Heterogeneous nanoporous organic frameworks-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction
Abstract
Converting captured carbon dioxide (CO2) into valuable chemicals and fuels through electrocatalysis and realizing the anthropogenic closed-carbon cycle can provide new solutions to environmental and energy problems. Nanoporous organic frameworks, including metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and porous organic polymers (POPs), as a class of potential electrocatalysts, have made great progress in CO2 reduction reaction due to their high porosity, large specific surface area, and structural/functionalization diversity. In this review, the recent developments in pristine MOFs/POPs, MOFs/POPs composite, and MOFs-/POPs-derived catalysts are discussed from aspects of catalyst design, synthesis strategy, test techniques, performance validation, active sites, and basic mechanism. We further summarize the challenges and prospects of MOFs/POPs-based materials in practical applications for CO2 reduction reactions and point out the potential paths of future research. This review can provide a comprehensive reference for the advanced design and systematic cognition of efficient nanoporous organic framework catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
The rapid development of global industries and human activities has led to a substantial increase in greenhouse gas emissions, causing continued damage to our ecological environment[1]. The idea of the conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary representative component of greenhouse gases, into hydrocarbon fuel has gained traction around the world[2]. So far, several strategies have been reported for CO2 conversion, such as chemical transformation[3], mineralization[4], enzymatic catalysis[5], photochemical catalysis[6], electrochemical catalysis[7,8], and so on. Electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) serves as an effective method to realize chemical energy storage with (excess) renewable electricity energy resources; this process can be conducted at room temperature and standard pressure, and can realize an artificial closed carbon cycle[9]. However, the C=O bond in CO2 has a high bond energy (750 kJ mol-1), creating an urgent need for efficient and stable electrocatalysts to activate and convert it into value-added products[10]. Therefore, through ideal design and tailored synthesis of highly efficient catalysts, combined with the understanding of catalytic mechanisms, the industrial application of electrocatalytic CO2RR technology and its expected challenges have gained increasing interest[11].
It is worth noting that electrocatalytic CO2RR is a relatively complex process with slow reaction kinetics. Different reaction conditions, i.e., electrode materials, reduction potential, electrolytes, pH, and so on, can lead to diverse reduction products, including compounds of single carbon [C1: carbon monoxide (CO), formic acid (HCOOH), methanol (CH3OH), and methane (CH4)], double carbon [C2: ethylene
High overpotential, poor catalyst stability and low product selectivity are the main problems for electrocatalytic CO2RR[19]. The exploration of efficient electrocatalysts is a critical factor in improving the activity and selectivity of CO2RR[20,21]. At present, studies have explored a series of catalysts for electrochemical CO2RR, including transition-metal-based catalysts (metals[22], alloys[23], metal oxides[24,25], metal sulfides[26], etc.), non-metallic catalysts (heteroatom-doped carbon nanomaterials[27]and polymers[28]), and their composites[29]. Based on the structural design, porous materials tend to exhibit superior electrocatalytic performance[30,31]. For example, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and porous organic polymers (POPs) have tunable properties, and their structural diversity makes them ideal candidates for catalyst optimization[32-34]. The high microporosity of MOFs and POPs not only allows good CO2 adsorption capacity under low-pressure conditions, inducing high local CO2 concentration at the electrode under liquid electrolyte conditions, but also promotes the transport of reactants to active sites and reduces mass transfer limitations. Moreover, their large specific surface area (SSA) can ensure the participation of more active sites during catalysis. However, due to their structural limitations, their catalytic activity remains insufficient to meet the requirements for industrial usage. Their structures can be modified to further improve the electrocatalytic activity through the following processes: (1) to prevent the loss of catalytic sites, strong covalent bonds can be used to tightly anchor them on the porous material; (2) to improve conductivity, electron-conducting molecules can be inserted into the porous materials; (3) electroactive components can be implanted into the porous materials through methods such as coating and hybridization to generate an intermediate product which further promotes the conversion to a specific product; (4) porous materials can be compounded with conductive carbon materials, mono-/bimetallic electrodes, and metal oxides, to synergistically promote the electron and mass transfer; and (5) using MOFs or POPs as sacrificial precursors, pyrolysis can produce heteroatom-doped carbon materials and single-atom catalysts (SACs).
In this work, we will discuss the recent developments of MOFs- and POPs-based nanoporous organic framework materials (pristine, hybrids, and derivatives) as catalysts for electrochemical CO2RR [Figure 1]. Apart from using the original MOFs and POPs as catalysts, we explore the following improvement strategies: (1) modification with metals; (2) encapsulation of guests (metal-based molecular catalysts or conductive molecules); (3) combination with functional groups to form composite materials; and (4) inclusion of derivatives (monatomic catalysts of MOFs or POPs). All these steps can enhance electron conductivity, CO2 adsorption capacity, and active site exposure, further improving activity and stability of catalysts. Finally, we identified the current challenges and offered solutions to enable the commercial application of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction technologies.
FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTROCATALYTIC CO2RR
Principle
CO2 is an inert, linear molecule highly stable at room temperature and standard pressure. Hence, electrocatalytic CO2RR can occur only under a highly negative potential. The reaction occurs at the interface of electrode and electrolyte, where the electrode is a solid electrocatalyst and the electrolyte is generally a CO2-saturated potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) aqueous solution[35,36]. This heterogeneous electrocatalytic process includes three main steps: (1) chemisorption of CO2 on the catalyst surface; (2) transfer of electrons and protons to the catalyst surface to destroy the C-O bond and form the C-H bond; and (3) reconstitution of the product, desorption from the electrode surface, and diffusion into the electrolyte.
From a thermodynamic perspective, a CO2 molecule adsorbs onto the working electrode to gain an electron; this process requires high energy to activate the CO2 molecule, enabling it to rearrange from its original linear structure into a curved free radical anion (i.e., intermediate CO2•-), which can then drive the subsequent reaction. The generation of this intermediate state slows down the kinetics of CO2RR, generating a super-potential during the reaction process, and is often considered as a rate-determining step (RDS) for the whole reaction. The complicated process can trigger a series of chemical reactions[37]. The relevant reactions occurring during CO2RR are mentioned in Table 1. Different products involve varying electron/proton transfer and coupling processes of reaction intermediates, and the formation of surface species such as *COOH, *OCHO, *CO, *CHO and *OCCOH (* indicates the adsorption state) produced during the CO2RR process is usually revealed by in-situ Raman spectroscopy, in-situ infrared spectroscopy and isotope labeling. Transition metals Au, Ag, Zn and Pd are easy to adsorb *COOH, so the main product of CO2RR is CO. Pb, In, Sn and Bi are easy to adsorb *OCHO, which promote the formation of
Possible pathways of electrochemical CO2RR
Reaction equations | Electrode potentials E0 (V vs. SHE) |
CO2(g) + 2H+ + 2e- ⇌ HCOOH(l) | -0.25 |
CO2(g) + H2O(l) + 2e- ⇌ HCOO-(aq) + OH- | -1.08 |
CO2(g) + 2H+ + 2e- ⇌ CO(g) + H2O(l) | -0.11 |
CO2 (g) + H2O(l) + 2e- ⇌ CO(g) + 2OH- | -0.93 |
CO2 (g) + 4H+ + 4e- ⇌ CH2O(l) + H2O(l) | -0.07 |
CO2 (g) + 3H2O(l) + 4e- ⇌ CH2O(g) + 4OH- | -0.90 |
CO2 (g) + 6H+ + 6e- ⇌ CH3OH(l) + H2O(l) | +0.02 |
CO2 (g) + 5H2O(l) + 6e- ⇌ CH3OH(l) + 6OH- | -0.81 |
CO2 (g) + 8H+ + 8e- ⇌ CH4(g) + 2H2O(l) | +0.17 |
CO2 (g) + 6H2O(l) + 8e- ⇌ CH4(g) + 8OH- | -0.66 |
2CO2 (g) + 2H+ + 2e- ⇌ H2C2O4(aq) | -0.50 |
2CO2 (g) + 2e- ⇌ C2O42-(aq) | -0.59 |
2CO2 (g) + 12H+ + 12e- ⇌ C2H4(g) + 4H2O(l) | +0.06 |
2CO2 (g) + 12H+ + 12e- ⇌ CH3CH2OH (aq) + 3H2O(l) | +0.08 |
2CO2 (g) + 8H+ + 8e- ⇌ CH3COOH (aq) + 2H2O(l) | +0.12 |
2CO2 (g) + 14H+ + 14e- ⇌ C2H6(g) + 4H2O(l) | +0.14 |
3CO2 (g) + 18H+ + 18e- ⇌ C3H7OH (aq) + 5H2O(l) | +0.10 |
Figure 2. The formation mechanism of various (A) C1 and (B) C2 products[38]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.
(a) Pathway for electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to C1 products
As shown in Figure 2A, the different adsorption states of reaction intermediates in CO2RR can lead to the change of the reaction path, resulting in various types of products[38]. For example, it is generally believed that the carbon adsorption (*COOH) and oxygen adsorption (*OCHO) of the reaction intermediate correspond to the paths to generate the 2e- reduction products CO and HCOOH, respectively[39]. *COOH undergoes electron/proton transfer and dehydration to produce *CO, which can be hydrogenated to form *CHO/*COH. The *CHOH formed by further hydrogenation of *CHO and *COH can be protonated to form *CH2OH, which then branches into two paths to form CH3OH, the 6e- reduction product, and CH4, the 8e- reduction product[40]. In addition, *CHO can also be protonated to form CH2O* and CH3O*, which are key intermediates for the formation of CH4 and CH3OH. However, in the CO2RR process, the selectivity of CH3OH is much lower than that of CH4, due to the high energy barrier in the conversion of *CH2OH and CH3O* to CH3OH, resulting in the kinetic hindrance of CH3OH generation[40].
(b) Pathway for electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to C2 products
The different pathways for the formation of various C2 products are shown in Figure 2B, in which *CO is an essential intermediate for the formation of multi-carbon products by C-C coupling[38]. The *CO dimers undergo proton and electron transfer to form *COCHO, which is further protonated to form
Performance evaluation
It is crucial to evaluate the performance of electrocatalysts using the following indexes based on the fundamental principle of electrocatalytic CO2RR[44]:
1. Initial potential: it is the external voltage to be applied when the current density of the electrocatalyst reaches a certain value.
2. Overpotential: it represents the difference between the actually applied working electrode potential and the standard/equilibrium potential, which reflects the driving force of the catalytic reaction.
3. Faradaic efficiency (FE): this parameter is defined as
where Q represents the charge in the catalytic process, n is the mole number of the product, α denotes the number of electrons transferred, and F = 96,485 C mol-1 is the Faraday constant. FE mainly reflects the selectivity of an electrocatalyst for a specific reduction product. A high FE (> 80%) indicates a good CO2 reduction electrocatalyst:
4. Current density: The total current density is usually calculated as the current through the electrode during CO2RR divided by the geometric surface area of the working electrode, and the current density required for commercial applications should be greater than 300 mA cm-2[45]. The partial current density is the effective current density for the formation of the target product and can be calculated by multiplying the total current density by the FE of the target product.
5. Stability: It means that the activity of the catalyst, the selectivity of the product and the reaction rate remain stable for a long time. In the process of the experiments, the stability of the FE of the target product and the stability of the running current/potential under potentiostatic/galvanostatic electrolysis conditions are usually evaluated. Currently, the longest running time reported is hundreds of hours, which can not reach the goal of thousands of hours of stable operation required by industrial applications[46]. The factors affecting the stability of the CO2RR mainly include the deactivation of the catalyst, the deposition of carbonate on the electrode surface, etc.
6. Turnover frequency (TOF): This parameter denotes the mole number of reduction products produced by each electrocatalysis active site per unit time. However, when the active sites of the catalyst are confused, it can be very difficult to calculate the TOF value.
7. Energy efficiency (EE): Also known as voltage efficiency, it is closely related to the cell voltage and FE through EE(%) = Ethermo/Ecell*FE, where Ethermo is the thermodynamic potential required for the electrocatalytic CO2RR to produce a product. Ecell is the actually applied potential (including the potential required for the reaction, the potential to overcome the catalytic overpotential, the resistance of the electrolyzer, and the potential to generate by-products, etc.). Improving EE helps reduce the total power input for the CO2RR. So far, only a few studies have calculated the EE of CO2RR systems, and there remains much space for improvement from the 70% EE of commercial application target[47].
Electrolytic cells
The design of CO2RR electrolytic cells has a great impact on mass transfer; the most common of these reactors are the H-type, continuous flow electrolytic cells and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) cells[48] [Figure 3].
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of different reactors. (A) H-cell. (B) Flow cell. (C) MEA[48]. Copyright 2021 the Royal Society of Chemistry.
H-type: The H-type cell is a typical reactor commonly used in laboratories. It comprises three electrodes (working, reference, and counter) and two compartments (cathode and anode). This cell design allows different chemical reactions in the two compartments while maintaining the electrochemical quarantine between them. The main feature of the H-cell is that its structure allows researchers to independently control the reaction conditions in each compartment, thus enabling precise control and optimization of the electrochemical reaction.
Continuous flow: The continuous flow cell is a relatively new type of microfluidic cell applied to electrochemical CO2RR in recent years[49]. In this cell, the gas diffusion electrode (GDE) is separated from the flowing liquid electrolyte. An external reference electrode can be used to test the electrode performance. The GDE is designed to improve the control and efficiency of the three-phase boundary in various electrochemical reactions. The gas/liquid products can be kept well separated while performing real-time analyses.
MEA: The core component of the MEA cell is the MEA formed by laminating a GDE, a catalyst layer and an ion exchange membrane in sequence. The MEA cell removes the cathode electrolyte chamber, achieving zero distance transfer of protons and ions, and effectively solving the difficulty of flooding electrodes. Meanwhile, this design reduces the impedance of the system and further accelerates the rate of CO2 electroreduction.
MOF-BASED ELECTROCATALYSTS
MOFs are a kind of crystal material self-assembled by coordination bonds between metal ions or inorganic clusters as nodes and organic ligands as linkers. They have been gradually adopted into electrocatalysis reactions given their high SSA, adjustable microporosity, confinement effect, and the availability of diverse functional groups[50,51]. Compared with conventional solid metal electrodes, the ordered porous structure of MOFs allows the permeation of ions and dissolved CO2 into the membrane to increase CO2 concentration at the local electrode through the inherent pore confinement. The pore sizes and SSA of MOFs can be adjusted through the coordination of different ligands with metal centers, which can make the active centers more accessible to CO2 and promote charge and mass transfer. Due to the regulable metal nodes and ligands serving as active centers or electron transfer agents, the number of useable active sites can be maximized by dispersing them with organic ligands, so MOFs can be finely tuned to possess the best performance as electrocatalysts for the CO2RR. Additionally, different kinds of active sites and reaction conditions can allow the formation of diverse reaction products by tuning the ligands and active metals. Various MOF-based materials, including their main products and catalytic activities, were summarized in Table 2.
The performance of different MOF-based electrocatalysts and their related products in CO2RR
Sample | Main products | Electrolyte | Maximum FE (%) | Electrode potential | Partial current density (mA cm-2) | Refs. |
Pristine MOFs | ||||||
Bi-BTC-D | HCOOH | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 95.5 | -0.86 VRHE | 11.2 | [54] |
CAU-17-fiber_400 | HCOOH | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 96.4 | -0.90 VRHE | 20.4 | [55] |
Bi-ZMOF | HCOOH | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 91.0 | -1.10 VRHE | ~15.0 at -1.3 VRHE | [56] |
EA-Pb | HCOOH | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 95.4 | -1.08 VRHE | 6.5 | [57] |
Co-PMOF | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 99.0 | -0.80 VRHE | 18.1 | [58] |
Cu-MFU-4l | CH4 | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 92.0 | -1.20 VRHE | 9.8 | [59] |
Cu-DBC | CH4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 56.0 | -1.40 VRHE | 11.4 | [60] |
Cu(I)-BTC | C2H4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 57.0 | -1.60 VRHE | / | [61] |
CALF20 | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 94.5 | -0.97 VRHE | 32.8 | [66] |
STPyP-Co | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 96.0 | -0.62 VRHE | 6.5 | [81] |
Co-PPOLs | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 94.2 | -0.90 VRHE | / | [83] |
Cu2(CuTCPP) nanosheets | HCOOH | 1 M H2O /CH3CN solution with 0.5 M EMIMBF4 | 68.4 | -1.55 VAg/Ag+ | 3.5 at -1.60 VAg/Ag+ | [85] |
2D Ni (Im)2 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 78.8 | -0.85 VRHE | 7.0 at -0.95 VRHE | [87] |
NiPc-NiO4 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 98.4 | -0.85 VRHE | 34.5 at -1.2 VRHE | [90] |
NiPc-Ni(NH)4 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 96.4 | -0.70 VRHE | 24.8 at -1.1 VRHE | [91] |
PcCu-Cu-O | C2H4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 50.0 | -1.20 VRHE | 7.3 | [93] |
Cu3(HHTQ)2 | CH3OH | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 53.6 | -0.40 VRHE | / | [94] |
HATNA-Cu-MOF | CH4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 78.0 | -1.50 VRHE | 8.2 | [95] |
2Bn-Cu@UiO-67 | CH4 | 1 M KOH | 81.0 | -1.50 VRHE | 420.0 | [96] |
Cu-DBC | CH4 | 1 M KOH | 80.0 | -0.90 VRHE | 162.4 | [97] |
Cu-SAs@ Ir-PCN-222-PA | C2H4 | 1 M PBS | 70.9 | -1.00 VRHE | 20.4 | [99] |
Cu0.5Zn0.5/ZIF-8 | CO | 0.5 KHCO3 | 88.5 | -1.00 VRHE | 11.6 | [101] |
MOFs composites | ||||||
Bi-UiO-66-CN | HCOOH | 0.1 KHCO3 | 93.0 | -0.75 VRHE | 1.5 | [109] |
Cu-SIM NU-1000 | HCOOH | 0.1 M NaClO4 | 31.0 | -0.82 VRHE | 1.2 | [111] |
Cu@ZIF-8 NWs | CxHy (CH4, C2H4) | 0.1 KHCO3 | 57.5 | -0.70 VRHE | / | [112] |
Bi/UiO-66 | HCOOH | 1.0 M KOH | 73.0 | -0.70 VRHE | 59.0 | [113] |
Ag@UiO-66-SH | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 74.0 | -1.10 VRHE | 19.5 | [115] |
Cu2O@Cu-MOF | CH4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 63.2 | -1.71 VRHE | 8.4 | [120] |
Cu2O/CPFs | C2H4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 61.8 | -1.30 VRHE | 8.0 | [121] |
Cu2O@MOF/CF | C2H5OH | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 44.3 | -0.615 VRHE | 9.7 | [123] |
Bi2O3/MOL | HCOOH | 0.5 M KHCO3 | > 85.0 | -0.87-1.17 VRHE | 11.8 | [118] |
CuO/Cu-MOF | C2H4 | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 50.0 | -1.10 VRHE | 7.0 | [119] |
CoCp2@MOF-545-Co | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 97.0 | -0.70 VRHE | 25.6 at -0.9 VRHE | [124] |
PPy@MOF-545-Co | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 98.0 | -0.80 VRHE | 13.0 at -1.0 VRHE | [125] |
ZIF-A-LD | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 90.57 | -1.10 VRHE | 6.83 | [126] |
MOFs derivatives | ||||||
ZIF-CNT-FA-p | CO | 0.1 M NaHCO3 | 100.0 | -0.86 VRHE | 7.7 | [132] |
MNC-D | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 92.0 | -0.58 VRHE | 6.8 | [134] |
NPC-1000 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 98.4 | -0.55 VRHE | 3.0 | [135] |
Cu-MOF20/300 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 39.6 | -0.56 VRHE | 34.97 at -0.64 VRHE | [138] |
InCuO-0.92 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 92.1 | -0.80 VRHE | 11.2 | [139] |
Bi NP@MWCNT | HCOOH | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 95.2 | -1.50 VSCE | 10.7 | [146] |
Ni-NC_ATPA@C | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 94.0 | -0.70 VRHE | ~6.0 | [149] |
Ni1/150NCs@NC | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 98.7 | -0.88 VRHE | 40.4 | [151] |
Co1Cu3@C | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 34.0 | -0.70 VRHE | 11.67 | [154] |
Sb2.5/Bi@C | HCOOH | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 94.8 | -0.78 VRHE | 4.74 | [157] |
Ce0.05Bi0.95@C NRs | HCOOH | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 96.1 | -1.50 VRHE | 18.9 | [158] |
Co/CNTs | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 90.0 | -0.70 VRHE | 20.6 | [160] |
Bi2O3@C-800 | HCOOH | 1.0 M KOH | 93.0 | -1.10 VRHE | 208.0 | [161] |
Sn (101)/SnO2/C-500 | HCOOH | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 93.3 | -0.80 VRHE | 8.2 | [130] |
FeSAs/CNF-900 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 86.9 | -0.47 VRHE | 2.9 | [165] |
C-AFC©ZIF-8 | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 91.6 | -0.63 VRHE | 4.1 | [166] |
Fe-N-C | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 93.5 | -0.50 VRHE | ~6.0 | [167] |
C-Zn1Ni4 ZIF-8 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 98 | -0.83 VRHE | 22.0 | [168] |
Ni-N-C | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 97 | -0.75 VRHE | 7.5 | [171] |
Ni1-N-C | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 96.8 | -0.80 VRHE | 27.0 | [172] |
Ni-N3-C | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 95.6 | -0.65 VRHE | 6.64 | [176] |
Co-N2 | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 94 | -0.78 VRHE | 32.7 | [178] |
Fe1N2O2/NC | CO | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 99.7 | -0.50 VRHE | 6.5 at -0.7 VRHE | [180] |
PA-CUDBC-1 | CH4 | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 75.3 | -1.10 VRHE | 47.8 | [181] |
Fe1-Ni1-NC | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 96.2 | -0.50 VRHE | 2.4 | [183] |
L-Co1Mn1-NC | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 97.6 | -0.47 VRHE | 34.7 at -0.97 VRHE | [185] |
MoFe-N-C | CO | 0.5 M KHCO3 | 95.96 | -0.60 VRHE | 11.7 ± 0.7 | [186] |
Pristine MOFs
Bulk MOFs
The isolated metal nodes of MOFs can serve as active sites, providing excellent monoatomic dispersity with 100% atomic efficiency. Bismuth (Bi) is considered to be a promising electrocatalytic material that can convert CO2 into HCOOH[52]. Therefore, Bi-based MOF (Bi-MOF) catalysts for CO2RR can be expected to possess high catalytic activity and product selectivity at low overpotential[53]. A stable Bi-MOF (Bi-BTC-D) was previously prepared by a hydrothermal process using trimesic acid (H3BTC) and bismuth nitrate pentahydrate [Bi(NO3)3·5H2O] with a high FE of 95.5% for HCOOH at -0.86 VRHE[54]. For this sample, the FE remained at ~90.0% even after 12 h of continued electrolysis, showing good stability. Moreover, the morphology of Bi-MOFs could be regulated to expose more active sites, thereby improving production efficiency of HCOOH. Inspired by this study, CAU-17 Bi-MOFs with hexagonal prism (CAU-17-hp) and nanofiber (CAU-17-fiber) morphologies have been synthesized by a wet-chemical process[55]. In particular, the sample CAU-17-fiber with a carbonization temperature of 400 °C (CAU-17-fiber_400) with a hierarchical structure developed by H3BTC-mediated morphology reconstruction had a high FE of 96.4% for HCOOH at -0.90 VRHE.
