REFERENCES
1. Corona BT, Rivera JC, Greising SM. Inflammatory and physiological consequences of debridement of fibrous tissue after volumetric muscle loss injury. Clin Transl Sci 2018;11:208-17.
2. Corona BT, Rivera JC, Owens JG, Wenke JC, Rathbone CR. Volumetric muscle loss leads to permanent disability following extremity trauma. J Rehabil Res Dev 2015;52:785-92.
3. Corona BT, Wenke JC, Ward CL. Pathophysiology of volumetric muscle loss injury. Cells Tissues Organs 2016;202:180-8.
4. Garg K, Ward CL, Hurtgen BJ, et al. Volumetric muscle loss: persistent functional deficits beyond frank loss of tissue. J Orthop Res 2015;33:40-6.
5. Larouche J, Greising SM, Corona BT, Aguilar CA. Robust inflammatory and fibrotic signaling following volumetric muscle loss: a barrier to muscle regeneration. Cell Death Dis 2018;9:409.
6. Terada N, Takayama S, Yamada H, Seki T. Muscle repair after a transsection injury with development of a gap: an experimental study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2001;35:233-8.
7. Anderson SE, Han WM, Srinivasa V, et al. Determination of a critical size threshold for volumetric muscle loss in the mouse quadriceps. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2019;25:59-70.
8. Mase VJ Jr, Hsu JR, Wolf SE, et al. Clinical application of an acellular biologic scaffold for surgical repair of a large, traumatic quadriceps femoris muscle defect. Orthopedics 2010;33:511.
9. Cross JD, Ficke JR, Hsu JR, Masini BD, Wenke JC. Battlefield orthopaedic injuries cause the majority of long-term disabilities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19 Suppl 1:S1-7.
10. Greising SM, Warren GL, Southern WM, et al. Early rehabilitation for volumetric muscle loss injury augments endogenous regenerative aspects of muscle strength and oxidative capacity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:173.
11. Porzionato A, Sfriso MM, Pontini A, et al. Decellularized human skeletal muscle as biologic scaffold for reconstructive surgery. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:14808-31.
12. Bach AD, Beier JP, Stern-Staeter J, Horch RE. Skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med 2004;8:413-22.
13. Lin CH, Lin YT, Yeh JT, Chen CT. Free functioning muscle transfer for lower extremity posttraumatic composite structure and functional defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:2118-26.
14. Ulusal AE, Lin CH, Lin YT, Ulusal BG, Yazar S. The use of free flaps in the management of type IIIB open calcaneal fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:2010-9.
15. Doi K, Hattori Y, Tan SH, Dhawan V. Basic science behind functioning free muscle transplantation. Clin Plast Surg 2002;29:483-95, v-vi.
16. Lee KT, Lee YJ, Kim A, Mun GH. Evaluation of donor morbidity following single-stage latissimus dorsi neuromuscular transfer for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:152e-64e.
17. Diwan A, Eberlin KR, Smith RM. The principles and practice of open fracture care, 2018. Chin J Traumatol 2018;21:187-92.
18. Mulbauer GD, Matthew HWT. Biomimetic scaffolds in skeletal muscle regeneration. Discoveries 2019;7:e90.
19. Panayi AC, Smit L, Hays N, et al. A porous collagen-GAG scaffold promotes muscle regeneration following volumetric muscle loss injury. Wound Repair Regen 2020;28:61-74.
20. Shayan M, Huang NF. Pre-clinical cell therapeutic approaches for repair of volumetric muscle loss. Bioengineering 2020;7:97.
21. Das S, Browne KD, Laimo FA, et al. Pre-innervated tissue-engineered muscle promotes a pro-regenerative microenvironment following volumetric muscle loss. Commun Biol 2020;3:330.
22. Aguilar CA, Greising SM, Watts A, et al. Multiscale analysis of a regenerative therapy for treatment of volumetric muscle loss injury. Cell Death Discov 2018;4:33.
23. Grogan BF, Hsu JR. Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium. Volumetric muscle loss. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19 Suppl 1:S35-7.
24. Forcina L, Miano C, Pelosi L, Musarò A. An overview about the biology of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Curr Genomics 2019;20:24-37.
25. Cezar CA, Mooney DJ. Biomaterial-based delivery for skeletal muscle repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015;84:188-97.
