fig11
Figure 11. Comparison of design alternatives in terms of integrated seismic and energy/environmental (A) Expected Annual Losses - EAL, (B) Carbon Emissions - CO2, (C) Resilience Loss - RL, and (D) the overall weighted loss.
Figure 11. Comparison of design alternatives in terms of integrated seismic and energy/environmental (A) Expected Annual Losses - EAL, (B) Carbon Emissions - CO2, (C) Resilience Loss - RL, and (D) the overall weighted loss.
All published articles will be preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/