REFERENCES
1. Grzybowski A, Pawlikowska-Łagód K, Lambert WC. A history of artificial intelligence. Clin Dermatol. 2024;42:221-9.
2. Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:2328-31.
3. Mayo RC, Leung J. Artificial intelligence and deep learning - radiology’s next frontier? Clin Imaging. 2018;49:87-8.
5. Li S, Brantley E. Malpractice liability risk and use of diagnostic imaging services: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:1403-12.
6. Herzog R, Elgort DR, Flanders AE, Moley PJ. Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period. Spine J. 2017;17:554-61.
9. IBM. AI vs. machine learning vs. deep learning vs. neural networks: what’s the difference? 2023. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning-vs-neural-networks. (accessed 2025-02-11).
10. Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev. 1959;3:210-29.
11. Jakhar D, Kaur I. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: definitions and differences. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45:131-2.
12. Tian C, Xu Y, Li Z, Zuo W, Fei L, Liu H. Attention-guided CNN for image denoising. Neural Netw. 2020;124:117-29.
13. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465-75.
14. Mugge L, DeBacker Dang D, Caras A, et al. Osteoporosis as a risk factor for intraoperative complications and long-term instrumentation failure in patients with scoliotic spinal deformity. Spine. 2022;47:1435-42.
15. Gillespie CW, Morin PE. Trends and disparities in osteoporosis screening among women in the United States, 2008-2014. Am J Med. 2017;130:306-16.
16. Malik AT, Retchin S, Phillips FM, et al. Declining trend in osteoporosis management and screening following vertebral compression fractures - a national analysis of commercial insurance and medicare advantage beneficiaries. Spine J. 2020;20:538-46.
17. Ferizi U, Besser H, Hysi P, et al. Artificial intelligence applied to osteoporosis: a performance comparison of machine learning algorithms in predicting fragility fractures from MRI data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:1029-38.
18. Kathirvelu D, Vinupritha P, Kalpana V. A computer aided diagnosis system for measurement of mandibular cortical thickness on dental panoramic radiographs in prediction of women with low bone mineral density. J Med Syst. 2019;43:148.
19. Pan Y, Shi D, Wang H, et al. Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest computed tomography scans obtained for lung cancer screening. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:4107-16.
20. Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE. Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:611-7.
21. Lin RT, Dalton JF, Como CJ, et al. Formal radiologist interpretations of intraoperative spine radiographs have low clinical value. Spine. 2024;49:933-40.
22. Levi AD, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson P, et al. Neurologic deterioration secondary to unrecognized spinal instability following trauma - a multicenter study. Spine. 2006;31:451-8.
23. Parenteau CS, Lau EC, Campbell IC, Courtney A. Prevalence of spine degeneration diagnosis by type, age, gender, and obesity using Medicare data. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5389.
24. Jamaludin A, Lootus M, Kadir T, et al; Genodisc Consortium. ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2017: Automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1374-83.
25. Kim K, Kim S, Lee YH, Lee SH, Lee HS, Kim S. Performance of the deep convolutional neural network based magnetic resonance image scoring algorithm for differentiating between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13124.
26. Pan Y, Chen Q, Chen T, et al. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:3035-43.
27. Guermazi A, Tannoury C, Kompel AJ, et al. Improving radiographic fracture recognition performance and efficiency using artificial intelligence. Radiology. 2022;302:627-36.
28. Voter AF, Larson ME, Garrett JW, Yu JJ. Diagnostic accuracy and failure mode analysis of a deep learning algorithm for the detection of cervical spine fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:1550-6.
29. Terai H, Suzuki A, Toyoda H, et al. Tandem keyhole foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: retrospective review of 35 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:38.
30. Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Tatsugami F, et al. Possibility of deep learning in medical imaging focusing improvement of computed tomography image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020;44:161-7.
31. Kaplan S, Zhu YM. Full-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET image using deep learning: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:773-8.
32. Gong E, Pauly JM, Wintermark M, Zaharchuk G. Deep learning enables reduced gadolinium dose for contrast-enhanced brain MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:330-40.
33. Edelstein WA, Mahesh M, Carrino JA. MRI: time is dose - and money and versatility. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:650-2.
34. Mehdi Z. MRI wait times must be shortened to improve health care, cornell researchers say 2018. https://cornellsun.com/2018/02/08/mri-wait-times-must-be-shortened-to-improve-health-care-cornell-researchers-say/. (accessed 2025-02-11).
35. McLean B, Thompson D. MRI and the critical care patient: clinical, operational, and financial challenges. Crit Care Res Pract. 2023;2023:2772181.