26. Tidball JG. Mechanisms of muscle injury, repair, and regeneration. Compr Physiol 2011;1:2029-62.
27. Grasman JM, Zayas MJ, Page RL, Pins GD. Biomimetic scaffolds for regeneration of volumetric muscle loss in skeletal muscle injuries. Acta Biomater 2015;25:2-15.
28. Nuutila K, Sakthivel D, Kruse C, Tran P, Giatsidis G, Sinha I. Gene expression profiling of skeletal muscle after volumetric muscle loss. Wound Repair Regen 2017;25:408-13.
29. Chargé SB, Rudnicki MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev 2004;84:209-38.
30. Wozniak AC, Anderson JE. Nitric oxide-dependence of satellite stem cell activation and quiescence on normal skeletal muscle fibers. Dev Dyn 2007;236:240-50.
31. Allen RE, Sheehan SM, Taylor RG, Kendall TL, Rice GM. Hepatocyte growth factor activates quiescent skeletal muscle satellite cells in vitro. J Cell Physiol 1995;165:307-12.
32. Gal-Levi R, Leshem Y, Aoki S, Nakamura T, Halevy O. Hepatocyte growth factor plays a dual role in regulating skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998;1402:39-51.
33. Tatsumi R, Anderson JE, Nevoret CJ, Halevy O, Allen RE. HGF/SF is present in normal adult skeletal muscle and is capable of activating satellite cells. Dev Biol 1998;194:114-28.
34. Tatsumi R, Hattori A, Ikeuchi Y, Anderson JE, Allen RE. Release of hepatocyte growth factor from mechanically stretched skeletal muscle satellite cells and role of pH and nitric oxide. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:2909-18.
35. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, Kalimo H, Järvinen M. Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:745-64.
36. Cornelison DD, Wilcox-Adelman SA, Goetinck PF, Rauvala H, Rapraeger AC, Olwin BB. Essential and separable roles for Syndecan-3 and Syndecan-4 in skeletal muscle development and regeneration. Genes Dev 2004;18:2231-6.
37. Cornelison DD, Filla MS, Stanley HM, Rapraeger AC, Olwin BB. Syndecan-3 and syndecan-4 specifically mark skeletal muscle satellite cells and are implicated in satellite cell maintenance and muscle regeneration. Dev Biol 2001;239:79-94.
38. Smith CW, Klaasmeyer JG, Woods TL, Jones SJ. Effects of IGF-I, IGF-II, bFGF and PDGF on the initiation of mRNA translation in C2C12 myoblasts and differentiating myoblasts. Tissue Cell 1999;31:403-12.
39. Dhawan J, Rando TA. Stem cells in postnatal myogenesis: molecular mechanisms of satellite cell quiescence, activation and replenishment. Trends Cell Biol 2005;15:666-73.
40. Grefte S, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Torensma R, Von den Hoff JW. Skeletal muscle development and regeneration. Stem Cells Dev 2007;16:857-68.
41. Folkman J, Klagsbrun M, Sasse J, Wadzinski M, Ingber D, Vlodavsky I. A heparin-binding angiogenic protein--basic fibroblast growth factor--is stored within basement membrane. Am J Pathol 1988;130:393-400.
42. DO MK, Suzuki T, Gerelt B, et al. Time-coordinated prevalence of extracellular HGF, FGF2 and TGF-β3 in crush-injured skeletal muscle. Anim Sci J 2012;83:712-7.
44. Laumonier T, Menetrey J. Muscle injuries and strategies for improving their repair. J Exp Orthop 2016;3:15.
45. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci 2011;2011:290602.
46. Webster MT, Manor U, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Fan CM. Intravital imaging reveals ghost fibers as architectural units guiding myogenic progenitors during regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2016;18:243-52.
47. Qazi TH, Mooney DJ, Pumberger M, Geissler S, Duda GN. Biomaterials based strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: existing technologies and future trends. Biomaterials 2015;53:502-21.
48. Mertens JP, Sugg KB, Lee JD, Larkin LM. Engineering muscle constructs for the creation of functional engineered musculoskeletal tissue. Regen Med 2014;9:89-100.
49. Sicari BM, Londono R, Badylak SF. Strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: seed vs. soil. J Mater Chem B 2015;3:7881-95.
50. Zhuang P, An J, Chua CK, Tan LP. Bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models: a review. Materials & Design 2020;193:108794.
