REFERENCES
1. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563-70.
2. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for thoracic surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:e123-210.
3. Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, et al. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The society of thoracic surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:801-9.
4. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes SE, et al. RADIAL Investigators. Angiographic outcome of coronary artery bypass grafts: the radial artery database international alliance. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109:688-94.
5. Gaudino M, Hameed I, Robinson NB, et al. Angiographic patency of coronary artery bypass conduits: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e019206.
6. Lamy A, Eikelboom J, Sheth T, et al. Rivaroxaban, aspirin, or both to prevent early coronary bypass graft occlusion: the COMPASS-CABG study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:121-30.
7. Alboom M, Browne A, Sheth T, et al. Conduit selection and early graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery: a post hoc analysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) coronary artery bypass grafting study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:1080-9.e1.
8. Gaudino M, Audisio K, Rahouma M, et al. ART Investigators. Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of skeletonized vs pedicled internal thoracic artery harvesting techniques in the arterial revascularization trial. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1380-6.
9. Lamy A, Browne A, Sheth T, et al. COMPASS Investigators. Skeletonized vs pedicled internal mammary artery graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery: a post hoc analysis from the COMPASS trial. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1042-9.
10. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. Writing Committee Members. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:197-215.
11. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2018;40:87-165.
12. Harik L, An KR, Dimagli A, et al. Choice of conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting: technical, anatomic, and pharmacologic considerations. Vessel Plus 2023;7:30.
13. Gaudino M, Sandner S, An KR, et al. Graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting and its association with patient characteristics and clinical events: a pooled individual patient data analysis of clinical trials with imaging follow-up. Circulation 2023;148:1305-15.
14. Kulik A, Abreu AM, Boronat V, Ruel M. Intensive versus moderate statin therapy and early graft occlusion after coronary bypass surgery: the aggressive cholesterol therapy to inhibit vein graft events randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;157:151-61.e1.
15. Kulik A, Le May MR, Voisine P, et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone after coronary artery bypass grafting: the clopidogrel after surgery for coronary artery disease (CASCADE) trial. Circulation 2010;122:2680-7.
16. Zhao Q, Zhu Y, Xu Z, et al. Effect of ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, or aspirin alone on saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:1677-86.
17. Willemsen LM, Janssen PWA, Peper J, et al. Effect of adding ticagrelor to standard aspirin on saphenous vein graft patency in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (POPular CABG): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2020;142:1799-807.
18. Alexander JH, Hafley G, Harrington RA, et al. PREVENT IV Investigators. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:2446-54.
19. Kulik A, Abreu AM, Boronat V, Kouchoukos NT, Ruel M. Ticagrelor versus aspirin and vein graft patency after coronary bypass: a randomized trial. J Card Surg 2022;37:563-70.
20. Buxton BF, Raman JS, Ruengsakulrach P, et al. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1363-71.
21. Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, Une D, Laupacis A, Fremes SE. RAPS Investigators. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:28-35.
22. Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE. Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation 2008;117:2859-64.
23. Petrovic I, Nezic D, Peric M, et al. Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;10:127.
24. Nasso G, Coppola R, Bonifazi R, Piancone F, Bozzetti G, Speziale G. Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the stand-in-Y mammary study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:1093-100.
25. Song SW, Sul SY, Lee HJ, Yoo KJ. Comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein as composite grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Circ J 2012;42:107-12.
26. Gaudino M, Bakaeen F, Benedetto U, et al. Use rate and outcome in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009361.
27. Deng MX, Lia H, Lee G, et al. Angiographic patency of coronary artery bypass conduits: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022;37:7-31.
28. Yokoyama Y, Takagi H, Kuno T. Graft patency of a second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;34:102-9.
29. Gaudino M, Audisio K, Di Franco A, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;62:ezac345.
30. Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S, et al. Arterial Revascularization Trial Investigators. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med 2019;380:437-46.
31. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. CORONARY Investigators. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2359-68.
32. Hayward PA, Gordon IR, Hare DL, et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the radial artery patency and clinical outcomes trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:60-7.
33. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. RADIAL Investigators. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2069-77.
34. Gaudino M, Lorusso R, Rahouma M, et al. Radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery versus saphenous vein as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e010839.
35. de Oliveira Sá MPB, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, et al. Patency of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery in coronary bypass graft surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Surg 2014;12:666-72.
36. Hayashi Y, Ito T, Maekawa A, et al. Effect of modified proximal anastomosis of the free right internal thoracic artery: piggyback and foldback techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;22:265-72.
37. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. Veterans affairs randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) study group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1827-37.
38. Antonopoulos AS, Odutayo A, Oikonomou EK, et al. SAFINOUS-CABG (Saphenous Vein Graft Failure - An Outcomes Study in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) group. Development of a risk score for early saphenous vein graft failure: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;160:116-27.e4.
