REFERENCES
1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) [Last accessed on 10 Jan 2024].
2. Carrel A VIII. On the experimental surgery of the thoracic aorta and heart. Ann Surg 1910;52:83-95.
4. Writing Committee Members; Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the american college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:e21-129.
5. Head SJ, Milojevic M, Taggart DP, Puskas JD. Current practice of state-of-the-art surgical coronary revascularization. Circulation 2017;136:1331-45.
6. Bachar BJ, Manna B. Coronary artery bypass graft. 2023. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507836/ [Last accessed on 10 Jan 2024].
7. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) rate. Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/indicators/coronary-artery-bypass-graft-cabg-rate [Last accessed on 10 Jan 2024].
8. van Gulik L, Janssen LI, Ahlers SJ, et al. Risk factors for chronic thoracic pain after cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:1309-13.
9. Whitlock RP, Devereaux PJ, Teoh KH, et al. Methylprednisolone in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (SIRS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:1243-53.
10. Day JR, Taylor KM. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Surg 2005;3:129-40.
11. Dieberg G, Smart NA, King N. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2016;223:554-60.
12. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2011;124:e652-735.
13. Ruel M, Williams A, Ouzounian M, et al. Missing the goal with the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for coronary artery revascularization. Can J Cardiol 2022;38:705-8.
14. Yadava OP, Narayan P, Padmanabhan C, et al. IACTS position statement on “2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization”: section 7.1-a consensus document. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;38:126-33.
15. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the coronary artery bypass graft surgery trialists collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563-70.
16. Al-Atassi T, Toeg H, Chan V, Ruel M. Coronary artery bypass grafting. In: Surgery of the chest, 9th ed. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2016, pp. 1551-79.
17. McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, Pothula VR, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation 2009;120:S78-84.
18. Guo MH, Toubar O, Issa H, et al. Long-term survival, cardiovascular, and functional outcomes after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in 566 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023:S0022-5223(23)00652-9.
19. Nantsios A, Elmistekawy E, Ponnambalam M, Lambert AS, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with chronic tracheostoma: alternative to reduce sternal wound complication risk. Innovations 2022;17:574-6.
20. Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:804-10.
21. Calafiore AM, Giammarco GD, Teodori G, et al. Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1658-65.
22. Marin-Cuartas M, Sá MP, Torregrossa G, Davierwala PM. Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery: robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass techniques. JTCVS Tech 2021;10:170-7.
23. Shen L, Hu S, Wang H, et al. One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2525-33.
24. Rabindranauth P, Burns JG, Vessey TT, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Paramesh V. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Innovations 2014;9:421-6.
25. Hedberg M, Boivie P, Engström KG. Early and delayed stroke after coronary surgery - an analysis of risk factors and the impact on short- and long-term survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:379-87.
26. Albert A, Ennker J, Hegazy Y, et al. Implementation of the aortic no-touch technique to reduce stroke after off-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156:544-54.e4.
27. Ziankou A, Ostrovsky Y. Early and midterm results of no-touch aorta multivessel small thoracotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity score-matched study. Innovations 2015;10:258-67.
28. Seki T, Yoshida T. Comparison of Mid-term graft patency between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;23:141-8.
29. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2375-84.
30. Ridderstolpe L, Gill H, Granfeldt H, Ahlfeldt H, Rutberg H. Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1168-75.
31. Jonkers D, Elenbaas T, Terporten P, Nieman F, Stobberingh E. Prevalence of 90-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:97-102.
32. Lemaignen A, Birgand G, Ghodhbane W, et al. Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:674.e11-8.
33. Gudbjartsson T, Jeppsson A, Sjögren J, et al. Sternal wound infections following open heart surgery - a review. Scand Cardiovasc J 2016;50:341-8.
34. Arribas-Leal JM, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Hernández-Torres A, et al. Incidence and predictors of sternal surgical wound infection in cardiac surgery: a prospective study. Int Wound J 2023;20:917-24.
35. Hernandez R, Lehr EJ. Mortality following deep sternal wound infection-not just a short-term complication? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;60:242-3.