51. Bian W, Bursac N. Tissue engineering of functional skeletal muscle: challenges and recent advances. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008;27:109-13.
52. Baiguera S, Del Gaudio C, Di Nardo P, Manzari V, Carotenuto F, Teodori L. 3D printing decellularized extracellular matrix to design biomimetic scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:2689701.
53. Evans DJ, Britland S, Wigmore PM. Differential response of fetal and neonatal myoblasts to topographical guidance cues in vitro. Dev Genes Evol 1999;209:438-42.
54. Miyoshi H, Adachi T. Topography design concept of a tissue engineering scaffold for controlling cell function and fate through actin cytoskeletal modulation. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2014;20:609-27.
55. Fan J, Abedi-Dorcheh K, Sadat Vaziri A, et al. A review of recent advances in natural polymer-based scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Polymers 2022;14:2097.
56. Jenkins TL, Little D. Synthetic scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering: cellular responses to fiber parameters. NPJ Regen Med 2019;4:15.
57. Cao H, Duan L, Zhang Y, Cao J, Zhang K. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021;6:426.
58. Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2013;19:485-502.
59. Hutmacher DW. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues--state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2001;12:107-24.
60. Corona BT, Greising SM. Challenges to acellular biological scaffold mediated skeletal muscle tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2016;104:238-46.
61. Boldrin L, Elvassore N, Malerba A, et al. Satellite cells delivered by micro-patterned scaffolds: a new strategy for cell transplantation in muscle diseases. Tissue Eng 2007;13:253-62.
62. Zhu C, Karvar M, Koh DJ, et al. Acellular collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix promotes functional recovery in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss. Regen Med 2023;18:623-33.
63. Badylak SF, Dziki JL, Sicari BM, Ambrosio F, Boninger ML. Mechanisms by which acellular biologic scaffolds promote functional skeletal muscle restoration. Biomaterials 2016;103:128-36.
64. Sicari BM, Dearth CL, Badylak SF. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches to enhance the functional response to skeletal muscle injury. Anat Rec 2014;297:51-64.
65. Menetrey J, Kasemkijwattana C, Day CS, et al. Growth factors improve muscle healing in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:131-7.
66. Ju YM, Atala A, Yoo JJ, Lee SJ. In situ regeneration of skeletal muscle tissue through host cell recruitment. Acta Biomater 2014;10:4332-9.
67. Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Spatiotemporal control of vascular endothelial growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels enhances angiogenesis. J Thromb Haemost 2007;5:590-8.
68. Shvartsman D, Storrie-White H, Lee K, et al. Sustained delivery of VEGF maintains innervation and promotes reperfusion in ischemic skeletal muscles via NGF/GDNF signaling. Mol Ther 2014;22:1243-53.
69. Lee J, Bhang SH, Park H, Kim BS, Lee KY. Active blood vessel formation in the ischemic hindlimb mouse model using a microsphere/hydrogel combination system. Pharm Res 2010;27:767-74.
70. Frey SP, Jansen H, Raschke MJ, Meffert RH, Ochman S. VEGF improves skeletal muscle regeneration after acute trauma and reconstruction of the limb in a rabbit model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:3607-14.
71. Hammers DW, Sarathy A, Pham CB, Drinnan CT, Farrar RP, Suggs LJ. Controlled release of IGF-I from a biodegradable matrix improves functional recovery of skeletal muscle from ischemia/reperfusion. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012;109:1051-9.
72. Doi K, Ikeda T, Marui A, et al. Enhanced angiogenesis by gelatin hydrogels incorporating basic fibroblast growth factor in rabbit model of hind limb ischemia. Heart Vessels 2007;22:104-8.
73. Layman H, Spiga MG, Brooks T, Pham S, Webster KA, Andreopoulos FM. The effect of the controlled release of basic fibroblast growth factor from ionic gelatin-based hydrogels on angiogenesis in a murine critical limb ischemic model. Biomaterials 2007;28:2646-54.
74. Yasuda Y, Koyama H, Tabata Y, et al. Controlled delivery of bFGF remodeled vascular network in muscle flap and increased perfusion capacity via minor pedicle. J Surg Res 2008;147:132-7.
75. Grasman JM, Do DM, Page RL, Pins GD. Rapid release of growth factors regenerates force output in volumetric muscle loss injuries. Biomaterials 2015;72:49-60.