The coordination environment of metal sites plays a significant role in CO2 activation and stabilization of important intermediates in the electrocatalytic process. A porous zeolitic MOF (Bi-ZMOF) was prepared by introducing carboxylic acid groups (yrazole-3,5-dicarboxylic acid, PDC) as ligands, which could convert CO2 to HCOOH with FE of 91% at -1.1 VRHE[56]. Theoretical calculations showed that the coordination of Bi with the pyrazole-N atom in the MOF facilitated electron mobility from the ligand to Bi sites, which promoted the activation of CO2, thereby reducing the potential for the generation of OCHO* and ultimately facilitating conversion of CO2 to HCOOH; Meanwhile, the weak bonding (hydrogen bonding) of COOH to the carboxyl group results in weak adsorption of COOH* on the MOF, ultimately inhibiting CO production. It has been reported that biomass-derived materials can capture Pb2+ in wastewater to synthesize Pb-based MOFs, which can not only solve lead (Pb) poisoning but also electrochemically convert CO2 to HCOOH. The ellagic acid (EA) obtained from pomegranate bark could effectively capture Pb2+ in aqueous media to synthesize stable Pb-based MOFs (EA-Pb), which could efficiently convert CO2 to HCOOH with FE of 95.37% at -1.08 VRHE[57]. At the same time, the removal rate of Pb2+ even at lower concentrations by EA was close to 99%. In the structure of EA-Pb, PbO6, as a metal node, has a tunable coordination mode (coordination number of 4-9) with the EA linker, which was essential for the reduction of CO2 to form the key intermediate HCOO*. Since the formation of CO and HCOOH involved the same RDS (*COO→HCOO*), the reaction pathway and product selectivity were revealed by theoretical calculations. Gibbs free energy change values for *HCOOH formation (-0.96 eV) and *HCOOH desorption (-0.59 eV) were more negative than *CO formation from HCOO* decomposition (-0.73 eV) and *CO desorption (-0.48 eV), indicating that the reduction of CO2 to HCOOH was thermodynamically more favorable. In parallel, the energy barrier of HER (1.99 eV) was much higher than that of CO2 reduction
The generation of any CO2 reduction product requires a multi-electron transfer process, and the poor conductivity and electron-donating ability have been the primary limiting factors for the exploration of efficient MOFs. Therefore, the integration of electron-rich units, electron mobility, and active components into MOFs may be an efficient method to enhance CO2RR performance. For example, (i) electron-rich polyoxometalates (POMs) can provide a large number of electrons; and (ii) metal-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrins (M-TCPPs, where M refers to a metal species) exhibit an intrinsic macrocyclic conjugated π-electron system, which can be highly conducive to electron migration. A range of POM-based MOFs (M-PMOFs) have been synthesized by a one-step process using a POM and M-TCPP[58]. The direct connection between POM and M-TCPP generated a directional electron transport channel from POM to M-TCPP under the application of an electric field. This helped promote the multi-electron migration during CO2 reduction and efficiently realize the conversion of CO2 to CO. The FECO of the cobalt (Co)-PMOF reached 99% at -0.8 VRHE, with excellent stability of > 36 h of recycling. This study showed that the intramolecular multi-electron transfer in the catalyst can also improve the electrocatalytic CO2RR performance. Theoretical calculations showed that the formation energy barrier of *COOH was significantly reduced after the assembly of POM and Co-TCPP (0.34 eV), compared with that of POM (0.96 eV), indicating that Co in Co-TCPP was the active site of the reaction rather than POM and there was an effective synergy between Co-TCPP and POM. The Co center in Co-TCPP could be reduced from Co(II) to Co(I) by accepting electrons captured by POM, and then Co(I) interacted with CO2 to generate Co(II) *COOH, which combined with protons and electrons to form Co(II) *CO, and finally to form CO.
In addition, Zhu et al. synthesized a copper (Cu)-based MOF structure (Cu-MFU-4l) with copper triazole (Cu(I)N3) as an active site to realize the process of CO2-to-CH4[59]. The FE of CH4 for this catalyst reached 92% at -1.2 VRHE. It has been reported that the selectivity of product was greatly affected even by slight differences in coordination environment of metal ions. Liu et al. compared two kinds of coordination structures based on catechol (C6H6O2)-derived ligands with copper oxide (CuO4 and CuO5) nodes to study the impact of metal d-orbital energy levels on the selectivity of electrocatalytic CO2RR products[60]. Compared to the square-planar CuO4 site, the square-pyramidal CuO5 site had a higher Cu 3d orbital energy level through coordination with its axial oxygen (O) atom. This enabled the CuO5 site to form a stronger π-back bond with the intermediate CO, thus facilitating its adsorption and the subsequent multi-step hydrogenation process to form CH4.
The high selectivity of C2 products can be achieved by controlling the valence state of metal nodes in the MOF. Deng et al. used methanol as a reducing agent to reduce Cu2+ in Cu(II)-Trimesic acid (BTC) framework (Cu(II)-BTC) to Cu+ which played a key role in the selectivity of C2 products, realizing the reconstruction of Cu+ and BTC and the generation of free carboxyl groups[61]. The electroreduction of CO2 to C2H4 was promoted by the change of the valence state of metal nodes and the generation of free carboxyl groups, and the FE was increased from 22% to 57% at -1.6 VRHE. The electrocatalytic performance did not decay after 38 h, indicating good stability. In addition, controlling the crystal face of MOFs with different solvents can also be used to adjust the selectivity of CO2 reduction. Lu et al. prepared Cu(I) 5-mercapto-1-methyltetrazole frameworks (Cu-MMTs) with (100) and (001) crystal faces using water and isopropanol as solvents, respectively[62]. Cu-MMTs with (001) crystal faces were beneficial to the formation of multi-carbon products with 73.75% FE. The difference was that the Cu-MMT with (100) crystal faces promoted the formation of single carbon with 63.98% FE. Furthermore, the size of MOFs also affects the selectivity of CO2 reduction. Four different sizes of Cu-MOFs (53, 109, 307, 1,335 nm) were synthesized[63]. As a result, small-sized MOFs with polycrystalline structures converted CO2 to ethylene and multi-carbon products with FEs of 55.4% and 81.8%, respectively, which was superior to large-sized single-crystal nanostructures.
Zinc (Zn)-based MOFs (Zn-MOFs) can also be used as electrocatalysts to convert CO2 to CO[64,65]. For this type of MOF, due to complete occupation of Zn(II) 3d orbitals, active sites mainly originate from the coordination of the ligands with the Zn(II) centers; i.e., the CO2RR performance can be adjusted by regulating the ligands. Al-Attas et al. employed 1, 2, 4-triazolate and 2-methylimidazolate as ligands to synthesize two different Zn-MOFs, Calgary framework 20 (CALF20) and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8), respectively[66]. The study indicated that CALF20 had a higher CO2 adsorption capacity (more than 4.5 times that of ZIF-8). Moreover, the sp2 C active sites in the 1, 2, 4-triazolate of CALF20 were far more in number than in the 2-methylimidazolate of ZIF-8. With increased CO2 adsorption performance and multiple binding sites, CALF20 exhibited better performance with a high CO FE of 94.5% at -0.97 VRHE. The theoretical results showed that sp2 C in the azole ligand coordinated with Zn(II) site could be used as catalytic active center for the electrochemical reduction of CO2. Compared with the diazole group in ZIF-8, the faster charge transfer efficiency of the triazole ligand in CALF20 promoted the accumulation of more electrons at adjacent active sites, thereby lowering the adsorption free energy of *COOH and improving the conversion efficiency of *COOH to CO.
Two-dimensional MOFs
Recently, two-dimensional (2D) MOF nanosheets have been widely used in electrocatalytic CO2RR due to their outstanding advantages: (1) Compared to bulk MOFs, MOF nanosheets can expose a higher proportion of metal atom active sites on the surface for CO2RR catalysis. It is particularly important that the exposed coordination-unsaturated metal atoms on the surface exhibit high catalytic activity[67]; (2) The electronic structure of metal atoms in MOF nanosheets can be effectively controlled by selecting appropriate organic ligands[68]. For electrocatalysis, the electronic structure of catalyst influences the binding strength of the intermediate products on the catalyst surface, and then determines the final activity and product selectivity; (3) Compared to bulk MOFs, MOF nanosheets have better conductivity[69]; (4) The highly porous, ultrathin characteristics of MOF nanosheets are conducive to the transport of reactants and products during the catalysis reaction[70,71]; and (5) Due to the diversity of MOF structures and the progress in material synthesis technologies, a large number of MOF nanosheets can be prepared easily to study their potential electrocatalytic properties[72].
Two-dimensional conductive MOFs (c-MOFs), as a member of the 2D materials family, are developed by combining transition metal nodes with conjugated organic ligands[73,74]. The framework of these c-MOFs and the corresponding physical properties are largely derived from the incorporated ligands. However, the synthesis of 2D c-MOFs is limited by available ligands. Macrocyclic compounds are regarded as infinite π-conjugated systems, exhibiting unique electronic behavior regardless of the presence or absence of substituents. Therefore, conjugated macrocyclic structures with well-defined shapes and non-foldable and fully π-conjugated backbones can be used to construct 2D MOFs[75,76].
Two different ligands, 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (BDC) and 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (NDC), were selected to prepare two 2D-MOFs (Cu-UBDC and Cu-UNDC) regulating electronic structure of Cu active centers[77]. It was found that the ratio of Cu+/Cu2+ was 1.12 for Cu-UNDC, far exceeding that of Cu-UBDC (0.85), indicating the change of electron densities of metal sites, thereby promoting electron migration. Consequently, FE of C2H5OH and C2H4 for Cu-UNDC was 24.3% at -1.0 VRHE, far exceeding that of Cu-UBDC (13.2%). In addition, for Cu-UBDC, Cu2O as a photocatalyst could be generated under the condition of CO2 reduction. Therefore, more efficient charge separation efficiency and more electrons can be used for CO2 reduction under illumination, resulting in an improved FE of 26.2% for the C2 product of Cu-UBDC, which was better than that of Cu-UNDC (21.8%).
Metalloporphyrin organic ligands exhibit tetrapyrrole macrocyclic conjugated structures. When they are used to construct MOFs, different topological structures can be formed by changing the number of nodal metal clusters or connections, which greatly improves the structural diversity of the porphyrin-metal framework materials. The metal centers of metalloporphyrins are easily reduced to a low-oxidation state during CO2 reduction, and the macrocyclic ligand skeleton helps maintain chemical stability[78]. Moreover, the structure of metalloporphyrins can be tuned and functionalized using redox-active molecular catalytic linkers[79]. Metalloporphyrin-based 2D MOFs have been widely studied as CO2RR electrocatalysts[80].
It has been reported that the Co-N4 site in the porphyrin ring can be used as an active site, with strong *COOH binding energy and moderate *CO adsorption energy in the process of electrocatalytic CO2RR. Therefore, a 2D-MOF based on Co-porphyrin is an excellent electrocatalyst for achieving the transformation of CO2 to CO[82]. Chen et al. prepared 2D Co-based porous porphyrin nanolayer (Co-PPOLs) catalyst with Co-N4 sites through a bottom-up self-assembly strategy[83] [Figure 4A]. The ultrathin nanolayer showed an average thickness of 3.8 nm [Figure 4B], which was conducive to the exposure of more active sites and faster electron transfer, so it could promote the adsorption, activation and transformation of reactants/intermediates, thereby improving the activity, selectivity and stability of electrocatalytic CO2RR. Therefore, the highest FECO was 94.2% at -0.9 V vs. RHE [Figure 4C]. Moreover, the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of Co-PPOLs under industrial currents was also studied. At a full battery voltage of 2.7 V (higher than the industrial grade current of 200 mA), the CO FE of CO-PPOLs could still reach 92% for 20 h in MEA cells [Figure 4D and E]. In addition, the electrocatalytic process with the assistance of light was conducive to the stabilization of CO intermediates bound to the catalyst, and promoted the formation of high-electron product CH4. Based on the above conditions, MOFs based on cobalt 5, 10, 15, 20-tetri (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (CoTCPP) (Co-MOF-525) achieved an FECH4 of 14% at -0.49 V vs. NHE[84]
Figure 4. (A) The synthesis of ultrathin 2D Co-PPOLs. (B) AFM image of Co-PPOLs. (C) FE of CO and H2 at different potentials. (D) FECO of Co-PPOLs in MEA under different potentials. (E) Long-term stability of Co-PPOLs in MEA[83]. Copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH. (F) Schematic illustration of the photo-assisted CO2RR on Co-MOF-525. (G) The FE of CH4 and CO under dark and light[84]. Copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH.
A Cu-MOF nanosheet, Cu2(Cu-TCPP), with porphyrinic Cu and Cu paddle wheel in two different chemical environments, was synthesized under cathodization conditions[85]. Due to cathodized reconstruction, the Cu-MOF nanosheets exhibited an FEHCOOH of 68.4% at -1.55 VAg/Ag+, superior to those of CuO, Cu2O, Cu, and Cu-TCPP. Similarly, a 2D porphyrin organometallic framework nanozyme (PPF-100) with Cu-paddle-wheels, Cu2(COO)4 structure could realize highly selective CO2RR and significantly inhibit the HER[86]. The FEs of CO and HCOOH were 72.4% and 24.1% at -3.0 V vs. Ag/Ag+ with no generation of H2, attributed to the hydrophobicity of PPF-100, which was conducive to inhibiting the HER, thereby improving the electrocatalytic performance of CO2 reduction. Furthermore, Wu et al. prepared ultrathin 2D nickel (Ni)-based ZIF nanosheets [Ni(Im)2] by exfoliating bulk MOFs to nanosheets of varying thicknesses as electrocatalysts to convert CO2 to CO[87]. Due to the existence of more Ni sites and rapid mass and electron transfer by ultrathin nanosheet structure, the CO FE for the 2D Ni(Im)2 nanosheets with thickness of 5 nm reached ~78.8% at -0.85 VRHE, much higher than that of bulk Ni(Im)2 ZIF (33.7%).
Metallophthalocyanines (MePc) have also been used for the preparation of 2D-MOFs with thermal/chemical stability and structural tunability at the molecular level[88,89]. 2D NiPc-NiO4 nanosheet MOF was previously constructed using Ni phthalocyanine (NiPc)-2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octanol (NiPc-OH) and Ni(II) ions[90]. The NiPc linked with nickel-catecholate [Ni(C6H4O2)2] served as an active site in this MOF; the high d-π orbital overlap between the two increased the conductivity of the nanosheets to
To further improve the electrical conductivity of H2Pc-based MOFs, NiPc-Ni(NH)4 nanosheets have been synthesized by using 2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octaaminophthalocyaninato nickel(II) [NiPc-(NH2)8] and Ni(II) ionsm[91]. Due to the NiPc links with Ni(NH)4 nodes, the electronic conductivity of NiPc-Ni (NH)4 can reach up to 2.39 × 10-4 S m-1, improving the electron transfer capacity. Controlled experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicated that, unlike NiPc-NiO4 nanosheets, a Ni-N4 unit in the H2Pc ring acted as catalytic active center, while the Ni(NH)4 node accelerated transport of protons/electrons to the active site, thereby promoting the process of CO2-to-CO. The FECO for this catalyst reached 96.4% at
The conversion of CO2 to C2H4 has great significance for sustainable energy production. However, this process can be quite difficult due to high energy barriers for the hydrogenation of *CO and C-C coupling steps[92]. For such cases, electrocatalysts with dual active sites are expected to be a better choice. By assembling metallo-ligand (2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octahydroxyphthalo-cyaninato) Cu(II) (PcCu-(OH)8) with CuO4 nodes, a PcCu-Cu-O 2D MOF was prepared for conversion of CO2 to C2H4[93]. It exhibited a high FE of 50(1)% and current density of 7.3 mA cm-2 at -1.2 VRHE with the synergistic effects of CuPc and CuO4; i.e., the CO formed on the CuO4 site could rapidly diffuse on CuPc site and dimerize with *CHO to form *OCCHO, thereby reducing C-C dimerization energy barrier. In summary, this study provided a strategy for designing and utilizing electrocatalysts with dual active sites to reduce CO2 into C2+ compounds.
Ligands with heteroatoms, such as tricycloquinazoline (TQ) and hexaazatrinaphthylene (HATNA), have also been reported for the 2D c-MOF preparation. Liu et al. selected an electron-deficient TQ moiety in the ligand incorporated into the 2D MOF framework and coordinated it with Cu2+ and Ni2+ to prepare
Single-atom MOFs
Atomically dispersed metal sites (ADMSs) in metal nodes of the coordinatively unsaturated sites are isolated metal atoms with well-defined local coordination structures, whose coordination bonds, bond lengths, and coordination numbers can be tuned to change the electrocatalytic CO2 selectivity/activity. The maximum atomic utilization and the unsaturated coordination environment reduce the excess metal cost and improve the catalyst performance. The design of monatomic catalysts with good electrical conductivity, discrete active centers, and good mass transfer performance for efficient electrocatalysis can be a challenging process. ADMSs can be easily introduced into (i) metal nodes and organic ligands due to their highly ordered arrangements; and (ii) the pores of MOFs. This property leads to advantages in several reactions, making ADMSs an important component of heterogeneous catalysis research.
