fig1

Impact of donor pool size on the variability of platelet lysate-derived extracellular vesicles for regenerative medicine

Figure 1. Characterization of the pEV isolated from PC and MPC. (A) Purity of pEV (number of particles per mg of protein) isolated from MPC and PC; (B) Protein concentration of pEV isolated from MPC and PC; (C) Particle size distribution diagram, comparing pEV isolated from PC (blue) and MPC (red); (D) Particle yield of pEV isolated from PC and MPC; (E) Protein/lipid ratio of pEV isolated from MPC and PC; (F) Comparison of mean normalized fluorescence of the AMC-H channel of PC and MPC pEV for different membrane markers; for each sample, three technical replicates were evaluated. Values represent the mean ± SEM. For all the analyses, 10 PCs (n = 10; pooling 5 different donors each), 9 MPCs (n = 9, pooling 50 different donors each), and 6 MPCs (n = 6, in the protein/lipid ratio) were used. Results were statistically compared by t-test. For Figure 1A - E, P-values are shown in the graph. For Figure 1F, P values for membrane markers were CD81 (P = 0.966), CD63 (P = 0.999), CD9 (P = 0.998), CD41b (P = 0.383), CD42a (P = 0.894), CD62 (P > 0.999) and CD29 (P = 0.996). PC: platelet concentrate; MPC: multiple platelet concentrate; pEV: platelet lysate-derived extracellular vesicles.

Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids
ISSN 2767-6641 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/