76. Lee K, Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments. J R Soc Interface 2011;8:153-70.
77. Borselli C, Storrie H, Benesch-Lee F, et al. Functional muscle regeneration with combined delivery of angiogenesis and myogenesis factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:3287-92.
78. Skuk D, Goulet M, Roy B, et al. Dystrophin expression in muscles of duchenne muscular dystrophy patients after high-density injections of normal myogenic cells. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2006;65:371-86.
79. Saxena AK, Marler J, Benvenuto M, Willital GH, Vacanti JP. Skeletal muscle tissue engineering using isolated myoblasts on synthetic biodegradable polymers: preliminary studies. Tissue Eng 1999;5:525-32.
80. Baker HB, Passipieri JA, Siriwardane M, et al. Cell and growth factor-loaded keratin hydrogels for treatment of volumetric muscle loss in a mouse model. Tissue Eng Part A 2017;23:572-84.
81. Tomblyn S, Pettit Kneller EL, Walker SJ, et al. Keratin hydrogel carrier system for simultaneous delivery of exogenous growth factors and muscle progenitor cells. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2016;104:864-79.
82. Dellavalle A, Maroli G, Covarello D, et al. Pericytes resident in postnatal skeletal muscle differentiate into muscle fibres and generate satellite cells. Nat Commun 2011;2:499.
83. Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, et al. A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 2008;3:301-13.
84. Qu-Petersen Z, Deasy B, Jankowski R, et al. Identification of a novel population of muscle stem cells in mice: potential for muscle regeneration. J Cell Biol 2002;157:851-64.
85. Genovese P, Patel A, Ziemkiewicz N, et al. Co-delivery of fibrin-laminin hydrogel with mesenchymal stem cell spheroids supports skeletal muscle regeneration following trauma. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2021;15:1131-43.
86. Chen FM, Zhang M, Wu ZF. Toward delivery of multiple growth factors in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010;31:6279-308.
87. Bao W, Li M, Yang Y, et al. Advancements and frontiers in the high performance of natural hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Front Chem 2020;8:53.
88. Spicer CD. Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: the importance of polymer choice. Polym Chem 2020;11:184-219.
89. Chai Q, Jiao Y, Yu X. Hydrogels for biomedical applications: their characteristics and the mechanisms behind them. Gels 2017;3:6.
90. Nakayama KH, Shayan M, Huang NF. Engineering biomimetic materials for skeletal muscle repair and regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2019;8:e1801168.
91. Pollot BE, Rathbone CR, Wenke JC, Guda T. Natural polymeric hydrogel evaluation for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018;106:672-9.
92. Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012;33:6020-41.
93. Carleton MM, Locke M, Sefton MV. Methacrylic acid-based hydrogels enhance skeletal muscle regeneration after volumetric muscle loss in mice. Biomaterials 2021;275:120909.
94. Passipieri JA, Baker HB, Siriwardane M, et al. Keratin hydrogel enhances in vivo skeletal muscle function in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss. Tissue Eng Part A 2017;23:556-71.
95. Juhas M, Engelmayr GC Jr, Fontanella AN, Palmer GM, Bursac N. Biomimetic engineered muscle with capacity for vascular integration and functional maturation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:5508-13.
96. Beier JP, Stern-Straeter J, Foerster VT, Kneser U, Stark GB, Bach AD. Tissue engineering of injectable muscle: three-dimensional myoblast-fibrin injection in the syngeneic rat animal model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1113-21.
97. Borselli C, Cezar CA, Shvartsman D, Vandenburgh HH, Mooney DJ. The role of multifunctional delivery scaffold in the ability of cultured myoblasts to promote muscle regeneration. Biomaterials 2011;32:8905-14.
98. Wang L, Cao L, Shansky J, Wang Z, Mooney D, Vandenburgh H. Minimally invasive approach to the repair of injured skeletal muscle with a shape-memory scaffold. Mol Ther 2014;22:1441-9.
99. Rossi CA, Flaibani M, Blaauw B, et al. In vivo tissue engineering of functional skeletal muscle by freshly isolated satellite cells embedded in a photopolymerizable hydrogel. FASEB J 2011;25:2296-304.