Chen et al. prepared an electrocatalyst (2Bn-Cu@UiO-67) by embedding N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-linked Cu single-atom sites (SAs) (2Bn-Cu) into porous MOF shell (UiO-67) for CH4 electrosynthesis[96]. It had FE of ~81% for CH4 at -1.5 VRHE, with a corresponding current density of 420 mA cm-2, due to the following properties: (i) Cu-SAs as the catalytic center of CO2RR were anchored on NHC by metal-carbon bonds. The electron donor effect of the NHC increased the charge density around metal sites which was beneficial to the adsorption of CHO* intermediate, thus promoting the CH4 formation; and (ii) The MOF framework had a strong ability to capture CO2 molecules and provided multiple channels to facilitate the diffusion of CO2 to 2Bn-Cu. These two aspects synergistically promoted efficient electrocatalytic CO2RR.
SA coordination with diverse heteroatoms exhibits advantages for the selectivity of various hydrocarbons[97]. Zhang et al. synthesized Cu-based c-MOF (Cu-DBC) consisting of a conjugated graphene-like ligand (dibenzo-[g, p]chrysene-2,3,6,7,10,11,14,15-octaol, 8OH-DBC) and Cu-O4 active sites to study the effects of coordination environment on CO2RR[97]. It was found that highly conjugated organic ligands imparted distinctive redox properties and electrical conductivity to Cu-DBC, while the abundant and uniformly distributed Cu-O4 sites contributed to highly selective transformation of CO2 to CH4. The
SAs are more likely to reduce CO2 into C1 products, such as HCOOH, CO, CH4, etc., while the formation of C2+ products by C-C coupling often requires double active sites[98]. Based on the above considerations, a MOF with Ir-porphyrin and Cu-SAs double active sites (Cu-SAs@ Ir-PCN-222-PA) was formed by confining Cu SAs in a nano-framework of Ir-porphyrin-based MOF (Ir-PCN-222), realized the tandem catalytic process of CO2→CO→C2H4[99] [Figure 5A]. As a result, Cu-SAs@Ir-PCN-222-PA could promoted the transformation of CO2 to C2H4 with high FE of 70.9% and current density of 20.4 mA·cm-2 at
Figure 5. (A) Synergistic tandem electrocatalytic CO2 to C2H4 for Cu-SAs@Ir-PCN-222-PA. (B) FE at -1.0 VRHE. (C) In situ FTIR spectrum for the electrocatalytic CO2RR on Cu-SAs@Ir-PCN-222-PA. (D) CO formation on Cu-SAs and Ir-porphyrin of Cu-SAs@IrPCN-222-PA[99]. Copyright 2024 the American Chemical Society.
The electronic structure adjustment of sp2 C sites in imidazole organic ligands influences the performance of electrocatalytic CO2RR. MxZny/ZIF-8 (M: transition metal) was prepared by substituting a portion of Zn2+ in ZIF-8 into Ni2+, Fe2+, and Cu2+ through a doping strategy[101]. As a result, the optimum Cu0.5Zn0.5/ZIF-8 could convert CO2 to CO with the highest FECO of 88.5% and partial current density of 11.57 mA cm-2 at -1.0 V vs. RHE, which was much higher than that of pristine ZIF-8 (FECO: 43.7%). The enhancement of performance was attributed to the enrichment of electrons on the sp2 C in the imidazole organic ligands because of the introduction of additional electronic states by Cu doping, promoting the rapid transfer of electrons. Furthermore, the change in the electronic structure of sp2 C made Cu0.5Zn0.5/ZIF-8 more strongly bound to COOH*, promoting the transformation process of CO2-to-CO. Furthermore, the electronic properties of SAs, such as binding energy and reaction coordinates, are considered the key factors determining their catalytic performance[102]. Xue et al. created a model to study these properties by confining a series of 3d transition metal SAs into the microporous cavity of UiO-66-NH2 for electrocatalytic CO2RR[103].
MOF composites
Traditional MOFs exhibit poor conductivity and lack electron-donating components in their structures, which greatly limit their catalytic efficiency for electrochemical CO2RR. These characteristics can be tuned by introducing guest species, including conductive substrates, metals, metal oxides, or functional molecules to construct MOF composites[104].
Metal-MOF composites
MOF films can be deposited on highly reactive catalytic materials, such as gold nanostructured microelectrodes (AuNMEs), silver (Ag), and other solid electrodes, to obtain high catalytic efficiency[105]. Ag, as an electrocatalyst, can reduce CO2 to CO[106]; however, this process can be impeded by competitive HER and selectivity of electrochemical reductive products[107]. Non-catalytic Zr6-oxo-based MOF (UiO-66) thin films with different thicknesses and chemical compositions have been assembled on Ag electrodes[108]. The existence of MOF membranes can systematically regulate the chemical environment of the active site on a molecular level, resulting in a significant improvement of electrocatalytic performance. Three key mechanisms have been used to verify such an improvement in electrocatalytic activity. Firstly, porous MOF membranes weakened the mass transfer of CO2 and H+ to Ag electrocatalysts. Compared to the reactants in the bulk solution, the local concentration of reactants near the catalyst changed significantly, thereby changing the catalytic path. Secondly, Zr6-oxo nodes of MOF contained brønsted acidic groups close to the catalytic activity surface. These groups accelerated electrocatalysis by stabilizing the activated *COOH intermediates. Thirdly, the decoration of MOFs with a positively charged ligand, such as (3-carboxypropyl) trimethylammonium (TMA), can control the proton transfer at the catalytic activity site, thereby improving the electrocatalytic selectivity. The combination of these three mechanisms increased the selectivity of CO for Ag from 43% to 89% at -0.8 VRHE.
Considering that the solubility of CO2 in acetonitrile was higher than that in water, coating the Bi electrode with UiO-66 film decorated by nitrile functional groups (Bi-UiO-66-CN) as a CO2 enrichment layer can increase the local concentration to 0.82 M, which was 27 times the concentration of CO2 in the bulk phase, and further improved the electrocatalytic rate and product selectivity[109]. By optimizing the thickness of the film, the maximum HCOOH FE could reach 93% at -0.75 VRHE for Bi-UiO-66-CN. Especially, the partial current density of HCOOH could reach 166 mA cm-2 at -0.9 V vs. RHE, more than seven times that of a bare Bi electrode. The improved activity was attributed to the change of the Bi surface microenvironment because of the anchor of UiO-66-CN membranes. At first, coating a UiO-66-CN membrane could enhance the CO2 adsorption capacity of the catalytic site, thus accelerating the catalytic reaction. Furthermore, the interfacial structure between Bi and UiO-66-CN promoted CO2 activation and intermediate stabilization, thereby promoting the selective formation of HCOOH.
The high SSA and periodic framework chemical functionality of MOFs provide the possibility of embedding metal active sites within their framework at a high density to include the characteristics of nanocrystals (NCs) for CO2RR[110]. Kung et al. coated MOF films (NU-1000) with Cu nanoparticles (NPs) to prepare an electrocatalyst (Cu-SIM NU-1000) for CO2RR using the following process[111]: Initially, Cu(II) was uniformly coated onto the NU-1000 film through solvothermal deposition in MOFs (SIM). Subsequently, Cu(II) was partially reduced to Cu(0) through an electrochemical process. Cu embedded in the MOF film did not change its crystallinity and morphology, but the SSA reduced compared to that of pure NU-1000. As a result, Cu-SIM NU-1000 primarily produced HCOOH as main product with FE of 31% at potential of
The heterogeneous interface constructed by the intimate contact between MOFs and Cu nanowires (NWs) can adjust the adsorption energy of specific intermediates, thus achieving precise regulation of product selectivity. Additionally, porous structure of MOFs facilitates the local enrichment of reactants, the exposure of active sites, and promotes the interfacial diffusion of reactants between Cu-NWs and MOFs, thereby improving catalytic performance. In-situ encapsulation of ZIF-8 on the Cu-NW surface to synthesize the composite Cu@ZIF-8 NWs with core-shell structure resulted in an FECH4 + C2H4 of 57.5% at -0.7 V vs. RHE[112] [Figure 6A and B]. However, it only produced CO for ZIF-8. For pure Cu-NWs, the mixed total FE of products CO, CH4, C2H4 and HCOOH, C2H5OH was low, but for H2, it was more than 50% at -0.5~-0.9 V. The difference in catalytic activity and product distribution between the composite structure and the single material suggested that the existence of the interface between ZIF-8 and Cu-NWs enabled the regulation of product selectivity and the effective inhibition of HER. In addition, wrapping of ZIF-8 on Cu regulated the adsorption energy of the reaction intermediate, which was also verified by DFT calculation. The combination of *CO and H to produce *CHO was regarded as a crucial stage in the process of CO2 to hydrocarbon products. The energy barrier of *CHO for Cu@ZIF-8 NWs was 0.62 eV, significantly lower than that of pure Cu (0.79 eV), proving that the formation and stabilization of *CHO was facilitated at the interface between Cu and ZIF-8, promoting the process of CO2→CH4+C2H4 [Figure 6C].
Figure 6. (A) Schematic diagram of Cu@ZIF-8 NWs for electrocatalytic CO2RR. (B) FE of CO, CH4, and C2H4. (C) Free energy of CO2RR on Cu NWs and Cu@ZIF-8 NWs[112]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier. (D) The possible mechanism of Bi/UiO-66 for CO2RR[113]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier. (E) The synthesis of Ag@UiO-66-SH[115]. Copyright 2023 the American Chemical Society.
It was reported the capture form of CO2 molecules on MOFs was also one of the factors affecting the efficiency of CO2 reduction[113]. Bi NPs, as an electrocatalyst, were loaded on UiO-66 (Bi/UiO-66) for the transformation of CO2 to HCOOH. The FE of HCOOH could reach 65%-85% at -0.4~-0.7 VRHE for both Bi and Bi/UiO-66. Notwithstanding, the current density of Bi/UiO-66 was -265 mA cm-2 at -0.7 VRHE, 4.6 times higher than that of pure Bi, which was attributed to the presence of CO2 adsorbed on the UiO-66 in the form of carbonate to promote CO2 conversion. The mechanism of CO2RR based on Bi/UiO-66 was also proposed. The CO2 enriched on Bi/UiO-66 reacted with OH- (KOH electrolyte) to form HCO3- which combined with UiO-66 falling from the electrode to form [Zr2(OH)2(CO3)4]2-[114], representing the CO2 capture process accompanied by the structural transformation of UiO-66. Meanwhile, HCOOH produced on Bi ionizes to release H+. The H+ then reacted with the carbonate ion to release CO2, which could be used directly in the CO2 conversion process [Figure 6D].
Ag NP catalysts are prone to sintering or agglomerating during the reaction, leading to a decrease in their activity. Confining NPs in the MOF is a good means of preventing aggregation while providing a path for product diffusion in its pores. To increase the pore size of MOFs, Aparna et al. replaced the BDC linker in UiO-66 with 2-mercaptobenzoic acid (2-MBA) to create defective MOFs (UiO-66-SH) [Figure 6E][115]. Due to the strong interaction between the thiol group and Ag, it helped anchor Ag NPs on MOFs to prepare Ag@UiO-66-SH, which could promote the transformation of CO2 to CO with 74% FE and high partial current density of 19.5 mA cm-2 at -1.1 V vs. RHE. To strongly inhibit the HER, Guntern et al. embedded
Metal-oxide-MOFs composites
Metal oxide NPs can act as effective electrocatalysts for CO2RR[116,117]. However, their low SSA limits the adsorption of reactant molecules. Moreover, they tend to agglomerate during the reaction, which limits the CO2 conversion. By embedding metal oxide NPs into MOFs, the porous structure is maintained and the interaction between the NPs and MOFs is enhanced, significantly boosting the strong electrocatalytic performance for CO2 reduction[118,119].
Cu2O, as an electrocatalyst, can convert CO2 into C2H4 with low FE and poor stability. CO2 capture and adsorption are key steps in the heterogeneous catalytic process; therefore, it is a feasible strategy to combine Cu2O with MOFs with high SSA to form an integrated catalyst, which can improve the CO2 adsorption capacity of Cu2O to realize the conversion of CO2→hydrocarbons with high selectivity and stability.
Owing to slow C-C coupling reaction kinetics and complex intermediates, C2H5OH selectivity over Cu-based catalysts is usually relatively low. To further improve the C2H5OH selectivity of the Cu-based electrocatalyst, the construction of asymmetric refined structures can enhance the charge polarization effect, which acts as a critical factor in promoting the proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process of CO2 to produce C2H5OH[122]. Zhang et al. coated Cu2O NPs with a NiCu-MOF grown on a Cu foam to synthesize Cu2O@MOF/CF with an asymmetric fine structure[123]. Cu2O@MOF/CF could serve as a cathode for CO2 reduction, providing high FE of 44.3% for C2H5OH at -0.615 V vs. RHE. The internal electric field induced by the existence of multiple self-polarization units in Cu2O@MOF/CF led to the asymmetric distribution of electrons and promoted C-C coupling process in CO2RR. The free energy of *OCCOH formation (1.26 eV) at the Cu site of Cu2O in Cu2O@MOF/CF was significantly lower than that of pure Cu2O/CF (2.13 eV) and Cu2O@CuMOF/CF (1.39 eV), indicating that the dimerization of *OCCOH tended to proceed at the Cu site of Cu2O and the introduction of MOF contributed to the C2H5OH formation.
The unusual flaky structure and electronic characteristics of 2D MOFs lead to several advantages in the construction of novel high-performance composites[118,119]. Liu et al. employed bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) NWs as active sites to be uniformly deposited on a metal-organic layer (MOL) to prepare a Bi2O3/MOL composite for CO2RR[118]. This composite had FE of > 85% for HCOOH at potential of -0.87~-1.17 VRHE, far more than that of Zr-based MOF (Bi2O3/UiO). The structural and chemical stability of the MOL and NWs allowed the composite to maintain its FE at -0.97 V for more than 21 h. Ultrafine CuO NPs were uniformly deposited on a 2D copper 1,4-dicarboxybenzene (1,4-BDC) MOF by hydrothermal method to prepare CuO/Cu-MOF composites[119]. The Cu-MOF contained a large number of channels with pore structures larger than the molecular size of CO2. It led to a CO2 adsorption capacity of the CuO/Cu-MOF composite at 1.0 atm to be ~5.0 mg gcat-1, significantly higher than that of the commercially available CuO NPs. The C2H4 FE for this composite reached 50.0% at potential of -1.1 VRHE, compared to CuO (25.5%) and Cu-MOF (37.6%). The improved electrocatalytic performance of the composite came from the improvement of adsorption and activation of CO2 molecules at the interface between Cu-MOF and CuO.
Functional-molecule-MOFs composites
The electron-rich units are embedded into the MOF to construct MOF-based composites with multiple electron transfer channels, which change the charge distribution around the active sites of MOF and further improve the performance of CO2RR. Metallocene (MCp2) is an electron-rich molecule with 18 delocalized electrons due to the presence of two cyclopentadienes (Cp) and a transition metal, making it a good electron donor. Meanwhile, MOFs with metalloporphyrin (M-TCPP), such as MOF-545-Co, may be a suitable electron acceptor. The metallocene molecule (CoCp2) modification into the MOF-545-Co channel
Figure 7. (A) Comparison of MCp2@MOF and MOF for CO2RR. (B) CO2 adsorption at 298 K. (C) The free energy of CO2RR to CO for Co-TCPP and CoCp2/Co-TCPP. (D) FE for CO and H2[124]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (E) Schematic presentation of PPy in the channel of MOF-545-Co. (F) FECO at different voltages[125]. Copyright 2021 the American Chemical Society.
For Zn-MOFs (such as ZIF-8), the catalytic active site for CO2 reduction is located on the ligand coordinated with Zn; therefore, the electrocatalytic activity of such catalysts can be improved by adjusting the ligands. As a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compound, 1,10-phenanthroline has strong electron donating ability. Doping it into the ligand of ZIF-8 enables the formation of stable coordination bonds with metal ions in MOFs, thereby enhancing the stability and functionality of the material[126]. The sp2 C atom in methylimidazole ligand of ZIF-8 was the catalytic active site for CO2RR, which was still the best catalytic active site after doping with phenanthroline molecules. Due to the doping of the electron donor unit, charge density of catalytic active site was significantly enhanced (3.702 to 4.884), so that the doped ZIF-8 (ZIF-A-LD) exhibited excellent CO FE (90.57%) at -1.1 V vs. RHE. The theoretical calculation further made known that doping of electron-donating molecules reduced the formation energy of intermediate *COOH on the catalytic active site and promoted the activation of CO2 molecules, thus improving its CO2 electrocatalytic activity.
MOF derivatives
The conversion of MOFs into different derivatives through post-synthesis strategies can achieve novel properties compared to original MOFs[127]. Several nanostructure materials, such as MOF-derived porous carbon materials[128], metal/metal oxides[129], and metal/metal oxide/carbon nanocomposites[130], have been developed using 8UMOF as a sacrifice template through heat treatment methods. Notably, MOF-derived materials can not only maintain porous structure and high SSA and enhanced electrical conductivity and structural stability, but also offer many unrivaled advantages, including controllable chemical composition and reduced electron and ion transport distances.
Heteroatom-doped carbon materials
Porous carbon materials have been widely employed in energy storage equipment due to their large SSA, stability, wide source of raw materials, and environment-friendly aspects[131]. Porous carbons prepared from MOFs as precursors have the advantages of controllable porous structure and high SSA. MOFs can also be used to prepare heteroatom-doped porous carbon, and the existence of heteroatoms can improve the electron density and interface wettability of the porous carbon material, which is conducive to the supply of electrolyte ions, thereby improving the electrochemical performance of the porous carbon.
As a low-cost material, N-doped carbon (NC) materials have a high SSA and adjustable electrochemical activity and conductivity, along with a strong inhibition of HER, thereby attracting much attention as electrocatalysts for CO2RR. Guo et al. prepared ZIF-8/MWCNTs by growing ZIF-8 on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and pyrolyzed them to prepare NC materials (ZIF-CNT-FA-p) for selective electrocatalysis of CO2 to CO against the HER[132]. This composite had a FE of 100% and total current density of 7.7 mA cm-2 at -0.86 V vs. RHE. The superior selectivity could originate from the enhancement of electron transport and CO2 mass transfer exhibited by the MWCNTs.