36. Meléndez JC, McCrank E. Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA. 1993;270:745-7.
37. Zaharchuk G, Gong E, Wintermark M, Rubin D, Langlotz CP. Deep learning in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:1776-84.
38. Lundervold AS, Lundervold A. An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI. Z Med Phys. 2019;29:102-27.
39. Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017;26:3142-55.
40. Bash S, Johnson B, Gibbs W, Zhang T, Shankaranarayanan A, Tanenbaum LN. Deep learning image processing enables 40% faster spinal MR scans which match or exceed quality of standard of care: a prospective multicenter multireader study. Clin Neuroradiol. 2022;32:197-203.
41. Bash S, Wang L, Airriess C, et al. Deep learning enables 60% accelerated volumetric brain MRI while preserving quantitative performance: a prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:2130-7.
42. Wiesinger F, Ho ML. Zero-TE MRI: principles and applications in the head and neck. Br J Radiol. 2022;95:20220059.
43. Ensle F, Kaniewska M, Lohezic M, Guggenberger R. Enhanced bone assessment of the shoulder using zero-echo time MRI with deep-learning image reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol. 2024;53:2597-606.
44. Aydıngöz Ü, Yıldız AE, Ergen FB. Zero echo time musculoskeletal MRI: technique, optimization, applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2022;42:1398-414.
45. Morbée L, Chen M, Herregods N, Pullens P, Jans LBO. MRI-based synthetic CT of the lumbar spine: geometric measurements for surgery planning in comparison with CT. Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109999.
46. Spadea MF, Maspero M, Zaffino P, Seco J. Deep learning based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: a review. Med Phys. 2021;48:6537-66.
47. Jans LBO, Chen M, Elewaut D, et al. MRI-based synthetic CT in the detection of structural lesions in patients with suspected sacroiliitis: comparison with MRI. Radiology. 2021;298:343-9.
48. van der Kolk BBYM, Slotman DJJ, Nijholt IM, et al. Bone visualization of the cervical spine with deep learning-based synthetic CT compared to conventional CT: a single-center noninferiority study on image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2022;154:110414.
49. Wiesinger F, Bylund M, Yang J, et al. Zero TE-based pseudo-CT image conversion in the head and its application in PET/MR attenuation correction and MR-guided radiation therapy planning. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80:1440-51.
50. Leynes AP, Yang J, Wiesinger F, et al. Zero-echo-time and Dixon deep pseudo-CT (ZeDD CT): direct generation of pseudo-CT images for pelvic PET/MRI attenuation correction using deep convolutional neural networks with multiparametric MRI. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:852-8.
51. Kisinde S, Hu X, Hesselbacher S, Lieberman IH. The predictive accuracy of surgical planning using pre-op planning software and a robotic guidance system. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:3676-87.
52. Wu H, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Li S. Automated comprehensive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessment using MVC-Net. Med Image Anal. 2018;48:1-11.
53. Djurasovic M, Glassman SD. Correlation of radiographic and clinical findings in spinal deformities. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2007;18:223-7.
54. Weng CH, Wang CL, Huang YJ, et al. Artificial intelligence for automatic measurement of sagittal vertical axis using ResUNet framework. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1826.
55. Wang X, Zhai S, Niu Y. Automatic vertebrae localization and identification by combining deep SSAE contextual features and structured regression forest. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:336-48.
56. Suzani A, Seitel A, Liu Y, Fels S, Rohling RN, Abolmaesumi P. Fast automatic vertebrae detection and localization in pathological CT scans - a deep learning approach. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF, editors. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - MICCAI 2015. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 678-86.
57. Martín-Noguerol T, Oñate Miranda M, Amrhein TJ, et al. The role of artificial intelligence in the assessment of the spine and spinal cord. Eur J Radiol. 2023;161:110726.
58. Miura J, Doita M, Miyata K, et al. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:8-13.
59. Hatem R, Simmons B, Thornton JE. A call to address AI “hallucinations” and how healthcare professionals can mitigate their risks. Cureus. 2023;15:e44720.
60. van Leeuwen KG, Schalekamp S, Rutten MJCM, van Ginneken B, de Rooij M. Artificial intelligence in radiology: 100 commercially available products and their scientific evidence. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:3797-804.
61. Kim DW, Jang HY, Kim KW, Shin Y, Park SH. Design characteristics of studies reporting the performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for diagnostic analysis of medical images: results from recently published papers. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20:405-10.
62. Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1:e271-97.