100. Wang HD, Lough DM, Kurlander DE, Lopez J, Quan A, Kumar AR. Muscle-derived stem cell-enriched scaffolds are capable of enhanced healing of a murine volumetric muscle loss defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:329e-39e.
101. Malafaya PB, Silva GA, Reis RL. Natural-origin polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell delivery in tissue engineering applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:207-33.
102. Zhang X, Zhang R, Wu S, Sun Y, Yang H, Lin B. Physically and chemically dual-crosslinked hydrogels with superior mechanical properties and self-healing behavior. New J Chem 2020;44:9903-11.
103. Kim S, Regitsky AU, Song J, Ilavsky J, McKinley GH, Holten-Andersen N. In situ mechanical reinforcement of polymer hydrogels via metal-coordinated crosslink mineralization. Nat Commun 2021;12:667.
104. Hogrebe NJ, Reinhardt JW, Gooch KJ. Biomaterial microarchitecture: a potent regulator of individual cell behavior and multicellular organization. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017;105:640-61.
105. Xu J, Nie N, Wu B, et al. The personalized application of biomaterials based on age and sexuality specific immune responses. Biomaterials 2021;278:121177.
106. Jiang Z, Fu M, Zhu D, et al. Genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials in tissue regeneration and engineering. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2022;66:53-73.
107. Wu J, Matthias N, Bhalla S, Darabi R. Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of human iPSCs in a murine model of VML. Mol Ther 2021;29:121-31.
108. Valentin JE, Badylak JS, McCabe GP, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. a comparative histologic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2673-86.
109. Sicari BM, Agrawal V, Siu BF, et al. A murine model of volumetric muscle loss and a regenerative medicine approach for tissue replacement. Tissue Eng Part A 2012;18:1941-8.
110. Porzionato A, Sfriso MM, Pontini A, et al. Decellularized human skeletal muscle as biologic scaffold for reconstructive surgery. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:14808-31.
111. Aurora A, Roe JL, Corona BT, Walters TJ. An acellular biologic scaffold does not regenerate appreciable de novo muscle tissue in rat models of volumetric muscle loss injury. Biomaterials 2015;67:393-407.
112. Sicari BM, Rubin JP, Dearth CL, et al. An acellular biologic scaffold promotes skeletal muscle formation in mice and humans with volumetric muscle loss. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:234ra58.
113. Dziki J, Badylak S, Yabroudi M, et al. An acellular biologic scaffold treatment for volumetric muscle loss: results of a 13-patient cohort study. NPJ Regen Med 2016;1:16008.
114. Garg K, Ward CL, Rathbone CR, Corona BT. Transplantation of devitalized muscle scaffolds is insufficient for appreciable de novo muscle fiber regeneration after volumetric muscle loss injury. Cell Tissue Res 2014;358:857-73.
115. Kasukonis B, Kim J, Brown L, et al. Codelivery of infusion decellularized skeletal muscle with minced muscle autografts improved recovery from volumetric muscle loss injury in a rat model. Tissue Eng Part A 2016;22:1151-63.
116. Merritt EK, Cannon MV, Hammers DW, et al. Repair of traumatic skeletal muscle injury with bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded on extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 2010;16:2871-81.
117. Conconi MT, De Coppi P, Bellini S, et al. Homologous muscle acellular matrix seeded with autologous myoblasts as a tissue-engineering approach to abdominal wall-defect repair. Biomaterials 2005;26:2567-74.
118. Krampera M, Pizzolo G, Aprili G, Franchini M. Mesenchymal stem cells for bone, cartilage, tendon and skeletal muscle repair. Bone 2006;39:678-83.
119. Tae SK, Lee SH, Park JS, Im GI. Mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomed Mater 2006;1:63-71.
120. De Coppi P, Bellini S, Conconi MT, et al. Myoblast-acellular skeletal muscle matrix constructs guarantee a long-term repair of experimental full-thickness abdominal wall defects. Tissue Eng 2006;12:1929-36.
121. Gilbert-Honick J, Grayson W. Vascularized and innervated skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 2020;9:e1900626.
122. Wang S, Yan H, Fang B, et al. A myogenic niche with a proper mechanical stress environment improves abdominal wall muscle repair by modulating immunity and preventing fibrosis. Biomaterials 2022;285:121519.