The existence of the N heteroatom can change electronic environment of the C atom, promote CO2 adsorption, and stabilize intermediate. It has also been found that the number and types of the doping N atoms determine the number of active centers, and ultimately affect the catalytic activity of the material[133]. Mesoporous NC (MNC-D) materials with adjustable structures and different N dopants have been constructed for CO2RR through the pyrolysis of ZIF-8, followed by treatment with N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF)[134]. MNC could efficiently promote the conversion process from CO2 to CO with FE of ~92% and current density of -6.8 mA cm-2 at -0.58 VRHE. Further studies showed that the pyridinic-N and defects produced by DMF treatment acted as active centers of the MNC catalyst, which was beneficial to adsorption and activation of CO2 molecules, further promoting electrocatalysis. In general, co-doping of pyridinic and graphitic N (active N) can synergistically improve the electrochemical CO2RR performance. Porous NC materials with a large number of active N sites have been prepared via calcinating O-rich MOF (Zn-MOF-74) and melamine (C3H6N6)[135]. The active N content in the composite was adjusted by regulating temperature and time. This catalyst well inhibited the HER, and had high FECO of 98.4% at
Metal/metal oxide interfaces
MOF-derived metal/metal oxide interfaces have a unique porous micro-/nanostructure and a high SSA. Their special morphology is conducive to uniform distribution of reactant molecules, adsorption, and activation, resulting in high selectivity and long cycle life for CO2RR[129,137]. A series of Cu/Cu2O hybrids with porous octahedral structures and varying ratios of Cu0 and Cu+ were prepared by the pyrolysis of Cu-MOF octahedrons in N2 atmosphere at different temperatures and heating rates[138]. The optimal catalyst (Cu-MOF20/300) with higher SSA (129.11 m2 g-1) and more Cu+ sites could reduce CO2 to CO and H2, where the highest FE of CO was 43.8% at -0.76 V vs. RHE for H-type cells. It was worth noting that compared with
Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts may have low product selectivity and stability due to the deactivation of the cathode; the catalytic efficiency can be further improved by exposing more active sites through the construction of bimetallic oxides. Porous bimetallic oxides with desired composition and structure by MOF pyrolysis can be synthesized to facilitate the electrochemical reaction[129,139]. Payra et al.[129] prepared cerium dioxide (CeO2) and cerium-doped titanium oxide (Ce1-xTixO2) spherical particles by thermal decomposition of Ce-UiO-66[140,141] and Ce1-xTix-UiO-66-NH2 MOFs for CO2RR[142]. CeO2 served as an electrocatalyst to efficiently reduce CO2 to CH3COOH, whereas Ce1-xTixO2 exhibited excellent inhibitory effect on HER. MOF-derived porous indium (In)-Cu bimetallic oxides with adjustable Cu/In ratios have been employed as efficient electrocatalysts (InCuO-x, x denotes the Cu/In molar ratio) to reduce CO2 to CO[139]. InCuO-0.92 had a CO2 adsorption capacity of 59.4 mg g-1 at 298 K, 5.7 times greater than that of
Metal/metal-oxide/carbon nanocomposite interfaces
The carbonization of MOFs provides a direct method for fabricating functional and porous metal/metal-oxide/carbon hybrid materials. Through high-temperature treatment, the MOFs can be directly calcinated into porous carbon materials, and the metal centers can be in situ incorporated into the carbon matrix[144,145]. Thus, the structure provides an excellent electronic connection between the metal/metal oxide interface and carbon skeleton.
Metal NPs deposited on carbon materials
Due to their significant electronic conductivity and high SSA, porous carbons can be used as substrates to load metal NPs[146], which can prevent NP aggregation, and enhance interface contact to provide better electrical conductivity. Therefore, increasing the density of active sites and interactions between metal NPs and carbon nanomaterials can further improve the catalytic performance[147]. MOFs are considered a promising precursor to synthesize metal NPs that can be distributed on the carbon substrate. For example, Bi NPs (~4.4 nm) have been grown in situ and uniformly distributed on functionalized MWCNTs to prepare Bi NP@MWCNT catalysts for CO2RR[146]
Figure 8. (A) The preparation process of Bi NP@MWCNT; (B) TEM image, (C) FE and (D) Current density of HCOOH for
In previous studies, it was found that smaller metal NPs are more likely to produce *COOH with lower energy. In addition, small metal clusters exhibit thermodynamic stability to avoid aggregation, thereby leading to high catalytic efficiency[150]. Wang et al. employed a Ni-Zn bimetallic MOF as a precursor to prepare Ni nanoclusters with a high dispersion of ~2 nm on NC material[151]. The particle size and content of Ni catalyst can be effectively regulated by adjusting Ni:Zn ratios in MOF precursors [Figure 8E]. The Ni nanoclusters (diameter = 1.9 nm) loaded on NC material from a MOF with a Ni:Zn ratio of 1:150 created a catalyst (Ni1/150NCs@NC) with FE of 98.7% for CO and partial current density of 40.4 mA cm-2 at -0.88 V
The reduction of CO2 to syngas (CO and H2) in a specific ratio is an important industrial feedstock for the synthesis of some chemicals (e.g., methanol, acetic acid, dimethyl ether, etc.)[152]. HER and CO2RR are two competitive processes, so regulating the adsorption energy of catalysts for H+ and CO2 is the key to producing CO/H2 with an appropriate ratio[153]. It was reported that by optimizing the electronic structure of metal alloy composites such as Cu-Co alloys, the adsorption energy of H+ and CO2 could be adjusted, and then a specific ratio of CO and H2 could be produced. Song et al. introduced Cu2+ into the synthesis process of ZIF-67 to synthesize bimetallic CoCu-MOFs, which were carbonized at high temperatures to synthesize CoCu@C composite catalysts[154]. The FE and current density of CO for the optimal sample Co1Cu3@C (34%,
The Bi-based catalyst shows better selectivity and current density in HCOOH[155], but due to the presence of competing HER, the FEHCOOH at low overpotential is low, and can only exceed 90% at a narrow potential window (< 750 mV)[156]. Combining different metals with Bi to form alloys by doping strategy can adjust the electron cloud distribution of the catalyst, thereby affecting its affinity for reactants and the stability of reaction intermediates, and further improving the generation efficiency of HCOOH. Ma et al. substituted partial Bi sites in Bi-MOF with Sb to prepare Sb-doped Bi-MOF (Sbx/Bi-MOF)[157], which was carbonized to prepare Sbx/Bi@C. Sb2.5/Bi@C with Sb doping of 2.5% showed excellent FEHCOOH of 94.8% at -1.4 VAg/AgCl, far exceeding that of Bi@C. Furthermore, the FEHCOOH of Sb2.5/Bi@C remained above 92% in the range from -1.3 to -1.6 V. The doping of a small amount of Sb could effectively promoted the generation of *OCHO and inhibited the formation of *H, thus significantly enhancing the selective formation of HCOOH in Bi materials. Furthermore, a series of Ce-doped Bi@C nanorod (NR) electrocatalysts were prepared by pyrolysis of Ce-doped Bi-MOFs[158]. Firstly, due to the doping of Ce, the number of active sites and adsorption of CO2 were increased; secondly, the increase of electron density around Bi sites promoted rapid electron transport and reduced the formation energy barrier of *OCHO. Therefore, Ce0.05Bi0.95@C NRs achieved high FEHCOOH of 96.1% at -1.5 VRHE, accompanied by high stability for 36 h. It was important that FEHCOOH could exceed 90% at an ultra-wide potential window (1,000 mV).
Carbon-supported metal composite catalysts are known to be quite active in producing C2 and C3 products due to the high CO2 pressure that can be generated at the three-phase boundary[159]. Zhao et al. prepared an oxide-derived (OD) Cu/C catalyst by carbonization of HKUST-1 precursors[159]. The FE of the obtained composite for CO2 conversion to alcohols was in the range of 45.2%-71.2% at potential of -0.1~-0.7 VRHE. For OD Cu/C-1000 catalyst obtained by carbonizing HKUST-1 at 1,000 °C, the CH3OH and C2H5OH production rates were 5.1~12.4 and 3.7~13.4 mg L-1 h-1, respectively. Equally notable was that the initial potential for generation of C2H5OH was ~-0.1 VRHE, corresponding to overpotential of ~190 mV. The increased performance of OD Cu/C originated from interaction between the uniform distribution of Cu and porous carbon matrices.
Metal oxides deposited on carbon
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a type of carbon material with graphene layers that exhibit semiconducting/metallic properties and tubular morphology. Theoretical studies have shown that the curling of the graphene layer results in an inward-to-outward shift of π-electron density, resulting in an electron-rich state on the outer surface. The catalyst dispersed into the CNT cavities exhibits a confinement effect, which affects the mass transfer and distribution of the reactants, thus changing the catalyst redox properties. The ultra-small cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co3O4) NPs with a high dispersion were confined within CNTs to prepare a composite electrocatalyst (Co/CNTs) by the pyrolysis of ZIF-67 to effectively reduce CO2 to CO[160]. Owing to the excellent nanostructure of the Co/CNTs, Co3O4 NPs served as the maximally exposed primary active sites, greatly improving the electrocatalytic efficiency. At the cathode potential of -0.7 VRHE, the Co/CNTs obtained 90% FECO and current density of 20.6 mA cm-2. In addition, the CNTs prevented the aggregation of the Co3O4 NPs in the electrolysis process, thus enabling the catalyst to remain stable for a long period (40 h). Similarly, Deng et al. used Bi-MOFs as sacrificial precursors to prepare a composite catalyst (Bi2O3@C-800) for the reduction of CO2[161]. The composite exhibited a stable FE of 93% for HCOOH at an initial potential of -0.28 VRHE and a high partial current density of 208 mA cm-2 at -1.1 VRHE in a flow-cell configuration. The carbon matrix improved the activity and selectivity, while oxides were favorable to the promotion of reaction kinetics and selectivity.
Different structural catalysts with tailored porosities can be produced through MOF pyrolysis, and treatment using different etching reagents provides efficient ways to generate specific active sites[130].
Figure 9. (A) The Sn (101)/SnO2/C-500 preparation process for CO2RR. (B) FE and (C) long-term stability of Sn (101)/SnO2/C-500. (D) The free energy of HCOO-, CO formation[130]. Copyright 2021 the American Chemical Society.
Single-atom catalysts
In recent years, transition-metal SACs (TM-SACs) have been extensively studied owing to their superior electrocatalytic performance, low cost, and stability. TM-SACs can act as adsorption and activation sites for H2O, O2, CO2, etc., and facilitate redox of adsorbed molecules[162]. The choice of support is particularly important for the formation of TM-SACs because individual atoms tend to agglomerate in the preparation process. In addition, the electron and mass transfer during electrocatalytic reaction are also affected by the substrate. With the advantages of adjustable structure and various available modification methods, MOF precursors/templates can be potentially employed in the synthesis of TM-SACs with high loading capacity, stability, and electrocatalytic activity[163].
Well-defined metal-nitrogen (M-Nx) sites confined into a carbon matrix (M-N-C) have been successfully obtained by the thermal decomposition of MOFs[164]. A Fe-doped MOF has been used to synthesize a carbon nano-skeleton with a hierarchical pore structure (micropores to large mesopores) and atomically dispersed metalloporphyrin-like Fe-N4 active centers[165]. The presence of mesopores in the nano-framework improved the amount and accessibility of monoatomic active sites and facilitated mass and charge transport. The FE for this composite reached 86.9% at -0.47 VRHE for CO. Isolated M-Nx sites could serve as active centers for CO2RR. However, the content of the isolated M-Nx active sites in the carbon matrix was generally limited, and they can be maximally exposed using various feasible strategies to achieve efficient catalysis. The functionalization of ZIF-8 NPs was first achieved by the selective restriction of ammonium ferric citrate
Figure 10. (A) Fe-N4 moiety in the defective porous graphitic layer (Fe-N4 pore). (B) Gibbs free energy on various sites[167]. Copyright 2019 the American Chemical Society. (C) The preparation process of C-ZnxNiy ZIF-8. (D) FE and (E) current density of CO at different potentials[168]. Copyright 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry. (F) The synthesis of M1-N-C by pyrolysis of MTV-MOFs. (G) FE of CO for
Although M-N-C as an effective electrocatalyst can promote the process of CO2-to-CO, the current of the competitive HER grows sharply with the increase of the overpotential, resulting in a rapid decline in the FE of CO, and it is difficult to obtain a high partial current density of CO. Therefore, obtaining high current density and FE for CO2RR simultaneously is an important challenge for M-N-C. Based on the above considerations, Yan et al. embedded unsaturated Ni-N units into porous carbon by pyrolyzing ZIF-8 doped with different Ni contents (ZnxNiy ZIF-8) [Figure 10C][168]. The FE of CO for all the C-ZnxNiy ZIF-8 could be maintained 92.0%~98.0% at a range of -0.53~-1.03 V vs. RHE, and the current density of CO increased with potential, reaching 71.5 ± 2.9 mA cm-2 at -1.03 VRHE [Figure 10D and E]. The theoretical calculations clarified that unsaturated Ni-N active sites possessed lower *COOH free energy and higher *H adsorption energy, thus exhibiting high CO2RR activity and inhibiting competitive HER. The catalyst breaks the "seesaw" effect limitation of selectivity and activity on the M-N-C material, and realizes efficient catalysis of CO2RR. In addition, Ni-N4 sites have two forms: embedded at the edge (Ni-N2+2) and in the bulk (Ni-N4) of the carbon matrix[169,170]. However, the catalytic active sites for CO2RR between these two types are difficult to distinguish. Over these considerations, Pan et al. used ZIF-based Ni-N-C catalyst to achieve highly selective conversion of CO2 to CO with FE of 96% at overpotential of 570 mV[171]. The DFT calculations revealed that the Ni-N2+2-C8 with active C atoms possessing dangling bonds were considered to be the active sites due to lower activation energy in the dissociation of COOH* intermediates. In contrast, Ni-N4-C10, which was tightly embedded into graphite layers, may not be active. Moreover, Ni-N2+2-C8 could efficiently inhibit the competitive HER as well.
Influence of coordination metal
Owing to the diversity in MOF structures and compositions, M-N-C catalysts containing different metal elements could be constructed using the tunability of the ligand central metal. By only changing the types of monatomic metals, the physicochemical properties of MOF-derived monatomic materials can be strictly controlled, thus creating a prerequisite for identifying and comparing the catalytic performance[172].
M-N-C with different M-N4 groups (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Cu) was prepared to explore the influence of metal centers on electrocatalytic performance[173]. It was found that the current density of CO2 reduction to CO was significantly different among the five catalysts, in which Co-N-C showed the best intrinsic activity (at -0.6 VRHE), followed by Fe-N-C, Ni-N-C, Mn-N-C and Cu-N-C. Due to similar structure of these five model catalysts, the binding affinity of metal sites for the key intermediates might be the reason for the difference in the electrocatalytic CO2RR activity. The binding ability of Mn-N4 and Fe-N4 to CO was too strong, so the desorption of CO* determined its activity. However, Ni-N4 was weakly bound to CO, so the activation of CO2 to form CO2*- was the main process affecting their activity. The more suitable energy barrier of Co-N4 for CO2*-and CO* was the reason for its best activity. Mn-O4-O could be formed due to the strong adsorption of Mn-N4 on O, and Mn-O4-O had a high energy barrier for CO2 adsorption, which explained the poor activity of Mn-N-C for CO2RR. For Cu-N-C, the central Cu ion was reduced to Cu (0), resulting in low activity. In terms of selectivity, the FEs of Fe-N-C, Ni-N-C and Mn-N-C were > 80%, whereas Co-N-C exhibited lower selectivity (48%), which was attributed to the different binding energies between CO2*- and H*.
The structural and functional diversity of multivariate MOFs (MTV-MOFs) provides the possibility to construct M-N-C with multiple metal centers to achieve electrocatalytic conversion under low CO2 concentration. Based on this, a series of MOFs with metal species at the center have been constructed by introducing both porphyrin and metalloporphyrin ligands using a mixed ligand strategy[172]. M-N-C
Effect of coordination environment
The metal active center in M-N-C interacts with its surrounding atoms to form a certain coordination environment, which can regulate electron density of the metal site, and then affect adsorption behavior of key reaction intermediates on the monatomic active center, thereby optimizing catalytic performance[174,175]. At present, the change of coordination environment of metal active centers mainly includes the regulation of number, species of coordination atoms, and cooperation of adjacent metal sites.
Regulation of coordination number
The variation in the coordination numbers of SAs in M-N-C leads to differences of the local electron density of the central metal atom, which greatly affects adsorption and configuration of the reaction intermediates during CO2RR, thus resulting in varying catalytic activities of SACs[176,177]. A PSMS strategy was adopted to prepare Ni-Nx-C with different N coordination numbers[176]. For Ni-N3-C catalyst used in the CO2RR, the FE reached 95.6% for CO at -0.65 VRHE, surpassing Ni-N4-C catalyst (89.2%). DFT calculations suggested that free energy of COOH* formation on Ni-N3-C was 0.66 eV, significantly lower than that of Ni-N4-C, thus promoting the CO formation. SACs have also been synthesized by inserting PPy into bimetallic MOFs[177]. The distance between two Ni atoms was elongated by the presence of Mg2+ in MgNiMOF-74. In the pyrolysis process, isolated Ni atoms could be stabilized by the PPy guest as a N source. Therefore, coordinated Ni-Nx inserted NC (NiSA-Nx-C) was prepared at different pyrolysis temperatures. For CO, the FE (98%) and TOF (1,622 h-1) of NiSA-N2-C catalysts were significantly higher than those of the NiSA-N3-C and NiSA-N4-C.
Atomically dispersed Co SAs with different N coordination numbers have been used to further understand the CO2RR intermediates and active sites[178]. The number of N atoms around that central Co site was regulated by control of volatile C-N fragment in the pyrolysis process at different temperatures. A decrease in the N coordination number increased the unoccupied 3d orbital of the Co atom, which favored the adsorption of CO2•- and then improved the performance of CO2RR. The catalyst with the Co-N2 site showed higher FE of 94% for CO and current density of 18.1 mA cm-2 at a low overpotential of 0.52 V than the catalyst with Co-N4 sites.
Regulation of coordination species
Based on the above research, the construction of M-Nx structure with a low unsaturated coordination number can obtain higher CO2 reduction performance. However, due to the limitation of M-Nx structure, the adjustable space is limited, making it very difficult to further improve the performance of unsaturated M-Nx sites. Introducing heteroatoms (O, S, etc.) into the unsaturated coordination structure to further adjust the local environment is also a feasible scheme to further improve electrocatalytic performance[179]. The electronegativity of heteroatom O is stronger than that of N, which plays an important role in regulating the microenvironment of Fe single atoms and improving the catalytic performance. Zhao et al. first doped oxygen-rich Zn-MOF-74 with Fe to obtain Fe/Zn-MOF-74, where Fe occupied the Zn site in Zn-MOF-74 and coordinated with O atoms of organic ligand[180]. After introducing melamine as a N source to MOFs, M@Fe/Zn-MOF-7 was formed, and then Fe-N coordination replaced part of Fe-O through calcination. Finally, Fe1N2O2/NC catalyst was obtained. The FE of CO for Fe1N2O2/NC was higher than 95% in the wide potential range of -0.4~-0.8 VRHE, and reached a maximum of 99.7% at -0.5 VRHE. The CO current density of Fe1N2O2/NC could reach 6.5 mA cm-2 at -0.7 VRHE. According to the calculation, the CO2 adsorption energy of Fe1N2O2 site (-1.41 eV) was significantly lower than that of other sites (FeN4: -1.65 eV, FeO4: -2.69 eV), indicating that CO was more easily adsorbed at FeN4 and FeO4 sites, which was not conducive to CO desorption. At the same time, FeO4 has strong spin polarization, less electron loss, and most electrons are concentrated on CO, resulting in difficulties in CO desorption.
Wei et al. prepared a MOF-derived monatomic Cu catalyst (plasma-activated CuDBC, PA-CUDBC-1) using a plasma activation strategy to achieve efficient electrocatalysis of CO2RR to produce CH4[181]. The plasma bombardment led to abundant O-vacancies on the catalyst, and the number of low coordination Cu sites increased significantly. In addition, the plasma treatment resulted in a layered porous structure, which allowed the catalyst to adsorb the reactant molecules efficiently. The synergistic effect of the porous structure and low coordination Cu sites significantly increased the production of CH4 using PA-CUDBC-1 with a high FE of 75.3% at -1.1 VRHE. The low coordination of Cu-O3-C and Cu-O2-C lowered the energy barrier for the decisive step (CO2→COOH*) and other key intermediates (*CO and *CHO), thus accelerating the kinetic process of CO2 conversion to CH4.
Cooperation of adjacent metal sites
The concentration of SAs can affect the distance between single atoms, leading to different catalytic pathways and even distinct catalytic products. Cu-Nx-C catalysts are effective CO2RR catalysts for producing hydrocarbons, including CH4 or C2H4[182]. Based on this, Cu-Nx-C catalysts with different Cu contents were prepared by optimizing the pyrolysis process. When the concentration of Cu was 4.9 mol%, the distance between the adjacent Cu-Nx species was small, so the C-C coupling could be realized, thus forming C2H4. On the contrary, if the Cu concentration in the Cu-Nx structure was less than 2.4 mol%, the distance between the Cu-Nx components increased, making the catalyst more conducive to producing CH4. The calculations further suggested that the formation of C2H4 was related to two intermediates CO bound on two adjacent Cu-N2 sites, and individual Cu-N4, Cu-N2 and adjacent Cu-Nx sites were related to the formation of CH4.
