradigm shift from a focus on limb salvage to limb reconstruction that prioritizes the care of peripheral nerves, residual bone, and muscle to reduce post-amputation pain and improve prosthetic control[2-4]. From a reconstructive surgery perspective, the focal point of innovation for amputation has been the prevention and treatment of terminal neuromas. Terminal neuromas are non-tumorigenic, bulbous masses that form at the distal end of amputated nerves in a vain attempt to reinnervate the now absent distal target. As one of the most common sequelae accompanying amputation, the prevention and treatment of terminal neuromas have historically been described as unsatisfactory[5,6]. To address these complications, surgeons have sought to identify new targets for transected nerves. Their search produced novel techniques such as targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), which resolve the problems of nerve transection by embedding the transected nerve end into muscle. This coupling of biologically compatible tissues provides the damaged nerve somewhere to go and something to do[3,4]. In addition to circumventing painful neuroma formation, the newly innervated muscle amplifies neural signals, providing an opportunity to record efferent motor activity via electromyography (EMG) and translate it into commands for a coupled prosthetic device. Both TMR and RPNI rely on the innate regenerative capacity of nerves to innervate new biological targets. The term innervation generally means to supply an organ or tissue with nerves, but do terminal targets need to be biological in order to form functional units? In the digital age, we have the technology to provide advanced robotic limb substitutes and the neural interfaces to control them, and so the philosophical question becomes: what constitutes innervation in the 21st century? In this opinion piece, we explore the concept of innervation as it relates to the field of neuroprosthetics, and the integral roles plastic surgeons may play in innovating innervation.

DISCUSSION

One class of devices capable of redefining innervation is the regenerative sieve electrode Figure 1. Like TMR and RPNI, sieve electrodes rely on axonal regeneration; however, rather than form functional neuromuscular junctions or cutaneous sensory receptors, sieve electrodes allow axonal regeneration through porous electrodes Table 1. These porous electrode structures enable greater isolation of axons into separate channels for highly selective recording and stimulation Figure 2[7,8]. Maximization of axonal contact cements this class as the most selective electrodes available, with improvements such as double layering allowing for upwards of 64 recording channels for even greater specificity[9]. Implementing guidance materials with cuff electrode functionality bolsters interface stability and selectivity[10]. Additionally, contemporary sieve electrodes boast substantial chronic viability; their thin polyimide build is highly flexible, reducing the risk of axonopathy commonly seen in their silicon variants[11]. Incorporating polyimide significantly reduced the immune response to the electrode with no signs of inflammation at 12 months of implantation in a rat model[12]. Once supplied with nerves, these electrodes can chronically interface with the user's nervous system to actuate a sophisticated prosthesis[10]. This formation of long-term functional neural connections with a synthetic target contends with the current definition of innervation, which holds the distal site of reinnervation to be exclusively biological.

Innovating innervation: how non-biological targets can revolutionize amputation care

Figure 1. Sieve electrodes contain multiple stimulation/recording channels with sufficient transit zones to allow axonal regeneration through, in both nerve coaptation (left) and amputation (right) models.

Innovating innervation: how non-biological targets can revolutionize amputation care

Figure 2. Graphical representation of how a neural interface’s proximity to the relevant neural tissue impacts the selectivity of that neural interface. Selectivity is improved from complete nerve transfer in TMR to the fascicular level in RPNI up to the axonal level in sieve electrodes.

Table 1

Summary of neural interfaces for prosthetic control that rely on nerve regeneration for prosthetic actuation

MethodInterfacing
tissue
FunctionalityVersatility for neural interfacingSummary
TMRSkinMotorUpper Limb
The terminal end of a transected nerve reinnervates the intact proximal muscles. High-density surface EMG electrode grids enable the recording of motor unit activity across 64 channels
RPNISkin Or
Muscle
Motor and
Sensation
Upper and
Lower Limb
The transected nerve is divided into several subunits, each reinnervating a muscle graft harvested from a proximal donor site. This biological PNI can be recorded or stimulated using transcutaneous or percutaneous electrodes. The number of available recording and stimulating channels is defined by the number of nerve subunits and the interface method
Sieve
electrode
FasciclesMotor and SensationUpper and
Lower Limb
The flat, porous structure of sieve electrodes presents discrete microchannels to isolate regenerating axons of the transected nerve. Double-layering allows for 64 channels capable of recording and stimulating specific fascicles

Regenerative sieve electrodes have demonstrated a trajectory of increasing selectivity and stability, but implantation’s predication on the transection of an intact nerve categorizes these electrodes as the most invasive. This categorization is symptomatic of experimental methodology, which evaluates invasivity via traditional neurorrhaphy models, comparing repair methods restoration of function to an intact limb[13]. While nerve transection is a prerequisite to regenerative electrode application, in an amputation and neuroma repair model, neurotmesis would have already occurred, significantly reducing the invasivity of electrode implantation. Srinivasan et al.[14]. validated the chronic viability of regenerative electrodes in a rat amputation model, exhibiting spontaneous, sensory-evoked, and electrically evoked action potentials in the sciatic nerve at five months. However, electrode implantation is not without risk, and despite the improved flexibility of polyimide electrodes, micromotion can still erode signal fidelity and damage native tissue[15,16]. Additionally, any chronic implant can incite a harmful immune response[16]. Millevolte et al.[17]. utilized surgical techniques to circumvent these mechanical limitations, housing sieve electrodes in the medullary canals of rabbits. Their Osseointegrated Neural Interface (ONI) generated somatosensory cortical responses at 12 weeks and improvements in recorded signal amplitude between weeks 3 and 5[17]. Overall, sieve electrodes present an exciting avenue for peripheral nerve interfaces, but their clinical implementation will require refined surgical methodology.