123. Ziemkiewicz N, Hilliard GM, Dunn AJ, et al. Laminin-111-enriched fibrin hydrogels enhance functional muscle regeneration following trauma. Tissue Eng Part A 2022;28:297-311.
124. Samandari M, Quint J, Rodríguez-delaRosa A, Sinha I, Pourquié O, Tamayol A. Bioinks and bioprinting strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Adv Mater 2022;34:e2105883.
125. Vasita R, Katti DS. Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine 2006;1:15-30.
126. Kishan AP, Cosgriff-Hernandez EM. Recent advancements in electrospinning design for tissue engineering applications: a review. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017;105:2892-905.
127. Ostrovidov S, Salehi S, Costantini M, et al. 3D bioprinting in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Small 2019;15:e1805530.
128. Jana S, Levengood SK, Zhang M. Anisotropic materials for skeletal-muscle-tissue engineering. Adv Mater 2016;28:10588-612.
129. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:613-21.
130. Wang L, Li T, Wang Z, et al. Injectable remote magnetic nanofiber/hydrogel multiscale scaffold for functional anisotropic skeletal muscle regeneration. Biomaterials 2022;285:121537.
131. Nakayama KH, Quarta M, Paine P, et al. Treatment of volumetric muscle loss in mice using nanofibrillar scaffolds enhances vascular organization and integration. Commun Biol 2019;2:170.
132. Wang L, Wu Y, Guo B, Ma PX. Nanofiber yarn/hydrogel core-shell scaffolds mimicking native skeletal muscle tissue for guiding 3D myoblast alignment, elongation, and differentiation. ACS Nano 2015;9:9167-79.
133. Lee JB, Jeong SI, Bae MS, et al. Highly porous electrospun nanofibers enhanced by ultrasonication for improved cellular infiltration. Tissue Eng Part A 2011;17:2695-702.
134. Leong MF, Rasheed MZ, Lim TC, Chian KS. In vitro cell infiltration and in vivo cell infiltration and vascularization in a fibrous, highly porous poly(D,L-lactide) scaffold fabricated by cryogenic electrospinning technique. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:231-40.
135. Wright L, Andric T, Freeman J. Utilizing NaCl to increase the porosity of electrospun materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2011;31:30-6.
136. Soliman S, Pagliari S, Rinaldi A, et al. Multiscale three-dimensional scaffolds for soft tissue engineering via multimodal electrospinning. Acta Biomater 2010;6:1227-37.
137. Rnjak-Kovacina J, Weiss AS. Increasing the pore size of electrospun scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2011;17:365-72.
138. Jin G, Li K. The electrically conductive scaffold as the skeleton of stem cell niche in regenerative medicine. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2014;45:671-81.
139. Saberi A, Jabbari F, Zarrintaj P, Saeb MR, Mozafari M. Electrically conductive materials: opportunities and challenges in tissue engineering. Biomolecules 2019;9:448.
140. Greising SM, Corona BT, McGann C, Frankum JK, Warren GL. Therapeutic approaches for volumetric muscle loss injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2019;25:510-25.
141. Farr AC, Hogan KJ, Mikos AG. Nanomaterial additives for fabrication of stimuli-responsive skeletal muscle tissue engineering constructs. Adv Healthc Mater 2020;9:e2000730.
142. Ito A, Yamamoto Y, Sato M, et al. Induction of functional tissue-engineered skeletal muscle constructs by defined electrical stimulation. Sci Rep 2014;4:4781.
143. Khodabukus A, Madden L, Prabhu NK, et al. Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Biomaterials 2019;198:259-69.
144. Kaji H, Ishibashi T, Nagamine K, Kanzaki M, Nishizawa M. Electrically induced contraction of C2C12 myotubes cultured on a porous membrane-based substrate with muscle tissue-like stiffness. Biomaterials 2010;31:6981-6.
145. Jo H, Sim M, Kim S, et al. Electrically conductive graphene/polyacrylamide hydrogels produced by mild chemical reduction for enhanced myoblast growth and differentiation. Acta Biomater 2017;48:100-9.
146. Shin SR, Aghaei-Ghareh-Bolagh B, Dang TT, et al. Cell-laden microengineered and mechanically tunable hybrid hydrogels of gelatin and graphene oxide. Adv Mater 2013;25:6385-91.
147. Chen C, Xi Y, Weng Y. Progress in the development of graphene-based biomaterials for tissue engineering and regeneration. Materials 2022;15:2164.