MOF-derived M-N-C has a planar and conjugated carbon structure, which can realize long-range electron delocalization and is considered as an ideal material for constructing adjacent SAs. Jiao et al. precisely constructed a Fe1-Ni1-NC catalyst in which adjacent Fe-N4 and Ni-N4 sites were decorated on NC support by pyrolysis of MOF composites (Fe&Ni-ZnO/ZIF-8) [Figure 11A][183]. Due to the synergy of neighboring Fe and Ni SAs, the activity of Fe1-Ni1-NC for conversion of CO2 to CO was enhanced, and FE of CO at
Figure 11. (A) The construction of Fe1-Ni1-N-C. (B) FECO at different potentials. (C) Electron density difference analysis for CO2 adsorbed onto the Fe-N4 sites of the Fe1-Ni1-N-C. (D) Free energy of CO2RR[183]. Copyright 2021 the American Chemical Society. (E) The construction of L-Co1Mn1-NC catalysts. (F) FECO curves[185]. Copyright 2024 the Royal Society of Chemistry. (G) Optimized catalytic models and reaction pathways on MoFe-N6[186]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
By introducing different metal atoms to form diatomic sites (DSs), the electronic structure of a single metal active site can be changed by precisely regulating the low-coordination microenvironment at the atomic level, and ultimately the selectivity and activity of CO formation on DSs can be improved[184].
POP-BASED ELECTROCATALYSTS
Similar to MOFs, POPs inherit excellent physical and chemical tunability provided by various functionalized monomers in their structures[187]. In addition, their strong covalent bond is an important sign that POPs differ from other porous materials to ensure the chemical stability of polymers, and with high SSA, they can bind specific catalytic sites, which is more suitable for CO2 capture and conversion[188]. Based on the adjustable porous structure and larger SSA of POPs, metal can be complexed or loaded in the POP framework through pre-design and post-modification strategies to realize the metallization of POPs, which can not only increase the exposure of the active center of the POPs, but also protect metal centers from aggregation in the reaction process, thus improving the electrocatalytic performance of CO2RR. Moreover, the introduction of heteroatoms into POPs or the combination of POPs with conductive carbon materials (such as graphene and CNTs) or metal electrodes (such as Au and Ag) can adjust the POP structure to promote the enrichment of CO2 and electron transport in the electrocatalytic process; In addition, porous POPs can be employed as sacrificial templates for the synthesis of porous catalysts with high dispersion of catalytic active sites. POPs exhibit good electrocatalytic activity in CO2RR due to their well-preserved structure and composition, and there has been considerable progress towards their development[189].
Pristine POPs
Non-metallic POPs
Conjugated triazine frameworks (CTFs), as porous polymeric materials linked by strong triazine bonds, possess favorable porous structure, high stability, and intrinsic N-rich doping. In addition, the conjugated structure of CTFs is beneficial to electron transport and mass transfer, so they are considered as potential electrode materials for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2[190]. Zhu et al. prepared triazine-based frameworks (TTF-1 and TTF-2) by ZnCl2 ionothermal method at 600 °C using 2,6-dicyanopyridine and 1,3-dicyanobenzene as monomers, respectively[190]. The abundant porous structure and large SSA of TTF-1 (1,234 m2 g-1) and TTF-2 (2,522 m2 g-1) endowed the electrode and electrolyte with a large contact surface, which was conducive to charge and mass transfer. However, the content of pyridinic N that served as active sites in TTF-1 was 13.8 atom%, much higher than that of TTF-2 (6.8 atom%). Therefore, CO FE of 82% was achieved at -0.68 VRHE for TTF-1, far exceeding the highest CO FE of 22% at -0.43 VRHE for TTF-2. In addition, TTF-1 could maintain about 75% FECO for 12 h, indicating its long-term stability.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are a type of organic polymer with porous crystal structures and strong covalent bonds, and their properties such as CO2 adsorption capacity and electronic conductivity can be achieved by adjusting the building units or linkages. It is noted that N sites (pyridine N, pyrrole N, etc.) are considered as active centers for electrocatalysis, while sp3 N sites show higher CO2 adsorption capacity compared to sp2 N sites[191]. Therefore, the design of amine-linked crystalline COFs containing sp3 N can be used as electrocatalysts to achieve efficient CO2 reduction. Based on the above considerations,
Figure 12. (A) The construction of TPTA-Pz-COF and TPTA-PDA-COF based on different linkages. (B) N2 adsorption isotherms of TPTA-Pz-COF. FE of H2, CO, CH4 and C2H4 for (C) TPTA-Pz-COF and (D) TPTA-PDA-COF. (E) CO2 adsorption energies of TPTA-Pz-COF and TPTA-PDA-COF[192]. Copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH. (F) The synthesis of N+-COF, NH-COF and N+-NH-COF. (G) CO FE. (H) The CO current density[193]. Copyright 2023 Springer Nature.
The linkage and linker of COF are simultaneously modified by post-modification strategy to enhance the CO2 binding capacity and conductivity, thus improving CO2RR performance[188]. Firstly, a crystalline COF (CoTAPP-PATA-COF) was prepared by utilizing 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-aminophenyl) porphinato]-cobalt (CoTAPP) and 4,4′,4″,4‴-(1,4-phenylenebis(azanetriyl)) tetrabenzaldehyde (PATA) as raw materials[193]. Then, ionization of PATA was conducted by in-situ ammonium groups to form N+-COF, while NaBH4 was used to reduce the C=N in COF to C-N to prepare N+-NH-COF [Figure 12F]. The conductivities of N+-NH-COF and N+-COF were 6.7 × 10-9 and 8.1 × 10-9 S m-1, far exceeding that of NH-COF (3.0 × 10-10 S m-1), indicating that ionic modification was beneficial to electron transport and further improved the activity of CO2 reduction. In addition, the minimum Tafel slope of N+-NH-COF indicated that the dual modification can significantly elevate CO2RR kinetics. As a result, N+-NH-COF could efficiently convert CO2 to CO with the highest FE of 97.32% at -0.8 VRHE, which was higher than that of NH-COF (95.26%), N+-COF (92.07%) and CoTAPP-PATA-COF (81.75%) [Figure 12G]. The presence of C-N bond promoted the adsorption of CO2, while the hydrophobicity of the catalyst can inhibit the competitive adsorption of water, thus improving the selectivity. Meanwhile, the best current density of CO was 28.01 mA cm-2 for N+-NH-COF at -1.0 V, significantly higher than that of NH-COF (22.83 mA cm-2), N+-COF (23.73 mA cm-2), CoTAPP-PATA-COF (13.26 mA cm-2) [Figure 12H]. The *COOH formation energy barrier on N+-NH-COF was lower than that of N+-COF, CoTAPP-PATA-COF and NH-COF, which promoted the *COOH→*CO process.
Metalized POPs
Metal complexation and PSMS are two common methods for preparing metalized POPs. The PSMS of POPs is generally achieved by introducing metal ions through cation exchange or coordination[194].
H2Pc[198] and porphyrin[199,200] polymers containing SA centers (M-N4) are promising electrocatalysts for
The strong π-π stacking between layers in polymer structure may cause the aggregation of the bulk structure, which hinders the full play of the catalytic activity of the catalytic center and reduces the electrocatalytic performance. The construction of an ultra-thin polymer structure may be a good solution[198]. Song et al. prepared an ultrathin covalent organic polymer (COP) with a thickness of ~1.7 nm by condensation of Co tetraaminophthalocyanine (CoPc-(NH2)4) and squaric acid (SA) as monomers
Figure 13. (A) The synthesis of COP-SA and COP-BDA. TEM and AFM images of (B) COP-SA and (C) COP-BDA. (D) FE and (E) CO current density from -0.4 to -0.65 VRHE. (F) Tafel plots. (G) The binding strength of *COOH[198]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
The regulation of CO2RR performance can be achieved by adjusting the microenvironment around the electrocatalytic site. Pz-linked NiPc COFs (NiPc-NH-TFPN, NiPc-NH-TFPN-COOH, NiPc-NH-TFPN-NH2, TFPN: tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile) with different ligands comprising -CN, -COOH, and -CH2NH2 groups were prepared to achieve the regulation of microenvironment near the active sites[202]. The presence of Pz linkage made COF have better conductivity and stability, while the adsorption capacity of NiPc-NH-TFPN-NH2 (80.6 cm3 g-1) for CO2 at 298 K was significantly higher than that of NiPc-NH-TFPN
In addition, the reduction of H2Pc ligands during the electroreduction of CO2RR at high overpotential may greatly affect the long-term stability of the electrocatalyst. The COP-CoPc was prepared by reacting viologen ligands with different redox states with cobalt polyphthalocyanine (CoPc-NH2), which showed good electrocatalytic selectivity (FECO > 90%) for CO2RR at a range of -0.68~-1.28 VRHE in the H-type cell, reaching up the highest FECO of 97.3% at -0.88 V[203]. The CO current density of COP-CoPc reached
A porphyrin complex with M-N4 sites is also a promising CO2RR electrocatalyst. Lu et al. prepared a Ni porphyrin CTF (NiPor-CTF) with NiN4 units for the effective reduction of CO2 to CO[204]. The CO FE of NiPor -CTF exceeded 90% at -0.6~-0.9 VRHE, reaching up the highest FE of 97% at -0.9 V with current density of 52.9 mA cm-2. The calculations indicated that the kinetic energy barrier of *CO2 to *COOH transition on NiN4 active sites could be reduced. Furthermore, Wang et al. prepared a large π-conjugated polymer (CoPor-N3) by coupling an electron-rich ligand (2, 6-bis (5-amino-1h-benzimidazole-2-yl) pyridine, N3) with meso-tetra (p-formylphenyl) porphyrin cobalt (CoPor) containing Co-N4 unit via strong covalent imine bonds (C=N)[205]. H2Por-N3 with no Co sites only had a low FECO of 5.4% at -0.65 VRHE, while the highest FE of the CoPor monomer for CO reached 78% at -0.55 VRHE, suggesting that the high CO selectivity of CoPor-N3 may be mainly contributed by the CoPor unit as an active site for CO2RR. It was worth noting that CoPor-N3 showed a significantly higher FECO of 96% at a lower potential of -0.50 VRHE than that of CoPor, which was mainly attributed to coupling between electron-rich N3 ligands and CoPor ensuring that electrons can be enriched around the Co center, facilitating the electron transfer from the Co center to CO2 for activation and reduction. In addition, the superior optical driving characteristics of the CoPor unit enabled CoPor-N3 to be used as a photosensitive electrocatalyst for the reduction of CO2 to CO, so that partial current density of CO reached -42.1 mA cm-2 at -0.60 VRHE under illumination, which was higher than the partial current density (-28.2 mA cm-2) with no illumination.
The use of different linkers can adjust the catalytic effect of metal centers and control CO2RR performance to a certain extent. However, the linker itself is generally not catalytically active. The performance of CO2RR can be improved in principle by linking metalloporphyrin groups with catalytic monomers (such as metal bipyridine) to synthesize polymers with two metal sites[206,207]. Porphyrin-bipyridine bifunctional COF (COF_Re) was constructed by Schiff base reaction between bipyridine rhenium [obtained by the reaction of 2,2′-bipyridine-5,5′-formaldehyde and pentacarbonyl chlororhenium (I)] and 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-aminophenyl) porphyrin (TAPP)[206]. Further modifications with cobalt chloride (CoCl2) or ferric chloride (FeCl3) led to the addition of the Co2+ or Fe3+ into the porphyrin unit, resulting in COFs with bimetallic sites
The particle size of COF is also a critical factor affecting its electrocatalytic performance, which is usually limited by the large particle size caused by particle aggregation, while the precise control of the morphology of COF catalyst is still a difficult problem. Endo et al. employed a trityl group-protected cobalt porphyrin precursor [Co(ttpp), ttpp = 5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis (4-(tritylamino) phenyl) porphinato (2-)] for the preparation of small particle COF (COF-366-Co)[209]. Due to the trityl protection, Co(ttpp) exhibited good solubility in the solvent, which could inhibit intermolecular packing and uniform nucleation of COF particles; therefore, the size of the crystals (COF-T) prepared was reduced to 162 ± 41 nm, much smaller than that of the COF particles (COF-A, about 10 μm) prepared by the unprotected porphyrin precursor. As a result, the smaller size of COF showed excellent electrocatalytic performance of CO2-to-CO with FE of
The binding strength between reactants and intermediates is considered to be one of the factors affecting the catalytic performance of COFs for CO2RR. Many methods have been used to promote the charge transfer within the framework, thereby regulating the binding strength of intermediates, and ultimately improving the electrocatalytic performance. Bimetallic COFs with dioxin-linkage were synthesized to improve the electron transfer within the framework, guaranteeing FECO of 97% and TOF of 2.87 s-1[210]. A conductive 2D H2Pc COF with isolated Cu-H2Pc active sites, as an electrocatalyst, can convert CO2 to acetate with FE of 90.3(2)% and current density of 12.5 mA cm-2 at -0.8 V vs. RHE[211]. Theoretical calculations showed that isolated Cu-H2Pc had a high electron density, ensuring the migration of d electrons from Cu to C. At the same time, due to the strong interaction between COF and *CH3 intermediates, the
POPs-based composites
POPs/C composites
Although the electrocatalysts of metalized POPs have well-defined and tunable active sites, the efficiency of their CO2RR is usually much lower than that of metal catalysts due to poor conductivity, which largely limits their practical applications. The combination of POPs with substrates to construct composites is seeking to confront poor electrical conductivity of POPs and obtain high electrocatalytic performance. The interaction of POPs and graphene or CNTs has been used to enhance the electron transport capability[215]. Lu et al. prepared a composite material (COF-366-Co@CNTs) by in-situ polymerization of COF with Co porphyrin units on amino-functionalized CNTs via covalent bonding to ensure close contact between COFs and CNTs[216], thereby promoting rapid electron transfer from the Co center to CNTs [Figure 14A]. To further adjust electronic structure of the Co center, COF-366-(OMe)2-Co@CNT was prepared by introducing an electron-withdrawing group (methoxy) into the porphyrin units during the preparation of the composite. In addition, COF-366-(OMe)2-Co@CNT had higher binding capacity for CO2 due to the hydrophobicity of the methoxy group and CO2. The ultrathin COF nanolayer with a thickness of 0.9 nm wrapped on the CNT greatly shortened the electron transport distance from the COF to the CNT [Figure 14B]. For these reasons, COF-366-(OMe)2-Co@CNT showed the best performance of CO2→CO, with FE of 93.6% at -0.68 VRHE, current density of 40 mA cm-2 at -1.05 V and TOF of 11,877 h-1 at
Figure 14. (A) The construction of COF-366-Co@CNT. (B) HRTEM images of COF-366-(OMe)2-Co@CNT. (C) FEs (D) Current densities and (E) TOFs[216]. Copyright 2020 the American Chemical Society. (F) The synthesis of CoP@CNT, CoP-Ph@CNT, and CoP-F@CNT. (G) FEs at -0.47~ -0.87 V[217]. Copyright 2022 Chinese Chemical Society.
MePc and its derivatives as electrocatalysts are capable of selectively electroreducing CO2 to CO. In contrast, the polymerization of metal H2Pc can improve the stability of the catalyst, but it can not effectively control electronic properties and microenvironment of the metal active center, so the catalytic activity is often weaker than that of small H2Pc molecules. Therefore, it is of great significance to regulate the polymerization of metal H2Pc molecules so as to give consideration to both stability and activity in the selective electrocatalytic reduction reaction of CO2. Guo et al. synthesized a CNT@conjugated microporous polymer (CMP) (CoPc-H2Pc) composite electrocatalyst with both catalytic activity and stability by copolymerizing H2Pc and cobalt H2Pc (CoPc) molecules on the CNT surface through Scholl coupling reaction[218]. The addition of H2Pc in the polymerization process can not only effectively avoid the metal shedding of CoPc in the reaction, but also promote the dispersion of metal Co in the ultra-thin shell of CMP at atomic level. The catalytic performance results suggested that the material had the lowest onset potential, achieving CO current density of 15.2 mA cm-2 at -0.6 VRHE, far exceeding of CNT@CMP(CoPc) with 9.9 mA cm-2. In addition, FECO of 96% can be maintained even at high current densities
The electrocatalytic activity of M-Nx sites in POPs may be affected by the carbon substrate, and it is reported that CNTs with highly curved surfaces may provide a unique curvature effect for M-Nx, which in turn improves the electrocatalytic performance[219]. Ao et al. prepared NiNx by high temperature pyrolysis of Ni particles in N-doped CNTs, and then coated CTF nanosheets to synthesize electrocatalyst
Metal/POP composites
Metal NPs suffer from problems such as easy aggregation, low mass and electron transfer, and poor stability in the reaction process, which significantly reduce their catalytic performance[221]. Metal/polymer hybridization is a feasible way to solve the above problems. The modification of metal NPs by POPs with large SSA and excellent stability is not only beneficial to the high dispersion of metal particles, thereby improving the accessibility of active sites, but also can improve the stability of metal catalysts in the catalytic process. The introduction of POPs can also regulate the catalytic microenvironment of metal sites. Therefore, it is highly desirable to design metal/polymers with higher mass and electron transfer efficiency through different strategies. Polymer ligands can control the surface accessibility of metal nanocatalysts, which provides a way to improve their cycle life and catalytic performance. Zhang et al. used Au and palladium (Pd) nanocatalysts stabilized by two polymer NHCs (mono- and polydentate) for CO2RR[222]. Compared to traditional thiols, amines, and other ligands, the stable metal-carbene bond at the reduction potential prevented the aggregation of metal NPs. The NHC-ligand-modified Au catalyst had 86% CO FE at -0.9 V for 11 h, whereas that of the unmodified Au was < 10%. Moreover, the hydrophobicity of polymer ligands and the surface electron density of NPs greatly improved the selectivity of C via the σ-donation of NHCs.
Cu-based catalysts can be used in the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to produce CH4, etc.[223]. However, due to complicated reaction process and poor structural stability, the selectivity and stability of CH4 are poor, which limits its practical application[224]. By adjusting the catalytic microenvironment of Cu sites, including the coverage of reaction intermediates[225], the adsorption of CO2, H2O[226], etc., the path of CO2RR can be regulated to improve the selectivity of CH4 products. The sheet-like structure and open channels of 2D COFs provide an ideal platform for regulating the catalytic microenvironment[227]. Cu NPs were modified by 2D COF nanosheets (NUS9) with high density of heteroatoms and sulfonic acid groups to prepare Cu-NUS9, which can adjust the selectivity and activity of its products. As a result, the Cu-NUS9 catalyst reduced CO2 to CH4 with 66% FE and 296 mA cm-2 of current density in an acidic electrolyte
In addition, Meng et al. proposed an effective tandem catalytic strategy to improve the selectivity of reducing CO2 to C2H4[228]. Combined with the advantages of non-noble metal monatomic Ni to produce CO and Cu nanocatalyst to conduct CO-CO coupling, the selectivity of CO2 to ethylene was improved by tandem catalysis. Based on the above considerations, non-noble PTF (Ni)/Cu was prepared by loading Cu NPs on Ni monatomic porphyrin-triazine framework (PTF-Ni) [Figure 15A and B]. In the catalytic process, monatomic Ni efficiently reduced CO2 to intermediate CO, and the generated CO was immediately converted to ethylene by the adjacent Cu nanocatalyst through C-C coupling reaction. As a result, compared with non-tandem catalyst PTF/Cu which mainly produced CH4, FE of C2H4 increased from 9.6% to 57.3% at -1.1 V vs. RHE [Figure 15C]. Furthermore, PTF (Ni)/Cu could still maintain ~91% of the initial activity after 11 h [Figure 15D]. PTF (Ni) was beneficial to increasing the generation of active intermediates of *CO on Cu NPs, thereby improving the probability of C-C coupling, and significantly reducing energy barrier required for the production of C2H4, thus improving activity of converting CO2 to C2H4 through tandem catalysis.