36. Ruel M, Shariff MA, Lapierre H, et al. Results of the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting angiographic patency study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;147:203-9.
37. Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1643-7.
38. Sherazee EA, Chen SA, Li D, Li D, Frank P, Kiaii B. Pain management strategies for minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. Innovations 2022;17:167-76.
40. Guo MH, Wells GA, Glineur D, et al. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: the MIST trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2019;78:140-5.
41. Liang L, Liu JJ, Kong QY, et al. Comparison of early outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting for multi-vessel disease conducted using minimally invasive or conventional off-pump techniques: a propensity-matched study based on SYNTAX score. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;17:144.
42. Liang L, Ma X, Kong Q, et al. Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2022;12:378-88.
43. Baishya J, George A, Krishnamoorthy J, Muniraju G, Chakravarthy M. Minimally invasive compared to conventional approach for coronary artery bypass grafting improves outcome. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20:57-60.
44. McGinn JT, Shariff M, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Goyal N, Ruel M. Abstract 18959: minimally invasive CABG: results to 6 years. Circulation 2012;126:A18959. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.126.suppl_21.a18959 [Last accessed on 10 Jan 2024]
45. Ruel M, Shariff M, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Mcginn J. 254 mid-term results of 800 minimally invasive coronary bypass operations. Can J Cardiol 2012;28:S186.
46. Akowuah EF, Maier RH, Hancock HC, et al. Minithoracotomy vs conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023;329:1957-66.
47. Issa HMN, Ruel M. Beating heart multi-vessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: techniques and pitfalls. J Vis Surg 2023;9:5.
48. Ruel M. Commentary: sternotomy for every cardiac surgery patient ain’t the future, so let’s get going. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:129-31.
49. Qureshi SH, Ruel M. The 7 pillars of multivessel minimally invasive coronary surgery. Innovations 2021;16:216-7.
50. Gaudino M, Angelini GD, Antoniades C, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: 30 years of debate. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009934.
51. Shaefi S, Mittel A, Loberman D, Ramakrishna H. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting-a systematic review and analysis of clinical outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019;33:232-44.
52. Ivanov J, Borger MA, Tu JV, Rao V, David TE. Mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Can J Cardiol 2008;24:279-84.
53. Yang L, Lin S, Zhang H, et al. Long-term graft patency after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass: a coronary trial cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:2055-61.
54. Benedetto U, Lau C, Caputo M, et al. Comparison of outcomes for off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in low-volume and high-volume centers and by low-volume and high-volume surgeons. Am J Cardiol 2018;121:552-7.
55. Kuss O, von Salviati B, Börgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:829-35, 835.e1-13.
56. Une D, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Rai V, Ruel M. Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced safely? Learning curve of small thoracotomy CABG. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:S250-1.
57. Rodriguez ML, Lapierre HR, Sohmer B, Ruel JP, Ruel MA. Predictors and outcomes of sternotomy conversion and cardiopulmonary bypass assistance in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Innovations 2016;11:315-20.
58. Rodriguez ML, Lapierre HR, Sohmer B, Glineur D, Ruel M. Mid-term follow-up of minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: is the early learning phase detrimental? Innovations 2017;12:116-20.
59. Andrawes PA, Shariff MA, Nabagiez JP, et al. Evolution of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: learning curve. Innovations 2018;13:81-90.
60. Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Cohen DJ, et al. The frequency and cost of complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from the United States Medicare program. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1980-6.
61. Chen JC, Kaul P, Levy JH, et al. Myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass graft surgery increases healthcare resource utilization. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1296-301.
62. Teman NR, Hawkins RB, Charles EJ, et al. Minimally invasive vs open coronary surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of cost and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;111:1478-84.
63. Jahangiri M, Mani K, Nowell J. Does minimally invasive coronary artery surgery have prognostic and cost benefits? Ann Thorac Surg 2022;114:609-10.
64. Ponnambalam M, Alex RM. Preoperative optimization and rapid discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting. Curr Opin Cardiol 2023;38:471-7.