148. Du Y, Ge J, Li Y, Ma PX, Lei B. Biomimetic elastomeric, conductive and biodegradable polycitrate-based nanocomposites for guiding myogenic differentiation and skeletal muscle regeneration. Biomaterials 2018;157:40-50.
149. Harrison BS, Atala A. Carbon nanotube applications for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007;28:344-53.
150. Edwards SL, Werkmeister JA, Ramshaw JA. Carbon nanotubes in scaffolds for tissue engineering. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009;6:499-505.
151. Kobayashi N, Izumi H, Morimoto Y. Review of toxicity studies of carbon nanotubes. J Occup Health 2017;59:394-407.
152. Jun I, Jeong S, Shin H. The stimulation of myoblast differentiation by electrically conductive sub-micron fibers. Biomaterials 2009;30:2038-47.
153. Ku SH, Lee SH, Park CB. Synergic effects of nanofiber alignment and electroactivity on myoblast differentiation. Biomaterials 2012;33:6098-104.
154. Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2014;10:2341-53.
155. Chen MC, Sun YC, Chen YH. Electrically conductive nanofibers with highly oriented structures and their potential application in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2013;9:5562-72.
156. Ostrovidov S, Ebrahimi M, Bae H, et al. Gelatin-polyaniline composite nanofibers enhanced excitation-contraction coupling system maturation in myotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:42444-58.
157. Zhao X, Zhang Z, Luo J, et al. Biomimetic, highly elastic conductive and hemostatic gelatin/rGO-based nanocomposite cryogel to improve 3D myogenic differentiation and guide in vivo skeletal muscle regeneration. Applied Materials Today 2022;26:101365.
158. Guo B, Qu J, Zhao X, Zhang M. Degradable conductive self-healing hydrogels based on dextran-graft-tetraaniline and N-carboxyethyl chitosan as injectable carriers for myoblast cell therapy and muscle regeneration. Acta Biomater 2019;84:180-93.
159. Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gardiner MD, Combellack E, Hawkins K, Whitaker IS. 3D bioprinting for reconstructive surgery: principles, applications and challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70:1155-70.
160. Quint JP, Mostafavi A, Endo Y, et al. In vivo printing of nanoenabled scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. Adv Healthc Mater 2021;10:e2002152.
161. Choi YJ, Jun YJ, Kim DY, et al. A 3D cell printed muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 2019;206:160-9.
162. Mostafavi A, Samandari M, Karvar M, et al. Colloidal multiscale porous adhesive (bio)inks facilitate scaffold integration. Appl Phys Rev 2021;8:041415.
163. Hwangbo H, Lee H, Jin EJ, et al. Bio-printing of aligned GelMa-based cell-laden structure for muscle tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater 2022;8:57-70.
164. Kim JH, Seol YJ, Ko IK, et al. 3D Bioprinted Human Skeletal Muscle Constructs for Muscle Function Restoration. Sci Rep 2018;8:12307.
165. Kim JH, Kim I, Seol YJ, et al. Neural cell integration into 3D bioprinted skeletal muscle constructs accelerates restoration of muscle function. Nat Commun 2020;11:1025.
166. Endo Y, Samandari M, Karvar M, et al. Aerobic exercise and scaffolds with hierarchical porosity synergistically promote functional recovery post volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 2023;296:122058.
167. Aurora A, Garg K, Corona BT, Walters TJ. Physical rehabilitation improves muscle function following volumetric muscle loss injury. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2014;6:41.
168. Edri R, Gal I, Noor N, et al. Personalized hydrogels for engineering diverse fully autologous tissue implants. Adv Mater 2019;31:e1803895.
169. Eugenis I, Wu D, Rando TA. Cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors: Engineering strategies for improving regeneration following volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 2021;278:121173.
170. Greising SM, Rivera JC, Goldman SM, Watts A, Aguilar CA, Corona BT. Unwavering pathobiology of volumetric muscle loss injury. Sci Rep 2017;7:13179.
171. Bursac N, Juhas M, Rando TA. Synergizing engineering and biology to treat and model skeletal muscle injury and disease. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2015;17:217-42.
172. Sicherer ST, Venkatarama RS, Grasman JM. Recent trends in injury models to study skeletal muscle regeneration and repair. Bioengineering 2020;7:76.