Figure 15. (A) Fabrication of PTF(Ni)/Cu. (B) HRTEM images of PTF(Ni)/Cu. (C) FEs of C2H4 and CH4 at different potential. (D) The long-term stability for 11 h on PTF(Ni)/Cu catalyst[228]. Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH.
Molecular catalyst/POP composites
The porous structure of POPs allows the insertion of molecular electrocatalysts via rapid diffusion to obtain sufficient active sites, thereby improving the electrocatalytic activity and stability[229]. To verify these characteristics, rhenium (Re)-based Re (2,2′-bpy-5,5′-diamine) (CO)3Cl was inserted into the framework of COF-2,2′-bp with non-metallic 2,2′-bpy moiety to segregate COF-2,2′-bpy-Re[230]. COF-2,2′-bpy-Re combined with carbon black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) actively catalyzes the reduction of CO2 to CO at -2.8 V only for a Re concentration of 29.38 wt%. After 30 m of controlled potential electrolysis (CPE), the CO FE for the catalyst reaches 81%. After 30 m, the electrocatalytic performance of the composite decreases due to the inhibition of mass transfer and substrate diffusion. Moreover, Co porphyrin molecules have been embedded into cationic POPs with bipyridyl ligands (POP-Py) by anion exchange to generate strong secondary coordination sphere interactions to improve CO2RR performance[231]. In this study, Co meso-tetra (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrine (Co-TCPP) was uniformly encapsulated in POP-Py under electrostatic attraction. The hybrid exhibited a CO FE of 83%, current density of 4.0 mA cm-2, and TOF of 1.4 s-1 at 0.49 V of overpotential, which was attributed to the synergistic interaction between the cationic polymer substrate and the molecular catalyst. The electrostatic effect of the positively charged framework of the cationic POPs could not only promote the dispersion and stable loading of the negatively charged molecular catalyst, but also stabilize the intermediate of the electrocatalytic reaction and improve the catalytic activity.
The strategy of integrating the photosensitive donor Ru(bpy)3Cl2 and the acceptor CO2 reduction activator Co-Por into the crystalline COF framework can effectively prolong excited state lifetime of Co-Por and improve the catalytic performance of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction under illumination. Wu et al. constructed Ru (bpy)3Cl2 photosensitizer into 2,2′-bipyridine-functionalized Co porphyrin-based COF (Co-Bpy-COF) by post-synthesis method, and obtained Co-Bpy-COF-Rux(x represented molar ratio of Ru to Co)[232]. Due to the large polarity difference of building units and the high crystallinity of 2D COF, the built-in electric field in Co-Bpy-COF-Ru1/2 was created to facilitate the migration of photoexcited electrons from Ru (bpy)3Cl2 to Co-Por on the one hand, and on the other hand, the excited state lifetime of Co-Por was
MOF/POP hybrids
COFs and MOFs, as two kinds of porous crystalline materials, have received extensive attention and research in electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Despite many similarities between them, there are still obvious differences in structure and functionality, and each has its own shortcomings. It is possible to combine their own advantages and form synergistic catalytic effect in electrocatalysis to overcome their respective shortcomings. In recent years, there have been many reports on MOF and COF hybrid materials, which have opened up a wide range of frontier applications for the synthesis and application of these materials[33]. However, MOFs/COFs reported in the literature have some problems, such as less exposure of active sites and insufficient research on interface effect or synergistic mechanism. Therefore, it is of great value and significance to explore MOF@COF hybrid materials with fully exposed active sites to realize electrocatalytic CO2RR and produce high-value-added products.
Based on the above considerations, Yang et al. prepared a series of composite electrocatalysts MCH-X by epitaxially growing an ultrathin Cu-Por-based COF (COF-366-OH-Cu) layer with nanoscale thickness on the surface of a mesoporous honeycomb UiO-66-NH2 template via covalent bonds (imine linkage)[233]. The morphology of MCH-X and the exposure of active sites were optimized by adjusting the amount of MOFs, which endowed the composite with high electrocatalytic performance. The optimum MCH-3 was still able to maintain the honeycomb structure due to the thinner COF layer with a thickness of ~8.5 nm, which was favorable for the exposure of the active sites. The CO2 adsorption capacity of MCH-3 was higher than that of COF-366-OH-Cu but lower than that of UiO-66-NH2, suggesting that the introduction of UiO-66-NH2 improved the affinity of the hybrid material for CO2. The results showed that UiO-66-NH2, COF-366-OH-Cu and MCH-3 could reduce CO2 to CH4 and a very small amount of C2H4. The maximum FECH4 and total current density of MCH-3 was 76.7% and -398.1 mA cm-2 at -1.0 V, far exceeding that of UiO-66-NH2 (15.9%, -187.8 mA cm-2) and COF-366-OH-Cu (37.5%, -374.4 mA cm-2), demonstrating the advantage of the honeycomb heterostructure possessed by MCH-3. Due to the introduction of MOFs, the formation energy barrier of the *COOH, acting as RDS for the CH4 generation for MCH-3, was 1.18 eV, lower than that of COF-366-OH-Cu (1.41 eV), further promoting the formation of the intermediates *CO, *CHO, and *CH2O. This work provides a reference for applications of porous crystalline hybrid materials in the efficient electrocatalytic reduction of CO2.
POP derivatives
COFs are ideal templates for the construction of carbon materials due to their 2D layered structure and high porosity. However, only massive 3D carbon materials can be obtained by direct pyrolysis, resulting in low conductivity and stacking structure. Therefore, it is highly desirable to control the structure of the derived carbon to obtain an electrocatalyst with high porosity, high electrical conductivity, and abundant atomic doping sites. In this context, Liu et al. used different templates (CNT, graphene) to prepare different sizes of COFs-derived carbon structures (1D to 3D) and studied their effects on CO2RR performance[234]. Firstly, trialdehyde phloroglucinol (TP) and [2,2′-bipyridine]-5,5′-diamine (BPY) were employed as monomers to prepare TP-BPY-COF, which was directly pyrolyzed at 800 °C to obtain 3D derived carbon materials. Then, the composites constructed by in-situ growth of COFs on CNTs and graphene were pyrolyzed under the same conditions to obtain 1D COF@CNT800 and 2D COF@Gr800, respectively. Finally, Co porphyrin units with CoN5 catalytic sites were anchored on carbon materials as electrocatalysts (Co-COF800, Co-COF@CNT800, Co-COF@Gr800) to reduce CO2 to CO [Figure 16A]. Due to the collapse of the pore structure for TP-BPY-COF after pyrolysis, the SSA of Co-COF800 decreased from 1,318 m2 g-1 of TP-BPY-COF to
Efficient CO2 reduction can be achieved by introducing new metal atoms to form bimetallic catalytic sites in carbon-supported SACs[235]. Metal atoms with high loading can break the weak interaction between single atomic sites, which is conducive to the synergistic effect between different metal atoms, thereby improving the selectivity and activity of CO2 reduction and inhibiting HER. COF@MOF hybrid materials with core-shell structure are ideal precursors for the formation of active sites with high loadings. In this context,
CONCLUSION
Summary
Porous MOF- and POP-based materials have been widely employed in electrocatalytic CO2RR because of their high SSA, customizable structure, adjustable functions, and good stability. In this report, we reviewed the development of MOF/POP-based nanoporous organic framework catalysts for electrochemical CO2RR in recent years.
For MOFs/POPs, the higher SSA enables them to disperse more electrochemical active sites, while their rich pore structure can promote the enrichment of reactants and mass transfer, thus accelerating the electrocatalytic reaction. To further improve conductivity of MOFs/POPs, MOF/POP composites are constructed by introducing guest species into MOFs/POPs to adjust the electron transport efficiency. Besides, compared with individual POPs/MOFs, the MOFs/POPs-derived materials can not only retain the original porous structure, but also improve the stability. Moreover, MOFs/POPs-derived materials have precisely controlled structures, which provide a clear model for the study of their active sites, structure-activity relationship, and basic mechanism. In general, MOFs/POPs involved in CO2RR are mainly classified into three categories: (1) pristine MOFs/POPs; (2) MOF/POP-based composites; and (3) MOF/POP derivatives.
In pristine MOFs, tunable metal ions or clusters and organic ligands are employed as active centers or electron transport agents. The metal centers are dispersed by organic ligands at the atomic level to tailor the original MOFs. The catalytic performance of MOFs can be improved by strategies such as adjusting/varying ligands, encapsulating active metal centers, and modifying electronic structure. The adjustment of the morphology of the MOFs, the exposure of specific crystal faces, and the particle size in the synthesis process also play critical roles in improving CO2RR performance. The choice of organic ligands can control the valence and coordination environment of metal nodes in MOFs, which act as important factors in the activation of CO2 and stabilization of key intermediates, further regulating the product selectivity of CO2 electrocatalytic reduction. By employing planar macrocyclic conjugated systems such as porphyrins and
Pristine POPs, as porous frameworks with strong covalent bonds, have better chemical stability than MOFs. Additionally, POPs with high SSA can bind specific catalytic sites, making them more suitable for CO2 capture and conversion. Properties such as CO2 adsorption capacity and electronic conductivity can be achieved by adjusting the building units or linkages. In addition, metal complexation of building blocks and PSMS are two common strategies used to synthesize metalized POPs. POPs with macrocyclic molecules, such as metalloporphyrins and MePc, are usually metalized by using building blocks, while PSMS is usually achieved by introducing metal ions through cation exchange or coordination. Introducing metal ions into POPs by means of coordination can greatly lower the amount of metal and obtain atomically dispersed sites, which is the key to achieving high selectivity in electrocatalytic reactions. By introducing different groups (such as electron-withdrawing/donating groups and hydrophilic/hydrophobic groups) into the ligands, the microenvironment around the metal sites can be adjusted to improve the electrocatalytic efficiency. In order to break through the limitation of POP particle aggregation and bulk structure stacking on the electrocatalytic CO2RR performance, the precise control of the morphology of POP catalysts, such as the synthesis of ultra-thin sheet structure and smaller particle size, can ensure higher active site exposure and electron transfer efficiency.
The original MOFs and POPs exhibit poor electrical conductivity, which can be adjusted by introducing guest substances, such as conductive substrates (metal electrodes), conductive carbon materials (carbon black, graphene, and CNTs), metal NPs (e.g., Pt, Co, Cu, Ag, etc.), metal oxides (Cu2O, Ag2O, Bi2O3, CuO, etc.), and functional molecules. Grafting or depositing MOFs/POPs on a substrate with good conductivity can significantly improve the charge transfer efficiency of the catalyst to improve the catalytic performance. Using MOFs/POPs as the substrates for metal catalysts can improve their stability and SSA, thereby maximizing the exposure of active sites while inhibiting the NP aggregation. In addition, the synergy of MOFs/POPs and carbon materials can adjust binding strength of key reaction intermediates, thus improving the electrocatalytic performance. Electron-rich units are embedded into MOFs/POPs to construct MOF/POP-based composites with multiple electron transfer channels, which changed the charge distribution around the active sites in MOFs/POPs and further improved the selectivity of the electrocatalytic CO2 reaction. In addition, MOF@COF hybrid materials can combine the high chemical stability of COFs and the adjustable functionality of MOFs, which is conducive to the further improvement of electrocatalytic efficiency.
MOF/POP-derived catalysts have excellent transport capacity, widely dispersed active sites, and good electrical conductivity. MOF-derived electrocatalysts based on structural and functional properties can be divided into metal oxides, metal NPs on carbon substrates, metal coordination NC materials (e.g., SACs), and metal-free electrocatalysts and nanocomposites. In addition, it has been reported that MOF-derived carbon materials as electrocatalysts can improve the CO2RR performance. Such materials retain the characteristics of the original MOFs to a large extent, and possess the superiority of abundant pores, large SSA, and adjustable electronic structure after doping. These properties can originate from high dispersion of active sites in the electrochemical CO2RR, which promote the adsorption and binding of the intermediates. In summary, regardless of MOFs/POPs (i) used directly as electrocatalysts; or (ii) designed to prepare single-atom embedded carbon materials as precursors, the resulting electrocatalysts exhibit enhanced inherent catalytic activity at the active site, improved mass transfer, and high stability, all of which are key characteristics required for the improvement of CO2RR performance.
Challenges and perspectives
Despite the vast development of MOF/POP-based electrocatalysts for CO2RR, there remain challenges in expanding their practical and commercial applications. Based on the existing literature, we present our views on the main challenges to be faced in the future and the corresponding feasible research directions:
1. Reasonable design and efficient preparation methods are key to ensuring the performance of MOF/POP electrocatalytic materials and their large-scale applications. Notably, most of the studied catalysts have not yet been commercialized. The rational design includes the selection of appropriate metal ions and organic ligands, and the control of crystal structure and pore characteristics by regulating the synthesis method, so as to optimize the electrocatalytic performance. The synthesis of most POP/MOF monomers and ligands is complex and costly, which has seriously limited their wide electrocatalytic applications. Future studies must particularly consider the cost factor. There is an urgent need to develop low-priced monomers, explore new synthetic strategies, and improve existing synthetic methods to achieve cost-effective large-scale production. Further, the wide electrocatalytic applications of POPs/MOFs are also limited by their low electrical conductivity, so the choice of surface modification and support materials is crucial to facilitate rapid electron transfer. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new preparation methods to obtain robust frameworks suitable for harsh environments to simultaneously improve their long-term stability.
2. MOF-derived materials show a strong structure-activity relationship, and the coordination metal and the coordination environment (coordination number and coordination species) exhibit a very significant impact on the performance of the electrocatalysts, but in the current literature, DFT calculations or in-situ infrared are mainly used to speculate the reaction process and catalytic mechanism. It is impossible to accurately observe how a single metal atom catalytic site catalyzes the whole process of CO2 reduction in real time, and few researchers have explored the effects of the morphology of MOF or POP-derived SACs on the electrocatalytic performance. Therefore, we should make full use of the increasingly advanced characterization instruments to provide real monitoring of the structural changes of catalysts and important intermediates in the catalytic process under working conditions, obtain more accurate and non-ambiguous electrocatalytic reaction paths, and provide more powerful technical support for the future industrial application of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Advanced in-situ characterization techniques, such as real-time X-ray diffraction (XRD), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM), can measure interfacial phenomena at the microscopic level and capture real-time changes at the atomic level. The dynamic evolution process of the multi-dimensional microstructure of the material from the nanometer to the atomic scale and the dynamics of the surface atoms under the operation condition are revealed. In situ Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy are important for understanding the evolution of intermediates, the effects of electrolyte and environment on intermediates, and interfacial electrochemistry during CO2 reduction. However, since the CO2 reduction is performed in a liquid electrolyte, other intermediates, besides *CO, *COOH, are generally difficult to detect. The distribution of intermediates and different products can be directly observed by in situ spectroscopy assisted with online product analysis. In addition, when the characteristic peaks of CO2RR intermediates/products overlap with other peaks, in situ spectroscopic techniques with higher resolution may be required. However, in general, the reaction path and products of CO2 reduction are complex. Although the intermediates in the reaction process can be identified by advanced in-situ spectroscopy technology, the best reaction path among many possibilities can not be determined. Therefore, by combining deep learning algorithms with various in-situ spectroscopic techniques, we can fully understand the path of CO2RR and promote the study of structure-property relationship to a new height.
3. High metal loading in carbon-supported SACs does not necessarily guarantee better catalytic performance, and a large number of metal atoms may be embedded in carbon materials, reducing the accessibility of metal single atoms. Since MOF or POP-derived SACs are mostly prepared by pyrolysis at high temperatures, it is necessary to use precursors with low metal content to inhibit the agglomeration of metal components during the synthesis. Therefore, it is indispensable to propose new technical methods to synthesize SACs with high density of active sites in large quantities while avoiding the aggregation of metal species. In addition, the introduction of new metal atoms into carbon-supported SACs by a post-modification strategy to form multi-metal catalytic sites can break the weak interaction between monatomic sites and achieve effective CO2 reduction by utilizing the synergistic effect between different metal atoms.
4. MOF/POP-based catalysts reported in the literature have a high selectivity (more than 90%) for CO or HCOOH in the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2, but their selectivity for high-electron C1 (such as CH4,
DECLARATIONS
Acknowledgments
The authors thank TopEdit (www.topeditsci.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
Methodology, writing-original draft, investigation, validation, resources, conceptualization:Ma, Y.
Review & editing, supervision: Zhang, G.; Yu, Q.; Lyu, S.; Duan, X.
Project administration, funding acquisition, conceptualization, review, editing, supervision: Zhang, S.
Availability of data and materials
The materials are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22309096, 22102220 and 22272105), Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (Nos. 242102230013, 242102320146), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 23ZR1423900), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province (No. ZR2021QB070) and PhD Research Startup Foundation (PXY-BSQD-2022034).
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2025.
REFERENCES
1. Cui, X.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Room-temperature methane conversion by graphene-confined single iron atoms. Chem 2018, 4, 1902-10.
2. Daiyan, R.; Saputera, W. H.; Masood, H.; Leverett, J.; Lu, X.; Amal, R. A disquisition on the active sites of heterogeneous catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to value-added chemicals and fuel. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2020, 10, 1902106.
3. He, H.; Perman, J. A.; Zhu, G.; Ma, S. Metal-organic frameworks for CO2 chemical transformations. Small 2016, 12, 6309-24.
4. Wang, F.; Dreisinger, D.; Jarvis, M.; Hitchins, T.; Trytten, L. CO2 mineralization and concurrent utilization for nickel conversion from nickel silicates to nickel sulfides. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 126761.
5. Zhai, T.; Wang, C.; Gu, F.; Meng, Z.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. Dopamine/polyethylenimine-modified silica for enzyme immobilization and strengthening of enzymatic CO2 conversion. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15250-7.
6. Ma, Y.; Yi, X.; Wang, S.; et al. Selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction in aerobic environment by microporous Pd-porphyrin-based polymers coated hollow TiO2. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1400.
7. Sun, S.; Mao, Y.; Liu, F.; et al. Recent advances in nanoscale engineering of Pd-based electrocatalysts for selective CO2 electroreduction to formic acid/formate. Energy. Mater. 2024, 4, 400027.
8. Feng, D.; Li, Z.; Guo, H.; et al. Conjugated polyimides modified self-supported carbon electrodes for electrochemical conversion of CO2 to CO. Energy. Mater. 2024, 4, 400069.
9. Xu, D.; Li, K.; Jia, B.; et al. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction towards industrial applications. Carbon. Energy. 2023, 5, e230.
10. Liu, A.; Gao, M.; Ren, X.; et al. Current progress in electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction to fuels on heterogeneous catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 3541-62.
11. Zhou, L.; Lv, R. Rational catalyst design and interface engineering for electrochemical CO2 reduction to high-valued alcohols. J. Energy. Chem. 2022, 70, 310-31.
12. He, J.; Li, Y.; Huang, A.; Liu, Q.; Li, C. Electrolyzer and catalysts design from carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide electrochemical reduction. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2021, 4, 680-717.
13. Bushuyev, O. S.; De, L. P.; Dinh, C. T.; et al. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2018, 2, 825-32.
14. Fu, Y.; Xie, Q.; Wan, L.; Huang, Q.; Luo, J. Ethanol assisted cyclic voltammetry treatment of copper for electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene. Mater. Today. Energy. 2022, 29, 101105.
15. Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. A review on electrocatalytic CO2 conversion via C-C and C-N coupling. Carbon. Energy. 2024, 6, e513.
16. Saha, P.; Amanullah, S.; Dey, A. Selectivity in electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACC. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 134-44.
17. Overa, S.; Ko, B. H.; Zhao, Y.; Jiao, F. Electrochemical approaches for CO2 conversion to chemicals: a journey toward practical applications. ACC. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 638-48.
18. Liu, C.; Mei, X.; Han, C.; Gong, X.; Song, P.; Xu, W. Tuning strategies and structure effects of electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide reduction reaction. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 1618-33.
19. Zhang, M. D.; Si, D. H.; Yi, J. D.; Zhao, S. S.; Huang, Y. B.; Cao, R. Conductive phthalocyanine-based covalent organic framework for highly efficient electroreduction of carbon dioxide. Small 2020, 16, e2005254.
20. Xue, Y.; Guo, Y.; Cui, H.; Zhou, Z. Catalyst design for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multicarbon products. Small. Methods. 2021, 5, e2100736.