39. Tian M, Wang X, Sun H, et al. No-touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques at 12 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2021;144:1120-9.
40. Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997;336:153-63.
41. Saw J, Wong GC, Mayo J, et al. Ticagrelor and aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart 2016;102:763-9.
42. Sandner S, Redfors B, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Association of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor with vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2022;328:554-62.
43. Solo K, Lavi S, Kabali C, et al. Antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2019;367:l5476.
44. Sun X, Huang J, Wang W, et al. Off-pump skeletonized versus pedicled left internal mammary artery grafting: mid-term results. J Card Surg 2015;30:494-9.
45. Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Stassano P, Vosa C. Randomized flow capacity comparison of skeletonized and pedicled left internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:24-30.
46. Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S, et al. Arterial Revascularization Trial investigators. Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: insights from the arterial revascularization trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:270-6.
47. de Oliveira Sá MPB, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, et al. Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:849-57.
48. Amano A, Takahashi A, Hirose H. Skeletonized radial artery grafting: improved angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1880-7.
49. Calafiore AM, Vitolla G, Iaco AL, et al. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1637-42.
50. Hirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S, Takahashi A. Skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery grafting for patients with diabetes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:287-92.
51. Kai M, Hanyu M, Soga Y, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic arteries in insulin-dependent diabetics. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:32-6.
52. Sazzad MF, Moniruzzaman M, Chanda PK, et al. Short term clinical and angiographic outcome of skeletonized harvesting technique of left internal mammary artery, compared to pedicled harvesting for coronary revascularization. Univ Heart J 2016;12:82-7.
53. Dimagli A, Soletti G Jr, Harik L, et al. Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG. J Clin Med 2023;12:2022.
54. Dreifaldt M, Samano N, Geijer H, Lidén M, Bodin L, Souza D. Pedicled versus skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts: a randomized trial. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2021;29:490-7.
55. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit - 5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:9-17.
56. Glineur D, Hanet C, Poncelet A, et al. Comparison of bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization using in situ or Y graft configurations: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation. Circulation 2008;118:S216-21.
57. Glineur D, Boodhwani M, Hanet C, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery configuration for coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003518.
58. Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:990-6.
59. Buttar SN, Yan TD, Taggart DP, Tian DH. Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Heart 2017;103:1419-26.
60. Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A, et al. Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;105:1109-19.
61. Thuijs DJFM, Head SJ, Stone GW, et al. Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:501-10.
62. Sabik JF 3rd, Mehaffey JH, Badhwar V, et al. Multiarterial vs single-arterial coronary surgery: 10-year follow-up of 1 million patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2024;117:780-8.
63. Thuijs DJFM, Davierwala P, Milojevic M, et al. SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators. Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;61:925-33.
64. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. ART Investigators. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2540-9.
65. Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus radial artery multi-arterial bypass grafting: a report from the STS database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;56:926-34.
66. Venardos N, Reece TB, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. Training for multiple arterial grafting: a thoracic surgery resident survey. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;111:1901-7.
67. Benedetto U, Caputo M, Gaudino M, et al. How safe is it to train residents to perform coronary surgery with multiple arterial grafting? Nineteen years of training at a single institution. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;29:12-22.
68. Guo LR, Chu MW, Tong MZ, et al. Does the trainee’s level of experience impact on patient safety and clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass surgery? J Card Surg 2008;23:1-5.
69. Taggart DP, Gaudino MF, Gerry S, et al. ART investigators. Effect of total arterial grafting in the arterial revascularization trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;163:1002-9.e6.
70. Gaudino M, Samadashvili Z, Hameed I, Chikwe J, Girardi LN, Hannan EL. Differences in long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts and the association with sex. JAMA Cardiol 2020;6:401-9.
71. Gaudino M, Alexander JH, Bakaeen FG, et al. Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:1031-40.
72. Gurevitch J, Kramer A, Locker C, et al. Technical aspects of double-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:841-6.
73. Gaudino M, Cellini C, Pragliola C, et al. Arterial versus venous bypass grafts in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation 2005;112:I265-9.
74. Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2011;305:167-74.
75. Glineur D, D’hoore W, de Kerchove L, et al. Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:980-8.
76. Mannacio VA, Di Tommaso L, Antignan A, De Amicis V, Vosa C. Aspirin plus clopidogrel for optimal platelet inhibition following off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the CRYSSA (prevention of coronary arteRY bypaSS occlusion after off-pump procedures) randomised study. Heart 2012;98:1710-5.
77. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation 2012;125:2827-35.
78. Dreifaldt M, Mannion JD, Bodin L, Olsson H, Zagozdzon L, Souza D. The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:105-11.
79. Houlind K, Fenger-Grøn M, Holme SJ, et al. DOORS Study Group. Graft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is inferior even with identical heparinization protocols: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study (DOORS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1812-9.e2.