The formation of functional connections between regenerative electrodes and damaged nerves to actuate robotic prostheses with high selectivity exemplifies the potential for nerves to innervate non-biological targets. If neural interfacing technology maintains this trajectory, these increasingly sophisticated devices will become progressively more relevant to plastic and reconstructive surgeons, who work with patients near the incidence of injury and often before any of these hypothetical devices would see implementation. While the technology for such devices is available, a defined surgical approach would facilitate their clinical application. To accommodate this forthcoming innovation, we posit expanding the definition of innervation to reach outside the boundaries of biology.

DECLARATIONS

Authors’ contributions

Manuscript drafting: Sears LA, Donnelly DAT, Zeng WF, Dingle AM

Concept and figure creation: Dingle AM

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Aaron M. Dingle and Dr. Weifeng Zeng are Junior Editor Board members of the PAR Journal. The other authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

REFERENCES

1. Karczewski AM, Dingle AM, Poore SO. The need to work arm in arm: calling for collaboration in delivering neuroprosthetic limb replacements. Front Neurorobot 2021;15:711028.

2. Mioton LM, Dumanian GA. Targeted muscle reinnervation and prosthetic rehabilitation after limb loss. J Surg Oncol 2018;118:807-14.

3. Markatos K, Karamanou M, Saranteas T, Mavrogenis AF. Hallmarks of amputation surgery. Int Orthop 2019;43:493-9.

4. Herr HM, Clites TR, Srinivasan S, et al. Reinventing extremity amputation in the era of functional limb restoration. Ann Surg 2021;273:269-79.

5. Boldery E. Amputation neuroma in nerves implanted in bone. Ann Surg 1943;118:1052-7.

6. Sachs M, Bojunga J, Encke A. Historical evolution of limb amputation. World J Surg 1999;23:1088-93.

7. Coker RA, Zellmer ER, Moran DW. Micro-channel sieve electrode for concurrent bidirectional peripheral nerve interface. Part A: recording. J Neural Eng 2019;16:026001.

8. Coker RA, Zellmer ER, Moran DW. Micro-channel sieve electrode for concurrent bidirectional peripheral nerve interface. Part B: stimulation. J Neural Eng 2019;16:026002.

11. Lago N, Udina E, Ramachandran A, Navarro X. Neurobiological assessment of regenerative electrodes for bidirectional interfacing injured peripheral nerves. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:1129-37.

12. Lago N, Ceballos D, Rodríguez FJ, Stieglitz T, Navarro X. Long term assessment of axonal regeneration through polyimide regenerative electrodes to interface the peripheral nerve. Biomaterials 2005;26:2021-31.

13. Vela FJ, Martínez-Chacón G, Ballestín A, Campos JL, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Abellán E. Animal models used to study direct peripheral nerve repair: a systematic review. Neural Regen Res 2020;15:491-502.

14. Srinivasan A, Tahilramani M, Bentley JT, et al. Microchannel-based regenerative scaffold for chronic peripheral nerve interfacing in amputees. Biomaterials 2015;41:151-65.

15. Woeppel K, Yang Q, Cui XT. Recent advances in neural electrode-tissue interfaces. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2017;4:21-31.

16. Adewole DO, Serruya MD, Harris JP, et al. The evolution of neuroprosthetic interfaces. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2016;44:123-52.

17. Millevolte AXT, Dingle AM, Ness JP, et al. Improving the selectivity of an osseointegrated neural interface: proof of concept for housing sieve electrode arrays in the medullary canal of long bones. Front Neurosci 2021;15:613844.

Cite This Article

Opinion
Open Access
Innovating innervation: how non-biological targets can revolutionize amputation care
Lucas A. SearsLucas A. Sears, ... Aaron M. Dingle

How to Cite

Sears, L. A.; Donnelly D. A. T.; Zeng W.; Dingle A. M. Innovating innervation: how non-biological targets can revolutionize amputation care. Plast. Aesthet. Res. 2024, 11, 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.04

Download Citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

Export Citation File:

Type of Import

Tips on Downloading Citation

This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.

Citation Manager File Format

Use the radio buttons to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex.

Type of Import

If you have citation management software installed on your computer your Web browser should be able to import metadata directly into your reference database.

Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.

Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.

About This Article

Special Issue

This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Peripheral Nerve Repair
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
303
Downloads
29
Citations
0
Comments
0
4

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

0
Author's Talk
Download PDF
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Plastic and Aesthetic Research
ISSN 2349-6150 (Online)   2347-9264 (Print)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/