21. Liang, F.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Sun, X. Recent development of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction application to energy conversion. Small 2021, 17, e2100323.
22. Dai, S.; Huang, T. H.; Liu, W. I.; et al. Enhanced CO2 electrochemical reduction performance over Cu@AuCu catalysts at high noble metal utilization efficiency. Nano. Lett. 2021, 21, 9293-300.
23. Liu, L.; Akhoundzadeh, H.; Li, M.; Huang, H. Alloy catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small. Methods. 2023, 7, e2300482.
24. Bui, T. S.; Lovell, E. C.; Daiyan, R.; Amal, R. Defective metal oxides: lessons from CO2RR and applications in NOxRR. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2205814.
25. Zhao, X.; Feng, Q.; Liu, M.; et al. Built-in electric field promotes interfacial adsorption and activation of CO2 for C1 products over a wide potential window. ACS. Nano. 2024, 18, 9678-87.
26. Mukherjee, A.; Abdinejad, M.; Mahapatra, S. S.; Ruidas, B. C. Metal sulfide-based nanomaterials for electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 9300-32.
27. Cui, H.; Guo, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Peng, Z. Heteroatom-doped carbon materials and their composites as electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018, 6, 18782-93.
28. Yang, D. H.; Tao, Y.; Ding, X.; Han, B. H. Porous organic polymers for electrocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 761-91.
29. Hong, J.; Park, K. T.; Kim, Y. E.; et al. Ag/C composite catalysts derived from spray pyrolysis for efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133384.
30. Sun, K.; Qian, Y.; Jiang, H. L. Metal-organic frameworks for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217565.
31. Yang, R.; Fu, Y.; Wang, H.; et al. ZIF-8/covalent organic framework for enhanced CO2 photocatalytic reduction in gas-solid system. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138040.
32. Liu, G.; Liu, S.; Lai, C.; et al. Strategies for enhancing the photocatalytic and electrocatalytic efficiency of covalent triazine frameworks for CO2 reduction. Small 2024, 20, e2307853.
33. Mushtaq, N.; Ahmad, A.; Wang, X.; Khan, U.; Gao, J. MOFs/COFs hybrids as next-generation materials for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 486, 150098.
34. Pan, Y.; Abazari, R.; Tahir, B.; et al. Iron-based metal-organic frameworks and their derived materials for photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic reactions. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2024, 499, 215538.
35. Wang, J.; Tan, H. Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chu, H.; Chen, H. M. Linking the dynamic chemical state of catalysts with the product profile of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 17254-67.
36. Li, M.; Garg, S.; Chang, X.; et al. Toward excellence of transition metal-based catalysts for CO2 electrochemical reduction: an overview of strategies and rationales. Small. Methods. 2020, 4, 2000033.
37. Al-rowaili, F. N.; Jamal, A.; Ba, S. M. S.; Rana, A. A review on recent advances for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol using metal-organic framework (MOF) and non-MOF catalysts: challenges and future prospects. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 15895-914.
38. Wang, D.; Mao, J.; Zhang, C.; et al. Modulating microenvironments to enhance CO2 electroreduction performance. eScience 2023, 3, 100119.
39. Wu, Y.; Cao, S.; Hou, J.; et al. Rational design of nanocatalysts with nonmetal species modification for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2020, 10, 2000588.
40. Xiao, H.; Cheng, T.; Goddard, W. A. Atomistic mechanisms underlying selectivities in C1 and C2 products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 130-6.
41. Zhi, X.; Vasileff, A.; Zheng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Qiao, S. Role of oxygen-bound reaction intermediates in selective electrochemical CO2 reduction. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 3912-30.
42. Peng, H.; Tang, M. T.; Liu, X.; Schlexer, L. P.; Bajdich, M.; Abild-pedersen, F. The role of atomic carbon in directing electrochemical CO2 reduction to multicarbon products. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 473-82.
43. Garza, A. J.; Bell, A. T.; Head-Gordon, M. Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS. Catal. 2018, 8, 1490-9.
44. Zang, Y.; Wei, P.; Li, H.; Gao, D.; Wang, G. Catalyst design for electrolytic CO2 reduction toward low-carbon fuels and chemicals. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2022, 5, 140.
45. Jin, S.; Hao, Z.; Zhang, K.; Yan, Z.; Chen, J. Advances and challenges for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO: from fundamentals to industrialization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20627-48.
46. Verma, S.; Kim, B.; Jhong, H. R.; Ma, S.; Kenis, P. J. A gross-margin model for defining technoeconomic benchmarks in the electroreduction of CO2. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1972-9.
47. Lai, W.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Z.; Huang, H. Design strategies for markedly enhancing energy efficiency in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 3603-29.
48. Ma, W.; He, X.; Wang, W.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to multi-carbon compounds over Cu-based catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12897-914.
49. Yang, C.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Organic-inorganic hybrid nanomaterials for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small 2020, 16, e2001847.
50. Zhou, Y.; Abazari, R.; Chen, J.; et al. Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks and MOF-derived composites: recent progress on electro- and photoelectrocatalytic applications. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2022, 451, 214264.
51. Chang, F.; Xiao, M.; Miao, R.; et al. Copper-based catalysts for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction to multicarbon products. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2022, 5, 139.
52. Zhong, H.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, X. Bismuth nanodendrites as a high performance electrocatalyst for selective conversion of CO2 to formate. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016, 4, 13746-53.
53. Cao, L.; Huang, J.; Wu, X.; et al. Active-site stabilized Bi metal-organic framework-based catalyst for highly active and selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate over a wide potential window. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 19522-32.
54. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; et al. Highly efficient and durable aqueous electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to HCOOH with a novel bismuth-MOF: experimental and DFT studies. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 9776-87.
55. Ying, Y.; Khezri, B.; Kosina, J.; Pumera, M. Reconstructed bismuth-based metal-organic framework nanofibers for selective CO2-to-formate conversion: morphology engineering. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 3402-12.
56. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Chen, X.; et al. A bismuth-based zeolitic organic framework with coordination-linked metal cages for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to HCOOH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202311223.
57. Chen, S.; Chung, L. H.; Chen, S.; et al. Efficient lead removal by assembly of bio-derived ellagate framework, which enables electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate. Small 2024, 20, e2400978.
58. Wang, Y. R.; Huang, Q.; He, C. T.; et al. Oriented electron transmission in polyoxometalate-metalloporphyrin organic framework for highly selective electroreduction of CO2. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4466.
59. Zhu, H. L.; Huang, J. R.; Zhang, X. W.; et al. Highly efficient electroconversion of CO2 into CH4 by a metal-organic framework with trigonal pyramidal Cu(I)N3 active sites. ACS. Catal. 2021, 11, 11786-92.
60. Liu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, N.; Liao, P.; Chen, X. Insight into the effect of the d-orbital energy of copper ions in metal-organic frameworks on the selectivity of electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. ACS. Catal. 2022, 12, 2749-55.
61. Deng, J.; Qiu, L.; Xin, M.; et al. Boosting Electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper-based metal-organic frameworks via valence and coordination environment modulation. Small 2024, 20, e2311060.
62. Lu, P.; Lv, J.; Chen, Y.; et al. Steering the selectivity of carbon dioxide electroreduction from single-carbon to multicarbon products on metal-organic frameworks via facet engineering. Nano. Lett. 2024, 24, 1553-62.
63. Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Song, Y.; et al. Simultaneous defect and size control of metal-organic framework nanostructures for highly efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction to multicarbon products. ACS. Mater. Lett. 2023, 5, 2121-30.
64. Cao, L.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y.; et al. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to syngas with a stable H2/CO ratio in a wide potential range over ligand-engineered metal-organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 9954-9.
65. Shao, P.; Yi, L.; Chen, S.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, J. Metal-organic frameworks for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide: the role of metal centers. J. Energy. Chem. 2020, 40, 156-70.
66. Al-attas, T. A.; Marei, N. N.; Yong, X.; et al. Ligand-engineered metal-organic frameworks for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide. ACS. Catal. 2021, 11, 7350-7.
67. Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J.; et al. Ultrathin metal-organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nat. Energy. 2016, 1, 16184.
68. Zhu, D.; Guo, C.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Du, Y.; Qiao, S. Z. Two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks with high oxidation states for efficient electrocatalytic urea oxidation. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 10906-9.
69. Duan, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, C. Ultrathin metal-organic framework array for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15341.
70. Yuan, M.; Wang, R.; Fu, W.; et al. Ultrathin two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets with the inherent open active sites as electrocatalysts in aprotic Li-O2 batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 11403-13.
71. Hu, Q.; Huang, X.; Wang, Z.; et al. Unconventionally fabricating defect-rich NiO nanoparticles within ultrathin metal-organic framework nanosheets to enable high-output oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 2140-6.
72. Zhou, W.; Huang, D. D.; Wu, Y. P.; et al. Stable hierarchical bimetal-organic nanostructures as highperformance electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4227-31.
73. Majumder, M.; Santosh, M. S.; Viswanatha, R.; Thakur, A. K.; Dubal, D. P.; Jayaramulu, K. Two-dimensional conducting metal-organic frameworks enabled energy storage devices. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2021, 37, 396-416.
74. Zhao, Y.; Hou, N.; Wang, Y.; et al. All-fiber structure covered with two-dimensional conductive MOF materials to construct a comfortable, breathable and high-quality self-powered wearable sensor system. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 1248-56.
75. Ball, M.; Zhang, B.; Zhong, Y.; et al. Conjugated macrocycles in organic electronics. ACC. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 1068-78.
76. Lv, J.; Li, W.; Li, J.; et al. A triptycene-based 2D MOF with vertically extended structure for improving the electrocatalytic performance of CO2 to methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217958.
77. Singh, A. K.; Gu, L.; Dutta, C. A.; Indra, A. Exploring ligand-controlled C2 product selectivity in carbon dioxide reduction with copper metal-organic framework nanosheets. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 8803-11.
78. Zhao, J.; Lyu, H.; Wang, Z.; et al. Phthalocyanine and porphyrin catalysts for electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide: progress in regulation strategies and applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 312, 123404.
79. Downes, C. A.; Marinescu, S. C. Electrocatalytic metal-organic frameworks for energy applications. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 4374-92.
80. Hu, X. M.; Rønne, M. H.; Pedersen, S. U.; Skrydstrup, T.; Daasbjerg, K. Enhanced catalytic activity of cobalt porphyrin in CO2 electroreduction upon immobilization on carbon materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6468-72.
81. Han, J.; An, P.; Liu, S.; et al. Reordering d orbital energies of single-site catalysts for CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12711-6.
82. Bohan, A.; Jin, X.; Wang, M.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Uncoordinated amino groups of MIL-101 anchoring cobalt porphyrins for highly selective CO2 electroreduction. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2024, 654, 830-9.
83. Zhang, W.; Liu, S.; Yang, Y.; et al. Exclusive Co-N4 sites confined in two-dimensional metal-organic layers enabling highly selective CO2 electroreduction at industrial-level current. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202219241.
84. Ifraemov, R.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Hod, I. Photo-assisted electrochemical CO2 reduction to CH4 using a co-porphyrin-based metal-organic framework. Solar. RRL. 2023, 7, 2201068.
85. Wu, J. X.; Hou, S. Z.; Zhang, X. D.; et al. Cathodized copper porphyrin metal-organic framework nanosheets for selective formate and acetate production from CO2 electroreduction. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 2199-205.
86. Lee, J.; Choi, H.; Mun, J.; et al. Nanozyme based on porphyrinic metal-organic framework for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small. Struct. 2023, 4, 2370002.
87. Wu, J. X.; Yuan, W. W.; Xu, M.; Gu, Z. Y. Ultrathin 2D nickel zeolitic imidazolate framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 11634-7.
88. Zhang, M. D.; Huang, J. R.; Shi, W.; Liao, P. Q.; Chen, X. M. Synergistic effect in a metal-organic framework boosting the electrochemical CO2 overall splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 2439-47.
89. Zhong, H.; Ghorbani-Asl, M.; Ly, K. H.; et al. Synergistic electroreduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide on bimetallic layered conjugated metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1409.
90. Yi, J. D.; Si, D. H.; Xie, R.; et al. Conductive two-dimensional phthalocyanine-based metal-organic framework nanosheets for efficient electroreduction of CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 17108-14.
91. Zhang, M.; Si, D.; Yi, J.; Yin, Q.; Huang, Y.; Cao, R. Conductive phthalocyanine-based metal-organic framework as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction reaction. Sci. China. Chem. 2021, 64, 1332-9.
92. Kim, Y.; Park, S.; Shin, S.; et al. Time-resolved observation of C-C coupling intermediates on Cu electrodes for selective electrochemical CO2 reduction. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4301-11.
93. Qiu, X. F.; Zhu, H. L.; Huang, J. R.; Liao, P. Q.; Chen, X. M. Highly selective CO2 electroreduction to C2H4 using a metal-organic framework with dual active sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7242-6.
94. Liu, J.; Yang, D.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Tricycloquinazoline-based 2D conductive metal-organic frameworks as promising electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 14473-9.
95. Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Dai, L.; et al. The synthesis of hexaazatrinaphthylene-based 2D conjugated copper metal-organic framework for highly selective and stable electroreduction of CO2 to methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 16409-15.
96. Chen, S.; Li, W. H.; Jiang, W.; et al. MOF encapsulating N-heterocyclic carbene-ligated copper single-atom site catalyst towards efficient methane electrosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202114450.
97. Zhang, Y.; Dong, L. Z.; Li, S.; et al. Coordination environment dependent selectivity of single-site-Cu enriched crystalline porous catalysts in CO2 reduction to CH4. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6390.
98. Zheng, W.; Yang, X.; Li, Z.; et al. Designs of tandem catalysts and cascade catalytic systems for CO2 upgrading. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202307283.
99. Mo, Q.; Li, S.; Chen, C.; Song, H.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, L. Engineering dual sites into the confined nanospace of the porphyrinic metal-organic framework for tandem transformation of CO2 to ethylene. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 6093-101.
100. Du, H.; Fu, J.; Liu, L.; et al. Recent progress in electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide toward multi-carbon products. Mater. Today. 2022, 59, 182-99.
101. Cho, J. H.; Lee, C.; Hong, S. H.; et al. Transition metal ion doping on ZIF-8 enhances the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2208224.
102. Chen, T.; Huang, B.; Day, S.; et al. Differential adsorption of l- and d-lysine on achiral MFI zeolites as determined by synchrotron
103. Xue, Q.; Xie, Y.; Wu, S.; et al. A rational study on the geometric and electronic properties of single-atom catalysts for enhanced catalytic performance. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 23206-12.
104. Liu, K.; Bigdeli, F.; Panjehpour, A.; et al. Metal organic framework composites for reduction of CO2. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2023, 493, 215257.
105. Zhao, Y.; Zheng, L.; Jiang, D.; et al. Nanoengineering metal-organic framework-based materials for use in electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions. Small 2021, 17, e2006590.
106. Yoon, Y.; Hall, A. S.; Surendranath, Y. Tuning of silver catalyst mesostructure promotes selective carbon dioxide conversion into fuels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15282-6.
107. Nam, D. H.; De, L. P.; Rosas-Hernández, A.; et al. Molecular enhancement of heterogeneous CO2 reduction. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 266-76.
108. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Shimoni, R.; Liberman, I.; Ifraemov, R.; Rozenberg, I.; Hod, I. Assembly of a metal-organic framework (MOF) membrane on a solid electrocatalyst: introducing molecular-level control over heterogeneous CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 13423-9.
109. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Naeem, M. S.; Shiva, S. G.; et al. Local CO2 reservoir layer promotes rapid and selective electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3397.
110. Guntern, Y. T.; Pankhurst, J. R.; Vávra, J.; et al. Nanocrystal/metal-organic framework hybrids as electrocatalytic platforms for CO2 conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12632-9.
111. Kung, C.; Audu, C. O.; Peters, A. W.; Noh, H.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T. Copper nanoparticles installed in metal-organic framework thin films are electrocatalytically competent for CO2 reduction. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2017, 2, 2394-401.
112. Sun, B.; Hu, H.; Liu, H.; et al. Highly-exposed copper and ZIF-8 interface enables synthesis of hydrocarbons by electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2024, 661, 831-9.
113. Takaoka, Y.; Song, J. T.; Takagaki, A.; Watanabe, M.; Ishihara, T. Bi/UiO-66-derived electrocatalysts for high CO2-to-formate conversion rate. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2023, 326, 122400.
114. Lu, X.; Zhu, C.; Wu, Z.; Xuan, J.; Francisco, J. S.; Wang, H. In situ observation of the pH gradient near the gas diffusion electrode of CO2 reduction in alkaline electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 15438-44.
115. Aparna, R. K.; Surendran, V.; Roy, D.; Pathak, B.; Shaijumon, M. M.; Mandal, S. Silver nanoparticle-decorated defective Zr-based metal-organic frameworks for efficient electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction with ultrahigh mass activity. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2023, 6, 4072-8.
116. Cheng, Q.; Huang, M.; Xiao, L.; et al. Unraveling the influence of oxygen vacancy concentration on electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate over indium oxide catalysts. ACS. Catal. 2023, 13, 4021-9.
117. Pourebrahimi, S.; Pirooz, M.; Ahmadi, S.; Kazemeini, M.; Vafajoo, L. Nanoengineering of metal-based electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction: a critical review. Mater. Today. Phys. 2023, 38, 101250.
118. Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Song, Q.; et al. Assembling metal organic layer composites for high-performance electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202117058.
119. Wang, L.; Li, X.; Hao, L.; Hong, S.; Robertson, A. W.; Sun, Z. Integration of ultrafine CuO nanoparticles with two-dimensional MOFs for enhanced electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 1049-57.
120. Tan, X.; Yu, C.; Zhao, C.; et al. Restructuring of Cu2O to Cu2O@Cu-metal-organic frameworks for selective electrochemical reduction of CO2. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 9904-10.
121. Sun, M.; Xu, X.; Min, S.; He, J.; Li, K.; Kang, L. Controllable preparation of Cu2O/Cu-CuTCPP MOF heterojunction for enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to C2H4. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 659, 159937.
122. Wang, P.; Yang, H.; Tang, C.; et al. Boosting electrocatalytic CO2-to-ethanol production via asymmetric C-C coupling. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3754.
123. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, G. Self-polarization triggered multiple polar units toward electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethanol with high selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202302241.
124. Xin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Dong, L.; Lan, Y. Metallocene implanted metalloporphyrin organic framework for highly selective CO2 electroreduction. Nano. Energy. 2020, 67, 104233.
125. Xin, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Implanting polypyrrole in metal-porphyrin MOFs: enhanced electrocatalytic performance for CO2RR. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 13, 54959-66.
126. Dou, S.; Song, J.; Xi, S.; et al. Boosting electrochemical CO2 reduction on metal-organic frameworks via ligand doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4041-5.
127. Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Huang, N.; Li, X.; Xu, Q. Recent advances in metal-organic framework-derived materials for electrocatalytic and photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2024, 510, 215858.
128. Zheng, Y.; Cheng, P.; Xu, J.; et al. MOF-derived nitrogen-doped nanoporous carbon for electroreduction of CO2 to CO: the calcining temperature effect and the mechanism. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 4911-7.
129. Payra, S.; Ray, S.; Sharma, R.; Tarafder, K.; Mohanty, P.; Roy, S. Photo- and electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 over metal-organic frameworks and their derived oxides: a correlation of the reaction mechanism with the electronic structure. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 2476-89.
130. Wu, J. X.; Zhu, X. R.; Liang, T.; et al. Sn(101) derived from metal-organic frameworks for efficient electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 9653-9.
131. Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Feng, D.; et al. MOF-derived 1D/3D N-doped porous carbon for spatially confined electrochemical CO2 reduction to adjustable syngas. Carbon. Energy. 2024, 6, e461.
132. Guo, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhou, X.; et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO with 100% faradaic efficiency by using pyrolyzed zeolitic imidazolate frameworks supported on carbon nanotube networks. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017, 5, 24867-73.
133. Ren, Q.; Wang, H.; Lu, X. F.; Tong, Y. X.; Li, G. R. Recent progress on MOF-derived heteroatom-doped carbon-based electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700515.
134. Kuang, M.; Guan, A.; Gu, Z.; Han, P.; Qian, L.; Zheng, G. Enhanced N-doping in mesoporous carbon for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 conversion. Nano. Res. 2019, 12, 2324-9.
135. Ye, L.; Ying, Y.; Sun, D.; et al. Highly efficient porous carbon electrocatalyst with controllable N-species content for selective CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3244-51.
136. Wang, R.; Sun, X.; Ould-Chikh, S.; et al. Metal-organic-framework-mediated nitrogen-doped carbon for CO2 electrochemical reduction. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 14751-8.
137. Frank, S.; Svensson, G. E.; Bøjesen, E. D.; et al. Exploring the influence of atomic level structure, porosity, and stability of bismuth(iii) coordination polymers on electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 26298-310.
138. Liu, J.; Peng, L.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Metal-organic-frameworks-derived Cu/Cu2O catalyst with ultrahigh current density for continuous-flow CO2 electroreduction. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15739-46.
139. Guo, W.; Sun, X.; Chen, C.; et al. Metal-organic framework-derived indium-copper bimetallic oxide catalysts for selective aqueous electroreduction of CO2. Green. Chem. 2019, 21, 503-8.
140. Payra, S.; Roy, S. From Trash to treasure: probing cycloaddition and photocatalytic reduction of CO2 over cerium-based metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021, 125, 8497-507.
141. Smolders, S.; Jacobsen, J.; Stock, N.; De, V. D. Selective catalytic reduction of NO by cerium-based metal-organic frameworks. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 337-41.
142. Han, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, K.; et al. In situ synthesis of titanium doped hybrid metal-organic framework UiO-66 with enhanced adsorption capacity for organic dyes. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 1870-80.
143. Yang, D.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, X.; et al. Nanoporous Cu/Ni oxide composites: efficient catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2 in aqueous electrolytes. Green. Chem. 2018, 20, 3705-10.
144. Kempasiddaiah, M.; Samanta, R.; Panigrahy, S.; Trivedi, R. K.; Chakraborty, B.; Barman, S. Electrochemical reconstruction of a 1D Cu(PyDC)(H2O) MOF into in situ formed Cu-Cu2O heterostructures on carbon cloth as an efficient electrocatalyst for CO2 conversion. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 10458-73.
145. Zhang, Y.; Sun, T.; Zhang, P.; Liu, K.; Li, F.; Xu, L. Synthesizing MOF-derived NiNC catalyst via surfactant modified strategy for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 to CO. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2023, 631, 96-101.
146. Zhang, X.; Fu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Qiao, J. Bismuth anchored on MWCNTs with controlled ultrafine nanosize enables high-efficient electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate fuel. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 4871-6.
147. Vasileff, A.; Zheng, Y.; Qiao, S. Z. Carbon solving carbon’s problems: recent progress of nanostructured carbon-based catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of CO2. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2017, 7, 1700759.
148. Gong, Q.; Ding, P.; Xu, M.; et al. Structural defects on converted bismuth oxide nanotubes enable highly active electrocatalysis of carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2807.
149. Jia, M.; Choi, C.; Wu, T. S.; et al. Carbon-supported Ni nanoparticles for efficient CO2 electroreduction. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 8775-80.
150. Huang, H.; Shen, K.; Chen, F.; Li, Y. Metal-organic frameworks as a good platform for the fabrication of single-atom catalysts. ACS. Catal. 2020, 10, 6579-86.
151. Wang, H.; Wu, X.; Liu, G.; Wu, S.; Xu, R. Bimetallic MOF derived nickel nanoclusters supported by nitrogen-doped carbon for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nano. Res. 2023, 16, 4546-53.
152. Chang, B.; Min, Z.; Liu, N.; et al. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to syngas. Green. Energy. Environ. 2024, 9, 1085-100.
153. Ringe, S. The importance of a charge transfer descriptor for screening potential CO2 reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2598.
154. Song, C.; Wang, X.; Song, G.; et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 by Co-Cu metastable alloy nanoparticles derived from MOFs. J. Alloys. Compd. 2024, 994, 174693.
155. Fan, J.; Zhao, X.; Mao, X.; et al. Large-area vertically aligned bismuthene nanosheet arrays from galvanic replacement reaction for efficient electrochemical CO2 conversion. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2100910.
156. Liu, S. Q.; Shahini, E.; Gao, M. R.; et al. Bi2O3 nanosheets grown on carbon nanofiber with inherent hydrophobicity for high-performance CO2 electroreduction in a wide potential window. ACS. Nano. 2021, 15, 17757-68.
157. Ma, S.; Wu, K.; Fan, S.; et al. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction enhanced by Sb doping in MOF-derived carbon-supported Bi-based materials. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 339, 126520.
158. Wang, Y.; Sui, P.; Xu, C.; et al. Optimizing Bi active sites by Ce doping for boosting formate production in a wide potential window. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024, 11, 926-35.
159. Zhao, K.; Liu, Y.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Yu, H. CO2 electroreduction at low overpotential on oxide-derived Cu/carbons fabricated from metal organic framework. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 5302-11.
160. Yang, H.; Yu, X.; Shao, J.; et al. In situ encapsulated and well dispersed Co3O4 nanoparticles as efficient and stable electrocatalysts for high-performance CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 15675-80.
161. Deng, P.; Yang, F.; Wang, Z.; et al. Metal-organic framework-derived carbon nanorods encapsulating bismuth oxides for rapid and selective CO2 electroreduction to formate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10807-13.
162. Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, Q.; Hu, Z. Recent advances in non-precious metal-nitrogen-carbon single-site catalysts for CO2 electroreduction reaction to CO. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2022, 5, 156.
163. Ma, S.; Han, W.; Han, W.; Dong, F.; Tang, Z. Recent advances and future perspectives in MOF-derived single-atom catalysts and their application: a review. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 3315-63.
164. Wang, S.; Yuan, X.; Zhou, S.; et al. Single-atomic-Ni electrocatalyst derived from phthalocyanine-modified MOF for convoying CO2 intelligent utilization. Energy. Mater. 2024, 4, 400032.
165. Chen, X.; Ma, D.; Chen, B.; et al. Metal-organic framework-derived mesoporous carbon nanoframes embedded with atomically dispersed Fe-N active sites for efficient bifunctional oxygen and carbon dioxide electroreduction. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2020, 267, 118720.
166. Ye, Y.; Cai, F.; Li, H.; et al. Surface functionalization of ZIF-8 with ammonium ferric citrate toward high exposure of Fe-N active sites for efficient oxygen and carbon dioxide electroreduction. Nano. Energy. 2017, 38, 281-9.
167. Qin, X.; Zhu, S.; Xiao, F.; Zhang, L.; Shao, M. Active sites on heterogeneous single-iron-atom electrocatalysts in CO2 reduction reaction. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2019, 4, 1778-83.
168. Yan, C.; Li, H.; Ye, Y.; et al. Coordinatively unsaturated nickel-nitrogen sites towards selective and high-rate CO2 electroreduction. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1204-10.
169. Chung, H. T.; Cullen, D. A.; Higgins, D.; et al. Direct atomic-level insight into the active sites of a high-performance PGM-free ORR catalyst. Science 2017, 357, 479-84.
170. Liu, K.; Wu, G.; Wang, G. Role of local carbon structure surrounding FeN4 sites in boosting the catalytic activity for oxygen reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017, 121, 11319-24.
171. Pan, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; et al. Atomic-level active sites of efficient imidazolate framework-derived nickel catalysts for CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 26231-7.
172. Jiao, L.; Yang, W.; Wan, G.; et al. Single-atom electrocatalysts from multivariate metal-organic frameworks for highly selective reduction of CO2 at low pressures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 20589-95.
173. Li, J.; Pršlja, P.; Shinagawa, T.; et al. Volcano trend in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction activity over atomically dispersed metal sites on nitrogen-doped carbon. ACS. Catal. 2019, 9, 10426-39.
174. Lee, S. M.; Cheon, W. S.; Lee, M. G.; Jang, H. W. Coordination environment in single-atom catalysts for high-performance electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small. Struct. 2023, 4, 2200236.
175. Wang, H.; Tong, Y.; Chen, P. Microenvironment regulation strategies of single-atom catalysts for advanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO. Nano. Energy. 2023, 118, 108967.
176. Zhang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Yang, W.; Xie, C.; Jiang, H. L. Rational fabrication of low-coordinate single-atom Ni electrocatalysts by MOFs for highly selective CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7607-11.
177. Gong, Y. N.; Jiao, L.; Qian, Y.; et al. Regulating the coordination environment of MOF-templated single-atom nickel electrocatalysts for boosting CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2705-9.
178. Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, X.; et al. Regulation of coordination number over single Co sites: triggering the efficient electroreduction of CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1944-8.
179. Jia, C.; Tan, X.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Sulfur-dopant-promoted electroreduction of CO2 over coordinatively unsaturated Ni-N2 moieties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23342-8.
180. Zhao, D.; Yu, K.; Song, P.; et al. Atomic-level engineering Fe1N2O2 interfacial structure derived from oxygen-abundant metal-organic frameworks to promote electrochemical CO2 reduction. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 3795-804.
181. Wei, S.; Jiang, X.; He, C.; et al. Construction of single-atom copper sites with low coordination number for efficient CO2 electroreduction to CH4. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 6187-92.
182. Guan, A.; Chen, Z.; Quan, Y.; et al. Boosting CO2 electroreduction to CH4 via tuning neighboring single-copper sites. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2020, 5, 1044-53.
183. Jiao, L.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Non-bonding interaction of neighboring Fe and Ni single-atom pairs on MOF-derived N-doped carbon for enhanced CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 19417-24.
184. Zhong, D. C.; Gong, Y. N.; Zhang, C.; Lu, T. B. Dinuclear metal synergistic catalysis for energy conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 3170-214.
185. Pei, J.; Zhang, G.; Liao, J.; et al. Low-coordinated Co-Mn diatomic sites derived from metal-organic framework nanorods promote electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2024, 12, 13694-702.
186. Jin, Z.; Yang, M.; Dong, Y.; et al. Atomic dispersed hetero-pairs for enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nanomicro. Lett. 2023, 16, 4.
187. Wang, Y.; Sun, R.; Chen, Y.; et al. Highly crystalline covalent triazine frameworks modified separator for lithium metal batteries. Energy. Mater. 2024, 4, 400056.
188. Chen, X.; Geng, K.; Liu, R.; et al. Covalent organic frameworks: chemical approaches to designer structures and built-in functions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5050-91.
189. Ali, S. A.; Sadiq, I.; Ahmad, T. Superlative porous organic polymers for photochemical and electrochemical CO2 reduction applications: from synthesis to functionality. Langmuir 2024, 40, 10414-32.
190. Zhu, X.; Tian, C.; Wu, H.; et al. Pyrolyzed triazine-based nanoporous frameworks enable electrochemical CO2 reduction in water. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 43588-94.
191. Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Hatton, T. A.; Liu, Y. Redox-tunable Lewis bases for electrochemical carbon dioxide capture. Nat. Energy. 2022, 7, 1065-75.
192. Xiao, Y.; Lu, J.; Chen, K.; Cao, Y.; Gong, C.; Ke, F. S. Linkage engineering in covalent organic frameworks for metal-free electrocatalytic C2H4 production from CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202404738.
193. Liu, M.; Yang, S.; Yang, X.; et al. Post-synthetic modification of covalent organic frameworks for CO2 electroreduction. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3800.
194. Dubed, B. G. C.; Franco, F.; Liu, C.; et al. Toward the understanding of the structure-activity correlation in single-site Mn covalent organic frameworks for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2024, 7, 1348-57.
195. Zhang, L.; Li, X. X.; Lang, Z. L.; et al. Enhanced cuprophilic interactions in crystalline catalysts facilitate the highly selective electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3808-16.
196. Sakamoto, N.; Nishimura, Y. F.; Nonaka, T.; et al. Self-assembled cuprous coordination polymer as a catalyst for CO2 electrochemical reduction into C2 products. ACS. Catal. 2020, 10, 10412-9.
197. Sakamoto, N.; Sekizawa, K.; Sato, S.; et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction improved by tuning the Cu-Cu distance in halogen-bridged dinuclear cuprous coordination polymers. J. Catal. 2021, 404, 12-7.
198. Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Zwitterionic ultrathin covalent organic polymers for high-performance electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2021, 284, 119750.
199. Arisnabarreta, N.; Hao, Y.; Jin, E.; et al. Single-layered imine-linked porphyrin-based two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks targeting CO2 reduction. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2024, 14, 2304371.
200. Zhang, M.; Liao, J. P.; Li, R. H.; et al. Green synthesis of bifunctional phthalocyanine-porphyrin cofs in water for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction coupled with methanol oxidation. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2023, 10, nwad226.
201. Wei, S.; Zou, H.; Rong, W.; Zhang, F.; Ji, Y.; Duan, L. Conjugated nickel phthalocyanine polymer selectively catalyzes CO2-to-CO conversion in a wide operating potential window. App. Catal. B. Environ. 2021, 284, 119739.
202. Xie, T.; Chen, S.; Yue, Y.; Sheng, T.; Huang, N.; Xiong, Y. Biomimetic phthalocyanine-based covalent organic frameworks with tunable pendant groups for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202411188.
203. Kong, X.; Liu, B.; Tong, Z.; et al. Charge-switchable ligand ameliorated cobalt polyphthalocyanine polymers for high-current-density electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. SmartMat 2024, 5, e1262.
204. Lu, C.; Yang, J.; Wei, S.; et al. Atomic Ni anchored covalent triazine framework as high efficient electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide conversion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806884.
205. Wang, T.; Guo, L.; Pei, H.; et al. Electron-rich pincer ligand-coupled cobalt porphyrin polymer with single-atom sites for efficient (photo)electrocatalytic CO2 reduction at ultralow overpotential. Small 2021, 17, e2102957.
206. Johnson, E. M.; Haiges, R.; Marinescu, S. C. Covalent-organic frameworks composed of rhenium bipyridine and metal porphyrins: designing heterobimetallic frameworks with two distinct metal sites. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 37919-27.
207. Zhang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Li, H.; et al. Viologen linker as a strong electron-transfer mediator in the covalent organic framework to enhance electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023, 7, 2661-70.
208. Li, J.; Tan, Y.; Lin, J.; et al. Coupling electrocatalytic redox-active sites in a three-dimensional bimetalloporphyrin-based covalent organic framework for enhancing carbon dioxide reduction and oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2024, 12, 9478-85.
209. Endo, K.; Raza, A.; Yao, L.; et al. Downsizing porphyrin covalent organic framework particles using protected precursors for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2313197.
210. Yue, Y.; Cai, P.; Xu, K.; et al. Stable bimetallic polyphthalocyanine covalent organic frameworks as superior electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 18052-60.
211. Qiu, X. F.; Huang, J. R.; Yu, C.; et al. A stable and conductive covalent organic framework with isolated active sites for highly selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide to acetate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202206470.
212. Zhang, M. D.; Huang, J. R.; Shi, W.; Liao, P. Q.; Chen, X. M. Self-accelerating effect in a covalent-organic framework with imidazole groups boosts electroreduction of CO2 to CO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202308195.
213. Wu, Q. J.; Si, D. H.; Wu, Q.; Dong, Y. L.; Cao, R.; Huang, Y. B. Boosting electroreduction of CO2 over cationic covalent organic frameworks: hydrogen bonding effects of halogen ions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202215687.
214. Liu, M.; Cui, C. X.; Yang, S.; et al. Elaborate modulating binding strength of intermediates via three-component covalent organic frameworks for CO2 reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202401750.
215. Wang, T.; Xu, L.; Chen, Z.; et al. Central site regulation of cobalt porphyrin conjugated polymer to give highly active and selective CO2 reduction to CO in aqueous solution. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2021, 291, 120128.
216. Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wei, W.; Ma, D. D.; Wu, X. T.; Zhu, Q. L. Efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction over ultrathin covalent organic framework nanolayers with isolated cobalt porphyrin units. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020, 12, 37986-92.
217. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lei, H.; et al. Tuning electronic structures of covalent co porphyrin polymers for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction in aqueous solutions. CCS. Chem. 2022, 4, 2959-67.
218. Wang, R.; Wang, X.; Weng, W.; et al. Proton/electron donors enhancing electrocatalytic activity of supported conjugated microporous polymers for CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202115503.
219. Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Lu, C.; et al. Single-atom anchored curved carbon surface for efficient CO2 electro-reduction with nearly 100% co selectivity and industrially-relevant current density. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2205553.
220. Ao, K.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Activating the Ni-contenting carbon nanotube by covalent triazine frameworks to form atomically dispersed Ni sites with curvature effect for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small. Struct. 2024, 5, 2300500.
221. Trindell, J. A.; Clausmeyer, J.; Crooks, R. M. Size stability and H2/CO selectivity for Au nanoparticles during electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 16161-7.
222. Zhang, L.; Wei, Z.; Thanneeru, S.; et al. A polymer solution to prevent nanoclustering and improve the selectivity of metal nanoparticles for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15834-40.
223. Zheng, Y.; Vasileff, A.; Zhou, X.; Jiao, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S. Z. Understanding the roadmap for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multi-carbon oxygenates and hydrocarbons on copper-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7646-59.
224. Popović, S.; Smiljanić, M.; Jovanovič, P.; Vavra, J.; Buonsanti, R.; Hodnik, N. Stability and degradation mechanisms of copper-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 14736-46.
225. Zheng, M.; Wang, P.; Zhi, X.; et al. Electrocatalytic CO2-to-C2+ with ampere-level current on heteroatom-engineered copper via tuning *CO intermediate coverage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 14936-44.
226. Liu, Z.; Lv, X.; Kong, S.; et al. Interfacial water tuning by intermolecular spacing for stable CO2 electroreduction to C2+ products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202309319.
227. Zhu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Ren, Z.; et al. Covalent organic framework ionomer steering the CO2 electroreduction pathway on Cu at industrial-grade current density. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 1572-9.
228. Meng, D. L.; Zhang, M. D.; Si, D. H.; et al. Highly selective tandem electroreduction of CO2 to ethylene over atomically isolated nickel-nitrogen site/copper nanoparticle catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 25485-92.
229. Zhou, L.; Tian, Q.; Shang, X.; et al. Heterostructure construction of covalent organic frameworks/Ti3C2-MXene for high-efficiency electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Green. Chem. 2024, 26, 1454-61.
230. Popov, D. A.; Luna, J. M.; Orchanian, N. M.; Haiges, R.; Downes, C. A.; Marinescu, S. C. A 2,2'-bipyridine-containing covalent organic framework bearing rhenium(i) tricarbonyl moieties for CO2 reduction. Dalton. Trans. 2018, 47, 17450-60.
231. Tang, J.; Zhu, C.; Jiang, T.; et al. Anion exchange-induced single-molecule dispersion of cobalt porphyrins in a cationic porous organic polymer for enhanced electrochemical CO2 reduction via secondary-coordination sphere interactions. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 18677-86.
232. Wu, Q. J.; Si, D. H.; Ye, S.; Dong, Y. L.; Cao, R.; Huang, Y. B. Photocoupled electroreduction of CO2 over photosensitizer-decorated covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 19856-65.
233. Yang, Y. L.; Wang, Y. R.; Dong, L. Z.; et al. A honeycomb-like porous crystalline hetero-electrocatalyst for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2206706.
234. Liu, G.; Li, X.; Liu, M.; et al. Dimensional engineering of covalent organic frameworks derived carbons for electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. SusMat 2023, 3, 834-42.
235. Lin, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Temperature-dependent CO2 electroreduction over Fe-N-C and Ni-N-C single-atom catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 133, 26786-90.
Cite This Article

How to Cite
Ma, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yu, Q.; Lyu, S.; Duan, X.; Zhang, S. Heterogeneous nanoporous organic frameworks-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction. Energy Mater. 2025, 5, 500053. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2024.215
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
About This Article
Special Issue
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data

Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at [email protected].